<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>McCreadie, B.R.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/18127/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>The dependence of the elastic properties of osteoporotic cancellous bone on volume fraction and fabric (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/15371/</link>
      <pubDate>2003-10-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Osteoporosis is a progressive systemic skeletal condition characterized by low bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration, with a consequent increase in susceptibility to fracture. Hence, osteoporosis would be best diagnosed by in vivo measurements of bone strength. As this is not clinically feasible, our goal is to estimate bone strength through the assessment of elastic properties, which are highly correlated to strength. Previously established relations between morphological parameters (volume fraction and fabric) and elastic constants could be applied to estimate cancellous bone stiffness in vivo. However, these relations were determined for normal cancellous bone. Cancellous bone from osteoporotic patients may require different relations. In this study we set out to answer two questions. First, can the elastic properties of osteoporotic cancellous bone be estimated from morphological parameters? Second, do the relations between morphological parameters and elastic constants, determined for normal bone, apply to osteoporotic bone as well? To answer these questions we used cancellous bone cubes from femoral heads of patients with (n=26) and without (n=32) hip fractures. The elastic properties of the cubes were determined using micro-finite element analysis, assuming equal tissue moduli for all specimens. The morphological parameters were determined using microcomputed tomography. Our results showed that, for equal tissue properties, the elastic properties of cancellous bone from fracture patients could indeed be estimated from morphological parameters. The morphology-based relations used to estimate the elastic properties of cancellous bone are not different for women with or without fractures.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Cancellous bone mechanical properties from normals and patients with hip fractures differ on the structure level, not on the bone hard tissue level (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/15283/</link>
      <pubDate>2002-05-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Osteoporosis is currently defined in terms of low bone mass. However, the source of fragility leading to fracture has not been adequately described. In particular, the contributions of bone tissue properties and architecture to the risk or incidence of fracture are poorly understood. In an earlier experimental study, it was found that the architectural anisotropy of cancellous bone from the femoral heads of fracture patients was significantly increased compared with age- and density-matched control material (Ciarelli et al., J Bone Miner Res 15:32-40; 2000). Using a combination of compression testing and micro-finite element analysis on a subset of cancellous bone specimens from that study, we calculated the hard tissue mechanical properties and the apparent (macroscopic) mechanical properties. The tissue modulus was 10.0 GPa (SD 2.2) for the control group and 10.8 GPa (SD 3.3) for the fracture group (not significant). There were no differences in either the apparent yield strains, percentages of highly strained tissue, or the relationship between apparent yield stress and apparent elastic modulus. Hence, a difference in the tissue yield properties is unlikely. At the apparent level, the fracture group had a significantly decreased transverse stiffness, resulting in increased mechanical anisotropy. These changes suggest that bone in the fracture group was "overadapted" to the primary load axis, at the cost of fragility in the transverse direction. We conclude that individuals with a history of osteoporotic fractures do not have weaker bone tissue. Architectural and mechanical anisotropy alone renders their bone weaker in the nonprimary loading direction.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>