<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Rüegsegger, P.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/18264/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Introduction and evaluation of a gray-value voxel conversion technique (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/15366/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-04-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>In micro finite element analyses (microFEA) of cancellous bone, the 3D-imaging data that the FEA-models are based on, contain a range of gray-values. In the construction of the eventual FEA-model, these gray-values are commonly thresholded. Although thresholding is successful at small voxel sizes, at larger voxel sizes there is substantial loss of trabecular connectivity. We propose a new method: the gray-value method, where the microFEA-models use the information within the 3D-imaging data directly, without prior thresholding. Our question was twofold. First, how does the gray-value method compare to both plain and mass-compensated thresholding? Second, what is the effect of element size on the results obtained with the gray-value method? We used nine microCT-scans of human vertebral cancellous bone. These were degraded to represent different resolutions, and converted into microFEA-models using plain thresholding, mass-compensated thresholding, and the gray-value method. The apparent elastic moduli of the specimens were determined using microFEA. The different methods were compared on the basis of the apparent elastic moduli, compared to those calculated for a 28 microm reference model. The results showed that the gray-value method greatly improves the results relative to other methods. The gray-value method gives accurate predictions of the apparent elastic moduli, for voxel sizes up to one trabecular thickness (Tb.Th.). For voxel sizes greater than one Tb.Th. the accuracy, although still better than for both thresholding methods, becomes increasingly worse.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Finite element analysis of trabecular bone structure: a comparison of image-based meshing techniques (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/15362/</link>
      <pubDate>1998-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>In this study, we investigate if finite element (FE) analyses of human trabecular bone architecture based on 168 microm images can provide relevant information about the bone mechanical characteristics. Three human trabecular bone samples, one taken from the femoral head, one from the iliac crest, and one from the lumbar spine, were imaged with micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) using a 28 microm resolution. After reconstruction the resolution was coarsened to 168 microm. First, all reconstructions were thresholded and directly converted to FE-models built of hexahedral elements. For the coarser resolutions of two samples, this resulted in a loss of trabecular connections and a subsequent loss of stiffness. To reduce this effect, a tetrahedral element meshing based on the marching cubes algorithm, as well as a modified hexahedron meshing, which thresholds the image such that load carrying bone mass is preserved, were employed. For each sample elastic moduli and tissue Von Mises stresses of the three different 168 microm models were compared to those from the hexahedron 28 microm model. For one sample the hexahedron meshing at 168 microm produced excellent results. For the other two samples the results obtained from the hexahedral models at 168 microm resolution were poor. Considerably better results were attained for these samples when using the mass-compensated or tetrahedron meshing techniques. We conclude that the accuracy of the FE-models at 168 microm strongly depends on the bone morphology, in particular its trabecular thickness. A substantial loss of trabecular connections during the hexahedron meshing process indicates that poor FE results will be obtained. In this case the tetrahedron or mass-compensated hexahedron meshing techniques can reduce the loss of connections and produce better results than the plain hexahedron meshing techniques.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>