<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Dantzig, S. van</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/18907/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Mighty metaphors: Behavioral and ERP evidence that power shifts attention on a vertical dimension (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/32618/</link>
      <pubDate>2012-02-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Thinking about the abstract concept power may automatically activate the spatial up-down image schema (powerful up; powerless down) and consequently direct spatial attention to the image schema-congruent location. Participants indicated whether a word represented a powerful or powerless person (e.g. 'king' or 'servant'). Following each decision, they identified a target at the top or bottom of the visual field. In Experiment 1 participants identified the target faster when their spatial position was congruent with the perceived power of the preceding word than when it was incongruent. In Experiment 2 ERPs showed a higher N1 amplitude for congruent spatial positions. These results support the view that attention is driven to the image schema congruent location of a power word. Thus, power is partially understood in terms of vertical space, which demonstrates that abstract concepts are grounded in sensory-motor processing. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The sound of enemies and friends in the neighborhood: Phonology mediates activation of neighbor semantics (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/32621/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-12-28T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Previous studies (e.g., Pecher, Zeelenberg, &amp; Wagenmakers, 2005) found that semantic classification performance is better for target words with orthographic neighbors that are mostly from the same semantic class (e.g., living) compared to target words with orthographic neighbors that are mostly from the opposite semantic class (e.g., nonliving). In the present study we investigated the contribution of phonology to orthographic neighborhood effects by comparing effects of phonologically congruent orthographic neighbors (book-hook) to phonologically incongruent orthographic neighbors (sand-wand). The prior presentation of a semantically congruent word produced larger effects on subsequent animacy decisions when the previously presented word was a phonologically congruent neighbor than when it was a phonologically incongruent neighbor. In a second experiment, performance differences between target words with versus without semantically congruent orthographic neighbors were larger if the orthographic neighbors were also phonologically congruent. These results support models of visual word recognition that assume an important role for phonology in cascaded access to meaning. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Spatial Attention is Driven by Mental Simulations (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/30613/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-03-10T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Introduction: Many studies have shown that task performance
is affected by the relation between the
spatial location and the meaning of a target
word. These effects have been obtained for
object names that have typical positions
in the physical world (Zwaan and Yaxley,
2003; Bergen et al., 2007; Šeticˇ and Domijan,
2007; Estes et al., 2008) and for concepts
that are metaphorically related to spatial
position (Richardson et al., 2003; Meier and
Robinson, 2004; Schnall and Clore, 2004;
Schubert, 2005; Giessner and Schubert,
2007; Casasanto, 2009; Van Dantzig, 2009).
Although these findings are consistent
with a mental simulation account, at least
some of the interactions between meaning
and spatial location might be explained by
polarity alignment. In our study (Pecher
et al., 2010) we tested whether spatial congruency
effects are best explained by mental
simulations or by polarity alignment. ...</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>A sharp image or a sharp knife: Norms for the modality-exclusivity of 774 concept-property items (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/26028/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-03-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>According to recent embodied cognition theories, mental concepts are represented by modality-specific sensory-motor systems. Much of the evidence for modality-specificity in conceptual processing comes from the property-verification task. When applying this and other tasks, it is important to select items based on their modality-exclusivity. We collected modality ratings for a set of 387 properties, each of which was paired with two different concepts, yielding a total of 774 concept-property items. For each item, participants rated the degree to which the property could be experienced through five perceptual modalities (vision, audition, touch, smell, and taste). Based on these ratings, we computed a measure of modality exclusivity, the degree to which a property is perceived exclusively through one sensory modality. In this paper, we briefly sketch the theoretical background of conceptual knowledge, discuss the use of the property-verification task in cognitive research, provide our norms and statistics, and validate the norms in a memory experiment. We conclude that our norms are important for researchers studying modality-specific effects in conceptual processing. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Abstract Concepts: Sensory-Motor Grounding, Metaphors, and Beyond (In Book)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/30616/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Abstract
In the last decade many researchers have obtained evidence for the idea that
cognition shares processing mechanisms with perception and action. Most of
the evidence supporting the grounded cognition framework focused on representations
of concrete concepts, which leaves open the question how abstract
concepts are grounded in sensory-motor processing. One promising idea is
that people simulate concrete situations and introspective experiences to
represent abstract concepts [Barsalou, L. W., &amp; Wiemer-Hastings, K. (2005).
Situating abstract concepts. In D. Pecher, &amp; R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding
cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking
(pp. 129–163). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.], although this has not
yet been investigated a lot. A second idea, which more researchers have
investigated, is that people use metaphorical mappings from concrete to
abstract concepts [Lakoff, G., &amp; Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by.
Chicago: Chicago University Press.]. According to this conceptual metaphor
theory, image schemas structure and provide sensory-motor grounding for
abstract concepts. Although there is evidence that people automatically activate
image schemas when they process abstract concepts, we argue that
situations are also needed to fully represent meaning.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Unconstraining theories of embodied cognition (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/16104/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-02-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The approach/avoidance effect refers to the finding that valenced stimuli trigger approach and avoidance actions. Markman and Brendl [Markman, A. B., &amp; Brendl, M. (2005). Constraining theories of embodied cognition. Psychological Science, 16, 6-16] argued that this effect is not a truly embodied phenomenon, but depends on participants' symbolic representation of the self. In their study, participants moved valenced words toward or away from their own name on the computer screen. This would induce participants to form a 'disembodied' self-representation at the location of their name, outside of the body. Approach/avoidance effects occurred with respect to the participant's name, rather than with respect to the body. In three experiments, we demonstrate that similar effects are found when the name is replaced by a positive word, a negative word or even when no word is presented at all. This suggests that the 'disembodied self' explanation of Markman and Brendl is incorrect, and that their findings do not necessarily constrain embodied theories of cognition.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Language comprehenders retain implied shape and orientation of objects (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/16742/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-01-10T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>According to theories of embodied cognition, language comprehenders simulate sensorimotor experiences to represent the meaning of what they read. Previous studies have shown that picture recognition is better if the object in the picture matches the orientation or shape implied by a preceding sentence. In order to test whether strategic imagery may explain previous findings, language comprehenders first read a list of sentences in which objects were mentioned. Only once the complete list had been read was recognition memory tested with pictures. Recognition performance was better if the orientation or shape of the object matched that implied by the sentence, both immediately after reading the complete list of sentences and after a 45-min delay. These results suggest that previously found match effects were not due to strategic imagery and show that details of sensorimotor simulations are retained over longer periods.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Perceptual processing affects conceptual processing (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/15974/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-08-27T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>According to the Perceptual Symbols Theory of cognition (Barsalou, 1999), modality-specific simulations underlie the representation of concepts. A strong prediction of this view is that perceptual processing affects conceptual processing. In this study, participants performed a perceptual detection task and a conceptual property-verification task in alternation. Responses on the property-verification task were slower for those trials that were preceded by a perceptual trial in a different modality than for those that were preceded by a perceptual trial in the same modality. This finding of a modality-switch effect across perceptual processing and conceptual processing supports the hypothesis that perceptual and conceptual representations are partially based on the same systems.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>