<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Reinders, M.J.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/1913/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>The effect of oligonucleotide microarray data pre-processing on the analysis of patient-cohort studies. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/13984/</link>
      <pubDate>2006-03-02T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Intensity values measured by Affymetrix microarrays have to be both normalized, to be able to compare different microarrays by removing non-biological variation, and summarized, generating the final probe set expression values. Various pre-processing techniques, such as dChip, GCRMA, RMA and MAS have been developed for this purpose. This study assesses the effect of applying different pre-processing methods on the results of analyses of large Affymetrix datasets. By focusing on practical applications of microarray-based research, this study provides insight into the relevance of pre-processing procedures to biology-oriented researchers. RESULTS: Using two publicly available datasets, i.e., gene-expression data of 285 patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML, Affymetrix HG-U133A GeneChip) and 42 samples of tumor tissue of the embryonal central nervous system (CNS, Affymetrix HuGeneFL GeneChip), we tested the effect of the four pre-processing strategies mentioned above, on (1) expression level measurements, (2) detection of differential expression, (3) cluster analysis and (4) classification of samples. In most cases, the effect of pre-processing is relatively small compared to other choices made in an analysis for the AML dataset, but has a more profound effect on the outcome of the CNS dataset. Analyses on individual probe sets, such as testing for differential expression, are affected most; supervised, multivariate analyses such as classification are far less sensitive to pre-processing. CONCLUSION: Using two experimental datasets, we show that the choice of pre-processing method is of relatively minor influence on the final analysis outcome of large microarray studies whereas it can have important effects on the results of a smaller study. The data source (platform, tissue homogeneity, RNA quality) is potentially of bigger importance than the choice of pre-processing method.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>New insights on human T cell development by quantitative T cell receptor gene rearrangement studies and gene expression profiling (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8406/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>To gain more insight into initiation and regulation of T cell receptor
      (TCR) gene rearrangement during human T cell development, we analyzed TCR
      gene rearrangements by quantitative PCR analysis in nine consecutive T
      cell developmental stages, including CD34+ lin- cord blood cells as a
      reference. The same stages were used for gene expression profiling using
      DNA microarrays. We show that TCR loci rearrange in a highly ordered way
      (TCRD-TCRG-TCRB-TCRA) and that the initiating Ddelta2-Ddelta3
      rearrangement occurs at the most immature CD34+CD38-CD1a- stage. TCRB
      rearrangement starts at the CD34+CD38+CD1a- stage and complete in-frame
      TCRB rearrangements were first detected in the immature single positive
      stage. TCRB rearrangement data together with the PTCRA (pTalpha)
      expression pattern show that human TCRbeta-selection occurs at the
      CD34+CD38+CD1a+ stage. By combining the TCR rearrangement data with gene
      expression data, we identified candidate factors for the
      initiation/regulation of TCR recombination. Our data demonstrate that a
      number of key events occur earlier than assumed previously; therefore,
      human T cell development is much more similar to murine T cell development
      than reported before.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>