<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Weustink, A.C.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/19860/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Major adverse cardiac events and the severity of coronary atherosclerosis assessed by computed tomography coronary angiography in an outpatient population with suspected or known coronary artery disease (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/37181/</link>
      <pubDate>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>PURPOSE: To investigate the predictive value of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) for major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven hundred and sixty-seven consecutive patients (496 men, age 62±11 y) with suspected or known heart disease referred to an outpatient clinic underwent 64-slice CTCA. The patients were followed for the occurrence of MACE (ie, cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina). RESULTS: Eleven thousand five hundred and sixty-four coronary segments were assessed. Of these, 178 (1.5%) were not assessable because of insufficient image quality. Overall, CTCA revealed the absence of CAD in 219 (28.5%) patients, nonobstructive CAD (coronary plaque ≤50%) in 282 (36.8%) patients, and obstructive CAD in 266 (34.7%) patients. A total of 21 major cardiac events (4 cardiac deaths, 12 myocardial infarctions, and 5 unstable angina) occurred during a mean follow-up of 20 months. One noncardiac death occurred. Seventeen events occurred in the group of patients with obstructive CAD, and 4 events occurred in the group with nonobstructive CAD. The event rate was 0% among patients with normal coronary arteries at CTCA. In multivariate analysis, the presence of obstructive CAD and diabetes were the only independent predictors of MACE. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary plaque evaluation by CTCA provides an independent prognostic value for the prediction of MACE. Patients with normal CTCA findings have an excellent prognosis at follow-up. Copyright </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Image quality and radiation exposure using different low-dose scan protocols in dual-source CT coronary angiography: Randomized study (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/33177/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: To compare image quality, radiation dose, and their relationship with heart rate of computed tomographic (CT) coronary angiographic scan protocols by using a 128-section dual-source CT scanner. Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approved the study; all patients gave informed consent. Two hundred seventy-two patients (175 men, 97 women; mean ages, 58 and 59 years, respectively) referred for CT coronary angiography were categorized according to heart rate: less than 65 beats per minute (group A) and 65 beats per minute or greater (group B). Patients were randomized to undergo prospective high-pitch spiral scanning and narrow-window prospective sequential scanning in group A (n = 160) or wide-window prospective sequential scanning and retrospective spiral scanning in group B (n = 112). Image quality was graded (1 = nondiagnostic; 2 = artifacts present, diagnostic; 3 = no artifacts) and compared (Mann-Whitney and Student t tests). Results: In group A, mean image quality grade was significantly lower with high-pitch spiral versus sequential scanning (2.67 ± 0.38 [standard deviation ] vs 2.86 ± 0.21; P &lt;.001). In a subpopulation (heart rate, &lt;55 beats per minute), mean image quality grade was similar (2.81 ± 0.30 vs 2.94 ± 0.08; P =.35). In group B, image quality grade was comparable between sequential and retrospective spiral scanning (2.81 ± 0.28 vs 2.80 ± 0.38; P =.54). Mean estimated radiation dose was significantly lower (high-pitch spiral vs sequential scanning) in group A (for 100 kV, 0.81 mSv ± 0.30 vs 2.74 mSv ± 1.14 [ P &lt;.001]; for 120 kV, 1.65 mSv ± 0.69 vs 4.21 mSv ± 1.20 [ P &lt;.001]) and in group B (sequential vs retrospective spiral scanning) (for 100 kV, 4.07 mSv ± 1.07 vs 5.54 mSv ± 1.76 [P =.02]; for 120 kV, 7.50 mSv ± 1.79 vs 9.83 mSv ± 3.49 [P =.1]). Conclusion: A high-pitch spiral CT coronary angiographic protocol should be applied in patients with regular and low (&lt;55 beats per minute) heart rates; a sequential protocol is preferred in all others. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Coronary plaque burden in patients with stable and unstable coronary artery disease using multislice CT coronary angiography (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/33190/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: We evaluated the multislice computed tomography (MSCT) coronary plaque burden in patients with stable and unstable angina pectoris. Materials and methods: Twenty-one patients with stable and 20 with unstable angina pectoris scheduled for conventional coronary angiography (CCA) underwent MSCT-CA using a 64-slice scanner offering a fast rotation time (330 ms) and higher X-ray tube output (900 mAs). To determine the MSCT coronary plaque burden, we assessed the extent (number of diseased segments), size (small or large), type (calcific, noncalcific, mixed) of plaque, its anatomic distribution and angiographic appearance in all available ≥2-mm segments. In a subset of 15 (seven stable, eight unstable) patients, the detection and classification of coronary plaques by MSCT was verified by intracoronary ultrasound (ICUS). Results: Sensitivity and specificity of MSCT compared with ICUS to detect significant plaques (defined as ≥1-mm plaque thickness on ICUS) was 83% and 87%. Overall, 473 segments were examined, resulting in 11.6±1.5 segments per patient. Plaques were present in 62% of segments and classified as large in 47% of diseased segments. Thirty-two percent were noncalcific, 25% calcific and 43% mixed. Plaques were most frequently located in the proximal and mid segments. Plaque was found in 33% of segments classified as normal on CCA. Unstable patients had significantly more noncalcific plaques when compared with stable patients (45% vs. 21%, p&lt;0.05). Conclusions: MSCT-CA provides important information regarding the coronary plaque burden in patients with stable and unstable angina. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Computed tomography coronary angiography in asymptomatic patients (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/33195/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: This study assessed the accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography (CT-CA) for detecting significant coronary artery disease (CAD; ≥50% lumen reduction) in intermediate/high-risk asymptomatic patients. Materials and methods: A total of 183 consecutive asymptomatic individuals (92 men; mean age 54±11 years) with more than one major risk factor (obesity, hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolaemia, family history, smoking) and an inconclusive or nonfeasible noninvasive stress test result (stress electrocardiography, stress echocardiography, nuclear stress scintigraphy) underwent CT-CA in an outpatient setting. All patients underwent conventional coronary angiography (CAG) within 4 weeks. Data from CT-CA were compared with CAG regarding the presence of significant CAD (≥50% lumen reduction). Results: Mean calcium score was 177±432, mean heart rate during the CT-CA scan was 58±8 bpm and the prevalence (per-patient) of obstructive CAD was 19%. CT-CA showed single-vessel CAD in 9% of patients, two-vessel CAD in 9% and three-vessel CAD in 0%. Per-patient sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of CT-CA were 100% (90-100), 98% (96-99), 97% (85-99), 100% (97-100), respectively. Positive and negative likelihood ratios were 151 and 0, respectively. Conclusions: CT-CA is an excellent noninvasive imaging modality for excluding significant CAD in intermediate/ high-risk asymptomatic patients with inconclusive or nonfeasible noninvasive stress test. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Prognostic value of Morise clinical score, calcium score and computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/33197/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: Our aim was to determine the prognostic value of computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA), coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) and Morise clinical score in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). Materials and methods: A total of 722 patients (480 men; 62.7±10.9 years) who were referred for further cardiac evaluation underwent CACS and contrast-enhanced CTCA to evaluate the presence and severity of CAD. Of these, 511 (71%) patients were without previous history of CAD. Patients were stratified according to the Morise clinical score (low, intermediate, high), to CACS (0-10, 11-100, 101-400, 401-1,000, &gt;1,000) and to CTCA (absence of CAD, nonsignificant CAD, obstructive CAD). Patients were followed up for the occurrence of major events: cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina and revascularisation. Results: Significant CAD (&gt;50% luminal narrowing) was detected in 260 (36%) patients; nonsignificant CAD (&lt;50% luminal narrowing) in 250 (35%) and absence of CAD in 212 (29%). During a mean follow-up of 20±4 months, 116 events (21 hard) occurred. In patients with normal coronary arteries on CTCA, the major event rate was 0% vs. 1.7% in patients with nonsignificant CAD and 7.3% in patients with significant CAD (p&lt;0.0001). Three hard events (14%) occurred in patients with CACS≤100 and two (9.5%) in patients with intermediate Morise score; one revascularisation was observed in a patient with low Morise score. At multivariate analysis, diabetes, obstructive CAD and CACS &gt;1,000 were significant predictors of events (p&lt;0.05). Conclusions: An excellent prognosis was noted in patients with a normal CTCA (0% event rate). CACS ≤100 and low-intermediate Morise score did not exclude the possibility of events at follow-up. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Accelerated subclinical coronary atherosclerosis in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/33200/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Objectives: We determined the extent, severity, distribution and type of coronary plaques in cardiac asymptomatic patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) using computed tomography (CT). Background: FH patients have accelerated progression of coronary artery disease (CAD) with earlier major adverse cardiac events. Non-invasive CT coronary angiography (CTCA) allows assessing the coronary plaque burden in asymptomatic patients with FH. Materials and methods: A total of 140 asymptomatic statin treated FH patients (90 men; mean age 52 ± 8 years) underwent CT calcium scoring (Agatston) and CTCA using a Dual Source CT scanner with a clinical follow-up of 29 ± 8 months. The extent, severity (obstructive or non-obstructive plaque based on &gt;50% or &lt;50% lumen diameter reduction), distribution and type (calcified, non-calcified, or mixed) of coronary plaque were evaluated. Results: The calcium score was 0 in 28 (21%) of the patients. In 16% of the patients there was no CT-evidence of any CAD while 24% had obstructive disease. In total 775 plaques were detected with CT coronary angiography, of which 11% were obstructive. Fifty four percent of all plaques were calcified, 25% non-calcified and 21% mixed. The CAD extent was related to gender, treated HDL-cholesterol and treated LDL-cholesterol levels. There was a low incidence of cardiac events and no cardiac death occurred during follow-up. Conclusion: Development of CAD is accelerated in intensively treated male and female FH patients. The extent of CAD is related to gender and cholesterol levels and ranges from absence of plaque in one out of 6 patients to extensive CAD with plaque causing &gt;50% lumen obstruction in almost a quarter of patients with FH. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in a large population of patients without revascularisation: Registry data on the impact of calcium score (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/33270/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-10-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) for detecting significant coronary artery stenosis (≥50% lumen reduction) at different coronary calcium score (CACS) values with conventional coronary angiography (CAG) as the reference standard. Material and methods: A total of 1,500 patients (928 men, mean age 58.2±12.5 years) in sinus rhythm who underwent CTCA (64-slice technology) and CAG were enrolled. Diagnostic accuracy and likelihood ratios (LR) of CTCA were evaluated against CAG for the total population and in different CACS classes (0; 1-10; 11-100; 101-400; 401-1,000; &gt;1,000). Results: The prevalence of obstructive disease was 51% (23.5% single vessel; 27.5% multivessel; progressive increase from 17.9% to 94% through the CACS classes). In the per-patient analysis, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of CTCA were 99%, 92%, 94% and 99%, respectively. Per-patient analysis showed a worse PPV of CTCA (76-77%) in classes with low CACS (1-10/11-100). Per-patient LR were higher in classes with extreme CACS values (0 = LR+ 18.3 and LR- = 0.0; c1,000 = LR+ 17.0 and LR- = 0.0) with values always &gt;7 for LR+ and &lt;0.033 for LR- for all CACS classes. Conclusions: CTCA is a reliable diagnostic modality, with high sensitivity and NPV regardless of CACS. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in a large population of patients without revascularisation: Registry data in NSTEMI acute coronary syndrome and influence of gender and risk factors (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/33276/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-10-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: This study sought to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) for detecting significant coronary artery stenosis (≥50% lumen reduction) compared with conventional coronary angiography (CAG) in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction-acute coronary syndrome (NSTEMI-ACS) and in subgroups selected by gender and number of risk factors (RF). Materials and methods: We selected from a population of 1,500 patients in a multicentre registry with NSTEMI-ACS who had undergone CTCA and CAG, (n=237; 187 men, mean age 63±10 years). Diagnostic accuracy and likelihood ratios (LR) of CTCA were assessed against CAG in the total population and subgroups (men, women: 0 RF = absence of RF, 1-2 RF = presence of one or two RF, &gt;2 RF = presence of more than two RF). Results: The prevalence of obstructive disease was 53%. In the per-patient analysis, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of CTCA were 100% (men 100%; women 100%; 0 RF 100%; 1-2 RF 100%; &gt;2 RF 100%), 95% (men 98%; women 50%; 0 RF NA% (NA, not assessable); 1-2 RF 96%; &gt;2 RF 96%), 95% (men 98%; women 91%; 0 RF 91%; 1-2 RF 96%; &gt;2 RF 96%), 100% (men 100%; women 100%; 0 RF NV%; 1-2 RF 100%; &gt;2 RF 100%), respectively. The per-segment analysis showed a reduction in PPV (ranging between 56% and 67%). The per-patient LR+ ranged between 18 and 27, whereas LR-were always 0. We observed no significant differences in diagnostic accuracy between subgroups. Conclusions: CTCA is a reliable diagnostic modality with high sensitivity and NPV in NSTEMI-ACS patients who are not candidates for early revascularisation, regardless of gender and number of risk factors. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Is there a difference in the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography between women and men? (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/34027/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-09-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>OBJECTIVE: To assess the influence of sex on the diagnostic performance of computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA). METHODS: A total of 916 symptomatic patients (30.5% women) without earlier history of coronary artery intervention underwent both CTCA and invasive coronary angiography. Descriptive diagnostic parameters, to detect obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD; ≥50% lumen diameter narrowing) on CTCA, were compared between women and men on a per-patient, per-vessel, and per-segment level. Adjusted values were calculated for clustered segments and differences in sex variables using logistic multivariate regression models in general estimated equations. RESULTS: Women were older, had less typical chest complaints, and had a lower prevalence, extent, and severity of CAD compared with men. Multivariate analysis on a per-patient level revealed no difference in sensitivity (98 vs. 99%, P=0.15), specificity (78 vs. 82%, P=0.65), positive predictive value (PPV; 87 vs. 95%, P=0.10), negative predictive value (NPV; 97 vs. 98%, P=0.63), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR; 198 vs. 721, P=0.07). No difference was found on per-vessel level analysis (sensitivity 95 vs. 97%, P=0.14; specificity 89 vs. 87%, P=0.93; PPV 73 vs. 79%, P=0.06; NPV 98 vs. 98%, P=0.72; and DOR 143 vs. 240, P=0.08). Per-segment analysis revealed a lower sensitivity (88 vs. 94%, P&lt;0.001) and DOR (163 vs. 302, P=0.002) in women compared with men, without a difference in specificity (96 vs. 95%, P=0.19), PPV (64 vs. 69%, P=0.07), and NPV (99 vs. 99%, P=0.08). CONCLUSION: CTCA can accurately rule out obstructive CAD in both women and men. CTCA is less accurate in women to detect individual obstructive disease. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The role of multi-slice computed tomography in stable angina management: a current perspective (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/24031/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-08-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Contrast-enhanced CT coronary angiography (CTCA) has evolved as a reliable alternative imaging modality technique and may be the preferred initial diagnostic test in patients with stable angina with intermediate pre-test probability of CAD. However, because CTCA is moderately predictive for indicating the functional significance of a lesion, the combination of anatomic and functional imaging will become increasingly important. The technology will continue to improve with better spatial and temporal resolution at low radiation exposure, and CTCA may eventually replace invasive coronary angiography. The establishment of the precise role of CTCA in the diagnosis and management of patients with stable angina requires high-quality randomised study designs with clinical outcomes as a primary outcome.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Non-invasive diagnostic workup of patients with suspected stable angina by combined computed tomography coronary angiography and magnetic resonance perfusion imaging (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/26557/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-07-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: To evaluate additional adenosine magnetic resonance perfusion (MRP) imaging in the diagnostic workup of patients with suspected stable angina with computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) as first-line diagnostic modality. Methods and Results: Two hundred and thirty symptomatic patients (male, 52%; age, 56 year) with suspected stable angina underwent CTCA. In patients with a stenosis of &gt;50% as visually assessed, MRP was performed and the quantitative myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI) was calculated. Coronary flow reserve (CFR) using invasive coronary flow measurements served as the standard of reference. CTCA showed non-significant CAD in 151/230 (66%) patients and significant CAD in 79/230 patients (34%), of whom 50 subsequently underwent MRP and CFR. MRP showed reduced perfusion in 32 patients (64%), which was confirmed by CFR in 27 (84%). All 18 cases of normal MRP (36%) were confirmed by CFR. The positive likelihood ratio of MRP for the presence of functional significant disease in patients with a lesion on CTCA was 4.49 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.12-9.99). The negative likelihood ratio was 0.05 (95%CI 0.01-0.34). Conclusions: CTCA as first-line diagnostic modality excluded coronary artery disease in a high percentage of patients referred for diagnostic workup of suspected stable angina. MRP made a significant contribution to the detection of functional significant lesions in patients with a positive CTCA.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>CT coronary plaque burden in asymptomatic patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/34304/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-07-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Objective: To determine the calcium score and coronary plaque burden in asymptomatic statin-treated patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) compared with a control group of patients with low probability of coronary artery disease, having non-anginal chest pain, using CT. Design, setting and patients: 101 asymptomatic patients with FH (mean age 53±7 years; 62 men) and 126 patients with non-anginal chest pain (mean age 56±7 years; 80 men) underwent CT calcium scoring and CT coronary angiography. All patients with FH were treated with statins during a period of 10±8 years before CT. The coronary calcium score and plaque burden were determined and compared between the two patient groups. Results: The median total calcium score was significantly higher in patients with FH (Agatston score=87, IQR 5-367) than in patients with non-anginal chest pain (Agatston score=7, IQR 0-125; p&lt;0.001). The overall coronary plaque burden was significantly higher in patients with FH (p&lt;0.01). Male patients with FH, whose low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were reduced by statins below 3.0 mmol/l, had significantly less coronary calcium (p&lt;0.01) and plaque burden (p=0.02). Conclusion: The coronary plaque burden is high in asymptomatic middle-aged patients with FH despite intense statin treatment.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Prognostic value of CT coronary angiography: Focus on obstructive vs. nonobstructive disease and on the presence of left main disease (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/33535/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-02-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: The authors investigated the prognostic value of computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD), with particular focus on left main (LM) disease and obstructive vs. nonobstructive disease. Materials and methods: A total of 727 consecutive patients (485 men, age 62±11years) with suspected (514; 70.1%) or known (213; 29.9%) CAD underwent CTCA. Patients were followed up for the occurrence of MACE (i.e. cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, percutaneous/surgical revascularisation). Results: A total of 117 MACE [five cardiac deaths, 11 acute myocardial infarctions (AMI), five unstable angina, 86 percutaneous coronary interventions, ten coronary artery bypass grafts] occurred during a mean follow-up of 20 months. Severity and extension of CAD was associated with a progressively worse prognosis. The event rate was 0% among patients with normal coronary arteries at CTCA. The presence of LM disease was not associated with a worse prognosis either in patients with no history of CAD or in those with a history of CAD. At multivariate analysis, presence of obstructive CAD and diabetes were the only independent predictors of MACE. Conclusions: Evaluation of atherosclerotic burden by CTCA provides an independent prognostic value for prediction of MACE. Patients with normal CTCA findings have an excellent prognosis at follow-up. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Low dose CT of the heart: a quantum leap into a new era of cardiovascular imaging (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/20307/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>In 10 years, computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) has shifted from an investigational tool to clinical reality. Even though CT technologies are very advanced and widely available, a large body of evidence supporting the clinical role of CTCA is missing. The reason is that the speed of technological development has outpaced the ability of the scientific community to demonstrate the clinical utility of the technique. In addition, with each new CT generation, there is a further broadening of actual and potential applications. In this review we examine the state of the art on CTCA. In particular, we focus on issues concerning technological development, radiation dose, implementation, training and organisation.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>CT coronary angiography and exercise ECG in a population with chest pain and low-to-intermediate pre-test likelihood of coronary artery disease (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/21472/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Objective: To evaluate diagnostic accuracy of exercise ECG (ex-ECG) versus 64-slice CT coronary angiography (CT-CA) for the detection of significant coronary artery stenosis in a population with low-to-intermediate pre-test likelihood of coronary artery disease (CAD). Design: Retrospective single centre. Setting: Tertiary academic hospital. Patients: 177 consecutive patients (88 men, 89 women, mean age 53.5±7.6 years) with chest pain and low-to-intermediate pre-test likelihood of CAD were retrospectively enrolled. Interventions: All patients underwent ex-ECG, CT-CA and invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Main outcome measure: A lumen diameter reduction of ≥50% was considered as significant stenosis for CT-CA. Ex-ECG was classified as positive, negative or non-diagnostic. Results were compared with ICA. Diagnostic accuracy of CT-CA and ex-ECG was calculated using ICA as the reference standard. A parallel comparative analysis using a cut-off value of 70% for significant lumen reduction was also performed too. Results: ICA disclosed an absence of significant stenosis (≥50% luminal narrowing) in 85.3% (151/177) patients, single-vessel disease in 9.0% (16/177) patients and multivessel disease in 5.6% (10/177) patients. Prevalence of obstructive disease at ICA was 14.7% (26/177). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values at the patient level were 100.0%, 98.7%, 92.9%, 100%, respectively, for CT-CA and 46.2%, 16.6%, 8.7%, 64.1%, respectively, for ex-ECG. Agreement between CT-CA and ex-ECG was 20.9%. CT-CA performed equally well in men and women, while ex-ECG had a better performance in men. After considering the cut-off value of 70% for significant stenosis, the difference between CT-CA and ex-ECG remained significant (p&lt;0.01), with a low agreement (21.5%). Conclusions: CT-CA provides optimal diagnostic performance in patients with atypical chest pain and low-to-intermediate risk of CAD. Ex-ECG has poor diagnostic accuracy in this population. Concerns are related to risk of radiation dose versus the benefits of correct disease stratification.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Evaluation of a multi-atlas based method for segmentation of cardiac CTA data: A large-scale, multicenter, and multivendor study (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/31567/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is increasingly used for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, CTA is not commonly used for the assessment of ventricular and atrial function, although functional information extracted from CTA data is expected to improve the diagnostic value of the examination. In clinical practice, the extraction of ventricular and atrial functional information, such as stroke volume and ejection fraction, requires accurate delineation of cardiac chambers. In this paper, we investigated the accuracy and robustness of cardiac chamber delineation using a multiatlas based segmentation method on multicenter and multivendor CTA data. Methods: A fully automatic multiatlas based method for segmenting the whole heart (i.e., the outer surface of the pericardium) and cardiac chambers from CTA data is presented and evaluated. In the segmentation approach, eight atlas images are registered to a new patient's CTA scan. The eight corresponding manually labeled images are then propagated and combined using a per voxel majority voting procedure, to obtain a cardiac segmentation. Results: The method was evaluated on a multicenter/multivendor database, consisting of (1) a set of 1380 Siemens scans from 795 patients and (2) a set of 60 multivendor scans (Siemens, Philips, and GE) from different patients, acquired in six different institutions worldwide. A leave-one-out 3D quantitative validation was carried out on the eight atlas images; we obtained a mean surface-to-surface error of 0.94±1.12 mm and an average Dice coefficient of 0.93 was achieved. A 2D quantitative evaluation was performed on the 60 multivendor data sets. Here, we observed a mean surface-to-surface error of 1.26±1.25 mm and an average Dice coefficient of 0.91 was achieved. In addition to this quantitative evaluation, a large-scale 2D and 3D qualitative evaluation was performed on 1380 and 140 images, respectively. Experts evaluated that 49% of the 1380 images were very accurately segmented (below 1 mm error) and that 29% were accurately segmented (error between 1 and 3 mm), which demonstrates the robustness of the presented method. Conclusions: A fully automatic method for whole heart and cardiac chamber segmentation was presented and evaluated using multicenter/multivendor CTA data. The accuracy and robustness of the method were demonstrated by successfully applying the method to 1420 multicenter/ multivendor data sets. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Incremental value of the CT coronary calcium score for the prediction of coronary artery disease (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/21352/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-10-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Objectives:: To validate published prediction models for the presence of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with new onset stable typical or atypical angina pectoris and to assess the incremental value of the CT coronary calcium score (CTCS). Methods:: We searched the literature for clinical prediction rules for the diagnosis of obstructive CAD, defined as≥50% stenosis in at least one vessel on conventional coronary angiography. Significant variables were re-analysed in our dataset of 254 patients with logistic regression. CTCS was subsequently included in the models. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated to assess diagnostic performance. Results:: Re-analysing the variables used by Diamond &amp; Forrester yielded an AUC of 0.798, which increased to 0.890 by adding CTCS. For Pryor, Morise 1994, Morise 1997 and Shaw the AUC increased from 0.838 to 0.901, 0.831 to 0.899, 0.840 to 0.898 and 0.833 to 0.899. CTCS significantly improved model performance in each model. Conclusions:: Validation demonstrated good diagnostic performance across all models. CTCS improves the prediction of the presence of obstructive CAD, independent of clinical predictors, and should be considered in its diagnostic work-up. © 2010 The Author(s).</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Left ventricular ejection fraction: Real-world comparison between cardiac computed tomography and echocardiography in a large population [La frazione di eiezione del ventricolo sinistro: confronto nel mondo reale tra cardio-TC ed ecocardiografia in un'ampia popolazione] (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/22060/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-10-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: This study compared cardiac computed tomography (CT) and two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (ECC) for assessing left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) using real-world data from a large patient population. Materials and methods: We studied 450 patients (284 males; mean age 64±12 years; range 12-88) who underwent CT and ECC due to suspected coronary artery disease. For CT, we used multiphase short-axis reconstructions and evaluated them with a dedicated software tool that uses Simpson's rule to compute LV volumes. For ECC, computation was based on the biplane Simpson's method. Results in terms of EF were compared with the paired Student's t test, Pearson's correlation coefficient (r), and Bland-Altman analysis. Results: EF was 52%±15% for CT and 55%±13% for ECC. Statistically significant differences, albeit with good correlation, were observed between the measurements (r=0.71; p&lt;0.05). ECC showed a slight tendency to overestimate EF. When the population was divided into subgroups according to EF, this was underestimated by ECC in the subgroup with EF &gt;50% and overestimated in those with EF 35%-50% and &lt;35%, with consistently significant differences between ECC and CT (p&lt;0.05) and progressively lower levels of agreement. Conclusions: In the real-world assessment of EF, ECC provides significantly different data from CT, with a bias that increases proportionally to LV systolic dysfunction.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Impact of tube current in the quantitative assessment of acute reperfused myocardial infarction with 64-slice delayed-enhancement CT: A porcine model [Impatto della corrente del tubo sulla valutazione quantitativa dell'infarto miocardico acuto riperfuso mediante TC 64 strati e tecnica di delayed enhancement: esperienza in modello animale porcino] (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/22070/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-10-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: This study evaluated the impact of tube current (mAs) in delayed-enhancement computed tomography (CT) imaging for assessing acute reperfused myocardial infarction in a porcine model. Materials and methods: In five domestic pigs (mean weight 24 kg), the circumflex coronary artery was balloon-occluded for 2 h and then reperfused. After 5 days, CT imaging was performed following administration of iodinated contrast material. A 64-slice CT system was used to perform first-pass coronary angiography with a tube current of 15 mAs/kg [Arterial Phase (ART)] followed by two delayed-enhancement (DE) scans 15 min after contrast material administration, with a tube current of 15 mAs/kg and 37.5 mAs/kg, respectively (DE1 and DE2). The mean heart rate decreased to 51±9 beats/min after administration of zatebradine (10 mg/kg IV). The data set was reconstructed during the end-diastolic phase of the cardiac cycle. Areas with DE, no reflow and remote myocardium [remote left ventricular (LV)] were calculated. CT values expressed in Hounsfield units (HU) were measured using five regions of interest (ROI): DE, no reflow, remote LV, LV cavity (LV lumen) and in air, respectively. Differences, correlations, image quality [signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)] and contrast resolution [contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)] were calculated. Results: Significant differences were found between attenuation of areas of DE, no reflow and remote LV (p&lt;0.001) within the different scans. There was a fair correlation between DE and no-reflow attenuation (r=0.6; p&lt;0.001). In DE 1 vs. DE2, areas of DE and no reflow were not significantly different (p&gt;0.05). The SNR and CNR were not significantly different in DE1 vs. DE2 (p&gt;0.05). Conclusions: Tube current does not significantly affect infarction area, image quality or contrast resolution of DE imaging with CT.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Functional parameters of the left ventricle: comparison of cardiac MRI and cardiac CT in a large population (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/19853/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-08-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: The authors sought to compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) for assessing left ventricular (LV) function parameters in a large patient population. Materials and methods: The study was conducted on 181 patients who underwent cardiac MRI and cardiac CT for various indications. For MRI, we used two-dimensional cine balanced steady-state free precession (b-SSFP) sequences, and for CT we used multiphase short-axis reconstructions. Volume data sets were evaluated with dedicated software. Results were compared with a paired, two-tailed Student's t test, Pearson's correlation (r), and Bland-Altman analysis. Results: A high level of concordance was observed between cardiac MRI and CT. Ejection fraction (EF) was 53±14% for MRI vs. 53%±15% for CT. There was good correlation for EF (r=0.71; p&gt;0.05) and end-systolic volume (r=0.74; p&gt;0.05). End-diastolic volume (74±23 ml at MRI vs. 71±19 ml at CT; r=0.58; p&lt;0.05) and myocardial mass (63±20 g at MRI and 56±18 g at CT; r=0.89; p&lt;0.01) showed statistically significant differences, although the discrepancy had no clinical impact. Conclusions: MRI and CT show a good level of agreement in assessing LV function parameters, and both can be used interchangeably in clinical practice.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Diabetes: Prognostic value of CT coronary angiography - Comparison with a nondiabetic population (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/20233/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-07-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: To evaluate the prognostic value of multidetector computed tomographic (CT) coronary angiography in a diabetic population known to have or suspected of having coronary artery disease (CAD) compared with that in nondiabetic individuals. Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approval and patient informed consent were obtained. Three hundred thirteen patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and 303 patients without DM underwent unenhanced 64-detector row CT, at which a calcium score was obtained, followed by CT angiography. Multidetector CT coronary angiograms were retrospectively classified as normal, showing nonobstructive CAD (≤50% luminal narrowing), or showing obstructive CAD (&gt; 50% luminal narrowing). During follow-up after CT angiography, major events (cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and unstable angina requiring hospitalization) and total events (major events plus coronary revascularizations) were recorded for each patient. Cox proportional hazards analysis and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to compare survival rates. Results: In the group of 313 patients with DM, there were 213 men, and the mean age was 62 years ± 11 (standard deviation). In the group of 303 patients without DM, there were 203 men, and the mean age was 63 years ± 11. The mean number of diseased segments (5.6 vs 4.4, P =.001) and the rate of obstructive CAD (51% vs 37%, P &lt; .001) were higher in patients with DM. Patients were followed up for a mean of 20 months ± 5.4 (range, 6-44 months). At multivariate analysis, DM (P &lt; .001) and evidence of obstructive CAD (P &lt; .001) were independent predictors of outcome. Obstructive CAD remained a significant multivariate predictor for both patients with DM and patients without DM. In both patients with DM and patients without DM with absence of disease, the event rate was 0%. The event rate increased to 36% in patients without DM but with obstructive CAD and was highest (47%) in patients with DM and obstructive CAD. Conclusion: In both patients with DM and patients without DM, multidetector CT coronary angiography provides incremental prognostic information over baseline clinical variables, and the absence of atherosclerosis at CT coronary angiography is associated with an excellent prognosis. Multidetector CT coronary angiography might be a clinically useful tool for improving risk stratification in both patients with DM and patients without DM.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography for the detection of in-stent restenosis: A meta-analysis (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/28352/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-06-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: We sought to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) compared with invasive coronary angiography for in-stent restenosis (ISR) detection. Methods: MEDLINE, Cochrane library, and BioMed Central database searches were performed until April 2009 for original articles. Inclusion criteria were (1) 64-MDCT was used as a diagnostic test for ISR, with &gt;50% diameter stenosis selected as the cut-off criterion for significant ISR, using invasive coronary angiography and quantitative coronary angiography as the standard of reference; (2) absolute numbers of true positive, false positive, true negative, and false negative results could be derived. Standard meta-analytic methods were applied. Results: Nine studies with a total of 598 patients with 978 stents included were considered eligible. On average, 9% of stents were unassessable (range 0-42%). Accuracy tests with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing 64-MDCT vs invasive coronary angiography showed that pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio (random effect model) values were: 86% (95% CI 80-91%), 93% (95% CI 91-95%), 12.32 (95% CI 7.26-20.92), 0.18 (95% CI 0.12-0.28) for binary ISR detection. The symmetric area under the curve value was 0.94, indicating good agreement between 64-MDCT and invasive coronary angiography. Conclusions: 64-MDCT has a good diagnostic accuracy for ISR detection with a particularly high negative predictive value. However, still a relatively large proportion of stents remains uninterpretable. Accordingly, only in selected patients, 64-MDCT may serve as a potential alternative noninvasive method to rule out ISR. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Lumen enhancement influences absolute noncalcific plaque density on multislice computed tomography coronary angiography: Ex-vivo validation and in-vivo demonstration (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/28531/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-05-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Aim: The purpose of this study was to define the in-vitro and in-vivo effects of intracoronary enhancement on the absolute density values of coronary plaques during multislice computed tomography. Methods: We studied seven ex-vivo left coronary artery specimens surrounded by olive oil and filled with isotonic saline and four solutions with decreasing dilutions of contrast material: control (isotonic saline), 1/200, 1/80, 1/50, and 1/20. The multislice computed tomography protocol was: slice/collimation 32 × 2 × 0.6 mm and rotation time 330 ms. The attenuation (Hounsfield units) value of atherosclerotic plaques was measured for each dilution in lumen, plaque (noncalcified coronary wall thickening), calcium, and surrounding oil. In-vivo assessment was performed in 12 patients (nine men; mean age 58.7 ± 9.9 years) who underwent two subsequent multislice computed tomography scans (arterial and delayed) after intravenous administration of a single bolus of contrast material. The attenuation values of lumen and plaques during arterial and delayed computed tomography were compared. The results were compared with one-way analysis of variance and correlated with Pearson's test. Results: Mean lumen (45 ± 38-669 ± 151 HU) and plaque (11 ± 35-101 ± 72 HU) attenuation differed significantly (P &lt; 0.001) among the different dilutions. The attenuation of lumen and plaque of coronary plaques showed moderate correlation (r = 0.54, P &lt; 0.001). The mean attenuation value in vivo for the arterial and delayed phase scans differed significantly (P &lt; 0.001) for lumen (325 ± 70 and 174 ± 46 HU, respectively) and plaque (138 ± 71 and 100 ± 52 HU, respectively). Conclusion: Coronary plaque attenuation values are significantly modified by differences in lumen contrast densities both ex vivo and in vivo. This should be taken into account when considering the distinction between lipid and fibrous plaques. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in a large population of patients without revascularisation: Registry data and review of multicentre trials (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/27367/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-04-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose. This study was undertaken to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography (CT-CA) for the detection of significant coronary artery stenosis (≥50% lumen reduction) compared with conventional coronary angiography (CCA) in a registry and to review major multicentre trials. Materials and methods. A total of 1,372 patients (882 men, 490 women; mean age 59.3±11.9 years) in sinus rhythm were studied with CT-CA (64-slice technology) and CCA. The diagnostic accuracy of CT-CA was evaluated against quantitative CCA as a reference standard for coronary artery stenosis. Positive and negative likelihood ratios and inter-and intraobserver agreement were calculated. Results. The prevalence of disease was 53%. CCA demonstrated the absence of significant coronary artery disease in 46.6% (639/1372), single-vessel disease in 24.7% (337/1372) and multivessel disease in 28.9% (396/1372) of patients. In per-patient analysis sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive value of CT-CA were 99% [confidence interval (CI) 97-99], 92% (CI 89-94), 94% (CI 91-95) and 99% (CI 97-99), respectively. Per-patient and per-segment likelihood ratios (LR+=12.4 and LR-=0.011; LR+=18.3 and LR-=0.064, respectively), were good. Inter-and intraobserver variability was 0.78 and 0.85, respectively. Conclusions. CT-CA is a reliable diagnostic modality both in terms of sensitivity and negative predictive value. Differences in trial results are also due to the different parameters used for patient inclusion. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Stress-ECG vs. CT coronary angiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: A "real-world" experience (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/27370/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-04-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of stress electrocardiogram (ECG) and computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) for the detection of significant coronary artery stenosis (≥50%) in the real world using conventional CA as the reference standard. Materials and methods. A total of 236 consecutive patients (159 men, 77 women; mean age 62.8±10.2 years) at moderate risk and with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) were enrolled in the study and underwent stress ECG, CTCA and CA. The CTCA scan was performed after i.v. administration of a 100-ml bolus of iodinated contrast material. The stress ECG and CTCA reports were used to evaluate diagnostic accuracy compared with CA in the detection of significant stenosis ≥50%. Results. We excluded 16 patients from the analysis because of the nondiagnostic quality of stress ECG and/or CTCA. The prevalence of disease demonstrated at CA was 62% (n=220), 51% in the population with comparable stress ECG and CTCA (n=147) and 84% in the population with equivocal stress ECG (n=73). Stress ECG was classified as equivocal in 73 cases (33.2%), positive in 69 (31.4%) and negative in 78 (35.5%). In the per-patient analysis, the diagnostic accuracy of stress ECG was sensitivity 47%, specificity 53%, positive predictive value (PPV) 5(31.4%) and negative in 78 (35.5%). In the per-patient analysis, the diagnostic accuracy of stress ECG was sensitivity 47%, specificity 53%, positive predictive value (PPV) 5)51% and negative predictive value (NPV) 49%. On stress ECG, 40 (27.2%) patients were misclassified as negative, and 34 (23.1%) patients with nonsignificant stenosis were overestimated as positive. The diagnostic accuracy of CTCA was sensitivity 96%, specificity 65%, PPV 74% and NPV 94%. CTCA incorrectly classified three (2%) as negative and 25 (17%) as positive. The difference in diagnostic accuracy between stress ECG and CTCA was significant (p &lt;0.01). Conclusions. CTCA in the real world has significantly higher diagnostic accuracy compared with stress ECG and could be used as a first-line study in patients at moderate risk. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Impact of contrast material volume on quantitative assessment of reperfused acute myocardial infarction using delayed-enhancement 64-slice CT: Experience in a porcine model (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/27331/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-02-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: Our purpose in this study was to compare the impact of contrast material volume in delayed-enhancement computer tomography (CT) imaging for assessing acute reperfused myocardial infarction. Materials and methods: In five domestic pigs (20-30 kg), the circumflex coronary artery (CX) was balloon-occluded for 2 h followed by reperfusion. After 5 days, CT imaging was performed after intravenous administration of iodinated contrast material (Iomeprol 400mgI/ml; Bracco, Italy). A 64-slice multidetector CT (MDCT) (Sensation 64, Siemens) scanner was used for imaging, with standard angiography characteristics. Three scans were performed: first, coronary angiography at first pass with 1.25 gI/kg of contrast material (ART); and remaining delayed-enhancement (DE1-DE2) 15 min after administration of 1.25 (DE1) and 15 min after additional administration of 2.50 gI/kg (=total 3.75 gI/kg-DE2). Mean heart rate decreased to 51±9 bpm after intravenous administration of Zatebradine (10 mg/kg). Data sets were reconstructed during the end-diastolic phase of the cardiac cycle. Areas of infarction-enhanced (DE), no-reflow (no-reflow) and remote myocardial [remote left ventricle (LV)] were manually contoured. CT attenuation values (Hounsfield units) were measured using five regions of interest: DE, no-reflow, remote LV, left ventricular cavity (lumen LV) and in air. Differences, correlations, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. Results: We found significant differences between the attenuation of DE, no-reflow and remote LV (p&lt;0.001). DE and no-reflow size were assessed accurately with DEMDCT. In particular, SNR and CNR showed higher values in DE2(∼6.0 and 3.5, respectively; r2=0.90) vs. DE1(∼4.0 and 2.2, respectively; r2=0.85). Conclusions: The increase of contrast material volume determines a significant improvement in myocardial infarction image quality with DE-MDCT. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Dose reduction in spiral CT coronary angiography with dual source equipment. Part II. Dose surplus due to slope-up and slope-down of prospective tube current modulation in a phantom model (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/27578/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-02-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: This study was undertaken to estimate surplus radiation dose in retrospectively electrocardiography (ECG)-gated dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography (DSCT-CA) due to the slope-up and slope-down of the tube current using prospectively ECG-triggered tube modulation. Materials and methods: We used an anthropomorphic phantom with an ECG-gated retrospective protocol and a DSCT scanner (Definition, Siemens). We used four tube current modulation algorithms: narrow pulsing window, with tube current reduction to 20% (A) and 4% (B) of peak current; and wide pulsing window, with tube current reduction to 20% (C) and 4% (D). Each algorithm was applied at five heart rates (HR=45, 60, 75, 90 and120 bpm) with adaptive pitch values (0.2-0.5). Data sets were reconstructed in 5% increments from 0-95% of the R-R interval. Noise was measured at each R-R step in order to identify low noise (100% dose), medium noise (slope-up/down) and high noise (4/20% dose). Width of the transition window (slope-up/slope-down from 4/20% to 100% dose) was calculated. The surplus dose due to slope-up/slope-down was calculated. Results: Surplus dose was 19% (A), 34% (B), 14% (C) and 21% (D). The transition window lasted 10%+10% (slope-up + down) for HR ≤75 bpm and all HR in C (except for 120 bpm; 25%+15%), 15%+15% for HR ≤90 bpm (A). For C and D, instead, the slope-up increased with progressively higher HR (10%-25% of the R-R interval, except for 90 bpm, 10%), whereas the slope-down remained constant at 5% (except for 120 bpm; 10%). Conclusions: The adaptive ECG-pulsing windows produced an increment of the surplus dose with increasing HR. The transition window was a constant source of surplus radiation dose in the range of 14%-34%. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with a zero calcium score (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/19568/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice CT coronary angiography (CT-CA) for the detection of significant coronary artery stenosis in patients with zero on the Agatston Calcium Score (CACS). We enrolled 279 consecutive patients (96 male, mean age 48±12 years) with suspected coronary artery disease. Patients were symptomatic (n=208) or asymptomatic (n=71), and underwent conventional coronary angiography (CAG). For CT-CA we administered an IV bolus of 100 ml of iodinated contrast material. CT-CA was compared to CAG using a threshold for significant stenosis of ≤50%. The prevalence of disease demonstrated at CAG was 15% (1.4% in asymptomatic). The population at CAG showed no or non-significant disease in 85% (238/279), single vessel disease in 9% (25/279), and multi-vessel disease in 6% (16/279). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of CT-CA vs. CAG on the patient level were 100%, 95%, 76%, and 100% in the overall population and 100%, 100%, 100%, and 100% in asymptomatic patients, respectively. CT-CA proves high diagnostic performance in patients with or without symptoms and with zero CACS. The prevalence of significant disease detected by CT-CA was not negligible in asymptomatic patients. The role of CT-CA in asymptomatic patients remains uncertain.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Assessment of coronary artery disease and calcified coronary plaque burden by computed tomography in patients with and without diabetes mellitus (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/21367/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: To compare the coronary atherosclerotic burden in patients with and without type-2 diabetes using CT Coronary Angiography (CTCA). Methods and Materials: 147 diabetic (mean age: 65 ± 10 years; male: 89) and 979 nondiabetic patients (mean age: 61 ± 13 years; male: 567) without a history of coronary artery disease (CAD) underwent CTCA. The per-patient number of diseased coronary segments was determined and each diseased segment was classified as showing obstructive lesion (luminal narrowing &gt;50%) or not. Coronary calcium scoring (CCS) was assessed too. Results: Diabetics showed a higher number of diseased segments (4.1 ± 4.2 vs. 2.1 ± 3.0; p &lt; 0.0001); a higher rate of CCS &gt; 400 (p &lt; 0.001), obstructive CAD (37% vs. 18% of patients; p &lt; 0.0001), and fewer normal coronary arteries (20% vs. 42%; p &lt; 0.0001), as compared to nondiabetics. The percentage of patients with obstructive CAD paralleled increasing CCS in both groups. Diabetics with CCS ≤ 10 had a higher prevalence of coronary plaque (39.6% vs. 24.5%, p = 0.003) and obstructive CAD (12.5% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.01). Among patients with CCS ≤ 10 all diabetics with obstructive CAD had a zero CCS and one patient was asymptomatic. Conclusions: Diabetes was associated with higher coronary plaque burden. The present study demonstrates that the absence of coronary calcification does not exclude obstructive CAD especially in diabetics.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Coronary calcium score and computed tomography coronary angiography in high-risk asymptomatic subjects: Assessment of diagnostic accuracy and prevalence of non-obstructive coronary artery disease (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/28180/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Objectives: The aim of the study was to compare the coronary artery calcium score (CACS) and computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) for the assessment of non-obstructive/obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in high-risk asymptomatic subjects. Methods: Two hundred and thirteen consecutive asymptomatic subjects (113 male; mean age 53.6 ± 12.4 years) with more than one risk factor and an inconclusive or unfeasible non-invasive stress test result underwent CACS and CTCA in an outpatient setting. All patients underwent conventional coronary angiography (CAG). Data from CACS (threshold for positive image: Agatston score 1/100/1,000) and CTCA were compared with CAG regarding the degree of CAD (non-obstructive/obstructive; &lt;/≥50% lumen reduction). Results: The mean calcium score was 151 ± 403 and the prevalence of obstructive CAD was 17% (8% one-vessel and 10% two-vessel disease). Per-patient sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of CACS were: 97%, 75%, 45%, and 100%, respectively (Agatston ≥1); 73%, 90%, 60%, and 94%, respectively (Agatston ≥100); 30%, 98%, 79%, and 87%, respectively (Agatston ≥1,000). Per-patient values for CTCA were 100%, 98%, 97%, and 100%, respectively (p &lt; 0.05). CTCA detected 65% prevalence of all CAD (48% non-obstructive), while CACS detected 37% prevalence of all CAD (21% non-obstructive) (p &lt; 0.05). Conclusion: CACS proved inadequate for the detection of obstructive and non-obstructive CAD compared with CTCA. CTCA has a high diagnostic accuracy for the detection of non-obstructive and obstructive CAD in high-risk asymptomatic patients with inconclusive or unfeasible stress test results. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>"in-house" pharmacological management for computed tomography coronary angiography: Heart rate reduction, timing and safety of different drugs used during patient preparation (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/24172/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>We retrospectively evaluated the effect, timing and safety of different pharmacological strategies during 64-slice CT coronary angiography (CT-CA). From the institutional database of CT-CA we enrolled 560 consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease. The type of drug preparation (group 1 = no treatment; group 2 = oral metoprolol; group 3 = other; group 4=intravenous (IV) atenolol; group 5=IV atenolol + nitrates; NR = non-responders), timing, and adverse effects were recorded. Heart rate (HR) during different preparation phases was recorded. Four adverse effects were recorded, none of which was attributable to pharmacological treatment. In all groups, except group 1, the HR on arrival was significantly reduced by the pharmacological treatment (p&lt;0.01). Group 4 showed the best (-16±8 bpm) HR reduction. There was no significant effect on HR due to nitrates (p=0.49), while a slight increase due to contrast material was noted (p&lt;0.05). Average time required for preparation was 44±25 min. Groups 4 and 5 showed the most effective timing (8±9 min and 8±8 min, respectively; p&lt;0.01). Pharmacological preparation in patients undergoing CT-CA is safe and effective. Best results in terms of HR reduction and fast preparation are obtained with IV administration of beta-blockers. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Comparison of the Value of Coronary Calcium Detection to Computed Tomographic Angiography and Exercise Testing in Patients With Chest Pain (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/24265/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The aim of this study was to investigate the value of coronary calcium detection by computed tomography compared to computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and exercise testing to detect obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with stable chest pain. A total of 471 consecutive patients with new stable chest complaints were scheduled to undergo dual-source multislice computed tomography (Siemens, Germany; coronary calcium score [CCS] and coronary CTA) and exercise electrocardiography (XECG). Clinically driven invasive quantitative angiography was performed in 98 patients. Only 3 of 175 patients (2%) with a negative CCS had significant CAD on CT angiogram, with only 1 confirmed by quantitative angiography. In patients with a high calcium score (Agatston score &gt;400), CTA could exclude significant CAD in no more than 4 of 65 patients (6%). In patients with a low-intermediate CCS, CTA more often yielded diagnostic results compared to XECG and could rule out obstructive CAD in 56% of patients. For patients with CAD on CT angiogram, those with abnormal exercise electrocardiographic results more often showed severe CAD (p &lt;0.034). In patients with diagnostic results for all tests, the sensitivity and specificity to detect &gt;50% quantitative angiographic diameter stenosis were 100% and 15% for CCS &gt;0, 82% and 64% for CCS &gt;100, 97% and 36% for CTA, and 70% and 76% for XECG, respectively. In conclusion, nonenhanced computed tomography for calcium detection is a reliable means to exclude obstructive CAD in stable, symptomatic patients. Contrast-enhanced CTA can exclude significant CAD in patients with a low-intermediate CCS but is of limited value in patients with a high CCS. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Computed tomography coronary angiography plaque burden in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/25000/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: To determine the relationship between established cardiovascular risk factors, clinical presentation and the extent of coronary artery disease (CAD), as described with computed tomography coronary angiography. MATERIAL AND Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we included 567 symptomatic individuals without a history of CAD who consecutively underwent 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography for evaluation of suspected CAD. We analyzed the prevalence of CAD depending on sex, age, symptoms and risk factors. Results: A total of 8542 segments were analyzed. No evidence of CAD was observed in 225 patients (40%), nonsignificant CAD in 221 patients (39%) and significant CAD (luminal narrowing &gt;50%) in the remaining 121 patients (21%). CAD increased with advancing age, significantly above 50 years (P &lt; 0.05). Female patients had a higher prevalence of normal coronary arteries and males of significant CAD (P &lt; 0.01). With the increase of risk factors, there was a significant increase of the significant disease (P &lt; 0.01). Typical pain with respect to atypical pain had the strongest association with significant CAD (16 vs. 38%; P &lt; 0.05). In multivariate analysis, the number of risk factors, age, male sex and typical pain remained strong predictors of significant CAD (P &lt; 0.0001). Conclusion: Computed tomography coronary angiography may play an important role in risk stratification of patients with suspected CAD. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Impact of heart rate frequency and variability on radiation exposure, image quality, and diagnostic performance in dual-source spiral CT coronary angiography (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/25252/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: To investigate the effect of heart rate frequency (HRF) and heart rate variability (HRV) on radiation exposure, image quality, and diagnostic performance to help detect significant stenosis (≥50% lumen diameter reduction) by using adaptive electrocardiographic (ECG) pulsing at dual-source (DS) spiral computed tomographic (CT) coronary angiography. Materials and Methods: Institutional review committee approval and informed consent were obtained. No prescan β-blockers were applied. Unenhanced CT and CT coronary angiography with adaptive ECG pulsing were performed in 927 consecutive patients (600 men, 327 women; mean age, 60.3 years ± 11.0 [standard deviation]) divided in three HRF groups: low, intermediate, and high (≤65, 66-79, and ≥80 beats/min, respectively), and four HRV groups given mean interbeat difference (IBD) during CT coronary angiography: normal, minor, moderate, and severe (IBDs of 0-1, 2-3, 4-10, and &gt;10, respectively). Radiation exposure and image quality were also evaluated. In 444 of these, diagnostic performance was presented as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPVs), and negative predictive values and likelihood ratios with corresponding 95% confidence intervals by using quantitative coronary angiography as the reference standard. Results: CT coronary angiography yielded good image quality in 98% of patients and no significant differences in image quality were found among HRF and HRV groups. Radiation exposure was significantly higher in patients with low versus high HRF and in patients with severe versus normal HRV. No significant differences among HRF and HRV groups in image quality and diagnostic performance were found. A nonsignificant trend was found toward a lower specificity and PPV in patients with a high HRF or severe HRV when compared with low HRF or normal HRV in patients with a low calcium score (Agatston score &lt;100). Conclusion: DS spiral CT coronary angiography performed with adaptive ECG pulsing results in preserved diagnostic image quality and performance independent of HRF or HRV at the cost of limited dose reduction in arrhythmic patients. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>CT coronary angiography in patients suspected of having coronary artery disease: Decision making from various perspectives in the face of uncertainty (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/25253/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: To determine the cost-effectiveness of computed tomographic (CT) coronary angiography as a triage test, performed prior to conventional coronary angiography, by using a Markov model. Materials and Methods: A Markov model was used to analyze the cost-effectiveness of CT coronary angiography performed as a triage test prior to conventional coronary angiography from the perspective of the patient, physician, hospital, health care system, and society by using recommendations from the United Kingdom, the United States, and the Netherlands for cost-effectiveness analyses. For CT coronary angiography, a range of sensitivities (79%-100%) and specificities (63%-94%) were used to help diagnose significant coronary artery disease (CAD). Optimization criteria (ie, outcomes considered) were: revised posttest probability of CAD, life-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Extensive sensitivity analysis was performed. Results: For a prior probability of CAD of less than 40%, the probability of CAD after CT coronary angiography with negative results was less than 1%. The Markov model calculations from the patient/physician perspective suggest that CT coronary angiography maximizes life-years respectively in 60-year-old men and women at a prior probability of less than 38% and 24% and maximizes QALYs at a prior probability of less than 17% and 11%. From the hospital/health care perspective, CT coronary angiography helps reduce health care and direct nonhealth care-related costs (according to UK/U.S. recommendations), regardless of prior probability, and lowers all costs, including production losses (Netherlands recommendations) at a prior probability of less than 87%-92%. Analysis performed from a societal perspective by using a willingness-topay threshold level of €80 000/QALY suggests that CT coronary angiography is cost-effective when the prior probability is lower than 44% and 37% in men and women, respectively. Sensitivity analyses showed that results changed across the reported range of sensitivity of CT coronary angiography. Conclusion: The optimal diagnostic work-up depends on the optimization criterion, prior probability of CAD, and the diagnostic performance of CT coronary angiography. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Dose reduction in spiral CT coronary angiography with dual-source equipment. Part I. A phantom study applying different prospective tube current modulation algorithms (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/24231/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-10-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: The authors sought to compare different algorithms for dose reduction in retrospectively echocardiographically (ECG)-gated dual-source computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography (DSCT-CA) in a phantom model. Materials and methods: Weighted CT dose index (CTDI) was measured by using an anthropomorphic phantom in spiral cardiac mode (retrospective ECG gating) at five pitch values adapted with two heart-rate-adaptive ECG pulsing windows using four algorithms: narrow pulsing window, with tube current reduction to 20% (A) and 4% (B) of peak current outside the pulsing window; wide pulsing window, with tube current reduction to 20% (C) and 4% (D). Each algorithm was applied at different heart rates (45, 60, 75, 90, 120 bpm). Results: Mean CTDI volume (CTDIvol) was 36.9±9.7 mGy, 23.9±5.6 mGy, 49.7±16.2 mGy and 38.5±12.3 mGy for A, B, C and D, respectively. Consistent dose reduction was observed with protocols applying the 4% tube current reduction (B and D). Using the conversion coefficient for the chest, the mean effective dose was the highest for C (9.6 mSv) and the lowest for B (4.6 mSv). Heart-ratedependent pitch values (pitch=0.2, 0.26, 0.34, 0.43, 0.5) and the use of heart-rate-adaptive ECG pulsing windows provided a significant decrease in the CTDIvol with progressively higher heart rates (45, 60, 75, 90, 120 bpm), despite using wider pulsing windows. Conclusions: Radiation exposure with DSCT-CA using a narrow pulsing window significantly decreases when compared with a wider pulsing window. When using a protocol with reduced tube current to 4%, the radiation dose is significantly lower. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Standardized evaluation methodology and reference database for evaluating coronary artery centerline extraction algorithms (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/24468/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-10-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Efficiently obtaining a reliable coronary artery centerline from computed tomography angiography data is relevant in clinical practice. Whereas numerous methods have been presented for this purpose, up to now no standardized evaluation methodology has been published to reliably evaluate and compare the performance of the existing or newly developed coronary artery centerline extraction algorithms. This paper describes a standardized evaluation methodology and reference database for the quantitative evaluation of coronary artery centerline extraction algorithms. The contribution of this work is fourfold: (1) a method is described to create a consensus centerline with multiple observers, (2) well-defined measures are presented for the evaluation of coronary artery centerline extraction algorithms, (3) a database containing 32 cardiac CTA datasets with corresponding reference standard is described and made available, and (4) 13 coronary artery centerline extraction algorithms, implemented by different research groups, are quantitatively evaluated and compared. The presented evaluation framework is made available to the medical imaging community for benchmarking existing or newly developed coronary centerline extraction algorithms. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Computed tomography versus exercise electrocardiography in patients with stable chest complaints: Real-world experiences from a fast-track chest pain clinic (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/24895/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-10-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Objective: To compare the diagnostic performance of CT angiography (CTA) and exercise electrocardiography (XECG) in a symptomatic population with a low-intermediate prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD). Design: Prospective registry. Setting: Tertiary university hospital. Patients: 471 consecutive ambulatory patients with stable chest pain complaints, mean (SD) age 56 (10), female 227 (48%), pre-test probability for significant CAD &gt;5%. Intervention: All patients were intended to undergo both 64-slice, dual-source CTA and an XECG. Clinically driven quantitative catheter angiography was performed in 98 patients. Main outcome measures: Feasibility and interpretability of, and association between, CTA and XECG, and their diagnostic performance with invasive coronary angiography as reference. Results: CTA and XECG could not be performed in 16 (3.4%) vs 48 (10.2%, p&lt;0.001), and produced nondiagnostic results in 3 (0.7%) vs 140 (33%, p&lt;0.001). CTA showed ≥1 coronary stenosis (≥50%) in 140 patients (30%), XECG was abnormal in 93 patients (33%). Results by CTA and XECG matched for 185 patients (68%, p=0.63). Catheter angiography showed obstructive CAD in 57/98 patients (58%). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of CTA to identify patients with ≥50% stenosis was 96%, 37%, 67% and 88%, respectively; compared with XECG: 71%, 76%, 80% and 66%, respectively. Quantitative CTA slightly overestimated diameter stenosis: 6 (21)% (R=0.71), compared with QCA. Of the 312 patients (66%) with a negative CTA, 44 (14%) had a positive XECG, but only 2/17 who underwent catheter angiography had significant CAD. Conclusion: CTA is feasible and diagnostic in more patients than XECG. For interpretable studies, CTA has a higher sensitivity, but lower specificity for detection of CAD.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Coronary lumen segmentation using graph cuts and robust kernel regression (In Book)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/17397/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-09-21T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>This paper presents a novel method for segmenting the coronary lumen in CTA data. The method is based on graph cuts, with edge-weights depending on the intensity of the centerline, and robust kernel regression. A quantitative evaluation in 28 coronary arteries from 12 patients is performed by comparing the semi-automatic segmentations to manual annotations. This evaluation showed that the method was able to segment the coronary arteries with high accuracy, compared to manually annotated segmentations, which is reflected in a Dice coefficient of 0.85 and average symmetric surface distance of 0.22 mm.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Geometry and Degree of Apposition of the CoreValve ReValving System With Multislice Computed Tomography After Implantation in Patients With Aortic Stenosis (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/24402/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-09-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Objectives: Using multislice computed tomography (MSCT), we sought to evaluate the geometry and apposition of the CoreValve ReValving System (CRS, Medtronic, Luxembourgh, Luxembourgh) in patients with aortic stenosis. Background: There are no data on the durability of percutaneous aortic valve replacement. Geometric factors may affect durability. Methods: Thirty patients had MSCT at a median 1.5 months (interquartile range [IQR] 0 to 7 months) after percutaneous aortic valve replacement. Axial dimensions and apposition of the CRS were evaluated at 4 levels: 1) the ventricular end; 2) the nadir; 3) central coaptation of the CRS leaflets; and 4) commissures. Orthogonal smallest and largest diameters and cross-sectional surface area were measured at each level. Results: The CRS (26-mm: n = 14, 29-mm: n = 16) was implanted at 8.5 mm (IQR 5.2 to 11.0 mm) below the noncoronary sinus. None of the CRS frames reached nominal dimensions. The difference between measured and nominal cross-sectional surface area at the ventricular end was 1.6 cm2(IQR 0.9 to 2.6 cm2) and 0.5 cm2(IQR 0.2 to 0.7 cm2) at central coaptation. At the level of central coaptation the CRS was undersized relative to the native annulus by 24% (IQR 15% to 29%). The difference between the orthogonal smallest and largest diameters (degree of deformation) at the ventricular end was 4.4 mm (IQR 3.3 to 6.4 mm) and it decreased progressively toward the outflow. Incomplete apposition of the CRS frame was present in 62% of patients at the ventricular end and was ubiquitous at the central coaptation and higher. Conclusions: Dual-source MSCT demonstrated incomplete and nonuniform expansion of the CRS frame, but the functionally important mid-segment was well expanded and almost symmetrical. Undersizing and incomplete apposition were seen in the majority of patients. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Assessment of left ventricular volumes with cardiac MRI: Comparison between two semiautomated quantitative software packages (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/24230/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-08-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: This study compared two quantitative semiautomated software packages for volumetric analysis of the left ventricle (LV) by magnetic resonance (MR) imaging using two-dimensional (2D) cine balanced steady-state free precession (b-SSFP) sequences. Materials and methods: We included 46 consecutive patients who underwent cardiac MR imaging for various indications. Two-dimensional cine b-SSFP sequences were used to assess the LV. Data sets were evaluated with two dedicated software packages: ViewForum, version 4.2, and Argus, version Va60C. Results were compared with Student's t test for paired samples, Pearson's r correlation coefficient and R2 coefficient of determination; ejection fraction differences were assessed with Bland-Altman analysis. The time required for analysis was also recorded. Results: We observed very high levels of concordance and reproducibility. High correlation was observed for ejection fraction (p&gt;0.05; r=0.9; R2=0.82). The time required for analysis was 7.6±2.78 min vs. 7.52±2.4 min (p&gt;0.05; r=0.85; R2=0.73). Intraobserver and interobserver variability did not show significant differences. Conclusions: LV volume evaluation is an integral part of cardiac MR imaging. In our experience, there is no significant difference between the commonly used software packages in either quantitative output or time required for analysis. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Diagnostic Accuracy of Computed Tomography Angiography in Patients After Bypass Grafting. Comparison With Invasive Coronary Angiography (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/24419/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-07-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Objectives: We sought to evaluate the contribution of noninvasive dual-source computed tomography angiography (CTA) in the comprehensive assessment of symptomatic patients after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Background: Assessment of bypass grafts and distal runoffs by invasive coronary angiography is cumbersome and often requires extra procedure time, contrast load, and radiation exposure. Methods: Dual-source CTA was performed in 52 (41 men, mean age 66.6 ± 13.2 years) symptomatic post-CABG patients scheduled for invasive coronary angiography. No oral or intravenous beta blockers or sedation were administered before the scan. Mean interval between CABG surgery and CTA was 9.6 ± 7.2 (range 0 to 20) years. Mean heart rate during scanning was 64.5 ± 13.2 (range 48 to 92) beats/min. Seventy-five percent of patients had both arterial and venous grafts. A total of 152 graft segments and 142 distal runoffs vessels were analyzed. Native coronary segments were divided into nongrafted (n = 118) and grafted segments (n = 289). A significant stenosis was defined as ≥50% lumen diameter reduction, and quantitative coronary angiography served as reference standard. Results: The diagnostic accuracy of CTA for the detection or exclusion of significant stenosis in arterial and venous grafts on a segment-by-segment analysis was 100%. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value to detect significant stenosis were 95% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 73% to 100%), 100% (95% CI: 96% to 100%), 100% (95% CI: 79% to 100%), 99% (95% CI: 95% to 100%) in distal runoffs respectively; 100% (95% CI: 97% to 100%), 96% (95% CI: 90% to 98%), 97% (95% CI: 93% to 99%), 100% (95% CI: 95% to 100%) in grafted native coronary arteries respectively; and 97% (95% CI: 83% to 100%), 92% (95% CI: 83% to 96%), 83% (95% CI: 67% to 92%), 99% (95% CI: 92% to 100%) in nongrafted native coronary arteries, respectively. Conclusions: Noninvasive CTA is successful for evaluating bypass grafts in symptomatic post-CABG patients, whereas invasive coronary angiography is still required for the assessment of significant stenosis in distal runoffs and native coronary arteries. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Preserved diagnostic performance of dual-source CT coronary angiography with reduced radiation exposure and cancer risk (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/25248/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-07-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: To evaluate the effects of standard and optimal electrocardiographic (ECG) pulsing on diagnostic performance, radiation dose, and cancer risk in symptomatic patients in a "real-world" clinical setting. Materials and Methods: The institutional review board approved the study, and all patients gave informed consent. Dual-source computed tomographic (CT) coronary angiography was performed in 436 symptomatic patients (301 men, 135 women; mean age, 61.6 years ± 10.6 [standard deviation]; age range, 23-89 years) referred for conventional coronary angiography. Standard and optimal ECG pulsing was performed in 327 and 109 patients, respectively. The diagnostic performance of dual-source CT coronary angiography for detection of significant stenosis (≥50 luminal diameter reduction), with quantitative coronary angiography as the reference standard, was reported as sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and positive and negative likelihood ratios. The mean effective radiation dose, additional fatal cancer risk, and age- and sex-specific cancer risks related to one CT coronary angiographic examination were determined from data averaged over the study population. Results: Mean effective doses with standard and optimal ECG pulsing were 14.2 mSv ± 3.2 and 10.7 mSv ± 3.6, respectively. Optimal ECG pulsing resulted in a 43% overall reduction in mean effective radiation dose and cancer risk compared with a nonpulsing protocol (18.8 mSv ± 3.5) and a 25% overall reduction in mean effective dose compared with the standard pulsing protocol. At patient-by-patient analysis, CT coronary angiography with standard ECG pulsing yielded sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 99%, 100%), 85% (95% CI: 81%, 88%), 94% (95% CI: 91%, 96%), and 99% (95% CI: 98%, 100%), respectively, for detection of significant stenosis. Optimal ECG pulsing yielded similar results: Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 100% (95% CI: 100%, 100%), 88% (95% CI: 82%, 94%), 97% (95% CI: 93%, 100%), and 100%, respectively. Conclusion: Compared with a nonpulsing protocol, optimal ECG pulsing resulted in significant (P &lt; .001) reductions in patient radiation dose and cancer risk (up to 55% reduction in patients with high heart rates) while preserving the diagnostic performance of dual-source CT coronary angiography. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Computed tomography coronary angiography vs. stress ECG in patients with stable angina (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/24228/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-06-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>This study compared the role of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography (MSCT-CA) and stress electrocardiography (ECG) in the diagnostic workup of patients with chronic chest pain. MSCT-CA was performed in 43 patients (31 men, 12 women, mean age 58.8±7.7 years) with stable angina after a routine diagnostic workup involving stress ECG and conventional CA. The following inclusion criteria were adopted: sinus rhythm and ability to hold breath for 12 s. Beta-blockers were administered in patients with heart rate ≥70 beats/minute. In order to identify or exclude patients with significant stenoses (≥50% lumen), we determined posttest likelihood ratios of stress test and MSCT-CA separately and of MSCT-CA performed after the stress test. The pretest probability of significant coronary artery disease (CAD) was 74%. Positive and negative likelihood ratios were 2.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-5.3] and 0.3 (95% CI: 0.2-0.7) for the stress test and 10.0 (95% CI: 1.8-78.4) and 0.0 (95% CI: 0.0-∞) for MSCT-CA, respectively. MSCT-CA increased the posttest probability of significant CAD after a negative stress test from 50% to 86% and after a positive stress test from 88% to 100%. MSCT-CA correctly detected all patients without CAD. Noninvasive MSCT-CA is a potentially useful tool in the diagnostic workup of patients with stable angina owing to its capability to detect or exclude significant CAD. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Learning curve for coronary CT angiography: What constitutes sufficient training? (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/16527/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-05-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: To prospectively evaluate the effect of experience with coronary computed tomographic (CT) angiography on the capability to detect coronary stenoses of 50% or more. Materials and Methods: The institutional review board approved the study protocol. All patients gave consent to undergo CT angiography before conventional coronary angiography after being informed of the additional radiation dose. They also consented to the use of their data for future research. Three radiologists and one cardiologist inexperienced with coronary CT angiography attended this institution's cardiac CT unit for a 1-year fellowship. Fellows were involved in the acquisition and reading of 12-15 coronary CT angiograms per week (about 600 per year). To assess the progression in diagnostic performance, fellows (readers) independently read 50 CT angiographic test cases in patients who also underwent conventional coronary angiography. Cases were repeatedly assigned in random order at baseline and at 4, 8, 26, and 52 weeks. The same cases were examined by two experts in consensus. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) were calculated and compared with conventional coronary angiography as the reference standard. Results: Respective reader ranges for sensitivity, specificity, and DOR were 33%-72%, 70%-94%, and 3.8-8.1 at baseline; 43%-80%, 71%-88%, and 8.8-15.2 after 6 months; and 66%-75%, 87%-92%, and 14.7-25.8 after 1 year. For expert physicians, respective results were 95%, 93%, and 255.9. Between baseline and 6 months, readers 1-3 showed nonsignificantly improved sensitivities, while specificities remained similar. Reader 4 showed significantly improved specificity, while sensitivity remained similar; all readers nonsignificantly improved DORs. Between baseline and 1 year: readers 1 and 2 significantly improved sensitivity but not specificity; reader 4 significantly improved specificity but not sensitivity; readers 1, 2, and 4 improved DOR significantly; reader 3 nonsignificantly improved sensitivity, specificity, and DOR. Conclusion: Increasing experience with coronary CT angiography improved the diagnostic performance of inexperienced physicians. However, acquiring expertise in coronary CT angiography was slow and may take more than 1 year.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Pre-Procedural Dual Source 64-Slice Computed Tomography in Unprotected Left Main Intervention (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/24409/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-05-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Breast cancer in the heart (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/24999/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-05-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>We present a case of a 46-year-old woman who presented to our institution with a history of quadrantectomy and a current progressive dyspnea. Multislice computed tomography of the heart and coronary arteries was performed with standard protocol. The investigation demonstrated a hypodense mass infiltrating the interventricular septum, the cardiac apex and the right ventricular chamber. The mass also surrounded the left anterior descending coronary artery without any sign of occlusion. Cardiac computed tomography is performed in the follow-up of almost all cancer patients. Therefore, we expect that the increased survival of patients with advanced stages of cancer will lead to more frequent encounters with this kind of finding in routine clinical investigations. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Coronary calcium score as gatekeeper for 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with chest pain: Per-segment and per-patient analysis (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/24171/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-04-23T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>We sought to investigate the performance of 64-slice CT in symptomatic patients with different coronary calcium scores. Two hundred patients undergoing 64-slice CT coronary angiography for suspected coronary artery disease were enrolled into five groups based on Agatston calcium score using the Mayo Clinic risk stratification: group 1: score 0, group 2: score 1-10, group 3: score 11-100, group 4: score 101-400, and group 5: score &gt; 401. Diagnostic accuracy for the detection of significant (≥50% lumen reduction) coronary artery stenosis was assessed on a per-segment and per-patient base using quantitative coronary angiography as the gold standard. For groups 1 through 5, sensitivity was 97, 96, 91, 90, 92%, and specificity was 99, 98, 96, 88, 90%, respectively, on a per-segment basis. On a per-patient basis, the best diagnostic performance was obtained in group 1 (sensitivity 100% and specificity 100%) and group 5 (sensitivity 95% and specificity 100%). Progressively higher coronary calcium levels affect diagnostic accuracy of CT coronary angiography, decreasing sensitivity and specificity on a per-segment base. On a per-patient base, the best results in terms of diagnostic accuracy were obtained in the populations with very low and very high cardiovascular risk. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Assessment of left main coronary artery atherosclerotic burden using 64-slice CT coronary angiography: Correlation between dimensions and presence of plaques (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/24227/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-04-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: The aim of this study was to correlate left main (LM) coronary artery dimensions with the presence of atherosclerosis by multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) coronary angiography (CA) and to assess coronary atherosclerotic plaques with a semiquantitative method. Materials and methods: Sixty-two consecutive patients (41 men, mean age 60±11) with suspected coronary artery disease underwent 64-MDCT coronary angiography. LM dimensions (length, ostial and bifurcation diameters), quantitative [location, Hounsfield unit (HU) attenuation] and qualitative (composition, shape) analysis of plaques within the LM were performed. All patients underwent conventional CA. Results: Thirty patients (mean age 55±10) without plaques in the LM presented the following average dimensions: length 10.6±6.1 mm, ostial diameter 5.5±0.7 mm, bifurcation diameter 4.9±0.9 mm. LM plaques (n=36) were detected in 32 patients (mean age 64±10) with the following LM average dimensions: length 11.3±4.0 mm, ostial diameter 6.0±1.2 mm and bifurcation diameter 6.0±1.2 mm. Plaques were calcified (40%, mean attenuation 742±191 HU), mixed (43%, mean attenuation 387±94 HU) or noncalcified (17%, mean attenuation 56±14 HU) and were frequently eccentric (77%). Age was significantly different in the two groups (p&lt;0.05). LM diameters of patients with plaques were improved (p&lt;0.05). A moderate correlation was found between the LM bifurcation diameter and the corresponding plaque area (r=0.56). Significant conventional CA lesions of the LM were present in just three patients (5%). Conclusions: Increased LM diameters are associated with the presence of atherosclerosis. MDCT CA indicates relevant features of LM atherosclerotic burden, as rupture and subsequent thrombosis of vulnerable plaques may develop from lesions characterised as nonsignificant at conventional CA. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Minimally invasive autopsy: An alternative to conventional autopsy? (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/18054/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-03-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: To determine the diagnostic performance of minimally invasive autopsy (MIA) for detection of causes of death and to investigate the feasibility of MIA as an alternative to conventional autopsy (CA) in the clinical setting. Materials and Methods: The institutional review board approved the MIA procedure and study, and informed consent was obtained for all deceased patients from relatives. Thirty deceased patients (19 men, 11 women;age range, 46-79 years), for whom family permission for CA on medical grounds had already been obtained, underwent additional evaluation with MIA prior to CA. MIA consisted of whole-body 16-section computed tomography (CT) and 1.5-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, followed by ultra-sonography-guided 12-guage needle biopsy of heart, both lungs, liver, both kidneys, and spleen. Percentage agreement between MIA and CA on cause of death was evaluated. Sensitivity and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of MIA for detection of overall (major plus minor) findings, with CA as the reference standard, were calculated. Specificity was calculated for overall findings. Sensitivity analysis was performed to explore the effect of the clustered nature of the data. Results: In 23 patients (77%), MIA and CA were in agreement on the cause of death. Sensitivity of MIA for detection of overall findings and detection of major findings was 93% (95% CI: 90%, 96%) and 94% (95% CI: 87%, 97%), respectively. Specificity was 99% (95% CI: 98%, 99%) for detection of overall findings. MIA failed to demonstrate acute myocardial infarction as the cause of death in four patients. Sensitivity analysis indicated a negligible correlation between observations within each patient. CT was superior to MR for detection of pneumothorax and calcifications. MR was superior to CT for detection of brain abnormalities and pulmonary embolus. With biopsy only, detection of disease in 55 organs was possible, which included 27 major findings. Conclusion: MIA is a feasible procedure with high diagnostic performance for detection of common causes of death such as pneumonia and sepsis;MIA failed to demonstrate cardiac diseases, such as acute myocardial infarction and endocarditis, as underlying cause of death.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Prognostic value of computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: A 24-month follow-up study (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/24170/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-02-18T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The aim of this study was to determine the predictive value of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) for major cardiac events in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). A total of 187 consecutive patients (119 men, age 62.5±10.5 years) without known heart disease underwent single-source 64-slice CTCA (Somatom Sensation 64, Siemens) for clinical suspicion of CAD. Patients underwent follow-up for the occurrence of cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina and cardiac revascularization. In total, 2,822 coronary segments were assessed. Forty-two segments (1.5%) were not assessable because of insufficient image quality. Overall, CTCA revealed absence of CAD in 65 (34.7%) patients, nonobstructive CAD (coronary plaque &gt;50%) in 87 (46.5%) patients and obstructive CAD (&gt;50%) in 35 (18.8%) patients. A total of 20 major cardiac events (3 myocardial infarctions, 16 cardiac revascularizations, 1 unstable angina) occurred during a mean follow-up of 24 months. One noncardiac death occurred. Seventeen events occurred in the group of patients with obstructive CAD and three events occurred in the group of nonobstructive CAD. The event rate was 0% among patients with normal coronary arteries at CTCA. CTCA has a 100% negative predictive value for major cardiac events at 24-month follow-up in patients with normal coronary arteries. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>"Radio-lucent" and "radio-opaque" coronary stents characterized by multislice computed tomography (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/24378/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-02-06T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>A 71-year-old man was admitted with stable angina pectoris. The coronary lesion in the obtuse marginal branch was successfully treated with a BVS bioabsorbable poly-l-lactic acid everolimus-eluting coronary stent and a Cypher stent. On multislice computed tomography (MSCT) coronary angiography performed after stenting, the in-stent lumen within radio-lucent polymer struts of the BVS stent was clearly depicted. In contrast, the metallic struts of the Cypher stent hampered precise in-stent luminal evaluation due to blooming artifact. Non-metallic coronary stents composed of radio-lucent polymers might have potential advantages compared to metallic stents with respect to non-invasive MSCT imaging. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Coronary lumen segmentation using graph cuts and robust kernel regression. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/17381/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>This paper presents a novel method for segmenting the coronary lumen in CTA data. The method is based on graph cuts, with edge-weights depending on the intensity of the centerline, and robust kernel regression. A quantitative evaluation in 28 coronary arteries from 12 patients is performed by comparing the semi-automatic segmentations to manual annotations. This evaluation showed that the method was able to segment the coronary arteries with high accuracy, compared to manually annotated segmentations, which is reflected in a Dice coefficient of 0.85 and average symmetric surface distance of 0.22 mm.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Diagnostic Accuracy of 64-Slice Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography. A Prospective, Multicenter, Multivendor Study (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/29792/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-12-16T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Objectives: This study sought to determine the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomographic coronary angiography (CTCA) to detect or rule out significant coronary artery disease (CAD). Background: CTCA is emerging as a noninvasive technique to detect coronary atherosclerosis. Methods: We conducted a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study involving 360 symptomatic patients with acute and stable anginal syndromes who were between 50 and 70 years of age and were referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography (CCA) from September 2004 through June 2006. All patients underwent a nonenhanced calcium scan and a CTCA, which was compared with CCA. No patients or segments were excluded because of impaired image quality attributable to either coronary motion or calcifications. Patient-, vessel-, and segment-based sensitivities and specificities were calculated to detect or rule out significant CAD, defined as ≥50% lumen diameter reduction. Results: The prevalence among patients of having at least 1 significant stenosis was 68%. In a patient-based analysis, the sensitivity for detecting patients with significant CAD was 99% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 98% to 100%), specificity was 64% (95% CI: 55% to 73%), positive predictive value was 86% (95% CI: 82% to 90%), and negative predictive value was 97% (95% CI: 94% to 100%). In a segment-based analysis, the sensitivity was 88% (95% CI: 85% to 91%), specificity was 90% (95% CI: 89% to 92%), positive predictive value was 47% (95% CI: 44% to 51%), and negative predictive value was 99% (95% CI: 98% to 99%). Conclusions: Among patients in whom a decision had already been made to obtain CCA, 64-slice CTCA was reliable for ruling out significant CAD in patients with stable and unstable anginal syndromes. A positive 64-slice CTCA scan often overestimates the severity of atherosclerotic obstructions and requires further testing to guide patient management. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Optimal electrocardiographic pulsing windows and heart rate: Effect on image quality and radiation exposure at dual-source coronary CT angiography (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/28920/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-09-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: To determine the optimal width and timing of the electrocardiographic (ECG) pulsing window within the cardiac cycle in relation to heart rate (HR), image quality, and radiation exposure in patients who are suspected of having coronary artery disease. Materials and Methods: The institutional review board approved the study, and all patients gave informed consent. Dual-source computed tomography (CT) was performed in 301 patients (mean HR, 70.1 beats per minute ± 13.3 [standard deviation]; range, 43-112 beats per minute) by using a wide ECG pulsing window (25%-70% of the R-R interval). Data sets were reconstructed in 5% steps from 20%-75% of R-R interval. Image quality was assessed by two observers on a per-segment level and was classified as good or impaired. High-quality data sets were those in which each segment was of good quality. The width and timing of the image reconstruction window was calculated. On the basis of these findings, an optimal HR-dependent ECG pulsing protocol was designed, and the potential dose-saving effect on effective dose (in millisieverts) was calculated. Results: At low HR (≤65 beats per minute), high-quality data sets were obtained during end diastole (ED); at high HR (≥80 beats per minute), they were obtained during end systole (ES); and at intermediate HR (66-79 beats per minute), they were obtained during both ES and ED. Optimal ECG pulsing windows for low, intermediate, and high HR were at 60%-76%, 30%-77%, and 31%-47% of the R-R interval, respectively, and with these levels, the effective dose was decreased at low HR from 18.7 to 6.8 mSv, at intermediate HR from 14.7 to 13.4 mSv, and at high HR from 11.3 to 4.2 mSv. Conclusion: With optimal ECG pulsing, radiation exposure to patients, particularly those with low or high HR, can be reduced with preservation of image quality. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Comprehensive Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenoses. Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography Versus Conventional Coronary Angiography and Correlation With Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Stable Angina (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/29764/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-08-19T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Objectives: We sought to determine the diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive visual (computed tomography coronary angiography [CTCA]) and quantitative computed tomography coronary angiography (QCT) to predict the hemodynamic significance of a coronary stenosis, using intracoronary fractional flow reserve (FFR) as the reference standard. Background: It has been demonstrated that CTCA provides excellent diagnostic sensitivity for identifying coronary stenoses, but may lack accurate delineation of the hemodynamic significance. Methods: We investigated 79 patients with stable angina pectoris who underwent both 64-slice or dual-source CTCA and FFR measurement of discrete coronary stenoses. CTCA and conventional coronary angiography (CCA), and QCT and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), were performed to determine the severity of a stenosis that was compared with FFR measurements. A significant anatomical or functional stenosis was defined as ≥50% diameter stenosis or an FFR &lt;0.75. Stented segments and bypass grafts were not included in the analysis. Results: A total of 89 stenoses were evaluated of which 18% (16 of 89) had an FFR &lt;0.75. The diagnostic accuracy of CTCA, QCT, CCA, and QCA to detect a hemodynamically significant coronary lesion was 49%, 71%, 61%, and 67%, respectively. Correlation between QCT and QCA with FFR measurement was weak (R values of -0.32 and -0.30, respectively). Correlation between QCT and QCA was significant, but only moderate (R = 0.53; p &lt; 0.0001). Conclusions: The anatomical assessment of the hemodynamic significance of coronary stenoses determined by visual CTCA, CCA, or QCT or QCA does not correlate well with the functional assessment of FFR. Determining the hemodynamic significance of an angiographically intermediate stenosis remains relevant before referral for revascularization treatment. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Dual source coronary computed tomography angiography for detecting in-stent restenosis (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/30275/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-07-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Objective: To evaluate the performance of dual source CT coronary angiography (DSCT-CA) in the detection of instent restenosis (≥50% luminal narrowing) in symptomatic patients referred for conventional angiography (CA). Design/patients: 100 patients (78 males, age 62 (SD 10)) with chest pain were prospectively evaluated after coronary stenting. DSCT-CA was performed before CA. Setting: Many patients undergo coronary artery stenting; availability of a non-invasive modality to detect in-stent restenosis would be desirable. Results: Average heart rate (HR) was 67 (SD 12) (range 46-106) bpm. There were 178 stented lesions. The interval between stenting and inclusion in the study was 35 (SD 41) (range 3-140) months. 39/100 (39%) patients had angiographically proven restenosis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of DSCT-CA, calculated in all stents, were 94%, 92%, 77% and 98%, respectively. Diagnostic performance at HR &lt;70 bpm (n = 69; mean 58 bpm) was similar to that at HR ≥70 bpm (n = 31; mean 78 bpm); diagnostic performance in single stents (n = 95) was similar to that in overlapping stents and bifurcations (n = 83). In stents ≥3.5 mm (n = 78), sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV were 100%; in 3 mm stents (n = 59), sensitivity and NPV were 100%, specificity 97%, PPV 91%; in stents ≤2.75 mm (n = 41), sensitivity was 84%, specificity 64%, PPV 52%, NPV 90%. Nine stents ≤2.75 mm were uninterpretable. Specificity of DSCT-CA in stents ≥3.5 mm was significantly higher than in stents ≤2.75 mm (OR = 6.14; 99%CI: 1.52 to 9.79). Conclusion: DSCT-CA performs well in the detection of in-stent restenosis. Although DSCT-CA leads to frequent false positive findings in smaller stents (≤2.75 mm), it reliably rules out in-stent restenosis irrespective of stent size.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Papillary fibroelastoma of the aortic valve and coronary artery disease visualized by 64-slice CT (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/30497/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-06-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: A 75-year-old male with a history of myocardial infarction and recent transient ischemic attack was referred to a cardiology clinic for preoperative evaluation before a cystectomy. Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography revealed a mobile mass on the right coronary cusp of the aortic valve. Multislice CT demonstrated a significant narrowing in the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery. Investigations: Physical examination, chest radiography, laboratory testing, electrocardiography, transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography, multislice-CT coronary angiography, pathological and histological examination of the surgically excised tissue. Diagnosis: Papillary fibroelastoma of the aortic valve in conjunction with coronary artery disease. Management: Surgical excision of the mobile lesion and an end-to-side anastomosis of the left internal mammary artery to the left anterior descending coronary artery.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography by using different generations of multisection scanners: Single-center experience (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/28874/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-02-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: To retrospectively compare sensitivity and specificity of four generations of multidetector computed tomographic (CT) scanners for diagnosing significant (≥50%) coronary artery stenosis, with quantitative conventional coronary angiography as reference standard. Materials and Methods: The institutional review board approved this study. All patients consented to undergo CT studies prior to conventional coronary angiography, after they were informed of the additional radiation dose, and to the use of their data for future retrospective research. Two hundred four patients (157 men, 47 women; mean age, 58 years ± 11 [standard deviation]), classified in four groups of 51 patients each, underwent coronary CT angiography with four-section, first- and second-generation 16-section, and 64-section CT scanners. Patients in sinus rhythm scheduled for conventional coronary angiography (stable angina, atypical chest pain) were included. Patients with bypass grafts and stents were excluded. Two readers unaware of results of conventional coronary angiography evaluated CT scans. Coronary artery segments of 2 mm or larger in diameter were included for comparative evaluation with quantitative coronary angiography. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for detection of significant stenoses (≥50% luminal diameter reduction) were calculated. Results: Image quality was rated poor for the following percentages of coronary artery segments: 33.1% at four-section CT, 14.4% at first-generation 16-section CT, 6.3% at second-generation 16-section CT, and 2.6% at 64-section CT. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV, respectively, were as follows: 57%, 91%, 60%, and 90% at four-section CT; 90%, 93%, 65%, and 99% at first-generation 16-section CT; 97%, 98%, 87%, and 100% at second-generation 16-section CT; and 99%, 96%, 80%, and 100% at 64-section CT. Diagnostic performance of four-section CT was significantly poorer than that of second-generation 16-section CT (odds ratio = 4.57) and 64-section CT (odds ratio = 2.89). Conclusion: Diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography varies among scanners of different generations. Earlier-generation scanners (four sections) had significantly poorer performance; performance of 16- compared with 64-section CT scanners showed progressive, although not significant, improvement. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Addition of the long-axis information to short-axis contours reduces interstudy variability of left-ventricular analysis in cardiac magnetic resonance studies (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/28799/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>OBJECTIVES: To reduce interstudy variability using long-axis information for correcting short-axis (SA) contours at basal and apical level for left-ventricular analysis by magnetic resonance imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 20 patients with documented heart failure and 20 volunteers underwent magnetic resonance imaging examination twice for measuring endocardial end-diastolic volume, endocardial end-systolic volume, mass, and ejection fraction. The boundary of the left ventricle, the mitral valve plane, and apex were marked manually on the 2- and 4-chamber long-axis images. Automatic epicardial and endocardial contour detection was performed on the SA images using the intersection of the outlines from the long axis as starting positions. The same observer compared the interstudy variability of this method with analysis that was based on the SA images only. RESULTS: The interstudy variability decreased when information from the long axis was included; for end-systolic volume, 9.6% versus 4.7% (P = 0.00014); for end-diastolic volume, 4.9% versus 2.5% (P = 0.0011); for mass, 7.4% versus 5.0% (P = 0.11); and for ejection fraction 12.2% versus 5.6% (P = 0.0017), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Identification of the mitral valve plane and apex on long-axis images to limit the extent of volume at the base and the apex of the heart reduces interstudy variability for left-ventricular functional assessment. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy of 64-Slice Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography in Women Versus Men With Angina Pectoris (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/35105/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-11-15T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>We compared the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomographic (CT) coronary angiography to detect significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in women and men. The 64-slice CT coronary angiography was performed in 402 symptomatic patients, 123 women and 279 men, with CAD prevalence of 51% and 68%, respectively. Significant CAD, defined as ≥50% coronary stenosis on quantitative coronary angiography, was evaluated on a patient, vessel, and segment level. The sensitivity and negative predictive value to detect significant CAD was very good, both for women and men (100% vs 99%, p = NS; 100% vs 98%, p = NS), whereas diagnostic accuracy (88% vs 96%; p &lt;0.01), specificity (75% vs 90%, p &lt;0.05), and positive predictive value (81% vs 95%, p &lt;0.001) were lower in women. The per-segment analysis demonstrated lower sensitivity in women compared with men (82% vs 93%, p &lt;0.001). The sensitivity in women did not show a difference in proximal and midsegments, but was significantly lower in distal segments (56% vs 85%, p &lt;0.05) and side branches (54% vs 89%, p &lt;0.001). In conclusion, CT coronary angiography reliably rules out the presence of obstructive CAD in both men and women. Specificity and positive predictive value of CT coronary angiography were lower in women. The sensitivity to detect stenosis in small coronary branches was lower in women compared with men. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>64-Slice CT coronary angiography in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/36759/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-11-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: A high diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice CT coronary angiography (CTCA) has been reported in selected patients with stable angina pectoris, but only scant information is available in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Objectives: To study the diagnostic performance of 64-slice CTCA in patients with non-ST elevation ACS. Patients and methods: 64-slice CTCA was performed in 104 patients (mean (SD) age 59 (9) years) with non-ST elevation ACS. Two independent, blinded observers assessed all coronary arteries for stenosis, using conventional quantitative angiography as a reference. Coronary lesions with ≥50% luminal narrowing were classified as significant. Results: Conventional coronary angiography demonstrated the absence of significant disease in 15% (16/104) of patients, and the presence of single-vessel disease in 40% (42/104) and multivessel disease in 44% (46/104) of patients. Sensitivity for detecting significant coronary stenoses on a patient-by-patient analysis was 100% (88/88; 95% CI 95 to 100), specificity 75% (12/16; 95% CI 47 to 92), and positive and negative predictive values were 96% (88/92; 95% CI 89 to 99) and 100% (12/12; 95% CI 70 to 100), respectively. Conclusion: 64-slice CTCA has a high sensitivity to detect significant coronary stenoses, and is reliable to exclude the presence of significant coronary artery disease in patients who present with a non-ST elevation ACS.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>64-Slice Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography in Patients With High, Intermediate, or Low Pretest Probability of Significant Coronary Artery Disease (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/36173/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-10-09T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Objectives: We assessed the usefulness of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) to detect or rule out coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with various estimated pretest probabilities of CAD. Background: The pretest probability of the presence of CAD may impact the diagnostic performance of CTCA. Methods: Sixty-four-slice CTCA (Sensation 64, Siemens, Forchheim, Germany) was performed in 254 symptomatic patients. Patients with heart rates ≥65 beats/min received beta-blockers before CTCA. The pretest probability for significant CAD was estimated by type of chest discomfort, age, gender, and traditional risk factors and defined as high (≥71%), intermediate (31% to 70%), and low (≤30%). Significant CAD was defined as the presence of at least 1 ≥50% coronary stenosis on quantitative coronary angiography, which was the standard of reference. No coronary segments were excluded from analysis. Results: The estimated pretest probability of CAD in the high (n = 105), intermediate (n = 83), and low (n = 66) groups was 87%, 53%, and 13%, respectively. The diagnostic performance of the computed tomography (CT) scan was different in the 3 subgroups. The estimated post-test probability of the presence of significant CAD after a negative CT scan was 17%, 0%, and 0% and after a positive CT scan was 96%, 88%, and 68%, respectively. Conclusions: Computed tomography coronary angiography is useful in symptomatic patients with a low or intermediate estimated pretest probability of having significant CAD, and a negative CT scan reliably rules out the presence of significant CAD. Computed tomography coronary angiography does not provide additional relevant diagnostic information in symptomatic patients with a high estimated pretest probability of CAD. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Spiral multislice computed tomography coronary angiography: A current status report (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/35743/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-09-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Multislice computed tomography coronary angiography (MSCT-CA) has emerged as a powerful noninvasive diagnostic modality to visualize the coronary arteries and to detect significant coronary stenoses. The latest generation 64-slice computed tomography (CT) scanners is a robust technique which allows high-resolution, isotropic, nearly motion-free coronary imaging. Coronary stenoses are detected with high sensitivity and a normal scan accurately rules out the presence of a coronary stenosis. With the introduction of further novel concepts in CT-technology one may expect that MSCT-CA will become a clinically used diagnostic tool. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Reliable High-Speed Coronary Computed Tomography in Symptomatic Patients (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/36187/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-08-21T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Objectives: Our objective was to prospectively evaluate the diagnostic performance of the high-speed dual-source computed tomography scanner (DSCT), with an increased temporal resolution (83 ms), for the detection of significant coronary lesions (≥50% lumen diameter reduction) in a clinically wide range of patients. Background: Cardiac motion artifacts may decrease coronary image quality with use of earlier computed tomography scanners that have a limited temporal resolution. Methods: We prospectively studied 100 symptomatic patients (79 men, 21 women, mean age 61 ± 11 years) with atypical (18%) or typical (55%) angina pectoris, or unstable coronary artery disease (27%) scheduled for conventional coronary angiography. Mean scan time was 8.58 ± 1.52 s. Mean heart rate was 68 ± 11 beats/min. Quantitative coronary angiography was used as the standard of reference. Irrespective of image quality or vessel size, all segments were included for analysis. Results: Invasive coronary angiography demonstrated no significant disease in 23%, single-vessel disease in 31%, and multivessel disease in 46% of patients; 1,489 coronary segments, containing 220 significant (14.8%) stenoses, were available for analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of DSCT coronary angiography for the detection of significant lesions on a segment-by-segment analysis were 95% (95% confidence interval [CI] 90 to 97), 95% (95% CI 93 to 96), 75% (95% CI 69 to 80), 99% (95% CI 98 to 99), respectively, and on a patient-based analysis 99% (95% CI 92 to 100), 87% (95% CI 65 to 97), 96% (95% CI 89 to 99), and 95% (95% CI 74 to 100), respectively. Conclusions: Noninvasive DSCT coronary angiography is highly sensitive to detect and to reliably rule out the presence of a significant coronary stenosis in patients presenting with atypical or typical angina pectoris, or unstable coronary artery disease. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Detection and characterization of coronary bifurcation lesions with 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/35756/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-08-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Aims: To compare the performance of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in the detection and classification (according to the Medina system) of bifurcation lesions (BLs). Methods and results: We studied 323 consecutive patients undergoing 64-slice CTCA prior to ICA. All coronary segments ≥2 mm in diameter were evaluated for the presence of a significant (≥50% diameter reduction on quantitative coronary angiography) BL. Evaluation of BL by CTCA included the assessment of significant lumen obstruction in both main and side branch vessels. Forty-one out of 43 patients (46/48 lesions) with significant BL were identified by CTCA. Excluding coronary segments with non-diagnostic image quality (5%), the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of CTCA for detecting significant BL were 96, 99, and 85 and 99%, respectively. In 39 of these 41 patients, CTCA assessment was concordant with the Medina lesion classification on ICA. Conclusion: Sixty-four-slice CTCA allows accurate assessment of complex BL. </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>