<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Makinwa, A.O.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/20621/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Private Remedies for Corruption: towards an international framework (Doctoral Thesis)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/37261/</link>
      <pubDate>2012-09-20T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>There is a shift taking place in the fight against corruption. Increasingly
attention is turning to the role of the private actor.2 This can be characterized as
a shift from a public approach that sees the state and government as the
primary driving force in the fight against corruption to an approach that sees
private processes and actors playing an equally important role. This begs the
question: what is a private approach? What is its motivation, content, or
method? How does a private approach interrelate with the public approach?
This book on private remedies for corruption is a response to these questions
from the perspective of private law.3 This chapter introduces the research
question, the research method and the relevance of this research.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Researching Civil Remedies for International Corruption: The Choice of the Functional Comparative Method (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/17125/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-11-02T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>This paper motivates the choice of the functional comparative method to research the issue 
of civil remedies for international corruption. It shows how the social, economic and political 
factors that have shaped the normative context of the research question point to the functional 
comparative method as an appropriate methodology. The paper suggests that this method of 
legal research is able to meet the challenges inherent in the cross-cultural analysis required in 
the case of issues with an international dimension. The paper also argues that the use of the 
functional comparative method provides a perspective on the larger issue of rule making in a 
globalised world, by providing an element of predictability in the search for ‘common rules’ 
of interaction. Furthermore, the functional comparison of responses of legal systems to the 
question of civil remedies for international corruption provides a window on the possibilities 
that exist for legal reform and development.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>