<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Haase-Kromwijk, B.J.J.M.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/20668/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>The optimal chain length for kidney paired exchanges: An analysis of the Dutch program (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/21236/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-11-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Living donor kidney exchange programs offer incompatible donor-recipient pairs the opportunity to be transplanted. To increase the number of these transplants, we examined in our actual donor-recipient couples how to reach the maximum number of matches by using different chain lengths. We performed 20 match procedures in which we constructed four different chain lengths: two, up to three, up to four and unlimited. The actual inflow and outflow of donor-recipient couples for each run were taken into consideration in this analysis. The total number of matched pairs increased from 148 pairs for only two-way exchanges to 168 for three-way exchanges. When a chain length of 4 was allowed five extra couples could be matched over a period of 5 years. Unlimited chain length did not significantly affect the results. The optimal chain length for living donor kidney exchange programs is 3. Longer chains with their inherent logistic burden do not lead to significantly more transplants.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>A plea for uniform European definitions for organ donor potential and family refusal rates (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/17905/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-11-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Conversion of potential organ donors to actual donors is negatively influenced by family refusals. Refusal rates differ strongly among countries. Is it possible to compare refusal rates in order to be able to learn from countries with the best practices? We searched in the literature for reviews of donor potential and refusal rates for organ donation in intensive care units. We found 14 articles pertinent to this study. There is an enormous diversity among the performed studies. The definitions of potential organ donors and family refusal differed substantially. We tried to re-calculate the refusal rates. This method failed because of the influence caused by the registered will on donation in the Donor Register. We therefore calculated the total refusal rate. This strategy was also less satisfactory considering possible influence of the legal consent system on the approach of family. Because of lack of uniform definitions, we can conclude that the refusal rates for organ donation can not be used for a sound comparison among countries. To be able to learn from well-performing countries, it is necessary to establish uniform definitions regarding organ donation and registration of all intensive care deaths.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Regional kidney allocation based only on full hla-dr compatibility is not feasible (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/27158/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-08-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Hurdles, barriers, and successes of a national living donor kidney exchange program (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/28954/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-12-27T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND.: Living donor kidney exchange is now performed in several countries. However, no information is available on the practical problems inherent to these programs. Here, we describe our experiences with 276 couples enrolled in the Dutch program. METHODS.: Our protocol consists of five steps: registration, computerized matching, crossmatching, donor acceptation, and transplantation. We prospectively collected data of each step of the procedure. RESULTS.: Of the 276 registered pairs we created 183 computer-matched combinations. However, 62 of 183 recipients proved to have a positive crossmatch with their new donor, which was not predicted by the screening results of the recipient centers. Alternative solutions were found for 39 couples, resulting in a total of 160 new combinations with negative crossmatches. Thereafter, because of 22 individual clinical problems, the exchange procedure had to be discontinued for 51 couples while only for 19 of them alternative solutions were found. At the end of day, 128 patients had received exchange kidneys, 55 were transplanted outside the program, 59 are still on the crossover waitlist, and 34 had left the program for medical or psychological reasons. CONCLUSION.: A living donor kidney exchange program is a dynamic process. Many clinical hurdles and barriers are encountered that for a large part were not foreseen but should be taken into account when programs are initiated based on computer simulations. Success is dependent on a flexible organization able to create alternative solutions when problems arise. Centralized allocation and crossmatch procedures are instrumental in this respect.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>A flexible national living donor kidney exchange program taking advantage of a central histocompatibility laboratory: the Dutch model. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/17705/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The shortage of deceased donor kidneys for transplantation has resulted in the expansion of living donation programs. A number of possibilities have been explored, since it became clear that donors do not need to be genetically related to their recipients. Apart from classical direct donation, other options such as paired exchange, list exchange, altruistic donation and domino paired exchange programs have been implemented. In the Netherlands, patients who cannot be transplanted with their potential living donor because of ABO blood group incompatibility or a positive crossmatch, have the option to participate in a national paired kidney exchange program. The practical issues related to this program are described. The 5-years experience with the Dutch kidney exchange program is very positive as, so far, 42% of the recipients included have been transplanted. Recommendations are given for a successful implementation of a common kidney exchange program of different transplantation centers focusing on the advantage of a central histocompatibility laboratory.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>