<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Gore, J.M.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/210/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Effects of stroke on medical resource use and costs in acute myocardial infarction. GUSTO I Investigators. Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries Study (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9003/</link>
      <pubDate>1999-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Stroke occurs concurrently with myocardial infarction (MI) in
      approximately 30 000 US patients each year. This number is expected to
      rise with the increasing use of thrombolytic therapy for MI. However, no
      data exist for the economic effect of stroke in the setting of acute MI
      (AMI). The purpose of this prospective study was to assess the effect of
      stroke on medical resource use and costs in AMI patients in the United
      States. METHODS AND RESULTS: Medical resource use and cost data were
      prospectively collected for 2566 randomly selected US GUSTO I patients
      (from 23 105 patients) and for the 321 US GUSTO I patients who developed
      non-bypass surgery-related stroke during the baseline hospitalization.
      Follow-up was for 1 year. All costs are expressed in 1993 US dollars.
      During the baseline hospitalization, stroke was associated with a
      reduction in cardiac procedure rates and an increase in length of stay,
      despite a hospital mortality rate of 37%. Together with stroke-related
      procedural costs of $2220 per patient, the baseline medical costs
      increased by 44% ($29 242 versus $20 301, P&lt;0.0001). Follow-up medical
      costs were substantially higher for stroke survivors ($22 400 versus
      $5282, P&lt;0.0001), dominated by the cost of institutional care. The main
      determinant for institutional care was discharge disability status. The
      cumulative 1-year medical costs for stroke patients were $15 092 higher
      than for no-stroke patients. Hemorrhagic stroke patients had a much higher
      hospital mortality rate than non-hemorrhagic stroke patients (53% versus
      15%, P&lt;0.001), which was associated with approximately $7200 lower mean
      baseline hospitalization cost. At discharge, hemorrhagic stroke patients
      were more likely to be disabled (68% versus 46%, P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In
      this first large prospective economic study of stroke in AMI patients, we
      found that strokes were associated with a 60% ($15 092) increase in
      cumulative 1-year medical costs. Baseline hospitalization costs were 44%
      higher because of longer mean lengths of stay. Stroke type was a key
      determinant of baseline cost. Follow-up costs were more than quadrupled
      for stroke survivors because of the need for institutional care.
      Disability level was the main determinant of institutional care and thus
      of follow-up costs.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Prediction of 30-Day Mortality Among Patients With Thrombolysis-Related Intracranial Hemorrhagic (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/5748/</link>
      <pubDate>1998-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background—Limited information exists on risk factors for mortality after thrombolysis-related intracranial hemorrhage. We wished to determine the characteristics associated with 30-day mortality after thrombolysis-related intracranial hemorrhage.

Methods and Results—We performed an observational analysis within a randomized trial of 4 thrombolytic therapies, conducted in 1081 hospitals in 15 countries. Patients presented with ST-segment elevation within 6 hours of symptom onset. Our population was composed of the 268 patients who had primary intracranial hemorrhage after thrombolysis. With univariable and multivariable analyses, we identified clinical and brain imaging characteristics that would predict 30-day mortality among these patients. CT or MRI were available for 240 patients (90%). The 30-day mortality rate was 59.7%. Glasgow Coma Scale score, age, time from thrombolysis to symptoms of intracranial hemorrhage, hydrocephalus, herniation, mass effect, intraventricular extension, and volume and location of intracranial hemorrhage were significant univariable predictors. Multivariable analysis of 170 patients with complete data, 98 of whom died, identified the following independent, significant predictors: Glasgow Coma Scale score (2, 19.3; P&lt;0.001), time from thrombolysis to intracranial hemorrhage (2, 15.8; P&lt;0.001), volume of intracranial hemorrhage (2, 11.6; P&lt;0.001), and baseline clinical predictors of mortality in the overall GUSTO-I trial (2, 10.3; P=0.001). The final model had a C-index of 0.931.

Conclusions—This model provides excellent discrimination between patients who are likely to live and those who are likely to die after thrombolytic-related intracranial hemorrhage; this may aid in making decisions about the appropriate level of care for such patients.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Risk Factors for In-hospital Nonhemorrhagic Stroke in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated With Thrombolysis: Results from GUSTO-I (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8789/</link>
      <pubDate>1998-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Nonhemorrhagic stroke occurs in 0.1% to 1.3% of patients with
      acute myocardial infarction who are treated with thrombolysis, with
      substantial associated mortality and morbidity. Little is known about the
      risk factors for its occurrence. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied the 247
      patients with nonhemorrhagic stroke who were randomly assigned to one of
      four thrombolytic regimens within 6 hours of symptom onset in the GUSTO-I
      trial. We assessed the univariable and multivariable baseline risk factors
      for nonhemorrhagic stroke and created a scoring nomogram from the baseline
      multivariable modeling. We used time-dependent Cox modeling to determine
      multivariable in-hospital predictors of nonhemorrhagic stroke. Baseline
      and in-hospital predictors were then combined to determine the overall
      predictors of nonhemorrhagic stroke. Of the 247 patients, 42 (17%) died
      and another 98 (40%) were disabled by 30-day follow-up. Older age was the
      most important baseline clinical predictor of nonhemorrhagic stroke,
      followed by higher heart rate, history of stroke or transient ischemic
      attack, diabetes, previous angina, and history of hypertension. These
      factors remained statistically significant predictors in the combined
      model, along with worse Killip class, coronary angiography, bypass
      surgery, and atrial fibrillation/flutter. CONCLUSIONS: Nonhemorrhagic
      stroke is a serious event in patients with acute myocardial infarction who
      are treated with thrombolytic, antithrombin, and antiplatelet therapy. We
      developed a simple nomogram that can predict the risk of nonhemorrhagic
      stroke on the basis of baseline clinical characteristics. Prophylactic
      anticoagulation may be an important treatment strategy for patients with
      high probability for nonhemorrhagic stroke, but further study is needed.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Incidence and predictors of bleeding after contemporary thrombolytic therapy for myocardial infarction (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/5553/</link>
      <pubDate>1997-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Although the benefit of thrombolytic therapy in reducing mortality in acute myocardial infarction is well established, the types of bleeding and risk factors for bleeding are less well described in large trials. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed the baseline characteristics, outcomes, and incidence of bleeding by location, severity, and treatment assignment among 41,021 patients in the GUSTO-I trial of thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction. Of the 40,903 patients for whom there were complete data, 1.2% suffered severe bleeding and 11.4% experienced moderate hemorrhage at a variety of sites. The most common sources of bleeding were procedure related. The thrombolytic regimen was strongly related to the incidence of bleeding; comparatively more bleeding was seen with the therapies of streptokinase plus intravenous heparin and the streptokinase and tissue plasminogen activator plus intravenous heparin combination. In multivariate analysis, the four most powerful independent predictors of hemorrhage were older age, lighter body weight, female sex, and African ancestry; they remained the most important predictors of bleeding when multivariate analysis was performed on patients who did not undergo invasive procedures. The presence of serious hemorrhage was associated with other undesirable outcomes (recurrent events, left ventricular dysfunction, arrhythmia, or stroke). CONCLUSIONS: Important predictors of bleeding in this population are increased age, lighter weight, female sex, African ancestry, and experiencing invasive procedures. Other nonhemorrhagic adverse clinical outcomes were associated with moderate and severe bleeding, which was in turn associated with increased length of hospital stay and mortality at 30 days.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/5468/</link>
      <pubDate>1993-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: The relative efficacy of streptokinase and tissue plasminogen activator and the roles of intravenous as compared with subcutaneous heparin as adjunctive therapy in acute myocardial infarction are unresolved questions. The current trial was designed to compare new, aggressive thrombolytic strategies with standard thrombolytic regimens in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. Our hypothesis was that newer thrombolytic strategies that produce earlier and sustained reperfusion would improve survival. METHODS: In 15 countries and 1081 hospitals, 41,021 patients with evolving myocardial infarction were randomly assigned to four different thrombolytic strategies, consisting of the use of streptokinase and subcutaneous heparin, streptokinase and intravenous heparin, accelerated tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) and intravenous heparin, or a combination of streptokinase plus t-PA with intravenous heparin. ("Accelerated" refers to the administration of t-PA over a period of 1 1/2 hours--with two thirds of the dose given in the first 30 minutes--rather than the conventional period of 3 hours.) The primary end point was 30-day mortality. RESULTS: The mortality rates in the four treatment groups were as follows: streptokinase and subcutaneous heparin, 7.2 percent; streptokinase and intravenous heparin, 7.4 percent; accelerated t-PA and intravenous heparin, 6.3 percent, and the combination of both thrombolytic agents with intravenous heparin, 7.0 percent. This represented a 14 percent reduction (95 percent confidence interval, 5.9 to 21.3 percent) in mortality for accelerated t-PA as compared with the two streptokinase-only strategies (P = 0.001). The rates of hemorrhagic stroke were 0.49 percent, 0.54 percent, 0.72 percent, and 0.94 percent in the four groups, respectively, which represented a significant excess of hemorrhagic strokes for accelerated t-PA (P = 0.03) and for the combination strategy (P &lt; 0.001), as compared with streptokinase only. A combined end point of death or disabling stroke was significantly lower in the accelerated-tPA group than in the streptokinase-only groups (6.9 percent vs. 7.8 percent, P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this large-scale trial indicate that accelerated t-PA given with intravenous heparin provides a survival benefit over previous standard thrombolytic regimens</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>