<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Baden-Fuller, C.W.F.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/2129/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Strategic renewal in the Dutch financial services sector: Renewal Trajectories from a Competence-based Perspective. (In Book)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/10934/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>How do large well-established firms renew themselves in an increasing
turbulent environment? Is there a generic pattern of change or is each
change journey rather idiosyncratic? We posed five questions about the
nature of renewal patterns. First, how do firms combine external versus
internal initiatives in a trajectory of strategic renewal? Second, how does
the balance of competence building and competence leveraging evolve in
a trajectory of strategic renewal? Third, what are the sequences of action
in a strategic renewal process? Fourth, do firms differ regarding speed
of their renewal processes? Finally, do different strategic renewal trajectories give rise to different or similar outcomes? Using a simple
framework and new metrics we described and analyzed the strategic renewal
journeys of the five largest financial service firms in the Netherlands
during the period 1990–1997. We found equifinality in viable trajectories
of strategic renewal. In four out of five firms, they result in similar outcomes
due to mimetic behavior. Nonetheless, one firm showed deviant
strategic behavior.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Investigating Strategic Renewal of Five Large Dutch Financial Services Firms (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/1347/</link>
      <pubDate>2004-06-29T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>How do large well-established firms renew themselves in an increasing turbulent environment? Is there a generic pattern of change or is each change journey rather idiosyncratic? We posed five questions about the nature of renewal patterns. First, how do firms combine external versus internal initiatives in a trajectory of strategic renewal? Second, how does the balance of competence building and competence leveraging evolve in a trajectory of strategic renewal? Third, what are the sequences of action in a strategic renewal process?  Fourth, do firms differ regarding speed of their renewal processes? Finally, do different strategic renewal trajectories give rise to different of similar outcomes? Using a simple framework and new metrics we described and analyzed the strategic renewal journeys of the five largest financial service firms in the Netherlands during the period 1990-1997. We found equifinality in viable trajectories of strategic renewal. In four out of five firms, they result in similar outcomes due to mimetic behaviour. Nonetheless, one firm showed deviant strategic behaviour.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Roland Colari (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/10967/</link>
      <pubDate>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Roland Calori received his Ph.D. from the University of Aix en Provence in 1983 and
joined EM Lyon later that same year, where he soon became department head. Later,
as the director of research he helped transform that school into one of France’s top
schools of commerce. Roland co-authored 5 books and was involved in the writing of
over 50 journal articles. He organized the 2001 EGOS colloquium in Lyon and was
preparing to assume the editor-in-chief responsibilities of Organization Studies in 2003.
Roland was also known for his active interest in companies and for the help he gave
to executives in consulting and training sessions. Roland was also a tremendous
supporter of LRP.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Coevolution of Firm Capabilities and Industry Competition (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/126/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-11-02T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>This paper proposes that rival firms not only search for new capabilities within their organization, but also for those that rest in their competitive environment. An integrated analysis of these search processes at both firm and industry levels of analysis shows how their interaction makes industries and firms coevolve over time. To contribute to an enhanced understanding of the concept of coevolution, a dynamic and integrative framework crossing meso and micro levels of analysis is constructed. This framework is applied to a longitudinal study of the music industry with a time-span of 120 years. The first part, a historical study, covers the period 1877 - 1990. The second part, a multiple-case study, covers the period 1990 - 1997. We conclude that search behavior drives coevolution through competitive dynamics among new entrants and incumbent firms and manifests itself in the simultaneous emergence of new business models and new organizational forms.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Coevolution of Firm Capabilities and Industry Competition: Investigating the Music Industry 1877-1997 (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/6469/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-11-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>This paper proposes that rival firms not only search for new capabilities within their organization, but also for those that rest in their competitive environment. An integrated analysis of these search processes at both firm and industry levels of analysis shows how their interaction makes industries and firms co-evolve over time. To contribute to an enhanced understanding of the concept of co-evolution, a dynamic and integrative framework crossing meso and micro levels of analysis is constructed. This framework is applied to a longitudinal study of the music industry with a time-span of 120 years. The first part, a historical study, covers the period 1877-1990. The second part, a multiple-case study, covers the period 1990-1997. We conclude that search behavior drives co-evolution through competitive dynamics among new entrants and incumbent firms and manifests itself in the simultaneous emergence of new business models and new organizational forms.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Mastering Strategic Renewal: Mobilizing Renewal Journeys in Multi-unit Firms (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/6463/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-04-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>How do large multi-unit firms in a deconstructing world reconcile the conflicting forces of profits for today and flexibility to adapt for tomorrow? Profits for today requires order, control, and stability: adaptation for tomorrow requires flexibility and creativity in the value-added system. Large firms in many industries are confronted with this challenge of exploration and exploitation. In the European financial services industries these conflicting tendencies are increasingly obvious. Existing large financial players seem well placed to exploit the present but ill suited to adapt to the future. Why is this so, and what can be done about it? We consider the mechanisms of selection, adaptation and co-evolution that take place between levels within the firm and between the firm and its environment, and from this identify four ideal kinds of strategic renewal journeys that organisations can adopt as a way of coping with increasing environmental pressures. We label these journeys: emergent, directed, facilitated, and transformational. We show how these ideal types represent different options for top, middle and front-line managers, and we identify how each type differs in its capacity to cope with the changing environment. We illustrate our renewal journeys with examples from Dutch (ING and Rabobank) and British financials (Barclays, Lloyds and Prudential) and other organisations such as GE, IBM, Intel, Novotel and Philips. We suggest that for mobilising renewal in well-established financial institutions—once protected but now exposed to the winds of change—managers have to recognise that many of the current journeys are unsuitable for the future.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Vaart houden in het strategisch proces (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/11038/</link>
      <pubDate>1997-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Hoe behoudt het bestuur van een grote complexe organisatie vaart in het bedenken en uitvoeren van strategische veranderingen? Dat is geen gemakkelijke opgave als er geen aanwijsbare dreigingen van buitenaf zijn en er geen duidelijke aanleiding is om algemene strategische maatregelen te nemen. De auteurs onderzoeken de inherente spanningen tussen stabiliteit en verandering. Verandering is noodzakelijk, wil men op langere termijn succes boeken, maar te veel verandering is desastreus. Volgens de auteurs zijn er verscheidene mogelijke oplossingen voor deze paradox. Een daarvan is het genereren van uiterst actieve perioden, gevolgd door relatief stabiele perioden en perioden waarin de vooruitgang gestaag verloopt. Aan de hand van de bezinningen van een bestuursvoorzitter van Unilever - die deze functie van 1984 tot 1994 uitoefende - onderzoeken de auteurs hoe men met deze spanningen omgaat en een oplossing zoekt.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Strategic Renewal: How Large Complex Organizatons Prepare for the Future (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/6398/</link>
      <pubDate>1997-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Strategic Renewal in Large Complex Organizations: A Competence Based View (In Book)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/6439/</link>
      <pubDate>1997-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Maintaining strategic momentum (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/11045/</link>
      <pubDate>1996-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The question of how the CEO of a large complex organization maintain strategic momentum is addressed. This represents a great challenge when there are no obvious external threats, and no obvious reasons for having a concerted action. The inherent tensions which exist between stability and change are explored. Change is necessary to maintain success, but too much change is disastrous. It is argued that there are several possible solutions to this paradox, including that of generating periods of intense activity followed by periods of comparative stability and incremental improvement. The introspection of one of the CEOs of Unilever is used to show how these tensions were played out and resolved.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Strategische vernieuwing vanuit een evolutionair perspectief: vier dynamische mechanismen (In Book)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/6444/</link>
      <pubDate>1995-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>