<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Poel-van de Luytgaarde, S.C.P.A.M. van der</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/21727/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Prognostic impact, concurrent genetic mutations, and gene expression features of AML with CEBPA mutations in a cohort of 1182 cytogenetically normal AML patients: Further evidence for CEBPA double mutant AML as a distinctive disease entity (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/33529/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-02-24T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>We evaluated concurrent gene mutations, clinical outcome, and gene expression signatures of CCAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha (CEBPA) double mutations (CEBPAdm) versus single mutations (CEBPAsm) in 1182 cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients (16-60 years of age). We identified 151 (12.8%) patients with CEBPA mutations (91 CEBPAdmand 60 CEBPAsm). The incidence of germline mutations was 7% (5 of 71), including 3 C-terminal mutations. CEBPAdmpatients had a lower frequency of concurrent mutations than CEBPAsmpatients (P &lt; .0001). Both, groups were associated with a favorable outcome compared with CEBPAwt(5-year overall survival [OS] 63% and 56% vs 39%; P &lt; .0001 and P = .05, respectively). However, in multivariable analysis only CEBPAdmwas a prognostic factor for favorable OS outcome (hazard ratio [HR] 0.36, P &lt; .0001; event-free survival, HR 0.41, P &lt; .0001; relapse-free survival, HR 0.55, P = .001). Outcome in CEBPAsmis dominated by concurrent NPM1 and/or FLT3 internal tandem duplication mutations. Unsupervised and supervised GEP analyses showed that CEBPAdmAML (n = 42), but not CEBPAsmAML (n = 18), expressed a unique gene signature. A 25-probe set prediction signature for CEBPAdmAML showed 100% sensitivity and specificity. Based on these findings, we propose that CEBPAdmshould be clearly defined from CEBPAsmAML and considered as a separate entity in the classification of AML. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Rapid complete cytogenetic remission after upfront dasatinib monotherapy in a patient with a NUP214-ABL1-positive T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Letter To Editor)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/18112/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>High EVI1 expression predicts poor survival in acute myeloid leukemia: a study of 319 de novo AML patients (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8228/</link>
      <pubDate>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The proto-oncogene EVI1 encodes a DNA binding protein and is located on
      chromosome 3q26. The gene is aberrantly expressed in acute myeloid
      leukemia (AML) patients carrying 3q26 abnormalities. Two mRNAs are
      transcribed from this locus: EVI1 and a fusion of EVI1 with MDS1
      (MDS1-EVI1), a gene located 5' of EVI1. The purpose of this study was to
      investigate which of the 2 gene products is involved in transformation in
      human AML. To discriminate between EVI1 and MDS1-EVI1 transcripts,
      distinct real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays
      were developed. Patients with 3q26 abnormalities often showed high EVI1
      and MDS1-EVI1 expression. In a cohort of 319 AML patients, 4 subgroups
      could be distinguished: EVI1(+) and MDS1-EVI1(-) (6 patients; group I),
      EVI1(+) and MDS1-EVI1(+) (26 patients; group II), EVI1(-) and MDS1-EVI1(+)
      (12 patients; group III), and EVI1(-) and MDS1-EVI1(-) (275 patients;
      group IV). The only 4 patients with a 3q26 aberration belonged to groups I
      and II. Interestingly, high EVI1 and not MDS1-EVI1 expression was
      associated with unfavorable karyotypes (eg, -7/7q-) or complex karyotypes.
      Moreover, a significant correlation was observed between EVI1 expression
      and 11q23 aberrations (mixed lineage leukemia [MLL] gene involvement).
      Patients from groups I and II had significantly shorter overall and
      event-free survival than patients in groups III and IV. Our data
      demonstrate that high EVI1 expression is an independent poor prognostic
      marker within the intermediate- risk karyotypic group.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>