http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/2175/ List of Publications en http://repub.eur.nl/static-eur/img/logo.png http://repub.eur.nl http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9953/ 2002-01-01T00:00:00Z BACKGROUND: Several studies have suggested that epinephrine augments the release of norepinephrine from sympathetic nerve terminals through stimulation of presynaptic receptors, but evidence pertaining to this mechanism in the heart is scarce and conflicting. Using the microdialysis technique in the porcine heart, we investigated whether epinephrine, taken up by and released from cardiac sympathetic nerves, can increase norepinephrine concentrations in myocardial interstitial fluid (NE(MIF)) under basal conditions and during sympathetic activation. METHODS AND RESULTS: During intracoronary epinephrine infusion of 10, 50, and 100 ng/kg per minute under basal conditions, large increments in interstitial (from 0.31+/-0.05 up to 140+/-30 nmol/L) and coronary venous (from 0.16+/-0.08 up to 228+/-39 nmol/L) epinephrine concentrations were found, but NE(MIF) did not change. Left stellate ganglion stimulation increased NE(MIF) from 3.4+/-0.5 to 8.2+/-1.5 nmol/L, but again, this increase was not enhanced by concomitant intracoronary epinephrine infusion. Intracoronary infusion of tyramine resulted in a negligible increase in epinephrine concentration in myocardial interstitial fluid (EPI(MIF)), whereas 30 minutes after infusion of epinephrine an increase of 9.5 nmol/L in EPI(MIF) was observed, indicating that epinephrine is taken up by and released from cardiac sympathetic neurons. Although 68% to 78% of infused epinephrine was extracted over the heart, the ratio of interstitial to arterial epinephrine concentrations was only approximately 20%, increasing to 29% with neuronal reuptake inhibition. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate epinephrine release from cardiac sympathetic neurons, but they do not provide evidence that epinephrine augments cardiac sympathoneural norepinephrine release under basal conditions or during sympathetic activation. http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9991/ 2002-01-01T00:00:00Z Studies on the effect of angiotensin II on norepinephrine release from sympathetic nerve terminals through stimulation of presynaptic angiotensin II type 1 receptors are equivocal. Furthermore, evidence that angiotensin II activates the cardiac sympathetic nervous system in vivo is scarce or indirect. In the intact porcine heart, we investigated whether angiotensin II increases norepinephrine concentrations in the myocardial interstitial fluid (NE(MIF)) under basal conditions and during sympathetic activation and whether it enhances exocytotic and nonexocytotic ischemia-induced norepinephrine release. In 27 anesthetized pigs, NE(MIF) was measured in the left ventricular myocardium using the microdialysis technique. Local infusion of angiotensin II into the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) at consecutive rates of 0.05, 0.5, and 5 ng/kg per minute did not affect NE(MIF), LAD flow, left ventricular dP/dt(max), and arterial pressure despite large increments in coronary arterial and venous angiotensin II concentrations. In the presence of neuronal reuptake inhibition and alpha-adrenergic receptor blockade, left stellate ganglion stimulation increased NE(MIF) from 2.7+/-0.3 to 7.3+/-1.2 before, and from 2.3+/-0.4 to 6.9+/-1.3 nmol/L during, infusion of 0.5 ng/kg per minute angiotensin II. Sixty minutes of 70% LAD flow reduction caused a progressive increase in NE(MIF) from 0.9+/-0.1 to 16+/-6 nmol/L, which was not enhanced by concomitant infusion of 0.5 ng/kg per minute angiotensin II. In conclusion, we did not observe any facilitation of cardiac norepinephrine release by angiotensin II under basal conditions and during either physiological (ganglion stimulation) or pathophysiological (acute ischemia) sympathetic activation. Hence, angiotensin II is not a local mediator of cardiac sympathetic activity in the in vivo porcine heart. http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/23634/ 2001-12-19T00:00:00Z For years sympathetic activity in man and experimental animals has been assessed by measuring circulating catecholamines. As their plasma concentration is not only determined by sympathetic activity but also by spillover and clearance, it is only useful as a screening tool for gross disturbances in general sympathetic tone. The isotope dilution method uses tritiated norepinephrine to differentiate between norepinephrine release into and its removal from the circulation. This technique is not only more precise but can also be applied for the assessment of regional sympathetic tone. Alternatively, local sympathetic activity can be monitored by microneurography, i.e. measuring the electrical activity of postganglionic sympathetic efferents. However, due to its invasive nature, microneurography in humans is restricted to monitoring sympathetic control of skin and muscle vasculature. Microdialysis is a new technique that can monitor local sympathetic act!Vlty almost continuously by measuring interstitial norepinephrine concentrations. The technique is based on the diffusion of norepinephrine from the intercellular space through a semi-permeable membrane mounted in a small catheter into a suitable perfusion fluid like Ringer's or Ringer's lactate, which can be collected continuously for later analysis. In conclusion, none of the mentioned techniques for monitoring sympathetic activity is superior to another as each has its own strengths and limitations. The choice for one or more of these methods strongly depends on the question that has to be answered; a combination of the various techniques may provide the investigator with a more powerful tool to monitor the sympathetic nervous system. http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9607/ 2001-01-01T00:00:00Z BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Endogenous norepinephrine release induced by cerebral ischemia may lead to small areas of necrosis in normal hearts. Conversely, norepinephrine may be one of the mediators that limit myocardial infarct size by ischemic preconditioning. Because brief ischemia in kidneys or skeletal muscle limits infarct size produced by coronary artery occlusion, we investigated whether cardiac norepinephrine release during transient cerebral ischemia also elicits remote myocardial preconditioning. METHODS: Forty-one crossbred pigs of either sex were assigned to 1 of 7 experimental groups, of which in 6 groups myocardial infarct size was determined after a 60-minute coronary occlusion and 120 minutes of reperfusion. One group served as control (no pretreatment), while the other groups were pretreated with either cerebral ischemia or an intracoronary infusion of norepinephrine. RESULTS: In 10 anesthetized control pigs, infarct size was 84+/-3% (mean+/-SEM) of the area at risk after a 60-minute coronary occlusion and 120 minutes of reperfusion. Intracoronary infusion of 0.03 nmol/kg. min(-)(1) norepinephrine for 10 minutes before coronary occlusion did not affect infarct size (80+/-3%; n=6), whereas infusion of 0.12 nmol/kg. min(-)(1) limited infarct size (65+/-2%; n=7; P:<0.05). Neither 10-minute (n=5) nor 30-minute (n=6) cerebral ischemia produced by elevation of intracranial pressure before coronary occlusion affected infarct size (83+/-4% and 82+/-3%, respectively). Myocardial interstitial norepinephrine levels tripled during cerebral ischemia and during low-dose norepinephrine but increased 10-fold during high-dose norepinephrine. Norepinephrine levels increased progressively up to 500-fold in the area at risk during the 60-minute coronary occlusion, independent of the pretreatment, while norepinephrine levels remained unchanged in adjacent nonischemic myocardium and arterial plasma. CONCLUSIONS: Cerebral ischemia preceding a coronary occlusion did not modify infarct size, which is likely related to the modest increase in myocardial norepinephrine levels during cerebral ischemia. The infarct size limitation by high-dose exogenous norepinephrine is not associated with blunting of the ischemia-induced increase in myocardial interstitial norepinephrine levels. http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9379/ 2000-01-01T00:00:00Z BACKGROUND: Elevated concentrations of norepinephrine (NE) have been observed in ischemic myocardium. We investigated the magnitude and mechanism of catecholamine release in the myocardial interstitial fluid (MIF) during ischemia and reperfusion in vivo through the use of microdialysis. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 9 anesthetized pigs, interstitial catecholamine concentrations were measured in the perfusion areas of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) and the left circumflex coronary artery. After stabilization, the LAD was occluded for 60 minutes and reperfused for 150 minutes. During the final 30 minutes, tyramine (154 nmol. kg(-1). min(-1)) was infused into the LAD. During LAD occlusion, MIF NE concentrations in the ischemic region increased progressively from 1. 0+/-0.1 to 524+/-125 nmol/L. MIF concentrations of dopamine and epinephrine rose from 0.4+/-0.1 to 43.9+/-9.5 nmol/L and from <0.2 (detection limit) to 4.7+/-0.7 nmol/L, respectively. Local uptake-1 blockade attenuated release of all 3 catecholamines by >50%. During reperfusion, MIF catecholamine concentrations returned to baseline within 120 minutes. At that time, the tyramine-induced NE release was similar to that seen in nonischemic control animals despite massive infarction. Arterial and MIF catecholamine concentrations in the left circumflex coronary artery region remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial ischemia is associated with a pronounced increase of MIF catecholamines, which is at least in part mediated by a reversed neuronal reuptake mechanism. The increase of MIF epinephrine implies a (probably neuronal) cardiac source, whereas the preserved catecholamine response to tyramine in postischemic necrotic myocardium indicates functional integrity of sympathetic nerve terminals. http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9176/ 1999-01-01T00:00:00Z Experimental findings suggest a pronounced concentration gradient of norepinephrine (NE) between the intravascular and interstitial compartments of the heart, compatible with an active neuronal reuptake (U1) and/or an endothelial barrier. Using the microdialysis technique in eight anesthetized pigs, we investigated this NE gradient, both under baseline conditions and during increments in either systemic or myocardial interstitial fluid (MIF) NE concentration. At steady state, baseline MIF NE (0.9 +/- 0.1 nmol/l) was higher than arterial NE (0.3 +/- 0.1 nmol/l) but was not different from coronary venous NE (1.5 +/- 0.3 nmol/l). Local U1 inhibition raised MIF NE concentration to 6.5 +/- 0.9 nmol/l. During intravenous NE infusions (0.6 and 1.8 nmol. kg(-1). min(-1)), the fractional removal of NE by the myocardium was 79 +/- 4% to 69 +/- 3%, depending on the infusion rate. Despite this extensive removal, the quotient of changes in MIF and arterial concentration (DeltaMIF/DeltaA ratio) for NE were only 0.10 +/- 0.02 for the lower infusion rate and 0.11 +/- 0.01 for the higher infusion rate, whereas U1 blockade caused the DeltaMIF/DeltaA ratio to rise to 0.21 +/- 0.03 and 0.36 +/- 0.05, respectively. From the differences in DeltaMIF/DeltaA ratios with and without U1 inhibition, we calculated that 67 +/- 5% of MIF NE is removed by U1. Intracoronary infusion of tyramine (154 nmol. kg(-1). min(-1)) caused a 15-fold increase in MIF NE concentration. This pronounced increase was paralleled by a comparable increase of NE in the coronary vein. We conclude that U1 and extraneuronal uptake, and not an endothelial barrier, are the principal mechanisms underlying the concentration gradient of NE between the interstitial and intravascular compartments in the porcine heart.