<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Hazebroek-Kampschreur, A.A.J.M.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/2189/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Estimating the effectiveness of screening for scoliosis: a case-control study (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/15179/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that screening for scoliosis is effective in reducing the need for surgical treatment. METHODS: The study was a case-control study. A total of 125 consecutive patients who were treated surgically for idiopathic scoliosis between January 2001 and October 2004 and who were born on or after January 1, 1984, were invited; 108 agreed to participate. A total of 216 control subjects were selected randomly and anonymously, matched with respect to age and gender. For 279 adolescents, exact screening exposure and outcomes could be analyzed. Case subjects were recruited from 4 university and 6 nonuniversity Dutch hospitals; control subjects were recruited from all 37 municipal health services in The Netherlands. RESULTS: Screen-detected patients received diagnoses at a significantly younger age than did otherwise-detected patients (10.8 +/- 2.6 vs 13.4 +/- 1.7 years). In total, 32.8% of the surgically treated patients had been screened between 11 and 14 years of age, compared with 43.4% of the control subjects. The odds ratio for being exposed to screening was 0.64. In total, 28% of the patients were diagnosed as having scoliosis before 11 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed no evidence that screening for scoliosis reduced the need for surgery. Abolishing screening seems justified, especially because the effectiveness of early treatment with bracing is still strongly debated. A randomized, controlled trial on the effectiveness of treating patients with idiopathic scoliosis with bracing is urgently needed.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Health-related quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after treatment: Short-term effects after brace or surgical treatment (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/36529/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>For treatment of teenagers with progressive adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in an early stage, two options are generally considered: treatment with a brace or observation followed by surgery if necessary. Many doctors and patients prefer conservative treatment (i.e. brace treatment) to surgical treatment, because surgery of the spine is generally considered a drastic intervention. Because potential differences in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after treatment between braced and surgically treated patients are not well explored, this study aimed to determine whether short-term differences exist in HRQoL between adolescents treated with a brace or treated surgically. A cross-sectional analysis of HRQoL was made of 109 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who, after completing treatment, filled out the Dutch SRS-22 Patient Questionnaire. All patients had been treated either with a brace or surgery, or with a brace followed by surgery. Patients treated surgically had significantly higher mean scores in the satisfaction with management domain than those treated with a brace. No other consistent differences in HRQoL were found between patients treated with a brace and patients treated surgically. Gender, curve type and curve size had no relevant effect on HRQoL. We conclude that short-term differences in HRQoL after treatment in adolescent patients with idiopathic scoliosis are negligible and cannot support preference of one treatment above the other. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Comparison between children and adolescents with and without chronic benign pain: consultation rate and pain characteristics (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9907/</link>
      <pubDate>2002-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The aim of the study was to determine whether children with chronic benign
      pain are in contact with their general practitioner (GP) more frequently
      than those without chronic benign pain. A random sample of children and
      adolescents aged between 0 and 18 years of age was drawn from the records
      of ten general practices. According to their responses to a pain
      questionnaire, subjects were assigned to the chronic benign pain group (n
          = 95) if they had pain of more than three months' duration, or to the
      control group (n = 105) if they had pain of less than three months'
      duration or no pain at all. All the subjects had an average GP
      consultation rate of 2.6 contacts per year. No significant age and sex
      differences were found. Chronic benign pain in childhood and adolescence
      is not related to increased use of healthcare services, suggesting that
      somatisation does not play a major role in children with chronic benign
      pain.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Chronic pain and its impact on quality of life in adolescents and their families (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9619/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>OBJECTIVE: To study chronic pain not caused by somatic disease in
          adolescents and the effect of pain on the quality of life of the
          adolescents and their families. METHODS: One hundred twenty-eight
          youngsters (12-18 years) who had reported chronic pain kept a 3-week diary
          of their pain and completed a questionnaire on quality of life. Their
          mothers completed a questionnaire on the impact of their youngster's pain
          on the family. RESULTS: The most prevalent pains were limb pain, headache,
          abdominal, and back pain. The pain increased during the day, with the
          highest frequency around dinner time and the highest intensity around
          bedtime. Girls reported more intense and more frequent pain than boys. The
          higher the intensity and frequency of the pain, the lower the
          self-reported quality of life of the female or male adolescent, especially
          regarding psychological functioning (e.g. feeling less at ease), physical
          status (a greater incidence of other somatic complaints), and functional
          status (more impediments to leisure and daily activities). Chronic pain
          also had a negative impact on family life. The mothers reported
          restrictions, particularly in social life, and problems dealing with the
          stress of the adolescent's pain. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic pain, not caused by
          somatic disease, was present to a higher degree in girls; the pain
          increased during the day and had a negative impact on quality of life of
          the adolescents and the family. There is a need for future research aimed
          at identifying risk factors for chronic pain and pain-associated quality
          of life in children and adolescents.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Trunk abnormalities in adolescence : a school health care based epidemiological cohort study (Doctoral Thesis)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/39389/</link>
      <pubDate>1993-09-22T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The rationale for the studies presented in this thesis was the whish to answer
the question whether an extra scoliosis screening should be added to the two
periodical medical examinations during adolescence. It was decided to use data
collected in a prospective follow-up study conducted since 1984 to answer the
following subquestions:
1. What is the prevalence of trunk abnormalities, including scoliosis and
Scheuermann's disease?
2. What is the incidence of trunk abnormalities?
3. What ace the determinants of trunk abnormalities?
4. Are the current frequency of periodical medical examinations during
adolescence, and the applied method of examining posture and back, adequate
for early detection of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?
5. Is it feasible to have scoliosis screening performed by school nurses?
6. What happens in the period between referral for scoliosis by the school
physician and the onset of observation or treatment by the orthopedic surgeon?</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>