http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/22206/ List of Publications en http://repub.eur.nl/static-eur/img/logo.png http://repub.eur.nl http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/32000/ 2012-01-01T00:00:00Z To describe the content of practice guidelines on euthanasia and assisted suicide (EAS) and to compare differences between settings and guidelines developed before or after enactment of the euthanasia law in 2002 by means of a content analysis. Most guidelines stated that the attending physician is responsible for the decision to grant or refuse an EAS request. Due care criteria were described in the majority of guidelines, but aspects relevant for assessing these criteria were not always described. Half of the guidelines described the role of the nurse in the performance of euthanasia. Compared with hospital guidelines, nursing home guidelines were more often stricter than the law in excluding patients with dementia (30% vs 4%) and incompetent patients (25% vs 4%). As from 2002, the guidelines were less strict in categorically excluding patients groups (32% vs 64%) and in particular incompetent patients (10% vs 29%). Healthcare institutions should accurately state the boundaries of the law, also when they prefer to set stricter boundaries for their own institution. Only then can guidelines provide adequate support for physicians and nurses in the difficult EAS decision-making process. http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/28008/ 2010-07-01T00:00:00Z Objective: To describe awareness, use and supportiveness for physicians of three practice guidelines on medical end-of-life decisions, and to identify factors associated with increased awareness of these guidelines. Methods: Questionnaires were sent to 793 physicians from 12 hospitals in 2005 (response 52%). Results: Most physicians were aware of the existence of the practice guidelines for euthanasia (75%) and do-not-resuscitate decisions (63%), and 35% were aware of the existence of the guidelines for palliative sedation. Physicians who had read the guidelines and had been in a situation in which they had to consider a euthanasia request, 88% had used the guidelines for euthanasia; corresponding figures are 92% for do-not-resuscitate and 100% for palliative sedation. When used, almost all physicians felt the guideline had been supportive. More positive attitudes towards guidelines and involvement in guideline development were associated with increased awareness of the presence of guidelines. Conclusion: It appears that practice guidelines on medical end-of-life decisions are useful for physicians: when they are aware of the presence of such guidelines in their institution, they gain support when using them. Practice implications: Health care institutions should be encouraged to disseminate guidelines among caregivers, and also involve them in the development of the guidelines. http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/19887/ 2010-03-01T00:00:00Z Objectives: To describe how Dutch healthcare institutions develop and disseminate institutional practice guidelines on medical end-of-life decisions and policy statements on euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (EAS) to relevant parties, and to describe supportiveness of EAS guidelines experienced by Dutch physicians. Methods: Questionnaires to all Dutch health care institutions in 2005. Questionnaire to sample of Dutch clinical specialists and nursing home physicians. Results: In most health care institutions, physicians (79%), ethics committees (79%), board of directors (64%) and nurses (61%) were involved in the development of guidelines. The Euthanasia Act and national guidelines were the most frequently reported sources for the development (73% and 71%, respectively). Not all institutions disseminated their written EAS policy statements and practice guidelines on medical end-of-life decisions to all relevant parties. Dutch physicians who reported the presence of a written guideline for EAS in their institution, felt supported by it in their decision-making after a patient's request for EAS. Conclusions: It is recommended that more health care institutions pay attention to the dissemination of their policy statements and practice guidelines to relevant parties. This will only lead to improvement in medical practice if this is accompanied by efforts to also stimulate the use of guidelines in practice. http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/24376/ 2009-09-01T00:00:00Z Objectives: To describe the existence of policy statements on euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (EAS) and practice guidelines for all medical end-of-life decisions in Dutch health care institutions in 2005, whether the existence of practice guidelines is related to characteristics of institutions, and to compare the existence of policies in 2005 and 1994. Methods: Questionnaires were sent to 566 institutions (all Dutch hospitals, nursing homes, general psychiatric hospitals, institutions for the mentally disabled, hospices) from October 2005 through March 2006. Results: Most institutions (70%) had a written policy statement concerning EAS. EAS was usually allowed under specific conditions (75%). Institutions mainly had practice guidelines for EAS and do-not-resuscitate decisions (62% and 63%). A minority had guidelines on palliative sedation (27%), alleviation of symptoms (27%) and withdrawing or withholding treatment (33%). In general, there were more practice guidelines in 2005 than in 1994. Larger institutions and institutions with an ethics committee more often had practice guidelines. Religious affiliation of an institution did not seem to be related to the existence of guidelines. Conclusions: Since many institutions still do not have practice guidelines for medical end-of-life decisions, they should be stimulated to introduce practice guidelines, being a first step in improving the quality of the care on institutional level.