<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Maas, A.J.J.A.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/22436/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Organizational Studies: (not-) Smothering each other as a Behavioural Strategy (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/39656/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to show that relationships between academics and
professionals can gain in organizational studies by prioritizing practical wisdom, which also benefits
teaching.
Design/methodology/approach – To explore practical corollaries of Flyvbjerg’s claim that social
scientists are better equipped than natural scientists to produce phronesis or practical wisdom.
Findings – Practical wisdom emerges when social scientists interact with professionals. In
(relational) practice, Organizational Science scientists and practitioners develop local knowledge that
cannot be taught a priori but which develops bottom up and emerges from practice. Scientists and
practitioners converse, exchange interpretations and perspectives, in specific contexts. Interaction and
communication with OS practitioners seems for OS professionals to be a necessary human condition to
develop phronesis.
Practical implications – Explores implications of Flyvberg’s method to critically study discourse
among OS scientists and between them and OS practitioners. Examine how discourse changes on the
basis of an example of phronesis.
Originality/value – To provide a practical contribution to the theory/practice debate.
Keywords Organizational theory, Organizations, Teaching methods
Paper type Conceptual paper</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>