<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Klasen, S.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/22614/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Inequality in human development: An empirical assessment of 32 countries (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/19643/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-06-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>One of the most frequent critiques of the HDI is that is does not take into account inequality within countries in its three dimensions. In this paper, we apply a simply approach to compute the three components and the overall HDI for quintiles of the income distribution. This allows a comparison of the level in human development of the poor with the level of the non-poor within countries, but also across countries. This is an application of the method presented in Grimm et al. (World Development 36(12):2527-2546, 2008) to a sample of 21 low and middle income countries and 11 industrialized countries. In particular the inclusion of the industrialized countries, which were not included in the previous work, implies to deal with a number of additional challenges, which we outline in this paper. Our results show that inequality in human development within countries is high, both in developed and industrialized countries. In fact, the HDI of the lowest quintiles in industrialized countries is often below the HDI of the richest quintile in many middle income countries. We also find, however, a strong overall negative correlation between the level of human development and inequality in human development.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Geography vs. institutions at the village level (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/18745/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-11-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>There is a well-known debate about the respective roles of geography versus institutions in explaining the long-term development of countries. These debates have usually been based on cross-country regressions where questions about parameter heterogeneity, unobserved heterogeneity, and endogeneity cannot easily be controlled for.  The innovation of Acemoglu, Johnson and Robinson (2001) was to address this last point by using settler mortality as an instrument for endogenous institutions and found that this supported their line of reasoning. We believe there is value-added to consider this debate at the micro level within a country as particularly questions of parameter heterogeneity and unobserved heterogeneity are likely to be smaller than between countries. Hence, we examine the determinants of economic development across villages on the Indonesian Island of Sulawesi and find technology adoption to play a crucial role. We show that geography-induced migration together with population size foster through their effect on institutions technology adoption.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>A Human Development Index by Income Groups (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/34787/</link>
      <pubDate>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Abstract
One of the most frequent critiques of the HDI is that is does not take into
account inequality within countries in its three dimensions. We suggest a
relatively easy and intuitive approach which allows to compute the three
components and the overall HDI for quintiles of the income distribution.
This allows to compare the level in human development of the poor with
the level of the non-poor within countries, but also across countries. An
empirical illustration for a sample of 13 low and middle income countries
and 2 industrialized countries shows that inequality in human development
within countries is indeed high. The results also show that the level of
inequality is only weakly correlated with the level of human development
itself.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>