<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Wardeh, A.J.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/2295/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Routine intracoronary beta-irradiation. Acute and one year outcome in patients at high risk for recurrence of stenosis (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9929/</link>
      <pubDate>2002-07-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>AIMS: Intracoronary radiation is a promising therapy potentially reducing restenosis following catheter-based interventions. Currently, only limited data on this treatment are available. The feasibility and outcome in daily routine practice, however, is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 100 consecutive patients, intracoronary beta-radiation was performed with a (90)Strontium system (Novoste Beta-Cathtrade mark) following angioplasty. Predominantly complex (73% type B2 and C) and long lesions (length 24.3+/-15.3 mm) were included (37% de novo, 19% restenotic and 44% in-stent restenotic lesions). Radiation success was 100%. Mean prescribed dose was 19.8+/-2.5 Gy. A pullback procedure was performed in 19% lesions. Geographic miss occurred in 8% lesions. Periprocedural thrombus formation occurred in four lesions, dissection in nine lesions. During hospital stay, no death, acute myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularization was observed. Major adverse cardiac events occurred predominantly between 6 and 12 months after the index procedure with major adverse cardiac event-free survival of 66% at 12 months (one death, 10 Q-wave myocardial infarctions, 23 target vessel revascularizations; ranked for worst event). CONCLUSION: Routine catheter-based intracoronary beta-radiation therapy after angioplasty is safe and feasible with a high acute procedural success. The clinical 1-year follow-up showed delayed occurrence of major adverse cardiac events between 6 and 12 months after the index procedure</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Initial observation regarding changes in vessel dimensions after balloon angioplasty and stenting followed by catheter-based beta-radiation. Is stenting necessary in the setting of catheter-based radiotherapy? (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/13059/</link>
      <pubDate>2002-04-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>AIMS: We sought to compare the effect of intracoronary beta-radiation on the vessel dimensions in de novo lesions using three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound quantification after balloon angioplasty and stenting. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty patients (44 vessels; 28 balloon angioplasty and 16 stenting) treated with catheter-based beta-radiation and 18 non-irradiated control patients (18 vessels; 10 balloon angioplasty and 8 stenting) were investigated by means of three-dimensional volumetric intravascular ultrasound analysis post-procedure and at 6-8 months follow-up. Total vessel (EEM) volume enlarged after both balloon angioplasty and stenting (+37 mm(3) vs +42 mm(3), P=ns), but vessel wall volume (plaque plus media) also increased similarly (+33 mm(3) vs +49 mm(3), P=ns) in the irradiated patients. Lumen volume remained unchanged in both groups (+3 mm(3) vs -7 mm(3), P=ns). In the stent-covered segments, neointima at follow-up was significantly smaller in the irradiated group than the control group (8 mm(3) vs 27 mm(3), P=0.001, respectively), but the total amount of tissue growth was similar in both groups (33 mm(3) vs 29 mm(3), P=ns). CONCLUSIONS: Intracoronary beta-radiation induces vessel enlargement after balloon angioplasty and/or stenting, accommodating tissue growth. Additional stenting may not play an important role in the prevention of constrictive remodelling in the setting of catheter-based intracoronary beta-radiotherapy.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Angiographical follow-up after radioactive "Cold Ends" stent implantation: a multicenter trial. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9837/</link>
      <pubDate>2002-02-05T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Radioactive stents with an activity of 0.75 to 12 microCi have shown &gt;40% edge restenosis due to neointimal hyperplasia and negative remodeling. This trial evaluated whether radioactive Cold Ends stents might resolve edge restenosis by preventing remodeling at the injured extremities. METHODS AND RESULTS: The 25-mm long (15-mm radioactive center and 5-mm nonradioactive ends) Cold Ends stents had an activity of 3 to 12 microCi at implantation. Forty-three stents were implanted in 43 patients with de novo native coronary artery disease. Two procedural, 1 subacute, and 1 late stent thrombosis occurred. A restenosis rate of 22% was observed with a shift of the restenosis, usually occurring at the stent edges of radioactive stents, into the Cold Ends stents. The most severe restenosis occurred at the transition zone from radioactive to nonradioactive segments, a region located in dose fall-off. CONCLUSION: Cold Ends stents did not resolve edge restenosis.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Clinical evaluation of radioactive stents (Doctoral Thesis)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/23524/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-09-21T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Restenosis, the major problem after stent implantation, is caused by in-stent neointimal
hyperplasia. A number of metbods and techniques have been studied during the last
ten years to address tbis issue, but in-stent restenosis has remained at a rate of 15-25%
in most of tbe clinical trials. Several experimental and clinical trials showed that
brachytherapy, following a balloon angioplasty or stent implantation, reduced restenosis
by inhibiting neointimal hyperplasia. Several in-vitro experiments and animal studies
demonstrated a reduction of in-stent restenosis after the implantation of 32p B-particle
emitting radioactive stents.
The research objective of this tbesis was to evaluate whether the implantation
of radioactive stents in patients with coronary artery disease could reduce in-stent
restenosis. In order for radioactive stents to become an accepted treatment in the current
clinical practice its safety, feasibility, efficacy, mechanism of action, and side effects
needed to be investigated.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The pattern of restenosis and vascular remodelling after cold-end radioactive stent implantation. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4825/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-08-22T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background Edge restenosis is a major problem after radioactive stenting. The cold-end stent has a radioactive mid-segment (15·9mm) and non-radioactive proximal and distal 5·7mm segments. Conceptually this may negate the impact of negative vascular remodelling at the edge of the radiation.

Method and Results ECG-gated intravascular ultrasound with three-dimensional reconstruction was performed post-stent implantation and at the 6-month follow-up to assess restenosis within the margins of the stent and at the stent edges in 16 patients. Angiographic restenosis was witnessed in four patients, all in the proximal in-stent position. By intravascular ultrasound in-stent neointimal hyperplasia, with a &gt;50% stented cross-sectional area, was seen in eight patients. This was witnessed proximally (n=2), distally (n=2) and in both segments (n=4). Echolucent tissue, dubbed the ‘black hole’ was seen as a significant component of neointimal hyperplasia in six out of the eight cases of restenosis. Neointimal hyperplasia was inhibited in the area of radiation: Δ neointimal hyperplasia=3·72mm3(8·6%); in-stent at the edges of radiation proximally and distally Δ neointimal hyperplasia was 7·9mm3(19·0%) and 11·4mm3(25·6%), respectively (P=0·017). At the stent edges there was no significant change in lumen volume.

Conclusions Cold-end stenting results in increased neointimal hyperplasia in in-stent non-radioactive segments.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Indirect evidence for a role of a subpopulation of activated neutrophils in the remodelling process after percutaneous coronary intervention. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/12920/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-07-20T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>AIM: Leukocytes have been implicated in restenosis following percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. We investigated the link between the activated status of circulating neutrophils and restenosis after angioplasty. METHODS AND RESULTS: The population of 108 patients with single, de novo lesions located in native coronary arteries were treated with elective balloon angioplasty (n=44) or stenting (n=64). Pre-, post-procedure and 6-month follow-up, angiograms were analysed by an independent core laboratory. Blood samples were collected immediately before treatment and the antigen CD66, which is specifically expressed by activated neutrophils, was measured. Overall, the average expression of CD66 was 6.4+/-3.6 of mean fluorescence intensity. In the stepwise linear regression model, which included biological, clinical and angiographic variables, absolute gain showed a direct association (P&lt;0.001) with relative late loss (relative late loss=absolute late loss/pre-procedure reference diameter), whereas CD66 expression was inversely associated with relative late loss (P=0.004). CD66 expression also showed an inverse association with relative late loss in the balloon angioplasty treated patients (P=0.002, beta=-0.49). In the stent subgroup, only reference vessel diameter and acute gain were independent predictors of relative late loss. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm the beneficial role of activated neutrophils pre-procedure in the restenotic process after balloon angioplasty. The lack of a relationship between CD66 expression by neutrophils and relative late loss after stenting suggests that this leukocyte may be involved in the remodelling process.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Clinical and angiographical follow-up after implantation of a 6--12 microCi radioactive stent in patients with coronary artery disease. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/12923/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-07-19T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>AIMS: This study is the contribution by the Thoraxcenter, Rotterdam, to the European(32)P Dose Response Trial, a non-randomized multicentre trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the radioactive Isostent in patients with single coronary artery disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: The radioactivity of the stent at implantation was 6--12 microCi. All patients received aspirin indefinitely and either ticlopidine or clopidogrel for 3 months. Quantitative coronary angiography measurements of both the stent area and the target lesion (stent area and up to 5 mm proximal and distal to the stent edges) were performed pre- and post-procedure and at the 5-month follow-up. Forty-two radioactive stents were implanted in 40 patients. Treated vessels were the left anterior descending coronary artery (n=20), right coronary artery (n=10) or left circumflex artery (n=10). Eight patients received additional non-radioactive stents. Lesion length measured 10+/-3 mm with a reference diameter of 3.07+/-0.69 mm. Minimal lumen diameter increased from 0.98+/-0.53 mm pre-procedure to 2.29+/-0.52 mm (target lesion) and 2.57+/-0.44 mm (stent area) post-procedure. There was one procedural non-Q wave myocardial infarction, due to transient thrombotic closure. Thirty-six patients returned for angiographical follow-up. Two patients had a total occlusion proximal to the radioactive stent. Of the patent vessels, none had in-stent restenosis. Edge restenosis was observed in 44%, occurring predominantly at the proximal edge. Target lesion revascularization was performed in 10 patients and target vessel revascularization in one patient. No additional clinical end-points occurred during follow-up. The minimal lumen diameter at follow-up averaged 1.66+/-0.71 mm (target lesion) and 2.12+/-0.72 (stent area); therefore late loss was 0.63+/-0.69 (target lesion) and 0.46+/-0.76 (stent area), resulting in a late loss index of 0.65+/-1.15 (target lesion) and 0.30+/-0.53 (stent area). CONCLUSION: These results indicate that the use of radioactive stents is safe and feasible, however, the high incidence of edge restenosis makes this technique currently clinically non-applicable.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Radioactive stents delay but do not prevent in-stent neointimal hyperplasia (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9562/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Restenosis after conventional stenting is almost exclusively caused by neointimal hyperplasia. Beta-particle-emitting radioactive stents decrease in-stent neointimal hyperplasia at 6-month follow-up. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 1-year outcome of (32)P radioactive stents with an initial activity of 6 to 12 microCi using serial quantitative coronary angiography and volumetric ECG-gated 3D intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 40 patients undergoing initial stent implantation, 26 were event-free after the 6-month follow-up period and 22 underwent repeat catheterization and IVUS at 1 year; they comprised half of the study population. Significant luminal deterioration was observed within the stents between 6 months and 1 year, as evidenced by a decrease in the angiographic minimum lumen diameter (-0.43+/-0.56 mm; P:=0.028) and in the mean lumen diameter in the stent (-0.55+/-0. 63 mm; P:=0.001); a significant increase in in-stent neointimal hyperplasia by IVUS (18.16+/-12.59 mm(3) at 6 months to 27.75+/-11. 99 mm(3) at 1 year; P:=0.001) was also observed. Target vessel revascularization was performed in 5 patients (23%). No patient experienced late occlusion, myocardial infarction, or death. By 1 year, 21 of the initial 40 patients (65%) remained event-free. CONCLUSIONS: Neointimal proliferation is delayed rather than prevented by radioactive stent implantation. Clinical outcome 1 year after the implantation of stents with an initial activity of 6 to 12 microCi is not favorable when compared with conventional stenting.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Comparison of mechanical properties of the left ventricle in patients with severe coronary artery disease by nonfluoroscopic mapping versus two-dimensional echocardiograms. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4858/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-11-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>In 40 patients, we compared linear local shortening assessed with nonfluoroscopic electromechanical mapping as a function of regional wall motion with echocardiographic data in a subset of patients with severe coronary artery disease and subsequently decreased left ventricular function. Our study showed that nonfluoroscopic electromechanical mapping can accurately assess regional wall motion. In addition, this study showed a significant decrease in unipolar voltages among segments with declining regional function.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Positive Geometric Vascular Remodeling Is Seen After Catheter-Based Radiation Followed by Conventional Stent Implantation but Not After Radioactive Stent Implantation (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4868/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background—Recent reports demonstrate that intracoronary radiation affects not only neointimal formation but also vascular remodeling. Radioactive stents and catheter-based techniques deliver radiation in different ways, suggesting that different patterns of remodeling after each technique may be expected.

Methods and Results—We analyzed remodeling in 18 patients after conventional stent implantation, 16 patients after low-activity radioactive stent implantation, 16 patients after higher activity radioactive stent implantation, and, finally, 17 patients who underwent catheter-based radiation followed by conventional stent implantation. Intravascular ultrasound with 3D reconstruction was used after stent implantation and at the 6-month follow-up to assess remodeling within the stent margins and at its edges. Preprocedural characteristics were similar between groups. In-stent neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) was inhibited by high-activity radioactive stent implantation (NIH 9.0 mm3) and by catheter-based radiation followed by conventional stent implantation (NIH 6.9 mm3) compared with low-activity radioactive stent implantation (NIH 21.2 mm3) and conventional stent implantation (NIH 20.8 mm3) (P=0.008). No difference in plaque or total vessel volume was seen behind the stent in the conventional, low-activity, or high-activity stent implantation groups. However, significant increases in plaque behind the stent (15%) and in total vessel volume (8%) were seen in the group that underwent catheter-based radiation followed by conventional stent implantation. All 4 groups demonstrated significant late lumen loss at the stent edges; however, edge restenosis was seen only in the group subjected to high-activity stent implantation and appeared to be due to an increase in plaque and, to a lesser degree, to negative remodeling.

Conclusions—Distinct differences in the patterns of remodeling exist between conventional, radioactive, and catheter-based radiotherapy with stenting.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Outcome from balloon induced coronary artery dissection after intracoronary beta radiation (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8353/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the healing of balloon induced coronary artery
      dissection in individuals who have received beta radiation treatment and
      to propose a new intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) dissection score to
      facilitate the comparison of dissection through time. DESIGN:
      Retrospective study. SETTING: Tertiary referral centre. PATIENTS: 31
      patients with stable angina pectoris, enrolled in the beta energy
      restenosis trial (BERT-1.5), were included. After excluding those who
      underwent stent implantation, the evaluable population was 22 patients.
      INTERVENTIONS: Balloon angioplasty and intracoronary radiation followed by
      quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and IVUS. Repeat QCA and IVUS were
      performed at six month follow up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: QCA and IVUS
      evidence of healing of dissection. Dissection classification for
      angiography was by the National Heart Lung Blood Institute scale. IVUS
      proven dissection was defined as partial or complete. The following IVUS
      defined characteristics of dissection were described in the affected
      coronary segments: length, depth, arc circumference, presence of flap, and
      dissection score. Dissection was defined as healed when all features of
      dissection had resolved. The calculated dose of radiation received by the
      dissected area in those with healed versus non-healed dissection was also
      compared. RESULTS: Angiography (type A = 5, B = 7, C = 4) and IVUS proven
      (partial = 12, complete = 4) dissections were seen in 16 patients
      following intervention. At six month follow up, six and eight unhealed
      dissections were seen by angiography (A = 2, B = 4) and IVUS (partial = 7,
      complete = 1), respectively. The mean IVUS dissection score was 5.2 (range
      3-8) following the procedure, and 4.6 (range 3-7) at follow up. No
      correlation was found between the dose prescribed in the treated area and
      the presence of unhealed dissection. No change in anginal status was seen
      despite the presence of unhealed dissection. CONCLUSION: beta radiation
      appears to alter the normal healing process, resulting in unhealed
      dissection in certain individuals. In view of the delayed and abnormal
      healing observed, long term follow up is indicated given the possible late
      adverse effects of radiation. Although in this cohort no increase in
      cardiac events following coronary dissections was seen, larger populations
      are needed to confirm this phenomenon. Stenting of all coronary
      dissections may be warranted in patients scheduled for brachytherapy after
      balloon angioplasty.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Positive geometric vascular remodeling is seen after catheter-based radiation followed by conventional stent implantation but not after radioactive stent implantation (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9460/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Recent reports demonstrate that intracoronary radiation
      affects not only neointimal formation but also vascular remodeling.
      Radioactive stents and catheter-based techniques deliver radiation in
      different ways, suggesting that different patterns of remodeling after
      each technique may be expected. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed
      remodeling in 18 patients after conventional stent implantation, 16
      patients after low-activity radioactive stent implantation, 16 patients
      after higher activity radioactive stent implantation, and, finally, 17
      patients who underwent catheter-based radiation followed by conventional
      stent implantation. Intravascular ultrasound with 3D reconstruction was
      used after stent implantation and at the 6-month follow-up to assess
      remodeling within the stent margins and at its edges. Preprocedural
      characteristics were similar between groups. In-stent neointimal
      hyperplasia (NIH) was inhibited by high-activity radioactive stent
      implantation (NIH 9.0 mm(3)) and by catheter-based radiation followed by
      conventional stent implantation (NIH 6.9 mm(3)) compared with low-activity
      radioactive stent implantation (NIH 21.2 mm(3)) and conventional stent
      implantation (NIH 20.8 mm(3)) (P:=0.008). No difference in plaque or total
      vessel volume was seen behind the stent in the conventional, low-activity,
      or high-activity stent implantation groups. However, significant increases
      in plaque behind the stent (15%) and in total vessel volume (8%) were seen
      in the group that underwent catheter-based radiation followed by
      conventional stent implantation. All 4 groups demonstrated significant
      late lumen loss at the stent edges; however, edge restenosis was seen only
      in the group subjected to high-activity stent implantation and appeared to
      be due to an increase in plaque and, to a lesser degree, to negative
      remodeling. CONCLUSIONS: Distinct differences in the patterns of
      remodeling exist between conventional, radioactive, and catheter-based
      radiotherapy with stenting.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Geometric vascular remodeling after balloon angioplasty and beta-radiation therapy: A three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound study (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9161/</link>
      <pubDate>1999-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Endovascular radiation appears to inhibit intimal thickening
      after overstretching balloon injury in animal models. The effect of
      brachytherapy on vascular remodeling is unknown. The aim of the study was
      to determine the evolution of coronary vessel dimensions after
      intracoronary irradiation after successful balloon angioplasty in humans.
      METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-one consecutive patients treated with balloon
      angioplasty and beta-radiation according to the Beta Energy Restenosis
      Trial-1.5 were included in the study. Volumetric assessment of the
      irradiated segment and both edges was performed after brachytherapy and at
      6-month follow-up. Intravascular ultrasound images were acquired by means
      of ECG-triggered pullback, and 3-D reconstruction was performed by
      automated edge detection, allowing the calculation of lumen, plaque, and
      external elastic membrane (EEM) volumes. In the irradiated segments, mean
      EEM and plaque volumes increased significantly (451+/-128 to 490.9+/-159
      mm(3) and 201.2+/-59 to 241.7+/-74 mm(3); P=0.01 and P=0.001,
      respectively), whereas luminal volume remained unchanged (250.8+/-91 to
      249.2+/-102 mm(3); P=NS). The edges demonstrated an increase in mean
      plaque volume (26.8+/-12 to 32. 6+/-10 mm(3), P=0.0001) and no net change
      in mean EEM volume (71. 4+/-24 to 70.9+/-24 mm(3), P=NS), resulting in a
      decrease in mean luminal volume (44.6+/-16 to 38.3+/-16 mm(3), P=0.01).
      CONCLUSIONS: A different pattern of remodeling is observed in coronary
      segments treated with beta-radiation after successful balloon angioplasty.
      In the irradiated segments, the adaptive increase of EEM volume appears to
      be the major contributor to the luminal volume at follow-up. Conversely,
      both edges showed an increase in plaque volume without a net change in EEM
      volume.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Preserved endothelium-dependent vasodilation in coronary segments previously treated with balloon angioplasty and intracoronary irradiation (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9177/</link>
      <pubDate>1999-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Abnormal endothelium-dependent coronary vasomotion has been
      reported after balloon angioplasty (BA), as well as after intracoronary
      radiation. However, the long-term effect on coronary vasomotion is not
      known. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term vasomotion of
      coronary segments treated with BA and brachytherapy. METHODS AND RESULTS:
      Patients with single de novo lesions treated either with BA followed by
      intracoronary beta-irradiation (according to the Beta Energy Restenosis
      Trial-1.5) or with BA alone were eligible. Of these groups, those patients
      in stable condition who returned for 6-month angiographic follow-up formed
      the study population (n=19, irradiated group and n=11, control group).
      Endothelium-dependent coronary vasomotion was assessed by selective
      infusion of serial doses of acetylcholine (ACh) proximally to the treated
      area. Mean luminal diameter was calculated by quantitative coronary
      angiography both in the treated area and in distal segments. Endothelial
      dysfunction was defined as a vasoconstriction after the maximal dose of
      ACh (10(-6) mol/L). Seventeen irradiated segments (89.5%) demonstrated
      normal endothelial function. In contrast, 10 distal nonirradiated segments
      (53%) and 5 control segments (45%) demonstrated endothelium-dependent
      vasoconstriction (-19+/-17% and -9.0+/-5%, respectively). Mean percentage
      of change in mean luminal diameter after ACh was significantly higher in
      irradiated segments (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Endothelium-dependent
      vasomotion of coronary segments treated with BA followed by beta-radiation
      is restored in the majority of stable patients at 6-month follow-up. This
      functional response appeared to be better than those documented both in
      the distal segments and in segments treated with BA alone.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>beta-Particle-emitting radioactive stent implantation. A safety and feasibility study (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9179/</link>
      <pubDate>1999-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: This study represents the Heart Center Rotterdam's
      contribution to the Isostents for Restenosis Intervention Study, a
      nonrandomized multicenter trial evaluating the safety and feasibility of
      the radioactive Isostent in patients with single coronary artery disease.
      Restenosis after stent implantation is primarily caused by neointimal
      hyperplasia. In animal studies, beta-particle-emitting radioactive stents
      decrease neointimal hyperplasia by inhibiting smooth muscle cell
      proliferation. METHODS AND RESULTS: The radioisotope (32)P, a
      beta-particle emitter with a half-life of 14.3 days, was directly embedded
      into the Isostent. The calculated range of radioactivity was 0.75 to 1.5
      microCi. Quantitative coronary angiography measurements were performed
      before and after the procedure and at 6-month follow-up. A total of 31
      radioactive stents were used in 26 patients; 30 (97%) were successfully
      implanted, and 1 was embolized. Treated lesions were in the left anterior
      descending coronary artery (n=12), the right coronary artery (n=8), or the
      left circumflex coronary artery (n=6). Five patients received additional,
      nonradioactive stents. Treated lesion lengths were 13+/-4 mm, with a
      reference diameter of 2.93+/-0. 47 mm. Minimum lumen diameter increased
      from 0.87+/-0.28 mm preprocedure to 2.84+/-0.35 mm postprocedure. No
      in-hospital adverse cardiac events occurred. All patients received aspirin
      indefinitely and ticlopidine for 4 weeks. Twenty-three patients (88%)
      returned for 6-month angiographic follow-up; 17% of them had in-stent
      restenosis, and 13% had repeat revascularization. No restenosis was
      observed at the stent edges. Minimum lumen diameter at follow-up averaged
      1.85+/-0.69 mm, which resulted in a late loss of 0.99+/-0. 59 mm and a
      late loss index of 0.53+/-0.35. No other major cardiac events occurred
      during the 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The use of radioactive stents
      with an activity of 0.75 to 1.5 microCi is safe and feasible.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>