<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Geschwind, H.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/2308/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>The immediate and long-term effect of optimal balloon angioplasty on the absolute coronary blood flow velocity reserve. A subanalysis of the DEBATE study. Doppler Endpoints Balloon Angioplasty Trial Europe. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/12947/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-09-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: There are limited data regarding the immediate and long-term effect of balloon angioplasty on the coronary flow reserve evaluated in a multicentre setting. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 86 patients with one-vessel disease and normal left ventricular function were analysed before and after optimal balloon angioplasty (diameter stenosis &lt;35%) and at 6-month follow-up. Coronary flow reserve was assessed with a Doppler guide wire. A low coronary flow reserve (&lt;or=2.5) after PTCA, due to an increased baseline blood flow velocity, was encountered in 42 of the 86 patients (49%). Recurrence of angina and target lesion revascularization were more frequent in these patients than in patients with a coronary flow reserve &gt;2.5 (46% vs 23% and 36% vs 16%, respectively; P&lt;0.05) due to a trend towards restenosis (29% vs 16%; P=0.15) or a low coronary flow reserve at follow-up due to persistent elevated baseline blood flow velocity. Patients without restenosis showed a decrease or increase of coronary flow reserve during follow-up, determined by alterations of hyperaemic blood flow velocity. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with an impaired coronary flow reserve directly after optimal balloon angioplasty showed a higher target lesion revascularization rate compared to patients with a coronary flow reserve &gt;2.5. This patient group consists of patients prone to develop restenosis, while other patients are characterized by a persistently low coronary flow reserve, probably secondary to disturbed autoregulation and/or diffuse mild coronary atherosclerosis. Coronary flow reserve alterations in patients without restenosis were related to changes in hyperaemic blood flow velocity, suggesting that this phenomenon relates to epicardial remodelling.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Angiographical and Doppler flow-derived parameters for assessment of coronary lesion severity and its relation to the result of exercise electrocardiography. DEBATE study group. Doppler Endpoints Balloon Angioplasty Trial Europe. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/12838/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-03-15T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>AIMS: Evaluation of angiographical and intracoronary Doppler-derived
      parameters of coronary stenosis severity. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of
      225 patients with one-vessel disease were studied before PTCA and at 6
      months follow-up. Exercise electrocardiography was performed to document
      presence (n = 157) or absence (n = 138) of an ST segment shift (&gt; or =0.1
      mV). Intracoronary blood flow velocity analysis was performed to determine
      the proximal/distal flow velocity ratio, the distal diastolic/systolic
      flow velocity ratio and coronary flow velocity reserve. Receiver operator
      characteristic curves were calculated to assess the predictive value of
      these variables compared with the exercise test. The distal coronary flow
      velocity reserve demonstrated the best linear correlation for both
      percentage diameter stenosis and minimum lumen diameter (r = 0.67 and r =
      0.66; P&lt;0.01), compared to the diastolic/systolic flow velocity ratio (r =
      0.19 and r = 0.14; P&lt;0.01) and the proximal/distal flow velocity ratio (r
          = 0.03 and r = 0.07; not significant). The areas under the curve were 0.
      84+/-0.02; 0.82+/-0.03 and 0.83+/-0.03 for diameter stenosis, minimum
      lumen diameter and coronary flow velocity reserve, respectively. Logistic
      regression analysis revealed that the percentage diameter stenosis or
      minimum lumen diameter and coronary flow velocity reserve were independent
      predictors for the result of stress testing. CONCLUSIONS: The distal
      coronary flow velocity reserve is the best intracoronary Doppler parameter
      for evaluation of coronary narrowings. Angiographical estimates of
      coronary lesion severity and distal coronary flow velocity reserve are
      good and independent predictors for the assessment of functional severity
      of coronary stenosis, emphasizing the complementary role of these
      parameters for clinical decision making.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Prognostic Value of Intracoronary Flow Velocity and Diameter Stenosis in Assessing the Short- and Long-term Outcomes of Coronary Balloon Angioplasty (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4973/</link>
      <pubDate>1997-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background The aim of this prospective, multicenter study was the identification of Doppler flow velocity measurements predictive of clinical outcome of patients undergoing single-vessel balloon angioplasty with no previous Q-wave myocardial infarction.

Methods and Results In 297 patients, a Doppler guidewire was used to measure basal and maximal hyperemic flow velocities proximal and distal to the stenosis before and after angioplasty. In 225 patients with an angiographically successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), postprocedural distal coronary flow reserve (CFR) and percent diameter stenosis (DS%) were correlated with symptoms and/or ischemia at 1 and 6 months, with the need for target lesion revascularization, and with angiographic restenosis (defined as DS 50% at follow-up). Logistic regression and receiver operator characteristic curve analyses were applied to determine the prognostic cutoff value of CFR and DS separately and in combination. Optimal cutoff criteria for predictors of these clinical events were DS, 35%; CFR, 2.5. A distal CFR after angioplasty &gt;2.5 with a residual DS 35% identified lesions with a low incidence of recurrence of symptoms at 1 month (10% versus 19%, P=.149) and at 6 months (23% versus 47%, P=.005), a low need for reintervention (16% versus 34%, P=.024), and a low restenosis rate (16% versus 41%, P=.002) compared with patients who did not meet these criteria.

Conclusions Measurements of distal CFR after PTCA, in combination with DS%, have a predictive value, albeit modest for the short- and long-term outcomes after PTCA, and thus may be used to identify patients who will or will not benefit from additional therapy such as stent implantation.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>