<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Rossum, C.T.M.  van</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/2382/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Seasonal variation in cause-specific mortality: are there high-risk groups? 25-year follow-up of civil servants from the first Whitehall study (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9783/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>OBJECTIVES: To determine the seasonal effect on all-cause and
      cause-specific mortality and to identify high-risk groups. METHODS: A
      25-year follow-up of 19,019 male civil servants aged 40-69 years. RESULTS:
      All-cause mortality was seasonal (ratio of highest mortality rate during
      winter versus lowest rate during summer 1.22, 95% CI : 1.1-1.3), largely
      due to the seasonal nature of ischaemic heart disease. Participants at
      high risk based on age, employment grade, blood pressure, cholesterol,
      forced expiratory volume, smoking and diabetes did not have higher
      seasonal mortality, although participants with ischaemic heart disease at
      baseline did have a higher seasonality effect (1.38, 95% CI : 1.2-1.6)
      than those without (1.18, 95% CI : 1.1-1.3) (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS:
      Seasonal mortality differences were greater among those with prevalent
      ischaemic heart disease and at older ages, but were not greater in
      individuals of lower socioeconomic status or with a high multivariate risk
      score. Since seasonal differences showed no evidence of declining over
      time, elucidating their causes and preventive strategies remains a public
      health challenge.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Prevalence, treatment, and control of hypertension by sociodemographic factors among the Dutch elderly (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9291/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The study objective was to assess the prevalence, level of treatment, and
          control of hypertension in a general elderly population according to age
          and sociodemographic factors. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of
          7983 participants of the Rotterdam Study who were &gt;/=55 years old and
          living in a district of Rotterdam. The prevalence of hypertension was
          based on blood pressure levels (&gt;/=160/95 mm Hg) and the use of blood
          pressure-lowering medication for the indication of hypertension, type of
          treatment, and control of hypertension. Systolic blood pressure rises with
          age, whereas diastolic blood pressure declines. The prevalence of
          hypertension increases with age and was higher among women (39%) than
          among men (31%). About 80% of the hypertensives were aware of having
          hypertension, and 82% of the 80% were treated. For 70% of them, treatment
          was adequate with reference to conservative criteria. Hypertension was
          more prevalent among persons not living in a home for the elderly, for
          more-educated men, and for less-educated women. Persons without a partner
          and men living in a home for the elderly had a higher risk of being
          unaware of or of not being treated for existing hypertension. Treatment
          was more often successful among those living in a home for the elderly.
          The prevalence of hypertension was higher among older women and increased
          with age in both genders. A large proportion of hypertensive elderly
          persons were aware and were successfully treated for hypertension. The
          degree of awareness and control appeared to be affected by
          sociodemographic factors. More importantly, the majority of hypertensives
          did not have their hypertension well controlled. This group requires more
          attention by medical practitioners to reduce the burden of cardiovascular
          diseases in elderly persons.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Employment grade differences in cause specific mortality. A 25 year follow up of civil servants from the first Whitehall study (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9298/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>STUDY OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that the association between
      socioeconomic status and mortality rates cuts across the major causes of
      death for middle aged and elderly men. DESIGN: 25 year follow up of
      mortality in relation to employment grade. SETTING: The first Whitehall
      study. PARTICIPANTS: 18,001 male civil servants aged 40-69 years who
      attended the initial screening between 1967 and 1970 and were followed up
      for at least 25 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Specific causes of death.
      RESULTS: After more than 25 years of follow up of civil servants, aged
      40-69 years at entry to the study, employment grade differences still
      exist in total mortality and for nearly all specific causes of death. Main
      risk factors (cholesterol, smoking, systolic blood pressure, glucose
      intolerance and diabetes) could only explain one third of this gradient.
      Comparing the older retired group with the younger pre-retirement group,
      the differentials in mortality remained but were less pronounced. The
      largest decline was seen for chronic bronchitis, gastrointestinal diseases
      and genitourinary diseases. CONCLUSIONS: Differentials in mortality
      persist at older ages for almost all causes of death.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Socioeconomic Inequalities in Cardiovascular Disease in an Ageing Population (Doctoral Thesis)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/19799/</link>
      <pubDate>1999-04-28T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Socioeconomic differences in stroke among Dutch elderly women: the Rotterdam Study (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9008/</link>
      <pubDate>1999-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We sought to assess the association between
          socioeconomic status and the risk of stroke among elderly women.
          Methods--The association between socioeconomic status and stroke emerged
          in cross-sectional and longitudinal data on 4274 female participants of
          the Rotterdam Study, a prospective, population-based, follow-up study in
          the Netherlands among older subjects. RESULTS: A history of stroke was
          more common among women in lower socioeconomic strata. The same trend was
          observed for the relationship between the lowest socioeconomic groups and
          the incidence of stroke. Risk factors for stroke were not related to
          socioeconomic status in a consistent manner. Smoking, history of
          cardiovascular diseases, and overweight were more common in lower
          socioeconomic groups. However, socioeconomic differences in hypertension,
          antihypertensive drug use, prevalence of atrial fibrillation, and
          prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy were not observed. The complex
          of established risk factors could only partly explain the association
          between socioeconomic status and stroke. CONCLUSIONS: There is a strong
          association among elderly women between socioeconomic status and stroke.
          The association could only partly be explained by known risk factors. Our
          findings indicate that not only the actual risk profile but also risk
          factors earlier in life may be of importance.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>