<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Morein, B.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/2655/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Protection of rhesus macaques from SIV infection by immunization with different experimental SIV vaccines. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/3510/</link>
      <pubDate>1994-11-11T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The immunogenicity and efficacy of an inactivated whole SIVmac (32H) preparation adjuvanted with muramyl dipeptide (SIV-MDP) and a gp120-enriched SIVmac (32H) ISCOM preparation (SIV-ISCOM), were compared by immunizing four rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) four times with SIV-MDP and four others in the same way with SIV-ISCOM. Two monkeys immunized with whole inactivated measles virus (MV) adjuvanted with MDP (MV-MDP) and two monkeys immunized with MV-ISCOM served as controls. In the SIV-ISCOM-immunized monkeys higher SIV-specific serum antibody titres were found than in the SIV-MDP-immunized monkeys. In contrast to the MV-immunized monkeys all SIV-MDP- and SIV-ISCOM-immunized monkeys were protected against intravenous challenge 2 weeks after the last immunization with 10 median monkey infectious doses (MID50) of a cell-free SIVmac (32H) challenge stock propagated in the human T-cell line C8166. After 43 weeks the protected monkeys were reboosted and 2 weeks later rechallenged with 10 MID50 of the same virus produced in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from a rhesus macaque. None of these animals proved to be protected against this challenge. In a parallel experiment in which the same numbers of monkeys were immunized in the same way, the animals were challenged intravenously with 10 MID50 of PBMC from an SIVmac (32H)-infected rhesus macaque. Two out of four SIV-MDP- and two out of four SIV-ISCOM-immunized monkeys proved to be protected from SIV infection.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>An immune stimulating complex (iscom) subunit rabies vaccine protects dogs and mice against street rabies challenge. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/3436/</link>
      <pubDate>1992-01-31T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Dogs and mice were immunized with either a rabies glycoprotein subunit vaccine incorporated into an immune stimulating complex (ISCOM) or a commercial human diploid cell vaccine (HDCV) prepared from a Pitman Moore (PM) rabies vaccine strain. Pre-exposure vaccination of mice with two intraperitoneal (i.p.) doses of 360 ng ISCOM or 0.5 ml HDCV protected 95% (38/40) and 90% (36/40) of mice, respectively, against a lethal intracerebral (i.c.) dose with challenge virus strain (CVS). One 360 ng i.p. dose of ISCOM protected 87.5% (35/40) of mice against i.c. challenge with CVS. Three groups of five dogs were vaccinated intramuscularly (i.m.) with 730 ng of rabies ISCOM prepared from either the PM or the CVS rabies strains, and they resisted lethal street rabies challenge. Postexposure treatment of mice with three or four 120 ng i.m. doses of ISCOM protected 90% (27/30) and 94% (45/48), respectively, of mice inoculated in the footpad with street rabies virus, but three doses of HDCV conferred no protection. When four doses of HDCV were administered postexposure, 78% (32/41) of the mice died of anaphylactic shock; 21% (11/52) of mice had already died of rabies 4 days after the third vaccine dose was administered.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Comparison of protection from homologous cell-free vs cell-associated SIV challenge afforded by inactivated whole SIV vaccines. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/3444/</link>
      <pubDate>1992-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>This study attempted to determine if SIV vaccines could protect against challenge with peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from an SIV infected rhesus monkey. Mature Macaca mulatta were vaccinated four times with formalin inactivated SIVmac32H administered in MDP adjuvant (n = 8) or SIVmac32H ISCOM vaccine (n = 8). Controls included animals vaccinated with measles virus in MDP adjuvant (n = 4) or ISCOM (n = 4) preparations. Of each group, half were challenged intravenously (IV) with ten MID50 of the cell-free SIVmac32H (11-88) SIV stock and half were challenged with ten MID50 of PBMCs from the SIVmac32H infected macaque 1XC. All SIV vaccinated animals challenged with the 11-88 cell free stock of SIVmac32H were protected, whereas only half of the SIV vaccinated monkeys receiving the same infectious dose of the 1XC cell stock were protected.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Formation and characterization of FeLV iscoms. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/3361/</link>
      <pubDate>1989-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Immunostimulating complexes (ISCOMs) have been prepared from feline leukaemia virus (FeLV) envelope proteins. The ISCOMs were characterized biochemically in SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis showing the presence of proteins of estimated molecular weights of 15,000, 27,000 and 70,000. Immunoblotting showed that both the transmembrane protein p15E and the external glycoprotein gp70 (making up the gp85 protein) were present in the ISCOM. Furthermore, a degradation product of gp70 with an estimated molecular weight of 32,000 was identified in the immunoblot. The FeLV ISCOM was shown by electron microscopy to have the characteristic cage-like structure of an ISCOM with a mean diameter of 37 nm. About 10% of the total amount of gp70 in the culture fluid was recovered in the ISCOMs. The largest loss was encountered during the sedimentation of the virus. In a preliminary immunization experiment in mice the FeLV ISCOMs elicited after a booster gave a clear-cut immune response against gp70.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Comparison of serological responses in cats vaccinated with two different FeVL vaccine preparations. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/3322/</link>
      <pubDate>1987-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>