<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Reinders Folmer, C.P.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/27607/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>An instrumental perspective on apologizing in bargaining: The importance of forgiveness to apologize (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/37696/</link>
      <pubDate>2012-02-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Although very little research in bargaining has addressed how perpetrators should deal with the aftermath of unfair allocations, it has been proposed that an apology may help the reconciliation process. Prior research, however, only focused on whether apologies can reveal positive effects on the reconciliation process but did not focus yet on whether perpetrators are actually willing to apologize. In this paper we investigate perpetrator's willingness to apologize for a trust violation in a bargaining setting. We hypothesized that perpetrators willingness to apologize would be a function of the extent to which the victim of the trust violation is willing to forgive. This effect, however, was expected to emerge only among those perpetrators who are low in dispositional trust. The results from a laboratory study with actual transgressions and actual apologetic behavior supported our predictions and thus emphasize an instrumental view on apologizing in bargaining situations. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>How Important Is an Apology to You? Forecasting Errors in Evaluating the Value of Apologies (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/22270/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Apologies are commonly used to deal with transgressions in relationships. Results to date, however, indicate that the positive effects of apologies vary widely, and the match between people’s judgments of apologies and the true value of apologies has not been studied. Building on the affective and behavioral forecasting literature, we predicted that people would overestimate how much they value apologies in reality. Across three experimental studies, our results showed that after having been betrayed by another party (or after imagining this to be the case), people (a) rated the value of an apology much more highly when they imagined receiving an apology than when they actually received an apology and (b) displayed greater trusting behavior when they imagined receiving an apology than when they actually received an apology. These results suggest that people are prone to forecasting errors regarding the effectiveness of an apology and that they tend to overvalue the impact of receiving one.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>