Halkes, P.H.A.

Prevention with low-dose aspirin plus dipyridamole in patients with disabling stroke (Article)

2010-11-01T00:00:00Z

Background and Purpose: The combination of low-dose aspirin and dipyridamole is more effective than aspirin alone in reducing the risk of recurrent stroke and other major cardiovascular events in patients with a recent transient ischemic attack or minor stroke. It is unknown whether this also applies to patients with a disabling stroke. Methods: We reanalyzed the data of 5700 patients from ESPRIT and ESPS-2 to study the effect of aspirin and dipyridamole according to modified Rankin scale (mRS) score at baseline. Primary outcome was vascular events (stroke, myocardial infarction, or vascular death). We used proportional hazards regression to estimate the treatment effect across mRS strata at baseline, and we tested for interactions with treatment. Results: In total, 426 patients (7.5%) had mRS score of 4 or 5 at baseline. The risk of an outcome event increased with mRS score. The relative risk associated with the combination of aspirin and dipyridamole compared to aspirin alone in patients with mRS score 0 to 5 was 0.79 (95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.91). The relative risk according to mRS subcategory score 0 to 4 at baseline varied between 0.73 and 0.96 for vascular events and between 0.62 and 0.96 for stroke. The number of patients with mRS score 5 was too small for reliable estimates, but the data suggest a beneficial effect. There was no evidence of interaction between treatment effect and mRS score at baseline. CONCLUSION-: The beneficial effect of the combination of low-dose aspirin and dipyridamole was present in all subcategories of the mRS score.

Risk indicators for development of headache during dipyridamole treatment after cerebral Ischaemia of arterial origin (Article)

2009-04-01T00:00:00Z

A considerable proportion of patients discontinue dipyridamole therapy because of headache. Risk indicators for the development of dipyridamole induced headache were identified by means of an exploratory analysis of data from the European/Australasian Stroke Prevention in Reversible Ischaemia Trial (ESPRIT) and the Second European Stroke Prevention Study (ESPS 2). In ESPRIT, dipyridamole induced headache was significantly associated with female sex, absence of hypertension and non-smoking (area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve 0.63 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.68)) and in ESPS 2 with female sex and absence of ischaemic lesions on imaging (area under the ROC curve 0.64 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.69)).

Interpretation of ESPRIT in the FASTER trial (Article)

2008-03-01T00:00:00Z

Large subcortical infarcts: clinical features, risk factors, and long-term prognosis compared with cortical and small deep infarcts (Article)

2006-07-01T00:00:00Z

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In this study we compared risk factors, clinical features, and stroke recurrence in a large series of patients with large subcortical, cortical, or small deep infarcts. METHODS: Patients with a transient or minor ischemic attack (modified Rankin Scale grade of < or =3) who had a single relevant supratentorial infarct of presumed noncardioembolic origin on CT were classified as suffering from a large subcortical (n=120), small deep (n=324), or cortical (n=211) infarct. Mean follow-up was 8 years. Rates of recurrent stroke were compared with Cox regression. RESULTS: The clinical deficits caused by large subcortical infarcts resembled either those of a cortical or those of a small deep infarct. Risk factor profiles were similar in the 3 groups. The rate of recurrent stroke in patients with a large subcortical infarct (25/120; 21%) did not differ from that of patients with a cortical infarct (46/211; 22%) or with a small deep infarct (60/324; 19%). After adjustment for age, sex, and vascular risk factors, hazard ratios for recurrent stroke of large subcortical and cortical infarcts were 1.05 (95% CI, 0.65 to 1.70) and 1.17 (95% CI, 0.79 to 1.73), respectively, compared with small deep infarcts. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical features, risk factor profiles, and stroke recurrence rate in patients with a large subcortical infarct only differ slightly from those in patients with small deep or cortical infarcts.

Classification of cause of death after stroke in clinical research (Article)

2006-06-01T00:00:00Z

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Classification of outcome events is essential in clinical research. The Executive Committee of the European/Australasian Stroke Prevention in Reversible Ischaemia Trial (ESPRIT), a secondary prevention trial in patients with cerebral ischemia, repeatedly encountered problems in classifying the cause of death after a stroke if the interval between these events was relatively long. We aimed to develop guidelines for classifying such events. METHODS: Twenty-nine neurologists with a special interest in stroke filled out a questionnaire and audited 5 case vignettes. On the basis of this information, we developed a proposal for classifying causes of death after stroke. This proposal was evaluated in an interobserver analysis in which 10 neurologists or residents in neurology assessed 20 of 100 case vignettes. RESULTS: Initially, there was great variation in classifications of the case vignettes, mainly because the correspondents strongly disagreed about the relative importance of the interval between stroke and death, the degree of disability after stroke, the discharge destination (home or institutional care), and the coexistence of infection. In the new proposal, the main criteria were "interval after stroke" (cutoff point at 1 month) and "best Rankin grade after stroke" (cutoff at 3). In the interobserver analysis, good agreement was obtained among the 5 pairs of neurologists who assessed the 20 case vignettes (kappa 0.80 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.92). CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of guidelines, neurologists show striking variation in the classification of causes of death in patients who die after a stroke. With precise rules, agreement in the classification of death after stroke strongly improved.