<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Storey, D.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/2809/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>The effect of business regulations on nascent to young business entrepreneurship (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/15791/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-03-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>We examine the relationship, across 39 countries, between regulation and entrepreneurship using a new two-equation model. We find the minimum capital requirement required to start a business lowers entrepreneurship rates across countries, as do labour market regulations. However the administrative considerations of starting a business – such as the time, the cost, or the number of procedures required – are unrelated to the formation rate of either nascent or young businesses. Given the explicit link made by Djankov et al. [Djankov et al. 2002, ‹The Regulation of Entry’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(1), 1–37] between the speed and ease with which businesses may be established in a country and its economic performance – and the enthusiasm with which this link has been grasped by European Union policy makers – our findings imply this link needs reconsidering.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The Effect of Business Regulations on Nascent and Young Business Entrepreneurship (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/7996/</link>
      <pubDate>2006-09-26T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>We examine the relationship, across 39 countries, between regulation and entrepreneurship using a new two-equation model. We find the minimum capital requirement required to start a business lowers entrepreneurship rates across countries, as do labour market regulations. However the administrative considerations of starting a business – such as the time, the cost, or the number of procedures required – are unrelated to the formation rate of either nascent or young businesses. Given the explicit link made by Djankov et al. (2002) between the speed and ease with which businesses may be established in a country and its economic performance – and the enthusiasm with which this link has been grasped by European Union policy makers – our findings imply this link needs reconsidering.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>From nascent to actual entrepreneurship: the effect of entry barriers (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9714/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>This exploratory study focuses on the conversion from nascent to
actual entrepreneurship and the role of entry barriers in this process.
Using data for a sample of countries participating in the Global
Entrepreneurship Monitor between 2002 and 2004, we estimate a twoequation
model explaining the nascent entrepreneurship rate and the young business
entrepreneurship rate, while taking into account the interrelationship
between the two variables (i.e. the conversion). Furthermore various
determinants of entrepreneurship reflecting the demand and supply side of
entrepreneurship as well as government intervention are incorporated in
the model. We find evidence for a strong conversion effect from nascent to
actual entrepreneurship. We also find positive effects on entrepreneurial
activity rates of labour flexibility and tertiary enrollment and a
negative effect of social security expenditure. Concerning the effect of
entry regulations we find mixed results. Using one set of entry regulation
measures we find no effects whereas using data from a second source we
find a weak negative effect of more burdensome entry regulations on the
rate of entrepreneurship.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The Relationship between Firm Births and Job Creation (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/6810/</link>
      <pubDate>2002-06-04T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>This paper examines the relationship between firm births and job creation in Great Britain. We use a new data set for 60 British regions, covering the whole of Great Britain, between 1980 and 1998. The central theme of the paper is that, with the exception of a recent paper by Audretsch and Fritsch for Germany, the relationship between new-firm startups and employment growth has previously been examined either with no time-lag or with only a short period lag. The current paper examines short-run as well as long-run relationships and provides results for Great Britain similar to those for Germany. We find that the short-run employment impact of new-firm startups in British regions has been bigger in the 1990s compared to the 1980s. Concerning long-run effects, we find that the employment impact of new-firm startups is strongest after about five years, but the effect disappears after a decade.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>