<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Kreft, D.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/2846/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>The prevalence and clonal expansion of high-level gentamicin-resistant enterococci isolated from blood cultures in a Dutch university hospital (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9210/</link>
      <pubDate>1999-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>We studied the prevalence and clonality of high-level gentamicin-resistant
          enterococci (HLGRE) in a Dutch university hospital. Of 238 enterococcal
          strains isolated from blood cultures between 1991 and 1997, 57 were HLGRE.
          Genomic analysis of these strains revealed 19 different genotypes, two of
          which were encountered more frequently [type A (12/57), type B (23/57)].
          The spread of these types largely explained the rise in HLGRE incidence
          from 14% in 1991 to 31% in 1997. However, the contribution of unique
          strains to the total HLGRE burden also increased from 4% to 16%. We
          conclude that both clonal expansion and the emergence of unique HLGRE have
          contributed significantly to the increasing incidence of HLGRE.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Comparison of eight methods to detect vancomycin resistance in enterococci (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8771/</link>
      <pubDate>1998-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>A collection of genetically unrelated vancomycin-resistant enterococci
          (VRE) including 50 vanA, 15 vanB, 50 vanC1, and 30 vanC2 VRE were used to
          evaluate the accuracy of eight currently available susceptibility test
          methods (agar dilution, disk diffusion, E-test, agar screen plate, Vitek
          GPS-TA and GPS-101, and MicroScan overnight and rapid panels). vanA VRE
          were detected by all methods. vanB VRE were often not detected by Vitek
          GPS-TA and MicroScan rapid (sensitivities, 47 and 53%, respectively),
          though the new Vitek GPS-101 was found to be a significant improvement.
          E-test and the agar screen were the only two methods detecting all VRE,
          including the vanC1/C2 VRE.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>