http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/30292/ List of Publications en http://repub.eur.nl/static-eur/img/logo.png http://repub.eur.nl http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/24265/ 2009-12-01T00:00:00Z The aim of this study was to investigate the value of coronary calcium detection by computed tomography compared to computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and exercise testing to detect obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with stable chest pain. A total of 471 consecutive patients with new stable chest complaints were scheduled to undergo dual-source multislice computed tomography (Siemens, Germany; coronary calcium score [CCS] and coronary CTA) and exercise electrocardiography (XECG). Clinically driven invasive quantitative angiography was performed in 98 patients. Only 3 of 175 patients (2%) with a negative CCS had significant CAD on CT angiogram, with only 1 confirmed by quantitative angiography. In patients with a high calcium score (Agatston score >400), CTA could exclude significant CAD in no more than 4 of 65 patients (6%). In patients with a low-intermediate CCS, CTA more often yielded diagnostic results compared to XECG and could rule out obstructive CAD in 56% of patients. For patients with CAD on CT angiogram, those with abnormal exercise electrocardiographic results more often showed severe CAD (p <0.034). In patients with diagnostic results for all tests, the sensitivity and specificity to detect >50% quantitative angiographic diameter stenosis were 100% and 15% for CCS >0, 82% and 64% for CCS >100, 97% and 36% for CTA, and 70% and 76% for XECG, respectively. In conclusion, nonenhanced computed tomography for calcium detection is a reliable means to exclude obstructive CAD in stable, symptomatic patients. Contrast-enhanced CTA can exclude significant CAD in patients with a low-intermediate CCS but is of limited value in patients with a high CCS. http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/24895/ 2009-10-01T00:00:00Z Objective: To compare the diagnostic performance of CT angiography (CTA) and exercise electrocardiography (XECG) in a symptomatic population with a low-intermediate prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD). Design: Prospective registry. Setting: Tertiary university hospital. Patients: 471 consecutive ambulatory patients with stable chest pain complaints, mean (SD) age 56 (10), female 227 (48%), pre-test probability for significant CAD >5%. Intervention: All patients were intended to undergo both 64-slice, dual-source CTA and an XECG. Clinically driven quantitative catheter angiography was performed in 98 patients. Main outcome measures: Feasibility and interpretability of, and association between, CTA and XECG, and their diagnostic performance with invasive coronary angiography as reference. Results: CTA and XECG could not be performed in 16 (3.4%) vs 48 (10.2%, p<0.001), and produced nondiagnostic results in 3 (0.7%) vs 140 (33%, p<0.001). CTA showed ≥1 coronary stenosis (≥50%) in 140 patients (30%), XECG was abnormal in 93 patients (33%). Results by CTA and XECG matched for 185 patients (68%, p=0.63). Catheter angiography showed obstructive CAD in 57/98 patients (58%). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of CTA to identify patients with ≥50% stenosis was 96%, 37%, 67% and 88%, respectively; compared with XECG: 71%, 76%, 80% and 66%, respectively. Quantitative CTA slightly overestimated diameter stenosis: 6 (21)% (R=0.71), compared with QCA. Of the 312 patients (66%) with a negative CTA, 44 (14%) had a positive XECG, but only 2/17 who underwent catheter angiography had significant CAD. Conclusion: CTA is feasible and diagnostic in more patients than XECG. For interpretable studies, CTA has a higher sensitivity, but lower specificity for detection of CAD.