<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Geelen, E.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/3044/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Genomic alterations in malignant transformation of Barrett's esophagus (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9624/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The incidence of adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus has been increasing
      rapidly over the past decades. Neoplastic progression is characterized by
      three well-defined premalignant stages: metaplasia, low-grade dysplasia,
      and high-grade dysplasia. A genome-wide overview, based on comparative
      genomic hybridization, was performed, evaluating 30 Barrett's
      adenocarcinomas and 25 adjacent precursors, i.e., 6 metaplasias, 9
      low-grade dysplasias, and 10 high-grade dysplasias. The frequency of
      losses and gains significantly increased in the subsequent stages of
      malignant transformation. Losses of 5q21-q23, 9p21, 17p12-13.1, 18q21, and
      Y were revealed in low-grade dysplasias. This was followed by loss of
      7q33-q35 and gains of 7p12-p15, 7q21-q22, and 17q21 in high-grade
      dysplasias along with high-level amplification (HLA) of 7q21 and 17q21. In
      the invasive cancers, additional losses of 3p14-p21, 4p, 4q, 8p21,
      13q14-q31, 14q24.3-q31, 16q21-q22, and 22q as well as gains of 3q25-q27,
      8q23-24.1, 12p11.2-12, 15q22-q24, and 20q11.2-q13.1 were distinguished
      along with HLAs of 8p12-p22 and 20q11.2-q13.1. Approximately one-third of
      the alterations in the dysplasias were also found in the adjacent
      adenocarcinomas, illustrating that multiple clonal lineages can be present
      in Barrett's esophagus. Novel findings include loss on 7q, gain on 12p,
      and the observation of several HLAs in high-grade dysplasias. Furthermore,
      loss of 7q33-q35 was found to represent a significant distinction between
      low-grade and high-grade dysplasia (P = 0.01), whereas loss of 16q21-q22
      and gain of 20q11.2-q13.1 were disclosed to significantly discriminate
      between high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma (P = 0.02 and P = 0.03,
      respectively). This inventory of genetic aberrations increases our
      understanding of malignant transformation in Barrett's esophagus and might
      provide useful biomarkers for disease progression.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Comparative genomic hybridization of cancer of the gastroesophageal junction: deletion of 14Q31-32.1 discriminates between esophageal (Barrett's) and gastric cardia adenocarcinomas (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9011/</link>
      <pubDate>1999-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Incidence rates have risen rapidly for esophageal and gastric cardia
          adenocarcinomas. These cancers, arising at and around the gastroesophageal
          junction (GEJ), share a poor prognosis. In contrast, there is no consensus
          with respect to clinical staging resulting in possible adverse effects on
          treatment and survival. The goal of this study was to provide more insight
          into the genetic changes underlying esophageal and gastric cardia
          adenocarcinomas. We have used comparative genomic hybridization for a
          genetic analysis of 28 adenocarcinomas of the GEJ. Eleven tumors were
          localized in the distal esophagus and related to Barrett's esophagus, and
          10 tumors were situated in the gastric cardia. The remaining seven tumors
          were located at the junction and could not be classified as either
          Barrett-related, or gastric cardia. We found alterations in all 28
          neoplasms. Gains and losses were distinguished in comparable numbers.
          Frequent loss (&gt; or = 25% of all tumors) was detected, in decreasing order
          of frequency, on 4pq (54%), 14q (46%), 18q (43%), 5q (36%), 16q (36%), 9p
          (29%), 17p (29%), and 21q (29%). Frequent gain (&gt; or = 25% of all tumors)
          was observed, in decreasing order of frequency, on 20pq (86%), 8q (79%),
          7p (61%), 13q (46%), 12q (39%), 15q (39%), 1q (36%), 3q (32%), 5p (32%),
          6p (32%), 19q (32%), Xpq (32%), 17q (29%), and 18p (25%). Nearly all
          patients were male, and loss of chromosome Y was frequently noted (64%).
          Recurrent high-level amplifications (&gt; 10% of all tumors) were seen at
          8q23-24.1, 15q25, 17q12-21, and 19q13.1. Minimal overlapping regions could
          be determined at multiple locations (candidate genes are in parentheses):
          minimal regions of overlap for deletions were assigned to 3p14 (FHIT,
          RCA1), 5q14-21 (APC, MCC), 9p21 (MTS1/CDKN2), 14q31-32.1 (TSHR), 16q23,
          18q21 (DCC, P15) and 21q21. Minimal overlapping amplified sites could be
          seen at 5p14 (MLVI2), 6p12-21.1 (NRASL3), 7p12 (EGFR), 8q23-24.1 (MYC),
          12q21.1, 15q25 (IGF1R), 17q12-21 (ERBB2/HER2-neu), 19q13.1 (TGFB1, BCL3,
          AKT2), 20p12 (PCNA), 20q12-13 (MYBL2, PTPN1), and Xq25. The distribution
          of the imbalances revealed similar genetic patterns in the three GEJ tumor
          groups. However, loss of 14q31-32.1 occurred significantly more frequent
          in Barrett-related adenocarcinomas of the distal esophagus, than in
          gastric cardia cancers (P = 0.02). The unclassified, "pure junction" group
          displayed an intermediate position, suggesting that these may be in part
          gastric cardia tumors, whereas the others may be related to
          (short-segment) Barrett's esophagus. In conclusion, this study has, fist,
          provided a detailed comparative genomic hybridization-map of GEJ
          adenocarcinomas documenting new genetic changes, as well as candidate
          genes involved. Second, genetic divergence was revealed in this poorly
          understood group of cancers.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>