<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Sutter, J. de</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/3236/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Prognostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with diabetes (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/10119/</link>
      <pubDate>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the incremental value of
      dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) for the risk stratification of
      diabetic patients who are unable to perform an adequate exercise stress
      test. Exercise capacity is frequently impaired in patients with diabetes.
      The role of pharmacologic stress echocardiography in the risk
      stratification of diabetic patients has not been well defined. RESEARCH
      DESIGN AND METHODS: We studied 396 diabetic patients (mean age 61 +/- 11
      years, 252 men [64%]) with limited exercise capacity who underwent DSE for
      evaluation of known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). End points
      were hard cardiac events (cardiac death and nonfatal myocardial
      infarction) and all causes of mortality. RESULTS: During a median
      follow-up of 3 years, 97 patients (24%) died (55 cardiac deaths), and 27
      patients had nonfatal myocardial infarction. In an incremental
      multivariate analysis model, clinical predictors of hard cardiac events
      were history of congestive heart failure, previous myocardial infarction,
      hypercholesterolemia, and ejection fraction at rest. The percentage of
      ischemic segments was incremental to the clinical model in the prediction
      of hard cardiac events (chi(2) = 37 vs. 18, P &lt; 0.05). Clinical predictors
      of all causes of mortality were history of congestive heart failure, age,
      hypercholesterolemia, and ejection fraction at rest. Wall motion score
      index at peak stress was incremental to the clinical model in the
      prediction of mortality (chi(2) = 52 vs. 43, P &lt; 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: DSE
      provides incremental data for the prediction of mortality and hard cardiac
      events in patients with diabetes who are unable to perform an adequate
      exercise stress test.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Improved identification of viable myocardium using second harmonic imaging during dobutamine stress echocardiography (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8312/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>OBJECTIVE: To determine whether, compared with fundamental imaging, second
      harmonic imaging can improve the accuracy of dobutamine stress
      echocardiography for identifying viable myocardium, using nuclear imaging
      as a reference. PATIENTS: 30 patients with chronic left ventricular
      dysfunction (mean (SD) age, 60 (8) years; 22 men). METHODS: Dobutamine
      stress echocardiography was carried out in all patients using both
      fundamental and second harmonic imaging. All patients underwent dual
      isotope simultaneous acquisition single photon emission computed
      tomography (DISA-SPECT) with
      (99m)technetium-tetrofosmin/(18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose on a separate day.
      Myocardial viability was considered present by dobutamine stress
      echocardiography when segments with severe dysfunction showed a biphasic
      sustained improvement or an ischaemic response. Viability criteria on
      DISA-SPECT were normal or mildly reduced perfusion and metabolism, or
      perfusion/metabolism mismatch. RESULTS: Using fundamental imaging, 330
      segments showed severe dysfunction at baseline; 144 (44%) were considered
      viable. The agreement between dobutamine stress echocardiography by
      fundamental imaging and DISA-SPECT was 78%, kappa = 0.56. Using second
      harmonic imaging, 288 segments showed severe dysfunction; 138 (48%) were
      viable. The agreement between dobutamine stress echocardiography and
      DISA-SPECT was significantly better when second harmonic imaging was used
      (89%, kappa = 0.77, p = 0.001 v fundamental imaging). CONCLUSIONS: Second
      harmonic imaging applied during dobutamine stress echocardiography
      increases the agreement with DISA-SPECT for detecting myocardial
      viability.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>