http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/32944/ List of Publications en http://repub.eur.nl/static-eur/img/logo.png http://repub.eur.nl http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/28154/ 2010-12-01T00:00:00Z Purpose of review: Despite the use of currently available lipid-lowering therapies, a significant proportion of patients with severe hypercholesterolaemia do not reach treatment goals and consequently remain at increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD). On the basis of clinical experience, these patients tend to have the most severe forms of familial hypercholesterolaemia or markedly elevated LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) levels but are unable to tolerate statin therapy. Recent findings: LDL apheresis is currently the best treatment option (or treatment rescue) to bring these patients closer to therapeutic LDL objectives, and has been shown to reduce the risk of CVD along with LDL-C levels. However, criteria for LDL apheresis eligibility and the percentage of patients receiving treatment vary widely from country to country across Europe. Despite the proven benefits of LDL apheresis, access to this procedure remains limited because of its high cost and low availability, reflecting inherent limitations of this treatment modality. Summary: There is a need to both better define the patient population eligible for LDL apheresis and to create unified European guidelines governing the use of apheresis. In addition to improving access to apheresis where appropriate, new therapies are needed to further decrease LDL-C and reduce the ongoing CVD risk in patients with severe hypercholesterolaemia. http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/28686/ 2010-07-01T00:00:00Z Background-Until recently, patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) were considered the best subjects for the assessment of changes in carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) in randomized intervention trials. Our aims were to investigate whether contemporary statin-treated HeFH patients still show accelerated cIMT increase and to assess the impact of statin treatment, before and after random assignment, on atherosclerosis progression. Methods and Results-We retrospectively evaluated cIMT change, and prior statin treatment and postbaseline LDL-C change as predictors of cIMT change, in 1513 HeFH patients who were randomly assigned to the statin arms of the early ASAP and more recent RADIANCE 1, CAPTIVATE, and ENHANCE studies. In the 3 recent studies combined, mean cIMT increased at only 33% of the rate of the simvastatin-treated patients in the ASAP study (0.014 mm/2 years [95% confidence interval, -0.0003- 0.028] versus 0.041 mm/2 years [95% confidence interval, 0.020-0.061]; P<0.05). Patients whose statin therapy could be intensified, as evidenced by an LDL-C decrease after the initiation of on-trial statin therapy, showed cIMT decrease in the first 6 to 12 months and a much lower cIMT increase measured over the full 2 years. In line with this, previously statin-naive HeFH patients showed a lower overall cIMT increase. Conclusions-Over the years, intensification of statin therapy in HeFH patients has resulted in an impressive decrease in carotid atherosclerosis progression. In studies that assess other antiatherosclerotic modalities, statin therapy may still induce rapid changes in cIMT. For future cIMT studies, our analyses suggest that patient populations other than intensively pretreated HeFH patients should be selected and that the statin regimen should not be changed on study initiation. http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/24936/ 2009-11-01T00:00:00Z Objective: To compare incidences of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in general and myocardial infarction (MI) specifically between new users of different statins in daily practice. Design and methodology: Retrospective observational cohort study. Data were obtained from the PHARMO Record Linkage System; the PHARMO database contains pharmacy dispensing records of 3 million patients in the Netherlands registered with community pharmacies, linked to hospitalisation records. The participants were new statin users in the period 2000-2005, excluding patients hospitalised for CVD events in the year prior to start of statin use. Main outcome measures: Adjusted hazard ratios of hospitalisations for CVD (including any type of ischemic heart disease, stroke, or revascularisation procedure) in general, or MI in particular, occurring during use of the initial statin within two years of start of therapy, comparing users of different statins. Results: The mean follow-up duration of 76,147 new statin users (14,530 pravastatin, 27,752 simvastatin, 25,777 atorvastatin, 8088 rosuvastatin) was 55 weeks. Incidence rates of CVD and MI per 100 person years ranged from 0.75 and 0.15 for rosuvastatin to 1.72 and 0.29 for pravastatin. Rosuvastatin users had a lower incidence rate of CVD compared to other statin users in general (28% lower), and simvastatin (29% lower) and pravastatin users (40% lower) in particular. The difference with atorvastatin was not statistically significant. Since this was not a prospective randomised study, there is the potential for unobserved risk factors to be responsible for some of the differences observed. Conclusion: Compared to other statin users without recent prior cardiovascular events, the incidence of fatal and nonfatal CVD in this retrospective observational cohort study was 28% lower among rosuvastatin users. http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/25066/ 2009-01-01T00:00:00Z Type III hyperlipoproteinemia (HLP) is mainly found in homozygous apolipoprotein (APO) E2 (R158C) carriers. Genetic factors contributing to the expression of type III HLP were investigated in 113 hyper- and 52 normolipidemic E2/2 subjects, by testing for polymorphisms in APOC3, APOA5, HL (hepatic lipase) and LPL (lipoprotein lipase) genes. In addition, 188 normolipidemic Dutch control panels (NDCP) and 141 hypertriglyceridemic (HTG) patients were genotyped as well. No associations were found for four HL gene polymorphisms and two LPL gene polymorphisms and type III HLP. The frequency of the rare allele of APOC3 3238 G>C and APOA5 -1131 T>C (in linkage disequilibrium) was significantly higher in type III HLP patients when compared with normolipidemic E2/2 subjects, 15.6 vs 6.9% and 15.1 vs 5.8%, respectively, (P<0.05). Furthermore, the frequencies of the APOA5 c.56 G>C polymorphism and LPL c.27 G>A mutation were higher in type III HLP patients, though not significant. Some 58% of the type III HLP patients carried either the APOA5 -1131 T>C, c.56 G>C and/or LPL c.27 G>A mutation as compared to 27% of the normolipidemic APOE2/2 subjects (odds ratio 3.7, 95% confidence interval=1.8-7.5, P<0.0001). The HTG patients showed similar allele frequencies of the APOA5, APOC3 and LPL polymorphisms, whereas the NDCP showed similar allele frequencies as the normolipidemic APOE2/2. Patients with the APOC3 3238 G>C/APOA5 -1131 T>C polymorphism showed a more severe hyperlipidemia than patients without this polymorphism. Polymorphisms in lipolysis genes associate with the expression and severity of type III HLP in APOE2/2. http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/28851/ 2008-12-09T00:00:00Z Background - Torcetrapib, an inhibitor of cholesteryl ester transfer protein, has been shown to increase the cardiovascular event rate despite conferring a significant high-density lipoprotein cholesterol increase. Using data from the Rating Atherosclerotic Disease Change by Imaging with a New CETP Inhibitor (RADIANCE) trials, which assessed the impact of torcetrapib on carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT), we sought to explore potential mechanisms underlying this adverse outcome. Methods and Results - Data from the RADIANCE 1 and 2 studies, which examined cIMT in 904 subjects with familial hypercholesterolemia and in 752 subjects with mixed dyslipidemia, were pooled. Subjects were randomized to either atorvastatin or torcetrapib combined with atorvastatin. Mean common cIMT progression was increased in subjects receiving torcetrapib plus atorvastatin compared with subjects receiving atorvastatin alone (0.0076±0.0011 versus 0.0025±0.0011 mm/y; P=0.0014). Subjects treated with torcetrapib plus atorvastatin displayed higher postrandomization systolic blood pressure and plasma sodium and bicarbonate levels in conjunction with lower potassium levels. The decrease in potassium levels was associated with the blood pressure increase. Markedly, the use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors tended to aggravate the blood pressure increase. Subjects receiving torcetrapib plus atorvastatin with the strongest low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction showed the smallest cIMT progression, whereas subjects with the highest systolic blood pressure increase showed the largest cIMT progression. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol increase was not associated with cIMT change. Conclusions - These analyses support mineralocorticoid-mediated off-target toxicity in patients receiving torcetrapib as a contributing factor to an adverse outcome. The absence of an inverse relationship between high-density lipoprotein cholesterol change and cIMT progression suggests that torcetrapib-induced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol increase does not mediate atheroprotection. Future studies with cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors without off-target toxicity are needed to settle this issue. http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/29641/ 2008-08-01T00:00:00Z Objective: The effectiveness of statin therapy in a real life setting may differ from that in clinical trials, as physicians make non-randomised treatment decisions for patients with less uniform and possibly different characteristics. We therefore performed a study to compare the effectiveness of different statins and doses in routine clinical practice with respect to total serum cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction and goal attainment according to European guidelines on the prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Research design and methods. Naive statin users starting treatment in 2003 and 2004 with LDL-C measurements at baseline and between 30 and 365 days after start of treatment were extracted from the PHARMO database. During treatment with their initial statin dose LDL-C reduction and attainment of cholesterol goals were compared between different statins and doses. Results: Of 2303 identified naive patients, approximately 30% were allocated to the high CVD-risk group. Average LDL-C reductions were 48%, 42%, 39%, and 32% at mean doses of 11 mg rosuvastatin, 17 mg atorvastatin, 22 mg simvastatin and 35 mg pravastatin, respectively. The proportion of patients attaining cholesterol goals was 75% for rosuvastatin, 68% for atorvastatin, 56% for simvastatin, and 42% for pravastatin. Dose comparisons showed greater LDL-C reduction and increased goal attainment for rosuvastatin 10 mg compared to other statins at most doses (adjusted p < 0.05). Conclusions. In a real life setting, both LDL-C reduction and the proportion of patients attaining cholesterol goals appear to be significantly increased among users of rosuvastatin compared to other statins. These results confirm and extend reported clinical trial results to a real world setting. http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/32431/ 2008-04-03T00:00:00Z Background: Ezetimibe, a cholesterol-absorption inhibitor, reduces levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol when added to statin treatment. However, the effect of ezetimibe on the progression of atherosclerosis remains unknown. Methods: We conducted a double-blind, randomized, 24-month trial comparing the effects of daily therapy with 80 mg of simvastatin either with placebo or with 10 mg of ezetimibe in 720 patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. Patients underwent B-mode ultrasonography to assess the intima-media thickness of the walls of the carotid and femoral arteries. The primary outcome measure was the change in the mean carotid-artery intima-media thickness, which was defined as the average of the means of the far-wall intima-media thickness of the right and left common carotid arteries, carotid bulbs, and internal carotid arteries. Results: The primary outcome, the mean (±SE) change in the carotid-artery intima-media thickness, was 0.0058±0.0037 mm in the simvastatin-only group and 0.0111±0.0038 mm in the simvastatin-plus-ezetimibe (combined-therapy) group (P = 0.29). Secondary outcomes (consisting of other variables regarding the intima-media thickness of the carotid and femoral arteries) did not differ significantly between the two groups. At the end of the study, the mean (±SD) LDL cholesterol level was 192.7±60.3 mg per deciliter (4.98±1.56 mmol per liter) in the simvastatin group and 141.3±52.6 mg per deciliter (3.65±1.36 mmol per liter) in the combined-therapy group (a between-group difference of 16.5%, P<0.01). The differences between the two groups in reductions in levels of triglycerides and C-reactive protein were 6.6% and 25.7%, respectively, with greater reductions in the combined-therapy group (P<0.01 for both comparisons). Side-effect and safety profiles were similar in the two groups. Conclusions: In patients with familial hypercholesterolemia, combined therapy with ezetimibe and simvastatin did not result in a significant difference in changes in intima-media thickness, as compared with simvastatin alone, despite decreases in levels of LDL cholesterol and C-reactive protein. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00552097.) Copyright http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/35481/ 2007-04-01T00:00:00Z Context: The traditional lipid and lipoprotein levels in patients with familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCH) are relatively mildly elevated and do not fully explain the increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). In other populations, high remnant-like particles cholesterol (RLP-C) levels are an independent risk factor for CVD. Objective: The objective of the study was to investigate whether plasma RLP-C concentrations are elevated in patients with FCH and contribute to the increased prevalence of CVD. Design, Setting, Participants: In this cross-sectional study, we studied RLP-C levels in 37 FCH families comprising 582 subjects, of whom 134 subjects were diagnosed FCH based on total cholesterol, triglyceride, and apolipoprotein-B levels. Plasma RLP-C concentrations were determined using an immune-separation technique. Results: For both men and women, the mean plasma RLP-C concentration (mmol/liter) was 2-fold elevated in FCH patients [0.59 (0.54-0.66) and 0.40 (0.37-0.43), respectively] compared with both normolipidemic relatives [0.27 (0.26-0.29) in male and 0.22 (0.21-0.23) in female, all P < 0.000]; and spouses [0.27 (0.23-0.31) in male and 0.24 (0.21-0.27) in female, all P <0.000]. Plasma RLP-C levels above the 90th percentile predicted prevalent CVD, independently of nonlipid cardiovascular risk factors [odds ratio 2.18 (1.02-4.66)] and triglyceride levels [odds ratio 2.35 (1.15-4.83)]. However, in both FCH patients and controls, RLP-C did not provide additional information about prevalent CVD over and above non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Conclusions: Patients with FCH have 2-fold elevated plasma RLP-C levels, which add to the atherogenic lipid profile and contribute to the increased risk for CVD. However, for clinical practice, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol is the best predictor of prevalent CVD. Copyright http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/35664/ 2007-01-01T00:00:00Z Recently, the upstream stimulatory factor 1 gene (USF1) was proposed as a candidate gene for familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCH). In this study, we examined the previously identified risk haplotype of USF1 with respect to FCH and its related phenotypes in 36 Dutch FCH families. The diagnosis of FCH was based on both the traditional diagnostic criteria and a nomogram. The two polymorphisms, USF1s1 and USF1s2, were in complete linkage disequilibrium. No association was found for the individual single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with FCH defined by the nomogram (USF1s1, P = 0.53; USF1s2, P = 0.53), whereas suggestive associations were found when using the traditional diagnostic criteria for FCH (USF1s1, P = 0.08; USF1s2, P = 0.07). USF1 was associated with total cholesterol (USF1s1, P 5 0.05; USF1s2, P = 0.04) and apolipoprotein B (USF1s1, P = 0.06; USF1s2, P = 0.04). Small dense LDL showed a suggestive association (USF1s1, P = 0.10; USF1s2, P = 0.09). The results from the haplotype analyses supported the results obtained for the individual SNPs. In conclusion, the previously identified risk haplotype of USF1 showed a suggestive association with FCH and contributed to the related lipid traits in our Dutch FCH families. Copyright http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/36528/ 2007-01-01T00:00:00Z Background: Familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCH) is the most common genetic lipid disorder with an undefined genetic etiology. Apolipoprotein A5 gene (APOA5) variants were previously shown to contribute to FCH. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association of APOA5 variants with FCH and its related phenotypes in Dutch FCH patients. Furthermore, the effects of variants in the APOA5 gene on carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) were examined. Materials and methods: The study population consisted of 36 Dutch families, including 157 FCH patients. Two polymorphisms in the APOA5 gene (- 1131T > C and S19W) were genotyped. Results: Haplotype analysis of APOA5 showed an association with FCH (p = 0.029), total cholesterol (p = 0.031), triglycerides (p < 0.001), apolipoprotein B (p = 0.011), HDL-cholesterol (p = 0.013), small dense LDL (p = 0.010) and remnant-like particle cholesterol (p = 0.001). Compared to S19 homozygotes, 19W carriers had an increased risk of FCH (OR = 1.6 [1.0-2.6]; p = 0.026) and a more atherogenic lipid profile, reflected by higher triglyceride (+ 22%) and apolipoprotein B levels (+ 5%), decreased HDL-cholesterol levels (- 7%) and an increased prevalence of small dense LDL (16% vs. 26%). In carriers of the - 1131C allele, small dense LDL was more prevalent than in - 1131T homozygotes (29% vs. 16%). No association of the APOA5 gene with IMT and CVD was evident. Conclusion: In Dutch FCH families, variants in the APOA5 gene are associated with FCH and an atherogenic lipid profile.