<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Betriu, A.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/332/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Carvedilol for prevention of restenosis after directional coronary atherectomy : final results of the European carvedilol atherectomy restenosis (EUROCARE) trial (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9300/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: In addition to its known properties as a competitive,
      nonselective beta and alpha-1 receptor blocker, carvedilol directly
      inhibits vascular myocyte migration and proliferation and exerts
      antioxidant effects that are considerably greater than those of vitamin E
      or probucol. This provides the basis for an evaluation of carvedilol for
      the prevention of coronary restenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a
      prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, 25 mg of
      carvedilol was given twice daily, starting 24 hours before scheduled
      directional coronary atherectomy and continuing for 5 months after a
      successful procedure. The primary end point was the minimal luminal
      diameter as determined during follow-up angiography 26+/-2 weeks after the
      procedure. Of 406 randomized patients, 377 underwent attempted
      atherectomy, and in 324 (88.9%), a &lt;/=50% diameter stenosis was achieved
      without the use of a stent. Evaluable follow-up angiography was available
      in 292 eligible patients (90%). No differences in minimal luminal diameter
      (1.99+/-0.73 mm versus 2.00+/-0.74 mm), angiographic restenosis rate
      (23.4% versus 23.9%), target lesion revascularization (16.2 versus 14.5),
      or event-free survival (79.2% versus 79.7%) between the placebo and
      carvedilol groups were observed at 7 months. CONCLUSIONS: The maximum
      recommended daily dose of the antioxidant and beta-blocker carvedilol
      failed to reduce restenosis after successful atherectomy. These findings
      are in contrast to those of the Multivitamins and Probucol Trial, which
      raises doubts regarding the validity of the interpretation that restenosis
      reduction by probucol was via antioxidant effects. The relationship
      between antioxidant agents and restenosis remains to be elucidated.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Predictors of 30-Day Mortality in the Era of Reperfusion for Acute Myocardial Infarction (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/5495/</link>
      <pubDate>1995-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Despite remarkable advances in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction, substantial early patient mortality remains. Appropriate choices among alternative therapies and the use of clinical resources depend on an estimate of the patient's risk. Individual patients reflect a combination of clinical features that influence prognosis, and these factors must be appropriately weighted to produce an accurate assessment of risk. Prior studies to define prognosis either were performed before widespread use of thrombolysis or were limited in sample size or spectrum of data. Using the large population of the GUSTO-I trial, we performed a comprehensive analysis of relations between baseline clinical data and 30-day mortality and developed a multivariable statistical model for risk assessment in candidates for thrombolytic therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: For the 41,021 patients enrolled in GUSTO-I, a randomized trial of four thrombolytic strategies, relations between clinical descriptors routinely collected at initial presentation, and death within 30 days (which occurred in 7% of the population) were examined with both univariable and multivariable analyses. Variables studied included demographics, history and risk factors, presenting characteristics, and treatment assignment. Risk modeling was performed with logistic multiple regression and validated with bootstrapping techniques. Multivariable analysis identified age as the most significant factor influencing 30-day mortality, with rates of 1.1% in the youngest decile (&lt; 45 years) and 20.5% in patients &gt; 75 (adjusted chi 2 = 717, P &lt; .0001). Other factors most significantly associated with increased mortality were lower systolic blood pressure (chi 2 = 550, P &lt; .0001), higher Killip class (chi 2 = 350, P &lt; .0001), elevated heart rate (chi 2 = 275, P &lt; .0001), and anterior infarction (chi 2 = 143, P &lt; .0001). Together, these five characteristics contained 90% of the prognostic information in the baseline clinical data. Other significant though less important factors included previous myocardial infarction, height, time to treatment, diabetes, weight, smoking status, type of thrombolytic, previous bypass surgery, hypertension, and prior cerebrovascular disease. Combining prognostic variables through logistic regression, we produced a validated model that stratified patient risk and accurately estimated the likelihood of death. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical determinants of mortality in patients treated with thrombolytic therapy within 6 hours of symptom onset are multifactorial and the relations complex. Although a few variables contain most of the prognostic information, many others contribute additional independent prognostic information. Through consideration of multiple characteristics, including age, medical history, physiological significance of the infarction, and medical treatment, the prognosis of an individual patient can be accurately estimated.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/5468/</link>
      <pubDate>1993-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: The relative efficacy of streptokinase and tissue plasminogen activator and the roles of intravenous as compared with subcutaneous heparin as adjunctive therapy in acute myocardial infarction are unresolved questions. The current trial was designed to compare new, aggressive thrombolytic strategies with standard thrombolytic regimens in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. Our hypothesis was that newer thrombolytic strategies that produce earlier and sustained reperfusion would improve survival. METHODS: In 15 countries and 1081 hospitals, 41,021 patients with evolving myocardial infarction were randomly assigned to four different thrombolytic strategies, consisting of the use of streptokinase and subcutaneous heparin, streptokinase and intravenous heparin, accelerated tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) and intravenous heparin, or a combination of streptokinase plus t-PA with intravenous heparin. ("Accelerated" refers to the administration of t-PA over a period of 1 1/2 hours--with two thirds of the dose given in the first 30 minutes--rather than the conventional period of 3 hours.) The primary end point was 30-day mortality. RESULTS: The mortality rates in the four treatment groups were as follows: streptokinase and subcutaneous heparin, 7.2 percent; streptokinase and intravenous heparin, 7.4 percent; accelerated t-PA and intravenous heparin, 6.3 percent, and the combination of both thrombolytic agents with intravenous heparin, 7.0 percent. This represented a 14 percent reduction (95 percent confidence interval, 5.9 to 21.3 percent) in mortality for accelerated t-PA as compared with the two streptokinase-only strategies (P = 0.001). The rates of hemorrhagic stroke were 0.49 percent, 0.54 percent, 0.72 percent, and 0.94 percent in the four groups, respectively, which represented a significant excess of hemorrhagic strokes for accelerated t-PA (P = 0.03) and for the combination strategy (P &lt; 0.001), as compared with streptokinase only. A combined end point of death or disabling stroke was significantly lower in the accelerated-tPA group than in the streptokinase-only groups (6.9 percent vs. 7.8 percent, P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this large-scale trial indicate that accelerated t-PA given with intravenous heparin provides a survival benefit over previous standard thrombolytic regimens</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction: no additional benefit from immediate percutaneous coronary angioplasty (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4288/</link>
      <pubDate>1988-01-30T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>A randomised trial of 367 patients with acute myocardial infarction was performed to determine whether an invasive strategy combining thrombolysis with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rTPA), heparin, and acetylsalicylic acid, and immediate percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) would be superior to a noninvasive strategy with the same medical treatment but without immediate angiography and PTCA. Intravenous infusion of 100 mg rTPA was started within 5 h after onset of symptoms (median 156 min). Angiography was performed 6-165 min later in 180 out of 183 patients allocated to the invasive strategy; 184 patients were allocated to the non-invasive strategy. Immediate PTCA reduced the percentage stenosis of the infarct-related segment, but this was offset by a high rate of transient (16%) and sustained (7%) reocclusion during the procedure and recurrent ischaemia during the first 24 h (17%). The clinical course was more favourable after non-invasive therapy, with a lower incidence of recurrent ischaemia within 24 h (3%), bleeding complications, hypotension, and ventricular fibrillation. Mortality at 14 days was lower in patients allocated to non-invasive treatment (3%) than in the group allocated to invasive treatment (7%). No difference between the treatment groups was observed in infarct size estimated from myocardial release of alpha-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase or in left ventricular ejection fraction after 10-22 days. Since immediate PTCA does not provide additional benefit there seems to be no need for immediate angiography and PTCA in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with rTPA.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Thrombolysis with rt-PA in acute myocardial infarction: no additional benefit of immediate PTCA (Miscellaneous)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/5368/</link>
      <pubDate>1988-01-30T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>A randomised trial of 367 patients with acute myocardial infarction was performed to determine whether an invasive strategy combining thrombolysis with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rTPA), heparin, and acetylsalicylic acid, and immediate percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) would be superior to a noninvasive strategy with the same medical treatment but without immediate angiography and PTCA. Intravenous infusion of 100 mg rTPA was started within 5 h after onset of symptoms (median 156 min). Angiography was performed 6-165 min later in 180 out of 183 patients allocated to the invasive strategy; 184 patients were allocated to the non-invasive strategy. Immediate PTCA reduced the percentage stenosis of the infarct-related segment, but this was offset by a high rate of transient (16%) and sustained (7%) reocclusion during the procedure and recurrent ischaemia during the first 24 h (17%). The clinical course was more favourable after non-invasive therapy, with a lower incidence of recurrent ischaemia within 24 h (3%), bleeding complications, hypotension, and ventricular fibrillation. Mortality at 14 days was lower in patients allocated to non-invasive treatment (3%) than in the group allocated to invasive treatment (7%). No difference between the treatment groups was observed in infarct size estimated from myocardial release of alpha-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase or in left ventricular ejection fraction after 10-22 days. Since immediate PTCA does not provide additional benefit there seems to be no need for immediate angiography and PTCA in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with rTPA.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>