<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Verdonck, L.F.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/3493/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Variable EBV DNA load distributions and heterogeneous EBV mRNA expression patterns in the circulation of solid organ versus stem cell transplant recipients (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/39321/</link>
      <pubDate>2012-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) driven post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) is a heterogeneous and potentially life-threatening condition. Early identification of aberrant EBV activity may prevent progression to B-cell lymphoma. We measured EBV DNA load and RNA profiles in plasma and cellular blood compartments of stem cell transplant (SCT; n = 5), solid organ transplant recipients (SOT; n = 15), and SOT having chronic elevated EBV-DNA load (n = 12). In SCT, EBV DNA was heterogeneously distributed, either in plasma or leukocytes or both. In SOT, EBV DNA load was always cell associated, predominantly in B cells, but occasionally in T cells (CD4 and CD8) or monocytes. All SCT with cell-associated EBV DNA showed BARTs and EBNA1 expression, while LMP1 and LMP2 mRNA was found in 1 and 3 cases, respectively. In SOT, expression of BARTs was detected in all leukocyte samples. LMP2 and EBNA1 mRNA was found in 5/15 and 2/15, respectively, but LMP1 mRNA in only 1, coinciding with severe PTLD and high EBV DNA. Conclusion: EBV DNA is differently distributed between white cells and plasma in SOT versus SCT. EBV RNA profiling in blood is feasible and may have added value for understanding pathogenic virus activity in patients with elevated EBV-DNA. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Predictive impact of allele-matching and EBMT risk score for outcome after T-cell depleted unrelated donor transplantation in poor-risk acute leukemia and myelodysplasia (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/26370/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-06-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Many parameters predict for outcome after unrelated donor (URD) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). High-resolution HLA-matching significantly impacts outcome and also the European Group of Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) risk score, based on patient age, disease stage, donor type, time from diagnosis to SCT and gender combination, may predict for non-relapse mortality and overall survival (OS). We evaluated the individual and combined effects of allele-matching and the EBMT risk score in 327 patients with poor-risk acute leukemia or myelodysplasia, who received a T-cell depleted URD alloSCT. Matching for HLA-A, -B, -C and -DRB1 alleles (8/8 match) was associated with a 5-year OS of 40% compared with 30% for mismatched (≤7/8) pairs (P=0.02). Patients with EBMT risk scores of 1-2, 3, 4 and 5-7 had 5-year OS estimates of 53, 43, 30 and 20%, respectively (P&lt;0.001). The favorable prognostic impact of an 8/8 donor was most pronounced if the EBMT risk score was low (1-2). Five-year OS was 74±8% vs 39±11% for fully matched patients with a low-risk EBMT score as compared with EBMT low-risk patients with ≤7/8 donors. These data underscore the importance of incorporating both the EBMT risk score and the degree of high-resolution HLA-matching in the risk assessment prior to URD alloSCT.Leukemia advance online publication, 24 May 2011; doi:10.1038/leu.2011.123.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Cytarabine dose for acute myeloid leukemia (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/25150/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-03-17T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Cytarabine (ara-C) is an important drug in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). High-dose cytarabine (2000 to 3000 mg per square meter of body-surface area) is toxic but results in higher rates of relapse-free survival than does the conventional dose of 100 to 400 mg per square meter. Intermediate dose levels have not been thoroughly evaluated. METHODS: We compared two induction regimens in patients 18 to 60 years of age (median, 49) who had newly diagnosed AML. The intermediate-dose group, totaling 431 patients, received cytarabine at a dose of 200 mg per square meter given by continuous intravenous infusion for 24 hours during cycle 1 of induction therapy and 1000 mg per square meter by infusion for 3 hours twice daily during cycle 2 of induction therapy. The high-dose group, totaling 429 patients, received a dose-escalated regimen of 1000 mg of cytarabine per square meter every 12 hours in cycle 1 and 2000 mg per square meter twice daily in cycle 2. Patients with a complete response did not receive additional cytarabine but received consolidation therapy in a third cycle of chemotherapy (mitoxantrone-etoposide) or underwent autologous or allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. Complete remission rates, survival rates, and toxic effects were assessed for each treatment group. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 5 years, no significant differences were noted between the intermediate-dose group and the high-dose group with respect to complete remission rates (80% and 82%, respectively), probability of relapse, event-free survival at 5 years (34% and 35%), or overall survival (40% and 42%). High-dose cytarabine provided no clear advantage in any prognostic subgroup. The high-dose treatment resulted in higher incidences of grade 3 and grade 4 toxic effects (in cycle 1), prolonged hospitalization, and delayed neutrophil recovery (in cycle 2) and platelet recovery (in cycles 2 and 3). CONCLUSIONS: Induction therapy with cytarabine at the lower dose already produced maximal antileukemic effects for all response end points, suggesting a plateau in the dose-response relationship above this dose level. High-dose cytarabine results in excessive toxic effects without therapeutic benefit. (Netherlands Trial Register number, NTR230.). Copyright </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Efficacy of escalated imatinib combined with cytarabine in newly diagnosed patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/23659/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-06-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Abstract.
BACKGROUND: In order to improve the molecular response rate and prevent resistance to treatment, combination therapy with different dosages of imatinib and cytarabine was studied in newly diagnosed patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in the HOVON-51 study.
DESIGN AND METHODS: Having reported feasibility previously, we hereby report the efficacy of escalated imatinib (200 mg, 400 mg, 600 mg or 800 mg) in combination with two cycles of intravenous cytarabine (200 mg/m(2) or 1000 mg/m(2) days 1 to 7) in 162 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 55 months, the 5-year cumulative incidences of complete cytogenetic response, major molecular response, and complete molecular response were 89%, 71%, and 53%, respectively. A higher Sokal risk score was inversely associated with complete cytogenetic response (hazard ratio of 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.79, P&lt;0.001). A higher dose of imatinib and a higher dose of cytarabine were associated with increased complete molecular response with hazard ratios of 1.60 (95% confidence interval, 0.96-2.68, P=0.07) and 1.66 (95% confidence interval, 1.02-2.72, P=0.04), respectively. Progression-free survival and overall survival rates at 5 years were 92% and 96%, respectively. Achieving a major molecular response at 1 year was associated with complete absence of progression and a probability of achieving a complete molecular response of 89%.
CONCLUSIONS: The addition of intravenous cytarabine to imatinib as upfront therapy for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia is associated with a high rate of complete molecular responses (Clinicaltrials.Gov Identifier: NCT00028847).</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Gemtuzumab ozogamicin as postremission treatment inAMLat 60 years of age or more: results of a multicenter phase 3 study (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/23647/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-04-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Abstract: In older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the prevention of relapse has remained one of the major therapeutic challenges, with more than 75% relapses after complete remission. The anti-CD33 immunotoxin conjugate gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) has shown antileukemic remission induction activity in patients with relapsed AML. Patients with AML or refractory anemia with excess blasts in first complete remission attained after intensive induction chemotherapy were randomized between 3 cycles of GO (6 mg/m(2) every 4 weeks) or no postremission therapy (control) to assess whether GO would improve outcome. The 2 treatment groups (113 patients receiving GO vs 119 control patients) were comparable with regard to age (60-78 years, median 67 years), performance status, and cytogenetics. A total of 110 of 113 received at least 1 cycle of GO, and 65 of 113 patients completed the 3 cycles. Premature discontinuation was mainly attributable to incomplete hematologic recovery or intercurrent relapse. Median time to recovery of platelets 50 x 10(9)/L and neutrophils 0.5 x 10(9)/L after GO was 14 days and 20 days. Nonhematologic toxicities were mild overall, but there was 1 toxic death caused by liver failure. There were no significant differences between both treatment groups with regard to relapse probabilities, nonrelapse mortality, overall survival, or disease-free survival (17% vs 16% at 5 years). Postremission treatment with GO in older AML patients does not provide benefits regarding any clinical end points. The HOVON-43 study is registered at The Netherlands Trial Registry (number NTR212) and at http://www.controlled-trials.com as ISRCTN77039377.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Matched unrelated donor stem cell transplant in 131 patients with follicular lymphoma: An analysis from the Lymphoma Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/24758/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Matched unrelated donor stem cell transplantation (MUD-SCT) provides the only curative option for patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) who fail conventional therapies and do not have a sibling donor. The purpose of this study was to analyse the outcome of patients with FL treated with MUD-SCT included in the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry. 131 patients treated with reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC, n = 87) or conventional myeloablative (CONV, n = 44) MUD-SCT between 2000 and 2005 were included. Median time from diagnosis to MUD-SCT was 47 months and the median number of previous therapeutic regimens was 4 (previous autograft: 47%). RIC recipients were significantly older, with a longer interval from diagnosis to MUD-SCT and had failed a previous autograft more frequently than CONV recipients. Non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 24% and 30% at 100-d and 1-year, respectively. After a median follow-up of 36 months, 17% of the patients developed disease progression, the 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) being 47%. Three-year overall survival (OS) for the whole series was 51%. On multivariate analysis, RIC regimens were associated with at lower NRM and a significantly longer PFS and OS. This retrospective study demonstrated that MUD-SCT results, even in heavily pre-treated populations, in a meaningful PFS and OS. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>High-dose daunorubicin in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/26809/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-09-24T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: A complete remission is essential for prolonging survival in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Daunorubicin is a cornerstone of the induction regimen, but the optimal dose is unknown. In older patients, it is usual to give daunorubicin at a dose of 45 to 50 mg per square meter of body-surface area. METHODS: Patients in whom AML or high-risk refractory anemia had been newly diagnosed and who were 60 to 83 years of age (median, 67) were randomly assigned to receive cytarabine, at a dose of 200 mg per square meter by continuous infusion for 7 days, plus daunorubicin for 3 days, either at the conventional dose of 45 mg per square meter (411 patients) or at an escalated dose of 90 mg per square meter (402 patients); this treatment was followed by a second cycle of cytarabine at a dose of 1000 mg per square meter for 6 days. The primary end point was event-free survival. RESULTS: The complete remission rates were 64% in the group that received the escalated dose of daunorubicin and 54% in the group that received the conventional dose (P = 0.002); the rates of remission after the first cycle of induction treatment were 52% and 35%, respectively (P&lt;0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of hematologic toxic effects, 30-day mortality (11% and 12% in the two groups, respectively), or the incidence of moderate, severe, or life-threatening adverse events (P = 0.08). Survival end points in the two groups did not differ significantly overall, but patients in the escalated-treatment group who were 60 to 65 years of age, as compared with the patients in the same age group who received the conventional dose, had higher rates of complete remission (73% vs. 51%), event-free survival (29% vs. 14%), and overall survival (38% vs. 23%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AML who are older than 60 years of age, escalation of the dose of daunorubicin to twice the conventional dose, with the entire dose administered in the first induction cycle, effects a more rapid response and a higher response rate than does the conventional dose, without additional toxic effects. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN77039377; and Netherlands National Trial Register number, NTR212.) Copyright </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Myeloablative allogeneic versus autologous stem cell transplantation in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first remission: A prospective sibling donor versus no-donor comparison (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/18473/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-02-05T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>While commonly accepted in poor-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the role of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is still disputed in adult patients with standard-risk ALL. We evaluated outcome of patients with ALL in first complete remission (CR1), according to a sibling donor versus no-donor comparison. Eligible patients (433) were entered in 2 consecutive, prospective studies, of whom 288 (67%) were younger than 55 years, in CR1, and eligible to receive consolidation by either an autologous SCT or an allo-SCT. Allo-SCT was performed in 91 of 96 patients with a compatible sibling donor. Cumulative incidences of relapse at 5 years were, respectively, 24 and 55% for patients with a donor versus those without a donor (hazard ratio [HR], 0.37; 0.23-0.60; P &lt; .001). Nonrelapse mortality estimated 16% (± 4) at 5 years after allo-SCT. As a result, disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years was significantly better in the donor group: 60 versus 42% in the no-donor group (HR: 0.60; 0.41-0.89; P= .01). After risk-group analysis, improved outcome was more pronounced in standard-risk patients with a donor, who experienced an overall survival of 69% at 5 years (P = .05). In conclusion, standard-risk ALL patients with a sibling donor may show favorable survival following SCT, due to both a strong reduction of relapse and a modest nonrelapse mortality. This trial is registered with http://www.trialregister.nl under trial ID NTR228.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Results of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation After Treatment With Different High-Dose Total-Body Irradiation Regimens in Five Dutch Centers (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/29722/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-08-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: To evaluate results of high-dose total-body irradiation (TBI) regimens for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Methods and Materials: A total of 1,032 patients underwent TBI in one or two fractions before autologous or allogeneic hematologic stem cell transplantation for acute leukemia and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The TBI regimens were normalized by using the biological effective dose (BED) concept. The BED values were divided into three dose groups. Study end points were relapse incidence (RI), non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS). Multivariate analysis was performed, stratified by disease. Results: In the highest TBI dose group, RI was significantly lower and NRM was higher vs. the lower dose groups. However, a significant influence on RFS and OS was not found. Relapses in the eye region were found only after shielding to very low doses. Age was of significant influence on OS, RFS, and NRM in favor of younger patients. The NRM of patients older than 40 years significantly increased, and OS decreased. There was no influence of age on RI. Men had better OS and RFS and lower NRM. Type of transplantation significantly influenced RI and NRM for patients with acute leukemia and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. There was no influence on RFS and OS. Conclusions: Both RI and NRM were significantly influenced by the size of the BED of single-dose or two-fraction TBI regimens; OS and RFS were not. Age was of highly significant influence on NRM, but there was no influence of age on RI. Hyperfractionated TBI with a high BED might be useful, assuming NRM can be reduced. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Dose-finding study of imatinib in combination with intravenous cytarabine: Feasibility in newly diagnosed patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/28746/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-03-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The HOVON cooperative study group performed a feasibility study of escalated imatinib and intravenous cytarabine in 165 patients with early chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Patients received 2 cycles of intravenous cytara- bine (200 mg/m2or 1000 mg/m2days 1-7) in conjunction with imatinib (200 mg, 400 mg, 600 mg, or 800 mg), according to predefined, successive dose levels. All dose levels proved feasible. Seven dose- limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed in 302 cycles of chemotherapy, which werecaused bystreptococcal bacteremia in 5 cases. Intermediate-dose cytarabine (1000 mg/m2) prolonged time to neutro- phil recovery and platelet recovery compared with a standard dose (200 mg/m2). High-dose imatinib (600 mg or 800 mg) extended the time to platelet recovery compared with a standard dose (400 mg). More infectious complications common toxicity criteria (CTC) grade 3 or 4 were observed after intermediate-dose cytara- bine compared with a standard-dose of cytarabine. Early response data after combination therapy included a complete cy-togenetic response in 48% and a major molecular response in 30% of patients, which increased to 46% major molecular responses at 1 year, including 13% complete molecular responses. We conclude that combination therapy of escalating dosages of imatinib and cytarabine is feasible. This study was registered at www.kankerbestrijding.nl as no. CKTO- 2001-03. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Rituximab improves the treatment results of DHAP-VIM-DHAP and ASCT in relapsed/progressive aggressive CD20+ NHL: A prospective randomized HOVON trial (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/28745/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-01-15T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>We evaluated the role of rituximab during remission induction chemotherapy in relapsed aggressive CD20+non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Of 239 patients, 225 were evaluable for analysis. Randomized to DHAP (cisplatin-cytarabine- dexamethasone)-VIM (etoposide-ifosfamide-methotrexate)-DHAP (cisplatin- cytarabine-dexamethasone) chemotherapy with rituximab (R; R-DHAP arm) were 119 patients (113 evaluable) and to chemotherapy without rituximab (DHAP arm) 120 patients (112 evaluable). Patients in complete remission (CR) and partial remission (PR) after 2 chemotherapy courses were eligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation. After the second chemotherapy cycle, 75% of the patients in the R-DHAP arm had responsive disease (CR or PR) versus 54% in the DHAP arm (P = .01). With a median follow-up of 24 months, there was a significant difference in failure-free survival (FFS24; 50% vs 24% vs, P &lt; .001), and progression free survival (PFS24; 52% vs 31% P &lt; .002) in favor of the R-DHAP arm. Cox-regression analysis demonstrated a significant effect of rituximab treatment on FFS24(HR 0.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29-0.57 versus 0.51, 95% CI 0.37-0.70) and overall-survival (OS24: HR 0.60 [0.41-0.89] vs 0.76 [0.52-1.10]) when adjusted for time since upfront treatment, age, World Health Organization performance status, and secondary age-adjusted international prognostic index. These results demonstrate improved FFS and PFS for relapsed aggressive B-cell NHLif rituximab is added to the re-induction chemotherapy regimen. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Results of a HOVON/SAKK donor versus no-donor analysis of myeloablative HLA-identical sibling stem cell transplantation in first remission acute myeloid leukemia in young and middle-aged adults: Benefits for whom? (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/35454/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-05-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The Dutch-Belgian Hemato-Oncology Cooperative Group and the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (HOVON-SAKK) collaborative study group evaluated out-come of patients (pts) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first remission (CR1) entered in 3 consecutive studies according to a donor versus no-donor comparison. Between 1987 and 2004, 2287 pts were entered in these studies of whom 1032 pts (45%) without FAB M3 or t(15;17) were in CR1 after 2 cycles of chemotherapy, received consolidation treatment, and were younger than 55 years of age and therefore eligible for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). An HLA-identical sibling donor was available for 326 pts (32%), whereas 599 pts (58%) lacked such a donor, and information was not available in 107 pts. Compliance with allo-SCT was 82% (268 of 326). Cumulative incidences of relapse were, respectively, 32% versus 59% for pts with versus those without a donor (P &lt; .001). Despite more treatmentrelated mortality (TRM) in the donor group (21% versus 4%, P &lt; .001), disease-free survival (DFS) appeared significantly better in the donor group (48% ± 3% versus 37% ± 2% in the no-donor group, P &lt; .001). Following risk-group analysis, DFS was significantly better for pts with a donor and an intermediate- (P = .01) or poor-risk profile (P = .003) and also better in pts younger than 40 years of age (P &lt; .001). We evaluated our results and those of the previous MRC, BGMT, and EORTC studies in a meta-analysis, which revealed a significant benefit of 12% in overall survival (OS) by donor availability for all patients with AML in CR1 without a favorable cytogenetic profile. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Intensified 12-week CHOP (I-CHOP) plus G-CSF compared with standard 24-week CHOP (CHOP-21) for patients with intermediate-risk aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma: A phase 3 trial of the Dutch-Belgian Hemato-Oncology Cooperative Group (HOVON) (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/35505/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-04-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Optimal dose and timing of CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) chemotherapy for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is still an unresolved issue. We assessed whether dose intensifications with cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin might improve outcome in younger patients with intermediate-risk aggressive NHL. Previously untreated patients were assigned to receive either 8 courses of standard CHOP (n = 239) or 6 courses of intensified (I)-CHOP (n = 238). Although there was a tendency in favor of I-CHOP for overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and event-free survival (EFS), the differences were not significant. However, although these analyses were not planned, when the intermediate-risk group was divided into low-intermediate- and high-intermediate-risk patients according to the International Prognostic Index (IPI), low-intermediate-risk patients had improved 6-year OS (67% vs 52%; P = .05), DFS (58% vs 45%; P = .06), and EFS (41% vs 30%; P = .21) when they were treated with I-CHOP compared with standard CHOP. On the other hand, high-intermediate-risk patients seem to have no benefit from I-CHOP. Although clinically relevant side effects occurred more often in the I-CHOP arm, treatmen-trelated mortality was similar. These data suggest that I-CHOP might be preferable to standard CHOP in younger patients with low-intermediate-risk aggressive NHL. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>High-vs low-dose cytarabine combined with interferon alfa in patients with first chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia. A prospective randomized phase III study (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/36524/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-02-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>A prospective randomized phase III study was performed to evaluate whether intensified cytarabine would induce a higher response rate and longer event-free interval as compared to low-dose cytarabine in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). One hundred and eighteen patients with CML in early chronic phase entered the study. Twenty-eight out of 32 patients assigned to group A received two cycles of a combination of intensified cytarabine and idarubicin followed by interferon alfa (IFN-α) maintenance, 28 patients in group B received standard treatment by a combination of low-dose cytarabine and IFN-α. Forty-nine patients with a human leukocyte antigen-identical sibling donor proceeded to allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) and nine patients were excluded from the analysis. Hematological response was observed in 97% of the patients in group A vs 86% of the patients in group B during the first year of treatment. In group A, 16 patients (50%) achieved a major cytogenetic response, which compared to seven patients (25%) with a major cytogenetic response in group B. With a median follow-up of 58 months (range 34-76), event-free survival was not significantly different between arms A and B. The estimated 5-year survival rate was 56% in the intensified arm and 77% in the low-dose arm (P=0.05). Recipients of allo-SCT showed a 5-year estimated survival rate of 55%. Although intensified cytarabine induced a higher initial percentage of major and complete cytogenetic responses, responses were not sustained by IFN-α maintenance therapy. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>High EVI1 expression predicts poor survival in acute myeloid leukemia: a study of 319 de novo AML patients (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8228/</link>
      <pubDate>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The proto-oncogene EVI1 encodes a DNA binding protein and is located on
      chromosome 3q26. The gene is aberrantly expressed in acute myeloid
      leukemia (AML) patients carrying 3q26 abnormalities. Two mRNAs are
      transcribed from this locus: EVI1 and a fusion of EVI1 with MDS1
      (MDS1-EVI1), a gene located 5' of EVI1. The purpose of this study was to
      investigate which of the 2 gene products is involved in transformation in
      human AML. To discriminate between EVI1 and MDS1-EVI1 transcripts,
      distinct real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays
      were developed. Patients with 3q26 abnormalities often showed high EVI1
      and MDS1-EVI1 expression. In a cohort of 319 AML patients, 4 subgroups
      could be distinguished: EVI1(+) and MDS1-EVI1(-) (6 patients; group I),
      EVI1(+) and MDS1-EVI1(+) (26 patients; group II), EVI1(-) and MDS1-EVI1(+)
      (12 patients; group III), and EVI1(-) and MDS1-EVI1(-) (275 patients;
      group IV). The only 4 patients with a 3q26 aberration belonged to groups I
      and II. Interestingly, high EVI1 and not MDS1-EVI1 expression was
      associated with unfavorable karyotypes (eg, -7/7q-) or complex karyotypes.
      Moreover, a significant correlation was observed between EVI1 expression
      and 11q23 aberrations (mixed lineage leukemia [MLL] gene involvement).
      Patients from groups I and II had significantly shorter overall and
      event-free survival than patients in groups III and IV. Our data
      demonstrate that high EVI1 expression is an independent poor prognostic
      marker within the intermediate- risk karyotypic group.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Effect of priming with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on the outcome of chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8458/</link>
      <pubDate>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Sensitization of leukemic cells with hematopoietic growth
      factors may enhance the cytotoxicity of chemotherapy in acute myeloid
      leukemia (AML). METHODS: In a multicenter randomized trial, we assigned
      patients (age range, 18 to 60 years) with newly diagnosed AML to receive
      cytarabine plus idarubicin (cycle 1) and cytarabine plus amsacrin (cycle
      2) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (321 patients) or
      without G-CSF (319). G-CSF was given concurrently with chemotherapy only.
      Idarubicin and amsacrin were given at the end of a cycle to allow the
      cell-cycle-dependent cytotoxicity of cytarabine in the context of G-CSF to
      have a greater effect. The effect of G-CSF on disease-free survival was
      assessed in all patients and in cytogenetically distinct prognostic
      subgroups. RESULTS: After induction chemotherapy, the rates of response
      were not significantly different in the two groups. After a median
      follow-up of 55 months, patients in complete remission after induction
      chemotherapy plus G-CSF had a higher rate of disease-free survival than
      patients who did not receive G-CSF (42 percent vs. 33 percent at four
      years, P=0.02), owing to a reduced probability of relapse (relative risk,
      0.77; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.61 to 0.99; P=0.04). G-CSF did not
      significantly improve overall survival (P=0.16). Although G-CSF did not
      improve the outcome in the subgroup with an unfavorable prognosis, the 72
      percent of patients with standard-risk AML benefited from G-CSF therapy
      (overall survival at four years, 45 percent, as compared with 35 percent
      in the group that did not receive G-CSF [relative risk of death, 0.75; 95
      percent confidence interval, 0.59 to 0.95; P=0.02]; disease-free survival,
      45 percent vs. 33 percent [relative risk, 0.70]; 95 percent confidence
      interval, 0.55 to 0.90; P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Sensitization of leukemic
      cells with growth factors is a clinically applicable means of enhancing
      the efficacy of chemotherapy in patients with AML.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Prevention of Epstein-Barr virus-lymphoproliferative disease by molecular monitoring and preemptive rituximab in high-risk patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8169/</link>
      <pubDate>2002-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Recipients of a partially T-cell-depleted (TCD) allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) developing reactivation of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) with quantified viral DNA levels exceeding 1000 genome equivalents/milliliter (geq/mL) are at high risk for EBV-lymphoproliferative disease (EBV-LPD). We studied whether preemptive therapy with rituximab prevents EBV-LPD, LPD-mortality, and abrogates viral reactivation in high-risk patients. We monitored 49 recipients of a TCD allo-SCT weekly for EBV reactivation by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Preemptive therapy by a single infusion of rituximab was given to patients with viral reactivation more than or equal to 1000 geq/mL. Results were compared with an historical control group of patients retrospectively monitored for EBV reactivation at similar intervals. There were 17 prospectively monitored patients who showed EBV reactivation more than or equal to 1000 geq/mL and 15 received preemptive therapy. Median time to preemptive therapy was 113 days (range, 41-202 days) after SCT. There were 14 patients who showed complete response (CR) as characterized by prevention of EBV-LPD and complete clearance of EBV-DNA from plasma, which was achieved after a median number of 8 days (range, 1-46 days). One patient progressed to EBV-LPD despite preemptive therapy, but obtained CR after 2 infusions of rituximab and donor lymphocyte infusion. There were 2 patients who had already developed EBV-LPD prior to preemptive rituximab, but obtained CR following 2 rituximab infusions. Comparison of this prospectively followed series to our historical cohort with the same high-risk profile showed a reduction of EBV-LPD incidence (18% +/- 9% versus 49% +/- 11%, respectively) and a complete abrogation of LPD-mortality (0% versus 26% +/- 10%, respectively) (P =.04) at 6 months from EBV-DNA more than or equal to 1000 geq/mL. Frequent quantitative monitoring of EBV reactivation and preemptive therapy by rituximab improves outcome in patients at high risk of EBV-LPD.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation is a frequent event after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) and quantitatively predicts EBV- lymphoproliferative disease following T-cell--depleted SCT (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8246/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Reactivation of the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) may evoke a protective cellular immune response or may be complicated by the development of EBV-lymphoproliferative disease (EBV-LPD). So far, very little is known about the incidence, recurrence, and sequelae of EBV reactivation following allo-SCT. EBV reactivation was retrospectively monitored in 85 EBV-seropositive recipients of a T-cell--depleted (TCD) allo-SCT and 65 EBV-seropositive recipients of an unmanipulated allo-SCT. Viral reactivation (more than 50 EBV genome equivalents [gEq]/mL) was monitored frequently by quantitative real-time plasma polymerase chain reaction until day 180 after SCT. Probabilities of developing viral reactivation were high after both unmanipulated and TCD-allogeneic SCT (31% +/- 6% versus 65% +/- 7%, respectively). A high CD34(+) cell number of the graft appeared as a novel significant predictor (P =.001) for EBV reactivation. Recurrent reactivation was observed more frequently in recipients of a TCD graft, and EBV-LPD occurred only after TCD-SCT. High-risk status, TCD, and use of antithymocyte globulin were predictive for developing EBV-LPD. Plasma EBV DNA quantitatively predicted EBV-LPD. The positive and negative predictive values of a viral load of 1000 gEq/mL were, respectively, 39% and 100% after TCD. Treatment-related mortality did not differ significantly between TCD and non-TCD transplants, but the incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease was significantly less in TCD patients. It is concluded that EBV reactivation occurs frequently after TCD and unmanipulated allo-SCT, especially in recipients of grafts with high CD34(+) cell counts. EBV-LPD, however, occurred only after TCD, and EBV load quantitatively predicted EBV-LPD in recipients of a TCD graft. (Blood. 2001;98:972-978)</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Cost-effectiveness of autologous bone marrow transplantation in comparison to conventional chemotherapy in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/1314/</link>
      <pubDate>1994-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>A prospective randomized clinical trial with simultaneous data collection for an economic appraisal was carried out to assess the effectiveness, quality of life and cost implications of ABMT vs standard chemotherapy in slowly responding patients with intermediate- and high-grade malignant non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). The patients had a partial response after three cycles of chemotherapy and had no evidence of BM involvement of NHL. The overall and disease-free survival at 3 years were 61% and 60%, respectively, in the ABMT group and 85% and 77% in the CHOP group (P = NS). Moreover, there were more (severe) complications and symptoms in the ABMT than in the CHOP group. The average costs of CHOP chemotherapy were significantly lower than the average costs in the ABMT group (CHOP: US$ 3118 vs ABMT: US$ 34,447). Considering long-term consequences the ABMT group was more expensive (US$ 34,580) and patients experienced 0.14 life years and 0.22 quality adjusted life years less than the CHOP group (discount rate 5%). As a result, changing therapy from CHOP to ABMT, as primary treatment in slow responders to CHOP, can not be recommended as the required additional investment does not produce health gains in terms of survival or quality of life.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>