<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Vis, H.M. van der</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/35333/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after total knee or hip replacement: Treatment pattern and outcomes (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/34173/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-09-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: To determine the thromboprophylactic treatment pattern and occurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), major bleeding, and wound infections in patients undergoing total knee replacement (TKR) or total hip replacement (THR). Methods: From the PHARMO database, all patients ≥18years hospitalized for TKR or THR between January 2003 and September 2008 were selected. Patients with pharmacy data up to 3months after hospitalization were included in the study cohort. Duration and type of thromboprophylaxis were assessed. VTE, major bleeding, and wound infections were identified by hospitalizations. Regarding VTE, timing of event in relation to thromboprophylaxis was determined. Results: The study population included 2930 patients with TKR, 5332 patients with THR without hip fracture, and 289 patients with THR and hip fracture. Mean duration of thromboprophylaxis was about 30 (± 20) days for all procedures, with low-molecular-weight heparin being the most frequently used drug. During 3 months of follow-up, 1% to 2% of patients were hospitalized for an event. The most observed event was wound infection (58%), followed by major bleeding (29%), and VTE (13%). For wound infection and major bleeding, median time after surgery was about 19days. Median time between surgery and VTE was 24days for TKR and 60days for THR. Eighteen of 23 VTE occurred during thromboprophylaxis. Conclusions: Although patients are often treated for fewer days than recommended, thromboprophylaxis after TKR and THR in the Netherlands is adequate. Only 5 of 23 VTE hospitalizations occurred off-treatment and might have been prevented. Furthermore, fewer than 1% of patients were hospitalized for bleeding. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Primary hemiarthroplasty versus conservative treatment for comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly (ProCon): A Multicenter Randomized Controlled trial (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/25671/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-05-27T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background. Fractures of the proximal humerus are associated with a profound temporary and sometimes permanent, impairment of function and quality of life. The treatment of comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus like selected three-or four-part fractures and split fractures of the humeral head is a demanding and unresolved problem, especially in the elderly. Locking plates appear to offer improved fixation; however, screw cut-out rates ranges due to fracture collapse are high. As this may lead to higher rates of revision surgery, it may be preferable to treat comminuted fractures in the elderly primarily with a prosthesis or non-operatively. Results from case series and a small-sample randomized controlled trial (RCT) suggest improved function and less pain after primary hemiarthroplasty (HA); however these studies had some limitations and a RCT is needed. The primary aim of this study is to compare the Constant scores (reflecting functional outcome and pain) at one year after primary HA versus non-operative treatment in elderly patients who sustained a comminuted proximal humeral fracture. Secondary aims include effects on functional outcome, pain, complications, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness. Methods/Design. A prospective, multi-center RCT will be conducted in nine centers in the Netherlands and Belgium. Eighty patients over 65 years of age, who have sustained a three-or four part, or split head proximal humeral fracture will be randomized between primary hemiarthroplasty and conservative treatment. The primary outcome is the Constant score, which indicates pain and function. Secondary outcomes include the Disability of the Arm and Shoulder (DASH) score, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, radiographic healing, health-related quality of life (Short-form-36, EuroQol-5D) and healthcare consumption. Cost-effectiveness ratios will be determined for both trial arms. Outcome will be monitored at regular intervals over the subsequent 24 months (1, 3 and 6 weeks, and 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months). Data will be analyzed on an intention to treat basis, using univariate and multivariable analyses. Discussion. This trial will provide level-1 evidence on the effectiveness of the two mostly applied treatment options for three-or four part and split head proximal humeral fractures in the elderly. These data may support the development of a clinical guideline for treatment of these traumatic injuries. Trial registration. Netherlands Trial Register (NTR2040). </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>