<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Niessen, L.W.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/3675/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>The effectiveness of thrombolysis with intravenous alteplase for acute ischemic stroke in daily practice (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/38080/</link>
      <pubDate>2012-06-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: Thrombolysis with intravenous alteplase has been proven an effective treatment for patients with acute ischemic stroke in randomized clinical trials. In daily practice, the effect of thrombolysis may be less, and complications may occur more often. Aims: The aim of this study was to assess effectiveness and safety of thrombolysis in an unselected observational cohort of patients. Methods: During a two-year period, all patients over 18 years with acute stroke who were admitted within four-hours from onset of symptoms in 12 centers were registered. We compared outcomes in patients who were treated with alteplase with patients who were not treated with alteplase. The primary outcome was good functional outcome at three-months measured with the modified Rankin Scale ≤2). The safety end point was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and mortality. We used a multivariable logistic regression model to adjust for baseline imbalances and multilevel analysis to take into account within center correlations. Results: Overall, 1657 patients with ischemic stroke were admitted within four-hours from onset of symptoms and 696 (42%) were treated with alteplase. Treatment with alteplase was associated with a favorable outcome (adjusted odds ratio 1·3; 95% confidence interval 1·0 to 1·7). After further adjustment for potential clustering effects, the adjusted odds ratio for good outcome was 1·4 (95% confidence interval 1·0 to 1·8). Thirty-six (5%) of the 696 patients treated with alteplase had a symptomatic intracranial bleeding complication. Conclusions: Thrombolysis for ischemic stroke with intravenous alteplase is an effective treatment also in an unselected observational cohort of patients. © 2011 The Authors. International Journal of Stroke </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Real-life costs and effects of an implementation program to increase thrombolysis in stroke (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/38079/</link>
      <pubDate>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Objectives: We have shown that a Breakthrough Series–based implementation program increases
the number of patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with alteplase 4.5% in real-life settings.
It is unclear whether such an implementation program is cost-effective.
Methods: The practice study includes 12 randomized hospitals and 5,515 patients. Its present
cost-effectiveness analysis involves 1,657 patients with ischemic stroke admitted within 4 hours
from onset. Defined primary outcomes are thrombolysis rate and actual health care costs up to 3
months, including additional implementation efforts. Secondary outcomes are lifetime qualityadjusted
years (QALYs) and lifetime costs of individual trial patients, using a validated probabilistic,
disability-stratified stroke life table. Differences in outcome include95%confidence intervals
(CI), adjusted for intracluster correlation.
Results: The thrombolysis rate in the intervention group was 44.3% vs 39.8% in the control
group (difference 4.5%; 95% CI 3.1% to 5.9%. Mean costs per patient at 3 months (euros were
converted to 2010 USD) were $9,192 USD in the intervention group and $9,647 USD in the
control group (difference !$455 USD; 95% CI !$232 to !$679 USD). Lifetime QALYs in the
intervention group were 3.89 and in the control group 3.84 (difference 0.05; 95% CI !0.04 to
0.14). The mean lifetime costs in the intervention group were $22,994 USD against $24,315
USD in the control group (difference !$1,321 USD; 95% CI !$1,722 to !$921 USD).
Conclusions: A Breakthrough Series implementation program of thrombolysis increases thrombolysis.
It saves short- and long-term health care costs due to lower hospital admission and residential
costs, increasing stroke care efficiency.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Real-life costs and effects of an implementation program to increase thrombolysis in stroke (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/37213/</link>
      <pubDate>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Objectives: We have shown that a Breakthrough Series–based implementation program increases
the number of patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with alteplase 4.5% in real-life settings.
It is unclear whether such an implementation program is cost-effective.
Methods: The practice study includes 12 randomized hospitals and 5,515 patients. Its present
cost-effectiveness analysis involves 1,657 patients with ischemic stroke admitted within 4 hours
from onset. Defined primary outcomes are thrombolysis rate and actual health care costs up to 3
months, including additional implementation efforts. Secondary outcomes are lifetime qualityadjusted
years (QALYs) and lifetime costs of individual trial patients, using a validated probabilistic,
disability-stratified stroke life table. Differences in outcome include95%confidence intervals
(CI), adjusted for intracluster correlation.
Results: The thrombolysis rate in the intervention group was 44.3% vs 39.8% in the control
group (difference 4.5%; 95% CI 3.1% to 5.9%. Mean costs per patient at 3 months (euros were
converted to 2010 USD) were $9,192 USD in the intervention group and $9,647 USD in the
control group (difference !$455 USD; 95% CI !$232 to !$679 USD). Lifetime QALYs in the
intervention group were 3.89 and in the control group 3.84 (difference 0.05; 95% CI !0.04 to
0.14). The mean lifetime costs in the intervention group were $22,994 USD against $24,315
USD in the control group (difference !$1,321 USD; 95% CI !$1,722 to !$921 USD).
Conclusions: A Breakthrough Series implementation program of thrombolysis increases thrombolysis.
It saves short- and long-term health care costs due to lower hospital admission and residential
costs, increasing stroke care efficiency.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Reducing disparities in breast cancer survival - The effect of large-scale screening of the uninsured (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/31007/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-09-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Do centres with well-developed protocols, training and infrastructure have higher rates of thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke? (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/31031/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-09-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: The introduction of intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue Plasminogen Activator (rt-PA) has greatly improved the effectiveness of acute ischaemic stroke care. However, in most hospitals only 2-10% of all admitted stroke patients are treated with thrombolysis. Aim: The purpose of this study is to identify if available protocols, training and infrastructure influence the thrombolysis rate. Design: Cohort study of 12 hospitals in the Netherlands. Methods: In a cohort of patients admitted with acute stroke within 24 h from onset of symptoms, data were obtained. Stroke service characteristics of 12 hospitals were acquired through structured interviews with intra- and extramural representatives, in order to asses (i) protocols, (ii) training and (iii) complexity of infrastructure. Data were analysed with multi-level logistic regression to relate the likelihood of treatment with thrombolysis to availability and completeness of protocols, training and infrastructure both outside (extramural) and inside (intramural) each centre. Results: Overall 5515 patients were included in the study. Thrombolysis rates varied from 5.7% to 21.7%. An association was observed between thrombolysis rates and extramural training [odds ratio (OR): 1.11; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.99-1.25] and availability of intramural protocols (OR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.12-1.91). After adjustment for hospital size and teaching vs. nonteaching hospital, these associations became stronger; extramural training [adjusted OR (aOR): 1.14; 95% CI: 1.01-1.30] and availability of intramural protocols (aOR: 1.77; 95% CI: 1.30-2.39). Conclusions: Extramural training and intramural protocols are important tools to increase thrombolysis rates for acute ischaemic stroke in hospitals. Intramural protocols and extramural training should be aimed at all relevant professionals. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Promoting thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/25811/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-05-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE-Thrombolysis with intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator is an effective treatment for acute ischemic stroke, but the number of treatable patients is limited. The PRomoting ACute Thrombolysis in Ischemic StrokE (PRACTISE) trial evaluated the effectiveness of a multidimensional implementation strategy for thrombolysis with intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in acute ischemic stroke. METHODS-The PRACTISE trial was a national multicenter cluster-randomized controlled trial with randomization after pairwise matching. Twelve hospitals, both urban and community, academic and nonacademic, in the Netherlands participated. All patients admitted with stroke within 24 hours from onset of symptoms were registered. The intervention included 5 implementation meetings based on the Breakthrough Series model. The primary outcome was treatment with thrombolysis. Secondary outcomes were admission within 4 hours after onset of symptoms, death or disability at 3 months, and quality of life. RESULTS-Overall 5515 patients were included in the study' 308 patients (12.2%) in the control centers and 393 patients (13.1%) in the intervention centers were treated with thrombolysis (adjusted OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.68). Among the 1657 patients with ischemic stroke admitted within 4 hours from onset, 391 (44.5%) of 880 in the intervention centers were treated with thrombolysis and 305 (39.3%) of 777 in the control centers; the adjusted OR for treatment with thrombolysis was 1.58 (95% CI, 1.11 to 2.27). CONCLUSIONS-An intensive implementation strategy increases the proportion of patients with acute stroke treated with thrombolysis in real-life settings. An apparently pivotal factor in the improvement of the treatment rate is better application of contraindications for thrombolysis. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Short- and long-term effects of a quality improvement collaborative on diabetes management (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/28656/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-11-28T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Introduction: This study examined the short- and long-term effects of a quality improvement collaborative on patient outcomes, professional performance, and structural aspects of chronic care management of type 2 diabetes in an integrated care setting.Methods: Controlled pre- and post-intervention study assessing patient outcomes (hemoglobin A1c, cholesterol, blood pressure, weight, blood lipid levels, and smoking status), professional performance (guideline adherence), and structural aspects of chronic care management from baseline up to 24 months. Analyses were based on 1,861 patients with diabetes in six intervention and nine control regions representing 37 general practices and 13 outpatient clinics.Results: Modest but significant improvement was seen in mean systolic blood pressure (decrease by 4.0 mm Hg versus 1.6 mm Hg) and mean high density lipoprotein levels (increase by 0.12 versus 0.03 points) at two-year follow up. Positive but insignificant differences were found in hemoglobin A1c (0.3%), cholesterol, and blood lipid levels. The intervention group showed significant improvement in the percentage of patients receiving advice and instruction to examine feet, and smaller reductions in the percentage of patients receiving instruction to monitor blood glucose and visiting a dietician annually. Structural aspects of self-management and decision support also improved significantly.Conclusions: At a time of heightened national attention toward diabetes care, our results demonstrate a modest benefit of participation in a multi-institutional quality improvement collaborative focusing on integrated, patient-centered care. The effects persisted for at least 12 months after the intervention was completed.Trial number: http://clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT 00160017. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Lifetime health effects and medical costs of integrated stroke services - a non-randomized controlled cluster-trial based life table approach (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/24001/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-11-17T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: Economic evaluation of stroke services indicates that such services may lead to improved quality of life at affordable cost. The present study assesses lifetime health impact and cost consequences of stroke in an integrated service setting.Methods: The EDISSE study is a prospective non-randomized controlled cluster trial that compared stroke services (n = 151 patients) to usual care (n = 187 patients). Health status and cost trial-data were entered in multi-dimensional stroke life-tables. The tables distinguish four levels of disability which are defined by the modified Rankin scale. Quality-of-life scores (EuroQoL-5D), transition and survival probabilities are based on concurrent Dutch follow-up studies. Outcomes are quality-adjusted life years lived and lifetime medical cost by disability category. An economic analysis compares outcomes from a successful stroke service to usual care, by bootstrapping individual costs and effects data from patients in each arm.Results: Lifetime costs and QALYs after stroke depend on age-of-onset of first-ever stroke. Lifetime QALYs after stroke are 2.42 (90% CI - 0.49 - 2.75) for male patients in usual care and 2.75 (-0.61; 6.26) for females. Lifetime costs for men in the usual care setting are €39,335 (15,951; 79,837) and €42,944 (14,081; 95,944) for women. A comparison with the stroke service results in an ICER of €11,685 saved per QALY gained (€14,211 and €7,745 for men and women respectively). This stroke service is with 90% certainty cost-effective.Conclusions: Our analysis shows the potential of large health benefits and cost savings of stroke services, taking a lifetime perspective, also in other European settings. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Incorporating equity-efficiency interactions in cost-effectiveness analysis - Three approaches applied to breast cancer control (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/21135/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-07-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: The past decade, medical technology assessment focused on cost-effectiveness analysis, yet there is an increasing need to consider equity implications of health interventions as well. This article addresses three equity-efficiency trade-off methods proposed in the literature. Moreover, it demonstrates their impact on cost-effectiveness analyses in current breast cancer control options for women of different age groups. Methods: We adapted an existing breast cancer model to estimate cost-effectiveness and equity effects of breast cancer interventions. We applied three methods to quantify the equity-efficiency trade-offs: 1) targeting specific groups, comparing disparities at baseline and in different intervention scenarios; 2) equity weighting, valuing low and high health gains differently; and 3) multicriteria decision analysis, weighing multiple equity and efficiency criteria. We compared the resulting composite league tables of all approaches. Results: The approaches show that a comprehensive breast cancer program, including screening, for women below 75 years of age was most attractive in both the group targeting approach and the equity weighting approach. Such control programs would reduce disparities with 56% and at 1908 per equity quality-adjusted life-year gained. In the multicriteria approach, a comprehensive treatment program for women below 75 years of age and treatment in stage III breast cancer were most attractive, with both an 82% selection probability, followed by screening programs for the two age groups. Conclusion: In the three equity weighing approaches, targeting women below 75 years of age was more cost-effective and led to more equitable distributions of health. This likely is similar in other fatal diseases with similar age distributions. The approaches may lead to different outcomes in nonfatal disease.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Relationships among Self-Management, Patient Perceptions of Care, and Health Economic Outcomes for Decision-Making and Clinical Practice in Type 2 Diabetes (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/23421/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Abstract.

OBJECTIVES:
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) treatment involves complex interactions between biological, psychological, and behavioral factors of care, requiring multifaceted efforts in clinical practice and disease management to reduce health and economic burdens. We aimed to quantify correlations among these factors and characterize their level of inclusion in economic analyses that are part of informed medical decision-making.
METHODS:

A comprehensive, stepwise systematic literature review was performed on published articles dated 1993 to 2008 using medical subject heading and keyword searches in electronic reference libraries. Data were collected using standardized techniques and were analyzed descriptively.
RESULTS:

A total of 97 articles fulfilling all inclusion criteria were reviewed, including 16 on economic models (17% of articles). Most studies were retrospective (41 of 97; 42%) and from managed care perspectives (66%). Oral antidiabetic drugs were a central focus, appearing in 83% of studies. Patient behaviors, particularly medication adherence and persistence in real-world settings, are well researched (n=65) and may influence diabetes outcomes, cardiovascular risk, mortality rates, and treatment-specific resource use (e.g., hospitalizations) and costs (&lt;or=$3400 annually per patient). Nevertheless, they are absent from current economic models.
CONCLUSIONS:

Strong correlations exist between patient behaviors, perspectives of care, health outcomes, and costs in T2D. Enhancing their inclusion in pharmacoeconomic modeling, notably the influence on clinical effectiveness of variation in self-management between treatments, should ultimately lead to more accurate estimates of comparative cost-effectiveness, and thereby improve value-based resource allocation and patient access to appropriate therapy.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Hospital rates of thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke: The influence of organizational culture (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/17952/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-10-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background and Purpose-: The purpose of this study was to determine if organizational culture explains differences in rates of intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke between different hospitals. Methods-: A cohort study was done in 12 centers admitting 5515 consecutive patients with acute stroke in The Netherlands. A multilevel logistic regression model was used to relate the likelihood of treatment with thrombolysis to characteristics of the organizational culture of the centers. Organizational culture was defined by 10 characteristics and scored by a panel. A sum score was created by adding all scores and dividing by 10. Results-: Thrombolysis rates varied from 5.7% to 21.7%. We observed an association between thrombolysis and the availability of informal and formal feedback (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.28); a learning culture (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.23); uncompromising, individual clinical leadership (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.23); explicit goals (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.17); and with the sum score (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.23). Conclusions-: Several cultural characteristics of the hospital organization are related to thrombolysis rate. Organizational culture may be an important target for interventions aimed at increasing rates of thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke in hospitals.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Costs and effects of secondary prevention with perindopril in stable coronary heart disease in Poland: An analysis of the EUROPA study including 1251 Polish patients (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/14809/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-09-25T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Objectives: To estimate the long-term impact of treatment with perindopril on costs and health effects in patients with stable coronary artery disease in Poland. Methods: The cost-effectiveness analysis was based on data from a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. A decision-tree analysis was employed, including Monte Carlo and bootstrapping techniques. This study was a sub-study of the EUROPA (European Trial on Reduction of Cardiac Events with Perindopril in Stable Coronary Artery Disease) trial (n = 12 218; mean follow-up 4.2 years). Resource use was based on data from Polish EUROPA study patients (n = 1251), while effectiveness was based on the whole EUROPA study. The health gain of perindopril in life-years was based on overall EUROPA study results, and the adapted Polish life expectancy of patients not dying during the trial. Costs were calculated in new Polish zloty (PLN), year 2003 values; €1 = PLN4.053. Only direct healthcare costs related to cardiovascular events and medication use were studied. Results: When observed mortality was combined with life expectancy beyond the end of the study, perindopril use showed a gain in life expectancy of 0.182 life-years (SD ± 0.129) at a cost of PLN1983 (SD ± 103) with discounting of 5% per annum on costs and no discounting on effects. This resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of PLN10 896 per life-year gained. The probability that the ICER for perindopril was below the threshold of PLN60 000 was 88%. The overall results were insensitive to discount rates for costs and life-years. Conclusions: Perindopril leads to a reduction in the risk of coronary events among patients with stable heart disease. When the expected improvement in life expectancy is combined with associated medical costs, there is a high probability that perindopril is cost effective, given the threshold of PLN60 000 per life-year gained.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Clinical spectrum of patients presenting with bronchiectasis in Nepal: Evidence of linkage between tuberculosis, tobacco smoking and toxic exposure to biomass smoke (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/15904/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Aims and objectives: The aim of the study was to describe the clinical spectrum of the patients presenting with bronchiectasis at the referral clinic for the respiratory diseases in eastern Nepal. An attempt would also be made to provide an overview of factors responsible for poor lung health in the community. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective observational study conducted at the Adult Chest Clinic of the Department of Internal Medicine at the B.P Koirala Institute of Health Sciences (BPKIHS), Dharan Nepal. The medical records of all the consecutive patients presenting with the diagnosis of bronchiectasis in the Adult Chest Clinic of Department of Medicine from January 2003 to December 2004 (two years) were reviewed for patient characteristics (age, gender, place of residence, occupation, smoking history, exposure to indoor air pollution due to use of biomass smoke, past and family history related to tuberculosis, and clinical characteristics such as clinical features and duration of symptoms Results: During the study period of two years, 100 patients presented with the diagnosis of bronchiectasis, 80 (80%) patients were smokers and 50 (50%) patients had history of significant exposure to indoor air pollution. Abnormal Chest X-ray was seen in 85(85%) patients. Post tubercular bronchiectasis was the most common etiological diagnosis Smoking status and exposure to indoor air pollution were important determinant for hospitalisation in patients with post tubercular bronchiectasis. Conclusions: In Nepal bronchiectasis remains one of the important chronic respiratory diseases, post tubercular variety being the commonest type .Tuberculosis, tobacco smoking and exposure to indoor air pollution contributes towards higher morbidity of this diseases.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Conditional reimbursement within the Dutch drug policy (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/35701/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-11-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>In The Netherlands, conditional reimbursement is considered to be a promising approach to achieving more effective and efficient pharmaceutical care. Because of its formal status and nationwide regulation, conditional reimbursement may allow governments to better control medical decision-making. To evaluate the effects of conditional reimbursement on medicine use and its performance as a policy tool, we compared observed volumes of medicine use with expected volumes. In addition, we mapped the annual growth by analysing trends in the volumes of use of all conditionally reimbursed drugs; starting with the year the drug entered the market (using macro-level data). Next we explored five cases in depth (using micro-level data) in order to explore what fraction of individual prescriptions met the requirements. We also performed qualitative research (document analysis, interviews (N = 65)) in order to obtain the stakeholders' perspectives on how the measure functions, as well as to interpret the case studies data further. The findings suggest that conditional reimbursement may be an effective policy instrument, but that several changes are needed to optimize its impact. These changes are predominantly related to transparency (e.g. conditions are set following clear procedures and criteria), legitimacy (conditions should be consistent with criteria for prioritization), feasibility of procedures to control appropriate use, and timely and appropriate commitment of the stakeholders. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke: from trial exclusion criteria to clinical contraindications. An international Delphi study (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/22450/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-07-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>OBJECTIVE: Several studies indicate that only a small proportion of patients with acute ischaemic stroke are treated with intravenous thrombolysis. Indications and contraindications for this treatment are usually based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria of randomised clinical trials. The trial context of these criteria hampers implementation in real life settings. We therefore aimed to obtain specialist opinion in a Delphi consensus on these contraindications.

METHODS: We used the Delphi approach on an international group of specialists in the field of thrombolysis. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were reworded into 18 quantitatively phrased propositions. Feedback consisted of the median score, interquartile range and the panellist's own score in the previous round. For each item, we defined consensus as the achievement of an interdecile range within two prespecified clinically relevant units.

RESULTS: Thirty-one specialists participated in the first round and 30 completed all three rounds. Consensus was reached on 12 of the 18 propositions: previous ischaemic stroke, head trauma and gastrointestinal tract bleeding should not have taken place earlier than 1.5 months, 2 months and 14 days, respectively; the severity of the neurological deficit is defined as a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 2-3 or more, and blood pressure level should not be &gt;185/110 mmHg; platelet count should be &gt;90x10(12)/l, glucose levels 2.7-22 mmol/l, international normalised ratio &lt;1.5 and activated partial thromboplastin time &lt;50 s. No consensus was reached on propositions concerning the stroke onset to treatment time, patient's age, recent medical procedures, spontaneous improvement rate and blood pressure treatment.

CONCLUSIONS: We present specialists' opinion on contraindications for intravenous thrombolysis in ischaemic stroke. The results of this study may be relevant for routine clinical practice as they may help to increase the number of treated patients.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Priority setting using multiple criteria: Should a lung health programme be implemented in Nepal? (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/35953/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-05-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Objectives: To identify and weigh the various criteria for priority setting, and to assess whether a recently evaluated lung health programme in Nepal should be considered a priority in that country. Methods: Through a discrete choice experiment with 66 respondents in Nepal, the relative importance of several criteria for priority setting was determined. Subsequently, a set of interventions, including the lung health programme, was rank ordered on the basis of their overall performance on those criteria. Results: Priority interventions are those that target severe diseases, many beneficiaries and people of middle-age, have large individual health benefits, lead to poverty reduction and are very cost-effective. Certain interventions in tuberculosis control rank highest. The lung health programme ranks 13th out of 34 interventions. Conclusion: This explorative analysis suggests that the lung health programme is among the priorities in Nepal when taking into account a range of relevant criteria for priority setting. The multi-criteria approach can be an important step forward to rational priority setting in developing countries. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Prioritisation by physicians in the Netherlands-The growth hormone example in drug reimbursement decisions (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/35836/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-03-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Drug treatment and reimbursement is an area of ever growing complexity in health priority setting. This paper assesses the National Registry of Growth Hormone Treatment (LRG) responsible for making prioritisation decisions in the Dutch drug reimbursement system in the treatment of growth hormone, using the framework for fairness. We used qualitative research consisting of semi-structured interviews and focus group sessions combined with quantitative methods to audit the decisions of the forum. The rationing decisions of the forum demonstrate accountability for reasonableness by the conditions for transparency, relevance, and appeal. Most rationales for the decisions are public and transparent. The patients and paediatricians see decisions made by the LRG as clinical and therefore relevant decisions. They also refer to extensive appeal procedures. The case also raises important issues regarding the legitimacy of expert-based priority setting as the cyclic nature of guideline development conflicts with the need for maintaining strict rationing criteria. In 13% of the patients, the sick funds did cover treatment as the forum advised them to do, but according to guideline criteria it may be unlikely that these patients have growth hormone deficiency. According to the LRG, however, only 2% of the decisions are inconsistent with the guidelines, as some criteria on what to do in case of more uncertainty, shifted. For the forum, it seems rather unthinkable to go against the professional norms, in spite of formal national regulations. For the Health Care Insurance Board (CVZ), it was not considered possible to go against national regulations, especially as professional norms have shifted without informing policy makers and patient representatives. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Economic analysis for clinical practice - The case of 31 national consensus guidelines in the Netherlands (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/36830/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-02-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Rationale, aims and objective: Evidence on the cost-effectiveness of health interventions in the development of practice guidelines has become of interest in many countries. Challenges are the quality of economic data, the use of cost-effectiveness criteria, and the consensus process. Our paper aims to assess the quality and use of economic information in the formulation of consensus guidelines in a Dutch pilot programme and to recommend improvements. Methods: Retrospective qualitative review of economic evaluations and formulated recommendations, using a checklist based on international standards. Results: The national programme to support the development of guidelines with economic analysis in multidisciplinary consensus groups run from 1998 to 2002. It has included 31 medical guidelines, addressing 23 conditions across seven International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-disease groups. Experts in health technology assessment have participated in the guidelines groups. Economic information in all guidelines varies by all criteria in the level of evidence used. Information on quality-adjusted life years gained is limited as is statistical analysis in most studies. Highest cost-effectiveness ratios reported are between €20 000 and €30 000. However, there is no uniformity in the definitions of acceptable cost-effectiveness ratios. Conclusions: Economic recommendations can be included in guidelines. Interaction between clinicians and health economists promotes a balance between medical and economic arguments. Among panellists there appears to be agreement on the level of the cost-effectiveness ratios that is acceptable. It is recommended that economic analysis is used to strengthen the evidence-base of guidelines. An evidence-grading system should include the quality of economic evaluation. Roles of policymakers and providers need to be defined. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Priority setting of health interventions: the need for multi-criteria decision analysis. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/14036/</link>
      <pubDate>2006-08-21T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Priority setting of health interventions is often ad-hoc and resources are not used to an optimal extent. Underlying problem is that multiple criteria play a role and decisions are complex. Interventions may be chosen to maximize general population health, to reduce health inequalities of disadvantaged or vulnerable groups, ad/or to respond to life-threatening situations, all with respect to practical and budgetary constraints. This is the type of problem that policy makers are typically bad at solving rationally, unaided. They tend to use heuristic or intuitive approaches to simplify complexity, and in the process, important information is ignored. Next, policy makers may select interventions for only political motives. This indicates the need for rational and transparent approaches to priority setting. Over the past decades, a number of approaches have been developed, including evidence-based medicine, burden of disease analyses, cost-effectiveness analyses, and equity analyses. However, these approaches concentrate on single criteria only, whereas in reality, policy makers need to make choices taking into account multiple criteria simultaneously. Moreover, they do not cover all criteria that are relevant to policy makers. Therefore, the development of a multi-criteria approach to priority setting is necessary, and this has indeed recently been identified as one of the most important issues in health system research. In other scientific disciplines, multi-criteria decision analysis is well developed, has gained widespread acceptance and is routinely used. This paper presents the main principles of multi-criteria decision analysis. There are only a very few applications to guide resource allocation decisions in health. We call for a shift away from present priority setting tools in health--that tend to focus on single criteria--towards transparent and systematic approaches that take into account all relevant criteria simultaneously.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Need for differential discounting of costs and health effects in cost effectiveness analyses (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8277/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Cost-effectiveness of prevention and treatment of the diabetic foot: a Markov analysis (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/10328/</link>
      <pubDate>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>OBJECTIVE: To estimate the lifetime health and economic effects of optimal
      prevention and treatment of the diabetic foot according to international
      standards and to determine the cost-effectiveness of these interventions
      in the Netherlands. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A risk-based Markov model
      was developed to simulate the onset and progression of diabetic foot
      disease in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes managed with care
      according to guidelines for their lifetime. Mean survival time, quality of
      life, foot complications, and costs were the outcome measures assessed.
      Current care was the reference comparison. Data from Dutch studies on the
      epidemiology of diabetic foot disease, health care use, and costs,
      complemented with information from international studies, were used to
      feed the model. RESULTS: Compared with current care, guideline-based care
      resulted in improved life expectancy, gain of quality-adjusted life-years
      (QALYs), and reduced incidence of foot complications. The lifetime costs
      of management of the diabetic foot following guideline-based care resulted
      in a cost per QALY gained of &lt; 25,000 US dollars, even for levels of
      preventive foot care as low as 10%. The cost-effectiveness varied sharply,
      depending on the level of foot ulcer reduction attained. CONCLUSIONS:
      Management of the diabetic foot according to guideline-based care improves
      survival, reduces diabetic foot complications, and is cost-effective and
      even cost saving compared with standard care.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Lifetime health effects and costs of diabetes treatment (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/10314/</link>
      <pubDate>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: This article presents cost-effectiveness analyses of the major
      diabetes interventions as formulated in the revised Dutch guidelines for
      diabetes type 2 patients in primary and secondary care. The analyses
      consider two types of care: diabetes control and the treatment of
      complications, each at current care level and according to the guidelines.
      METHODS: A validated probabilistic diabetes model describes diabetes and
      its complications over a lifetime in the Dutch population, computing
      quality-adjusted life years and medical costs. Effectiveness data and
      costs of diabetes interventions are from observational current care
      studies and intensive care experiments. Lifetime consequences of in total
      sixteen intervention mixes are compared with a baseline glycaemic control
      of 10% HBA1C. RESULTS: The interventions may reduce the cumulative
      incidence of blindness, lower-extremity amputation, and end-stage renal
      disease by &gt;70% in primary care and &gt;60% in secondary care. All primary
      care guidelines together add 0.8 quality-adjusted life years per lifetime.
      CONCLUSION: In case of few resources, treating complications according to
      guidelines yields the most health benefits. Current care of diabetes
      complications is inefficient. If there are sufficient resources, countries
      may implement all guidelines, also on diabetes control, and improve
      efficiency in diabetes care.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Health-related quality of life and treatment satisfaction in Dutch patients with type 2 diabetes (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9865/</link>
      <pubDate>2002-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>OBJECTIVE: To estimate the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and
      treatment satisfaction for patients with type 2 diabetes in the
      Netherlands and to examine which patient characteristics are associated
      with quality of life and treatment satisfaction. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
      METHODS: For a sample of 1,348 type 2 diabetes patients, recruited by 29
      general practitioners, we collected data regarding HRQOL. This study was
      performed as part of a larger European study (Cost of Diabetes in Europe -
      Type 2 [CODE-2]). We used a generic instrument (Euroqol 5D) to measure
      HRQOL. Treatment satisfaction was assessed using the Diabetes Treatment
      Satisfaction Questionnaire. RESULTS: Patients without complications had an
      HRQOL (0.74) only slightly lower than similarly aged persons in the
      general population. Insulin therapy, obesity, and complications were
      associated with a lower HRQOL, independent of age and sex. Although higher
      fasting blood glucose and HbA1c levels were negatively associated with
      HRQOL, these factors were not significant after adjustment for other
      factors using multivariate analysis. Overall treatment satisfaction was
      very high. Younger patients, patients using insulin, and patients with
      higher HbA1c levels were less satisfied with the treatment than other
      patients. CONCLUSIONS: Obesity and the presence of complications are
      important determinants of HRQOL in patients with type 2 diabetes.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>