<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Schellekens, H.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/36814/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>The cost-effectiveness of periodic safety update reports for biologicals in Europe (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/40088/</link>
      <pubDate>2013-05-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>We analyzed the cost-effectiveness of all Periodic Safety Update Reports (PSURs) submitted for biologicals in Europe from 1995 to 2009 by comparing two regulatory scenarios: full regulation (PSUR reporting) and limited regulation (no PSUR reporting, but all other parts of the pharmacovigilance framework remain in place). During this period, PSUR reporting resulted in the detection of 2 out of a total of 24 urgent safety issues for biologicals: (i) distant spread of botulinum toxin and (ii) edema/fluid collection associated with off-label use of dibotermin-alfa. We used Markov-chain life tables to calculate costs and health effects of PSURs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of full regulation (PSUR reporting) vs. limited regulation (no PSUR reporting) for the base-case scenario was €342,110 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. It is possible to assess the cost-effectiveness of regulatory requirements using the same methods as those used in assessing the cost-effectiveness of medical interventions. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Value for money of drug regulation (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/38394/</link>
      <pubDate>2012-06-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The cost-effectiveness of drug regulation: The example of thorough QT/QTc studies (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/38273/</link>
      <pubDate>2012-02-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>We analyzed the cost-effectiveness of the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) E14 guideline that requires a thorough QT/QTc (TQT) study for all drugs under development. We compared two pharmacoeconomic scenarios: the health effects and costs resulting from implementing ICH E14 (regulation scenario) vs. not implementing ICH E14 (no regulation scenario). We used a dynamic population model to calculate the cost-effectiveness of ICH E14 for a prototype QT-prolonging antipsychotic drug entering the US and European markets. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of regulation vs. no regulation were .4 million per sudden cardiac death prevented and 187,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained in users of antipsychotic drugs. The main driver of cost was the requirement for electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring of users of QTc-prolonging drugs. Even when several of the assumptions in the model were varied, there were no results in favor of regulation. Our study shows that cost-effectiveness analysis of drug regulatory measures is feasible and should be considered before developing such measures. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Interferons, properties and applications (Doctoral Thesis)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/31492/</link>
      <pubDate>1980-05-14T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The main theme of this thesis is the clinical evaluation of interferon.
From the biology of the interferon system and animal experiments it
can be expected that exogenous interferon will exert its optimum effect
when used to prevent acute infections or to modulate chronic infections.
Therefore, we administered interferon to patients with chronic
hepatitis B virus infection (chapter 5) and to renal transplant recipients,
in whom viral infections occur frequently in the first months
after transplantation (chapter 6).
The other studies in this thesis are directly related to the problems
we met in the clinical studies. We wanted to study interferon in
an animal renal transplantation model. For us the most obvious choice
was the rat. However, little was known about the production and characterization
of rat interferon. Chapter 2 describes our experiences
with rat interferon.
While we were well underway with the study in renal transplant recipients,
we were contacted by Martin Hirsch, who was conducting a
similar trial in Boston. Some of his patients receiving 3 x 106 U HLI
every other day showed severe bone marrow depression. We had no such
problem in our trial, but we used another type of interferon: HFI.
For this reason we started a study on the t'oxicity of interferons for
bone marrow in vitro.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Influence of interferon preparations on the proliferative capacity of human and mouse bone marrow cells in vitro (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/26815/</link>
      <pubDate>1978-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The toxicity of interferon to bone marrow was studied by the use of in vitro colony forming assays for hemopoietic cells. In the same study the relative inhibitory effects of two clinically common interferon preparations, leukocyte and fibroblast interferons, were compared with regard to their effect on both myeloid [colony-forming unit, culture (CFUc)] and erythroid [colony-forming unit, erythroid (CFUe)] progenitor cells. CFUe formation in human bone marrow cells in vitro appeared to be fairly resistant to both interferons. Only high doses of both interferons gave a marked inhibition of CFUe. However, the toxicity of leukocyte and fibroblast interferon was divergent for CFUe in human bone marrow. Leukocyte interferon appeared to be considerably more inhibitory for CFUe than was fibroblast interferon. The effects of mouse interferon, induced in L929 cells, on the growth of CFUc and CFUe in murine bone marrow cells were comparable with those of fibroblast interferon on human cells. The toxicity of human and murine interferon was species specific. Except for the toxicity of leukocyte interferon to CFUc in human bone marrow, the toxicity of interferon was marked only with concentrations on interferon far exceeding the amount necessary to produce an antiviral state in vitro.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>