<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Willems, T.P.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/3966/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Human tissue valves in aortic position: determinants of reoperation and valve regurgitation (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9616/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Human tissue valves for aortic valve replacement have a
          limited durability that is influenced by interrelated determinants.
          Hierarchical linear modeling was used to analyze the relation between
          these determinants of durability and valve regurgitation measured by
          serial echocardiography. METHODS AND RESULTS: In adult patients, 218
          cryopreserved aortic allografts were implanted with the subcoronary (85)
          or the root replacement technique (133), and 81 patients had root
          replacement with a pulmonary autograft. Mean follow-up was 4.2 years (SD
          2.7; range, 0 to 10.5). Patient age, operator experience with subcoronary
          implantation, and allograft diameter were independent predictors for
          reoperation. With repeated color Doppler echocardiography, the severity of
          aortic regurgitation was assessed by the jet length method and the jet
          diameter ratio. Multilevel hierarchical linear modeling was used to
          estimate initial aortic regurgitation (intercept), its change over time
          (slope), and the effect of 11 potential determinants of durability on
          aortic regurgitation. With the jet length method, the intercept was 0.94
          grade and the slope was 0.11 grade per year. With the jet diameter ratio,
          the intercept was 0.34 and the annual increase was 0.01. Subcoronary
          implanted valves had more initial aortic regurgitation, but progression of
          aortic valve regurgitation did not differ from root replacement. At
          midterm follow-up, recipient age &lt;40 years was the only independent
          predictor of aortic regurgitation. CONCLUSIONS: Subcoronary implantation
          has a learning curve, resulting in more initial aortic regurgitation and
          early reoperation compared with root replacement. In both techniques,
          progression of aortic regurgitation over time is small but accelerated in
          young adults.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>