http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/4075/ List of Publications en http://repub.eur.nl/static-eur/img/logo.png http://repub.eur.nl http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4752/ 2003-03-01T00:00:00Z Abstract AIMS: This study examined the six-month angiographic results of direct coronary stenting, and compared the nine-month safety, efficacy and cost of this strategy versus stenting after balloon predilatation. METHODS: In phase I of VELVET, 122 patients (mean age = 62.3 +/- 10.1 years, 77% male, 11% with diabetes) with angina pectoris or myocardial ischemia resulting from a single de novo 51% to 95% coronary stenosis underwent direct stenting. The endpoints of phase I included angiographic findings and rates of major adverse cardiac events up to six months of follow-up. In phase II, 401 patients (mean age = 61.3 +/- 10.8 years, 79% male, 16% with diabetes) with angina pectoris or documented myocardial ischemia resulting from single or multiple, de novo or restenotic, coronary lesions were randomized between direct stenting and stenting after predilatation. The immediate angiographic results, and clinical outcomes and costs associated with the two treatment strategies up to nine months of follow-up were compared. RESULTS: In phase I the mean diameter stenosis immediately before and after the procedure, and at six months was 61.7+/-9.4%, 13.5+/-6.3%, and 33.6+/-16.2%, respectively. The six-month binary restenosis rate was 11%. The overall rate of major adverse cardiac events, including two non-cardiac deaths, was 9.8%. In phase II, the success rates of the intended delivery strategies were 87.9% and 97.9% for direct stenting and predilatation, respectively (p < 0.001), while the procedural success rates were similar (93.9% vs 96.5%). Over a follow-up period of nine months, major adverse cardiac events rates were 12.0% and 10.9% in patients randomized to direct stenting and predilatation, respectively (non-significant). Analyses of the costs incurred up to nine months in each treatment group revealed a mean saving of e362 per patient in favor of the direct stenting strategy (non-significant). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with a strategy of stenting preceded by balloon dilatation, direct stenting was associated with an equivalent procedural success rate, equivalent clinical results up to nine months of follow-up, and a reduction in procedural and in-hospital costs (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.001, respectively), that was no longer significant after nine months. http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/18581/ 2002-07-01T00:00:00Z http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/12994/ 2001-11-24T00:00:00Z BACKGROUND: Studies have reported benefit of oral therapy with the phosphodiesterase inhibitor, trapidil, in reducing restenosis after coronary angioplasty. Coronary stenting is associated with improved late outcome compared with balloon angioplasty, but significant neointimal hyperplasia still occurs in a considerable proportion of patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of trapidil 200 mg in preventing in-stent restenosis. METHODS: Patients with a single native coronary lesion requiring revascularization were randomized to placebo or trapidil at least 1 h before, and continuing for 6 months after, successful implantation of a coronary Wallstent. The primary end-point was in-stent neointimal volume measured by three-dimensional reconstruction of intravascular ultrasound images recorded at the 6 month follow-up catheterization. RESULTS: Of 312 patients randomized at 21 centres in nine countries, 303 (148 trapidil, 155 placebo) underwent successful Wallstent implantation, and 139 patients (90%) in the placebo group and 130 (88%) in the trapidil group had repeat catheterization at 26+/-2 weeks. There was no significant difference between trapidil and placebo-treated patients regarding in-stent neointimal volume (108.6+/- 95.6 mm(3)vs 93.3+/-79.1 mm(3);P=0.16) or % obstruction volume (38+/-18% vs 36+/-21%;P=0.32), in angiographic minimal luminal diameter at follow-up (1.63+/-0.61 mm vs 1.74+/-0.69 mm;P=0.17), restenosis rate (31% vs 24%;P=0.24), cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiac events at 7 months (22% vs 20%;P=0.71) or anginal complaints (30% vs 24%;P=0.29). CONCLUSION: Oral trapidil 600 mg daily for 6 months did not reduce in-stent hyperplasia or improve clinical outcome after successful Wallstent implantation and is not indicated for this purpose. http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4821/ 2001-09-12T00:00:00Z Aims To prospectively evaluate the influence of stent length on 6 month clinical and angiographic outcome, in patients with native coronary lesions up to 45mm in length, undergoing elective Magic Wallstent implantation. Methods and Results On the basis of pre-procedural angiography, 276 patients (aged 61·3±10·2 years; 78·6% male; 41·7% unstable angina) with a total of 302 lesions were prospectively assigned to one of five different length categories of Magic Wallstent. Angiography in multiple matched projections before and after implantation and at 6 months follow-up was analysed at the core laboratory. Primary end-points for the efficacy analysis were cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiac events and quantitative coronary angiography analysis 6 months after stent implantation. Magic Wallstent implantation was successful in 301 of 302 lesions and in 98·6% a residual stenosis <20% by online quantitative coronary angiography was achieved. At 30 days, 6·2% (1·8% subacute occlusion) of patients had experienced major adverse cardiac events, 27·5% at 6 months and 30·4% at 9 months. Angiographic restenosis occurred in 37%. Restenosis rates for the mini, extra-short, short, medium and long Wallstent groups were 25·9%, 25%, 22·6%, 36·2% and 67·5%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed stent length to be independently associated with greater angiographic restenosis and major adverse cardiac events. Conclusions While shorter Magic Wallstents provided late outcomes comparable with short balloon-expandable stents, excessive restenosis with longer Wallstents should obviate their use in elective percutaneous intervention. Long coronary lesions provide a challenging substrate for emerging antirestenosis therapies, such as stent coatings and brachytherapy.