<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Herwerden, L.A. van</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/416/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Data Resource Profile: Adult cardiac surgery database of the Netherlands Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/39914/</link>
      <pubDate>2012-12-18T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>n 2007 The Netherlands Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (Nederlandse Vereniging voor Thoraxchirurgie, NVT) instituted the Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. The dataset comprises demographic factors, type of intervention, in-hospital mortality and 18 risk factors for mortality after cardiac surgery, according to the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation definitions. Currently, this procedural database contains over 60 000 interventions. Completeness of data is excellent and national coverage of all 16 Dutch cardio-thoracic surgery centres has been achieved since the start. The primary goal of the database is to control and maintain the quality of care by evaluation of outcomes. This is accomplished by regular feedback and comparison of outcomes. For a subset of the database (procedures from 10 out of 16 centres) longer-term follow-up has been established by means of data linkage to two national registries. This provides information on survival status, causes of death and readmissions. The database has recently been used for research, resulting in methodological papers aimed at optimizing comparison of outcomes. In future, clinical issues will also be addressed, for example survival after coronary artery bypass grafting and valve surgery. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The Ross procedure: A systematic review and meta-analysis (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/19343/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-01-20T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background - Reports on outcome after the Ross procedure are limited by small study size and show variable durability results. A systematic review of evidence on outcome after the Ross procedure may improve insight into outcome and potential determinants. Methods and Results - A systematic review of reports published from January 2000 to January 2008 on outcome after the Ross procedure was undertaken. Thirty-nine articles meeting the inclusion criteria were allocated to 3 categories: (1) consecutive series, (2) adult patient series, and (3) pediatric patient series. With the use of an inverse variance approach, pooled morbidity and mortality rates were obtained. Pooled early mortality for consecutive, adult, and pediatric patients series was 3.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8 to 4.9), 3.2% (95% CI, 1.5 to 6.6), and 4.2% (95% CI, 1.4 to 11.5). Autograft deterioration rates were 1.15% (95% CI, 1.06 to 2.06), 0.78% (95% CI, 0.43 to 1.40), and 1.38%/patient-year (95% CI, 0.68 to 2.80), respectively, and for right ventricular outflow tract conduit were 0.91% (95% CI, 0.56 to 1.47), 0.55% (95% CI, 0.26 to 1.17), and 1.60%/patient-year (95% CI, 0.84 to 3.05), respectively. For studies with mean patient age &gt;18 years versus mean patient age ≤ 18 years, pooled autograft and right ventricular outflow tract deterioration rates were 1.14% (95% CI, 0.83 to 1.57) versus 1.69% (95% CI, 1.02 to 2.79) and 0.65% (95% CI, 0.41 to 1.02) versus 1.66%/patient-year (95% CI, 0.98 to 2.82), respectively. Conclusions - The Ross procedure provides satisfactory results for both children and young adults. Durability limitations become apparent by the end of the first postoperative decade, in particular in younger patients.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Dissection of a dilated autograft root (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/35564/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-03-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Five year clinical effect of coronary stenting and coronary artery bypass grafting in renal insufficient patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: insights from ARTS trial. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/13793/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-08-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>AIMS: To compare coronary stent implantation and bypass surgery for multivessel coronary disease in patients with renal insufficiency. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the ARTS trial, 142 moderate renal insufficient patients (Ccr&lt;60 mL/min) with multivessel coronary disease were randomly assigned to stent implantation (n=69) or CABG (n=73). At 5 years, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of mortality (14.5% in the stent group vs. 12.3% in the CABG group, P=0.81), or combined endpoint of death, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), or myocardial infarction (MI) (30.4% in the stent group vs. 23.3% in the CABG group, P=0.35). Among patients who survived without CVA or MI, 18.8% in the stent group underwent a second revascularization procedure when compared with 8.2% in the surgery group (P=0.08). The event-free survival at 5 years was 50.7% in the stent group and 68.5% in the surgery group (P=0.04). CONCLUSION: At 5 years, the differences in mortality and combined incidence of death, CVA, and MI between coronary stenting and surgery did not reach statistically significant level. However, the occurrence of MACCE in the stent group was higher than in the CABG group, mainly driven by the higher incidence of repeat revascularization in the stent group.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The impact of the introduction of drug-eluting stents on the clinical practice of surgical and percutaneous treatment of coronary artery disease. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/13630/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-04-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>AIMS: Sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) have recently been shown to reduce restenosis in selected patients. The impact of this new stent on the use of coronary bypass graft (CABG) surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in clinical practice is yet unknown. Therefore, we investigated the impact of SES on the clinical practice of CABG and PCI in a series of unselected consecutive patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between April and October 2002, a policy of SES implantation for all procedures has been instituted in our hospital. In total, 798 patients were referred to PCI and 275 to CABG (SES group). A control group was composed of all interventions (806 PCI and 314 CABG) performed during the preceding 6 months (pre-SES). The main outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 15 months. In the SES era, a significant shift was noted in the PCI group towards more multi-vessel stenting (28 vs. 24%; P&lt;0.05), more bifurcation stenting (18 vs. 7%; P&lt;0.0001), and the use of more stents (1.9 vs. 1.5; P&lt;0.05). In the PCI elective patients, a shift was noted towards more three-vessel disease (pre-SES: 16% vs. SES: 23%; P=0.02). Furthermore, we observed a shift in the CABG group towards more impaired LV function (pre-SES: 34% vs. SES: 41%; P=0.02) and towards more three-vessel disease (pre-SES: 67% vs. SES: 75%; P=0.03). Overall, the cumulative MACE percentages at 1 year after coronary revascularization (PCI and CABG combined) decreased from 16.8 to 13.8% (P=0.03). The cumulative MACE percentages in the pure SES group and the pre-SES bare metal stent group at 12 months were 15.6 and 19.8%, respectively (P&lt;0.01). CONCLUSION: The introduction of the SES has certainly had an impact on the treatment strategy of coronary artery disease (CAD). Increased use of these stents allows more complex coronary anatomy to be treated by PCI, and results in lower repeat revascularization rates.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Comparison of outcomes after aortic valve replacement with a mechanical valve or a bioprosthesis using microsimulation (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8309/</link>
      <pubDate>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Mechanical valves and bioprostheses are widely used for aortic
      valve replacement. Though previous randomised studies indicate that there
      is no important difference in outcome after implantation with either type
      of valve, knowledge of outcomes after aortic valve replacement is
      incomplete. OBJECTIVE: To predict age and sex specific outcomes of
      patients after aortic valve replacement with bileaflet mechanical valves
      and stented porcine bioprostheses, and to provide evidence based support
      for the choice of prosthesis. METHODS: Meta-analysis of published results
      of primary aortic valve replacement with bileaflet mechanical prostheses
      (nine reports, 4274 patients, and 25,726 patient-years) and stented
      porcine bioprostheses (13 reports, 9007 patients, and 54,151
      patient-years) was used to estimate the annual risks of postoperative
      valve related events and their outcomes. These estimates were entered into
      a microsimulation model, which was employed to calculate age and sex
      specific outcomes after aortic valve replacement. RESULTS: Life expectancy
      (LE) and event-free life expectancy (EFLE) for a 65 year old man after
      implantation with a mechanical valve or a bioprosthesis were 10.4 and 10.7
      years and 7.7 and 8.4 years, respectively. The lifetime risk of at least
      one valve related event for a mechanical valve was 48%, and for a
      bioprosthesis, 44%. For LE and EFLE, the age crossover point between the
      two valve types was 59 and 60 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:
      Meta-analysis based microsimulation provides insight into the long term
      outcome after aortic valve replacement and suggests that the currently
      recommended age threshold for implanting a bioprosthesis could be lowered
      further.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Sustained improvement after combined anterior mitral leaflet extension and myectomy in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/13203/</link>
      <pubDate>2003-10-28T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Mitral leaflet extension (MLE) combined with septal myectomy
      is a new surgical approach to treat hypertrophic obstructive
      cardiomyopathy (HOCM) and an enlarged mitral leaflet area. The study
      presents the long-term clinical results and outcome of this technique.
      METHODS AND RESULTS: MLE entails grafting a glutaraldehyde-preserved
      autologous pericardial patch onto the center portion of the anterior
      mitral valve leaflet. Twenty-nine patients with HOCM were studied. Mean
      follow-up (+/-SD) was 3.4+/-2.1 years (range 3 months to 7.7 years). The
      preoperative calculated mitral leaflet area was 16.7+/-3.4 cm2. New York
      Heart Association functional class improved significantly from 2.8+/-0.4
      to 1.3+/-0.4 (P&lt;0.05), width of the interventricular septum decreased from
      23+/-4 to 17+/-2 mm (P&lt;0.05), left ventricular outflow tract gradient
      decreased from 100+/-20 to 17+/-14 mm Hg (P&lt;0.01), severity of mitral
      regurgitation graded on a scale from 0 to 4+ decreased from 2.5+/-0.9 to
      0.5+/-0.6 (P&lt;0.01), and severity of the systolic anterior motion of the
      mitral valve graded on a scale from 0 to 3+ decreased from 2.9+/-0.3 to
      0.5+/-0.7 (P&lt;0.01) postoperatively. There were no deaths associated with
      surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term follow-up shows sustained improvement in
      functional status, reduction of outflow tract obstruction, and attenuation
      of mitral regurgitation and systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve.
      In this respect, the new technique widens the surgical applications in
      HOCM.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Coronary artery bypass graft surgery and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Twenty-year clinical outcome. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/13057/</link>
      <pubDate>2002-04-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>AIMS: The purpose of this study is to compare the long-term outcome (up to 20 years) of coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in a consecutive patient series at a single centre. Survival is similar after CABG and PTCA up to 8 years follow-up in patients with multivessel disease, with a reduced need for repeat revascularization after CABG. As coronary artery disease is a lifetime disease, longer-term follow-up of these revascularization therapies is necessary to help clinical decision-making. METHODS AND RESULTS: The CABG study population consisted of the first 1041 consecutive patients who underwent a first elective coronary bypass surgery between 1970 and 1980. The PTCA study population consisted of 702 consecutive patients who underwent a first elective coronary angioplasty procedure between 1980 and 1985. Mortality and subsequent revascularization up to 20 years were captured. Survival rates were adjusted using proportional hazards methods to account for baseline differences. RESULTS: The unadjusted survival rates were 92%, 77%, 57% and 49% after CABG at respectively, 5-, 10-, 15- and 17 years and 91%, 80%, 64% and 59% after PTCA. In the multivessel disease subgroup, survival was similar with a benefit apparent after CABG in the first 8 years of follow-up. The therapy chosen, CABG or PTCA, was a univariate predictor of mortality in favour of PTCA (RR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.10-1.49), but after correction for baseline characteristics, the relative risk of mortality for CABG vs PTCA was comparable (RR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.87-1.24). The adjusted survival curves in the subgroup of diabetic elderly patients with multivessel disease were similar after the tenth year with only a slightly better survival in the CABG population in the first 10 years. Repeat intervention was more frequently required after PTCA during the first 8 years, but after this time more frequently in the CABG group. CONCLUSION: When comparing CABG and PTCA it can be concluded that both strategies are equally effective in terms of 20-year survival. In particular, after more than 10 years all differences tend to disappear. While repeat intervention was significantly higher in the first year after PTCA, after 7-8 years, reintervention was greater in patients who had initial CABG.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Percutaneous valve implantation: back to the future? (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9971/</link>
      <pubDate>2002-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Comparison of coronary-artery bypass surgery and stenting for the treatment of multivessel disease (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8448/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: The recent recognition that coronary-artery stenting has improved the short- and long-term outcomes of patients treated with angioplasty has made it necessary to reevaluate the relative benefits of bypass surgery and percutaneous interventions in patients with multivessel disease. METHODS: A total of 1205 patients were randomly assigned to undergo stent implantation or bypass surgery when a cardiac surgeon and an interventional cardiologist agreed that the same extent of revascularization could be achieved by either technique. The primary clinical end point was freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events at one year. The costs of hospital resources used were also determined. RESULTS: At one year, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the rates of death, stroke, or myocardial infarction. Among patients who survived without a stroke or a myocardial infarction, 16.8 percent of those in the stenting group underwent a second revascularization, as compared with 3.5 percent of those in the surgery group. The rate of event-free survival at one year was 73.8 percent among the patients who received stents and 87.8 percent among those who underwent bypass surgery (P&lt;0.001 by the log-rank test). The costs for the initial procedure were $4,212 less for patients assigned to stenting than for those assigned to bypass surgery, but this difference was reduced during follow-up because of the increased need for repeated revascularization; after one year, the net difference in favor of stenting was estimated to be $2,973 per patient. CONCLUSION: As measured one year after the procedure, coronary stenting for multivessel disease is less expensive than bypass surgery and offers the same degree of protection against death, stroke, and myocardial infarction. However, stenting is associated with a greater need for repeated revascularization.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Human tissue valves in aortic position: determinants of reoperation and valve regurgitation (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9616/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Human tissue valves for aortic valve replacement have a
          limited durability that is influenced by interrelated determinants.
          Hierarchical linear modeling was used to analyze the relation between
          these determinants of durability and valve regurgitation measured by
          serial echocardiography. METHODS AND RESULTS: In adult patients, 218
          cryopreserved aortic allografts were implanted with the subcoronary (85)
          or the root replacement technique (133), and 81 patients had root
          replacement with a pulmonary autograft. Mean follow-up was 4.2 years (SD
          2.7; range, 0 to 10.5). Patient age, operator experience with subcoronary
          implantation, and allograft diameter were independent predictors for
          reoperation. With repeated color Doppler echocardiography, the severity of
          aortic regurgitation was assessed by the jet length method and the jet
          diameter ratio. Multilevel hierarchical linear modeling was used to
          estimate initial aortic regurgitation (intercept), its change over time
          (slope), and the effect of 11 potential determinants of durability on
          aortic regurgitation. With the jet length method, the intercept was 0.94
          grade and the slope was 0.11 grade per year. With the jet diameter ratio,
          the intercept was 0.34 and the annual increase was 0.01. Subcoronary
          implanted valves had more initial aortic regurgitation, but progression of
          aortic valve regurgitation did not differ from root replacement. At
          midterm follow-up, recipient age &lt;40 years was the only independent
          predictor of aortic regurgitation. CONCLUSIONS: Subcoronary implantation
          has a learning curve, resulting in more initial aortic regurgitation and
          early reoperation compared with root replacement. In both techniques,
          progression of aortic regurgitation over time is small but accelerated in
          young adults.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Prognosis after aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthesis: predictions based on meta-analysis and microsimulation (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9617/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Bioprostheses are widely used as an aortic valve substitute,
          but knowledge about prognosis is still incomplete. The purpose of this
          study was to provide insight into the age-related life expectancy and
          actual risks of reoperation and valve-related events of patients after
          aortic valve replacement with a porcine bioprosthesis. METHODS AND
          RESULTS: We conducted a meta-analysis of 9 selected reports on stented
          porcine bioprostheses, including 5837 patients with a total follow-up of
          31 874 patient-years. The annual rates of valve thrombosis,
          thromboembolism, hemorrhage, and nonstructural dysfunction were 0.03%,
          0.87%, 0.38%, and 0.38%, respectively. The annual rate of endocarditis was
          estimated at 0.68% for &gt;6 months of implantation and was 5 times as high
          during the first 6 months. Structural valve deterioration was described
          with a Weibull model that incorporated lower risks for older patients.
          These estimates were used to parameterize, calibrate, and validate a
          mathematical microsimulation model. The model was used to predict life
          expectancy and actual risks of reoperation and valve-related events after
          implantation for patients of different ages. For a 65-year-old male, these
          figures were 11.3 years, 28%, and 47%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The
          combination of meta-analysis with microsimulation enabled a detailed
          insight into the prognosis after aortic valve replacement with a
          bioprosthesis for patients of different ages. This information will be
          useful for patient counseling and clinical decision making. It also could
          serve as a baseline for the evaluation of newer valve types.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Mortality and repeat interventions up until 20 years after aorto-coronary bypass surgery with saphenous vein grafts. A follow-up study of 1041 patients. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/12874/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-05-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>AIMS: To determine very long-term survival and incidence of recurrent
          interventions following aorto-coronary bypass surgery using venous grafts.
          METHODS AND RESULTS: A group of 1041 consecutive patients operated upon
          between 1971 and 1980 were followed for a median of 19 years (range
          13-26). Peri-operative mortality was 1.2%. Survival probability at 5, 10,
          15, and 20 years was 92%, 77%, 57%, and 40%, respectively. After 5 or more
          years following operation the mortality was higher than in the matched
          Dutch population. Age, extent of coronary artery disease, and ejection
          fraction are independent predictors of mortality. Of the 593 deceased
          patients at least 63% died of a probable cardiac cause, while
          cardiovascular mortality is 40% in the general Dutch population. Repeat
          revascularization procedures (aorto-coronary bypass surgery or
          percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) were performed in 343
          patients (33%), with an increasing incidence after 7 years. CONCLUSION:
          Aorto-coronary bypass surgery using vein grafts is safe and has a
          reasonable long-term prognosis for survival, although less than a matched
          population. After approximately 7 years both mortality and the need for
          repeated revascularizations increased. Since a majority of patients died
          of a cardiac cause and a substantial number of patients required repeated
          revascularization, aorto-coronary bypass surgery is a palliative treatment
          of a progressive disease.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Complicaties kort na percutane transluminale angioplastiek of na coronariachirurgie bij 183 vergelijkbare patienten met een meervatscoronaria-aandoening (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4602/</link>
      <pubDate>1994-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>