<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Groot, E. de</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/41832/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Factor VIII deficiency does not protect against atherosclerosis (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/31953/</link>
      <pubDate>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Summary. Background: Hemophilia A patients have a lower cardiovascular mortality rate than the general population. Whether this protection is caused by hypocoagulability or decreased atherogenesis is unclear. Objectives: To evaluate atherosclerosis and endothelial function in hemophilia A patients with and without obesity as well as in matched, unaffected controls. Methods: Fifty-one obese (body mass index [BMI]≥30kgm-2) and 47 non-obese (BMI≤25kgm-2) hemophilia A patients, and 42 obese and 50 matched non-obese male controls were included. Carotid and femoral intima-media thickness [IMT] and brachial flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) were measured as markers of atherogenesis and endothelial function. Results: The overall population age was 50±13 years. Carotid IMT was increased in obese subjects (0.77±0.22mm) as compared with non-obese subjects (0.69±0.16mm) [mean difference 0.07mm (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02-0.13, P=0.008)]. No differences in mean carotid and femoral IMT between obese hemophilic patients and obese controls were found (mean difference of 0.02mm [95% CI -0.07-0.11, P=0.67], and mean difference of 0.06mm [95% CI -0.13-0.25, P=0.55], respectively). Thirty-five per cent of the obese hemophilic patients and 29% of the obese controls had an atherosclerotic plaque (P=0.49), irrespective of the severity of hemophilia. Brachial FMD was comparable between obese hemophilic patients and obese controls (4.84%±3.24% and 5.32%±2.37%, P=0.45). Conclusion: Hemophilia A patients with obesity develop atherosclerosis to a similar extent as the general male population. Detection and treatment of cardiovascular risk factors in hemophilic patients is equally necessary. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Carotid atherosclerosis progression in familial hypercholesterolemia patients: A pooled analysis of the ASAP, ENHANCE, RADIANCE 1, and CAPTIVATE studies (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/28686/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-07-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background-Until recently, patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) were considered the best subjects for the assessment of changes in carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) in randomized intervention trials. Our aims were to investigate whether contemporary statin-treated HeFH patients still show accelerated cIMT increase and to assess the impact of statin treatment, before and after random assignment, on atherosclerosis progression. Methods and Results-We retrospectively evaluated cIMT change, and prior statin treatment and postbaseline LDL-C change as predictors of cIMT change, in 1513 HeFH patients who were randomly assigned to the statin arms of the early ASAP and more recent RADIANCE 1, CAPTIVATE, and ENHANCE studies. In the 3 recent studies combined, mean cIMT increased at only 33% of the rate of the simvastatin-treated patients in the ASAP study (0.014 mm/2 years [95% confidence interval, -0.0003- 0.028] versus 0.041 mm/2 years [95% confidence interval, 0.020-0.061]; P&lt;0.05). Patients whose statin therapy could be intensified, as evidenced by an LDL-C decrease after the initiation of on-trial statin therapy, showed cIMT decrease in the first 6 to 12 months and a much lower cIMT increase measured over the full 2 years. In line with this, previously statin-naive HeFH patients showed a lower overall cIMT increase. Conclusions-Over the years, intensification of statin therapy in HeFH patients has resulted in an impressive decrease in carotid atherosclerosis progression. In studies that assess other antiatherosclerotic modalities, statin therapy may still induce rapid changes in cIMT. For future cIMT studies, our analyses suggest that patient populations other than intensively pretreated HeFH patients should be selected and that the statin regimen should not be changed on study initiation. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Simvastatin with or without ezetimibe in familial hypercholesterolemia (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/32431/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-04-03T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: Ezetimibe, a cholesterol-absorption inhibitor, reduces levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol when added to statin treatment. However, the effect of ezetimibe on the progression of atherosclerosis remains unknown. Methods: We conducted a double-blind, randomized, 24-month trial comparing the effects of daily therapy with 80 mg of simvastatin either with placebo or with 10 mg of ezetimibe in 720 patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. Patients underwent B-mode ultrasonography to assess the intima-media thickness of the walls of the carotid and femoral arteries. The primary outcome measure was the change in the mean carotid-artery intima-media thickness, which was defined as the average of the means of the far-wall intima-media thickness of the right and left common carotid arteries, carotid bulbs, and internal carotid arteries. Results: The primary outcome, the mean (±SE) change in the carotid-artery intima-media thickness, was 0.0058±0.0037 mm in the simvastatin-only group and 0.0111±0.0038 mm in the simvastatin-plus-ezetimibe (combined-therapy) group (P = 0.29). Secondary outcomes (consisting of other variables regarding the intima-media thickness of the carotid and femoral arteries) did not differ significantly between the two groups. At the end of the study, the mean (±SD) LDL cholesterol level was 192.7±60.3 mg per deciliter (4.98±1.56 mmol per liter) in the simvastatin group and 141.3±52.6 mg per deciliter (3.65±1.36 mmol per liter) in the combined-therapy group (a between-group difference of 16.5%, P&lt;0.01). The differences between the two groups in reductions in levels of triglycerides and C-reactive protein were 6.6% and 25.7%, respectively, with greater reductions in the combined-therapy group (P&lt;0.01 for both comparisons). Side-effect and safety profiles were similar in the two groups. Conclusions: In patients with familial hypercholesterolemia, combined therapy with ezetimibe and simvastatin did not result in a significant difference in changes in intima-media thickness, as compared with simvastatin alone, despite decreases in levels of LDL cholesterol and C-reactive protein. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00552097.) Copyright </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>