<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Hulsink, W.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/4188/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Multifunctional Agriculture Meets Health Care: Applying the Multi-Level Transition Sciences Perspective to Care Farming in the Netherlands (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/39963/</link>
      <pubDate>2013-04-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Care farming is a promising example of multifunctional agriculture: it is an innovation at the crossroads of the agricultural and healthcare sectors. Our objective is to develop a framework for understanding the success of initiatives in this field. We link empirical data with the multi-level perspective from the transition sciences and extend this perspective with insights from the literature on entrepreneurship, alliance management and organisational attributes. This framework allows us to explain the success of the three major types of initiatives: (1) individual care farms; (2) regional foundations of care farmers; and (3) care institutions collaborating with groups of farmers at a regional level. We propose that the main factors responsible for the success of initiatives are the commitment and competences of the entrepreneur, the creation of alliances, the quality of the new regional organisations and the implementation of the care farm services in care organisations. The relative importance of the factors varies between the different types of initiatives and local and regional levels. © 2012 The Authors. Sociologia Ruralis </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Care Farms in the Netherlands: An Underexplored Example of Multifunctional Agriculture-Toward an Empirically Grounded, Organization-Theory-Based Typology (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/37911/</link>
      <pubDate>2012-09-28T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>For agricultural and rural development in Europe, multifunctionality is a leading concept that raises many questions. Care farming is a promising example of multifunctional agriculture that has so far received little attention. An issue that has not been examined thoroughly is the strategic mapping of different care farm organizations in this emerging field. The objective of this article is to develop a typology for care farms in the Netherlands and provide insight into the diversity of care farms. We have used different concepts from organization theory and information from regional organizations of care farmers to identify key dimensions and develop a typology of care farms. Key dimensions are the ratio between agriculture and care, the background of the initiators, and the degree of collaboration with formal care institutions. We found six main types of care farms with different identities, four of which were initiated by the farmers' families (mainly female partners). The other two types were started by new entrants in agriculture. On the basis of our findings, we confirmed, disputed, and supplemented insights to multifunctional farming literature. As a further contribution to that field, drawing from the organization theories underlying our typology, we have sought to understand how different types of care farms could emerge. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Patterns of innovating networking in small firms (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/35006/</link>
      <pubDate>2012-07-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: Small firms rely on a variety of network partners, and in various roles, to initiate and implement innovations. While past typologies of innovation networking were defined at the level of firms or industries, the purpose of this paper is to develop a typology at the level of innovation objects. Design/methodology/approach: Drawing on survey data of 594 innovations in Dutch small firms, cluster analysis is applied to develop a typology of networking patterns for innovation in small firms. Findings: In total, six patterns of innovation networking were identified: supplier-based, customer-based, informal-based, bank/accountant-based, science-based and government-based. The supplier-based pattern is most dominant and characterized by modest and simple contributions from networking partners, while governments tend to be involved in innovations marked by voluminous and complex partner involvement. Validity of the typology is suggested by two findings: more voluminous and complex networking patterns are correlated with firms' internal capabilities, and with the newness and competence requirements of innovations. Originality/value: For practitioners the typology provides a more fine-grained view on how innovations in small firms are developed. This includes the role of relatives and friends, bank and accountants, and remote partners such as governments - network partners which so far were not covered in typologies of innovation networking. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>From Go to IPO? The Hyper-growth Strategy of the New European Telecoms Operator Versatel (Case Study)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/38861/</link>
      <pubDate>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Abstract: In the beginning of 1999, it became clear to Gary Mesch, co-founder of Versatel, that an initial public offering (IPO or 'going public') should be considered a serious option to further finance the rapid growth of his company. After securing hundreds of millions of euros to construct Versatel's own fiber-optic telecommunications network and the acquisition of customers, Versatel still required significant capital to finance its growth and repay interest obligations. In just four years, the company had grown from 15 employees in 1995 to more than 300 in 1998. Many questions crossed Gary's mind, but one was most pressing: Would going public even be possible?
</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Kenniscampus als compensatie (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/21586/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-10-29T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Beleidsmakers willen een kenniscampus ontwikkelen als
alternatief voor de sluiting van de onderzoeksafdelingen van
MSD en Abbott. Echter, het ontbreken van een private of
publieke onderzoeksfaciliteit maakt deze kenniscampussen
onaantrekkelijk als vestigingsplaats voor innovatieve bedrijven.
Voor innovatie is aansluiten bij bestaande campussen
gunstiger.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Science and Technology-based Regional Entrepreneurship in the Netherlands: Building Support Structures for Business Creation and Growth Entrepreneurship (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/13220/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-08-05T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>In this contribution we develop a theoretical framework derived from the national system of innovation literature and the subsequent criticisms voiced by regional scientists and industry/technology experts who emphasize the importance of the intermediate subnational and sectoral levels to analysing science- and technology-based regional entrepreneurship in the Netherlands. The national system of innovation of the Netherlands, and its specifics and peculiarities, and the country’s general entrepreneurship policy, and the most important policy and support initiatives are subsequently discussed. Based on a desire to overcome the knowledge paradox between fundamental research and market needs and on the recognition that the Netherlands lags behind other countries when it comes to innovative entrepreneurship, various changes and initiatives were recently introduced in the Netherlands. The impression is of an overambitious national government with numerous programmes, schemes and agencies involved, sometimes working with each other but at other times separately as well, and its effectiveness can be questioned. Serious paperwork and preparation is involved in the participation in most programes and, together with the complexity of these programmes and policies, small and young entrepreneurs are neither informed, ready or well-equipped; some of them are not even interested in participating in those schemes.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The Locus of Innovation in Small and Medium-sized Firms: The Importance of Social Capital and Networking in Innovative Entrepreneurship (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/12873/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-07-21T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Social networks matter in the innovation processes of young and small firms, since ‘innovation does not exist in a vacuum (Van De Ven, 1986: 601).’ The contacts a firm has could both generate advantages for further innovation and growth, and disadvantages leading to inertia and stagnation. In the first case the existing social network or the new business contact provides opportunities furthering eventual success, in the second case, the existing network or the new business contacts turns out to have a constraining or even detrimental effect on performance. The search and use of social capital is driven by goal-specificity: it only includes those ties that help the actor in the attainment of particular goals. Most of the research so far has been deliberately or unwillingly one-sided, by for instance only looking at entrepreneurial firms in dynamic industries (or more specifically, start-ups in the high-tech industries). Or selective attention has been paid to either the internal sources or the external contacts to trigger innovation. And when a conclusive study has been conducted into investigating both the effect of internal and external ties on innovation, the sample often includes large and established companies and managers (instead of entrepreneurs and smaller firms, as what we are interested in). The main line of reasoning in this paper is as follows. In the first section we discuss the key network concepts, such as, social capital, relational embeddedness (strong and weak ties), structural embeddedness (i.e. structural holes). Section two deals with innovation and the central role of knowledge in the discovery and realisation of innovations. Social networks and its potential for knowledge brokering appear to be important and therefore the last section focuses on the relationship between particular network characteristics and innovation.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Entrepreneurship Education and Training in a Small Business Context: Insights from the Competence-based Approach (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/12466/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-05-22T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The concept of competence, as it is brought into play in current research, is a potentially powerful construct for entrepreneurship education research and practice. Although the concept has been the subject of strong debate in educational research in general, critical analysis of how it has been used, applied and experienced in entrepreneurship education practice is scarce. This article contributes specifically to the discussion of entrepreneurial competence by theoretically unfolding and discussing the concept. Subsequently, the implications of applying a competence-based approach in entrepreneurship education are illustrated and discussed based on analysis of two cases that were aimed at identifying, diagnosing and eventually developing entrepreneurial competence in small businesses in the Netherlands and Flanders (Belgium). The cases show that the added value of focussing on competence in entrepreneurship education lies in making the (potential) small business owner aware of the importance of certain entrepreneurial competencies and in providing direction for competence development. In this process it is fundamental that competence is treated as an item for discussion and interpretation, rather than as a fixed template of boxes to be ticked. Furthermore the cases highlight that a competence-based approach does not determine the type of educational and instructional strategies to be used. Its consequential power in that respect is limited.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Clustering in ICT: From Route 128 to Silicon Valley, from DEC to Google, from Hardware to Content (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/10617/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-10-30T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>One of the pioneers in academic entrepreneurship and high-tech clustering is MIT and the Route 128/Boston region. Silicon Valley centered around Stanford University was originally a fast follower and only later emerged as a scientific and industrial hotspot. Several technology and innovation waves, have shaped Silicon Valley over all the years. The initial regional success of Silicon Valley started with electro-technical instruments and defense applications in the 1940s and 1950s (represented by companies as Litton Engineering and Hewlett &amp; Packard). In the 1960s and 1970s, the region became a national and international leader in the design and production of integrated circuit and computer chips, and as such became identified as Silicon Valley (e.g. Fairchild Semiconductor, and Intel). In the 1970s and 1980s, Silicon Valley capitalised further on the development, manufacturing and sales of the personal computer and workstations (e.g. Apple, Silicon Graphics and SUN), followed by the proliferation of telecommunications and Internet technologies in the 1990s (e.g. Cisco, 3Com) and Internet-based applications and info-mediation services (e.g. Yahoo, Google) in the late 1990s and early 2000s. When the external and/or internal conditions of its key industries change, Silicon Valley seemed to have an innate capability to restructure itself by a rapid and frequent reshuffling of people, competencies, resources and firms. To characterise the demise of one firm leading, directly or indirectly, to the formation of another and the reconfiguration of business models and product offerings by the larger companies in emerging industries, Bahrami &amp; Evans (2000) introduced the  term `flexible recycling.’ This dynamic process of learning by doing, failing and recombining (i.e. allowing new firms to rise from the ashes of failed enterprises) is one of the key factors underlying the dominance of Silicon Valley in the new economy.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Silicon Valley in the Polder? Entrepreneurial Dynamics, Virtuous Clusters and Vicious Firms in the Netherlands and Flanders (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/10459/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-07-24T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>High-technology starters do not operate in a vacuum and innovation is not a solitary activity. The activities of technology-based firms are embedded in socio-economic networks with other companies, investors, universities, vocational institutions, etc. The geographical proximity of those institutions and infrastructural hubs will partly play a role in determine the location of ICT firms decision. Furthermore, many high-tech companies shape clusters around areas where their major customers are located. The topic of this paper is regional clustering Enright, 1992; Rosenfeld, 1997within the context of Internet and ICT technology. A dynamic model previously developed for the analysis of ICT-entrepreneurship and networking will be applied to make a critical analysis of five ICT-clusters in the Netherlands and Flanders (Northern part of Belgium): the Louvain Technology Corridor, Flanders Language Valley, Amsterdam Alley, Dommel Valley, and Twente.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Virtual Enterprises, Mobile Markets and Volatile Customers (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/6728/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-06-28T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Recently, several new mobile virtual network operators (MVNOs) have entered the European mobile telecommunications markets. These service providers do not own a mobile network, but instead they buy capacity from other companies. Because these virtual operators do not possess an infrastructure of their own, they have signed contracts with incumbent mobile operators with a network. The growth of these MVNOs which use leased network capacity from existing carriers, presents the incumbent mobile operators with a strategic dilemma. Network-based mobile operators have almost full control over their infrastructure but they may not know their customers well enough to fill the demand for cheaper and/or innovative services. New service-based operators may create affinity with the customer and introduce quickly all kinds of innovations and/or price discounts, but they still have to negotiate access terms and conditions with one of the domestic network-based operators. It has become important, and in some countries even urgent, to introduce regulatory measures concerning non-discriminatory access to the mobile telecommunications sector. This paper looks furthermore deeper into the entry and innovation strategies by MVNOs on the mobile market in the Netherlands, and its impact on competition.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Network effects on Entrepreneurial Processes: Start-ups in the Dutch ICT Industry 1990-2000 (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/976/</link>
      <pubDate>2003-10-17T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The value of networks as an integral part of the explanation of entrepreneurial success is widely acknowledged. It is unclear, however, in what way certain networks influence the success of start-up companies. The question of this paper is: 'in what way does the entrepreneur's network contribute to the success of his start-up.' The network is important because it may contribute to three entrepreneurial processes, i.e. the ability of the entrepreneur to discover opportunities, to get resources, and to gain legitimacy. The networks of 30 ICT start-ups in the Netherlands were (re)constructed on the basis of in-depth interviews with the founders and desk research. A distinction was made between three types of initial network conditions. First, the more or less independent start-ups; secondly, spin-offs from established companies and lastly, start-ups in incubators. On the basis of the variations in the structure of the network and the type of relations we draw conclusions concerning the contribution of a particular network configuration to the ability of the start-up to survive and to grow.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Creating competition &amp; mastering markets; New entrants, monopolists, and regulators in transforming public utilities across the Atlantic (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/434/</link>
      <pubDate>2003-06-19T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>This paper is on the transformation of network industries or public utilities in Western Europe and the United States (US). A network industry provides a public or basic service by operating a large infrastructure system whose main characteristics are strongly increasing returns to scale, high levels of capital intensity, deployment of long-lasting industrial assets, and of vital importance to the economy (e.g. telecommunication, energy, transportation systems, water distribution, postal services, broadcasting). The objective of this paper is to look at the transformation of utility markets and to investigate whether the (re-)engineering of utility markets has effectively produced new industrial structures and has generated alternative outcomes. And secondly, whether this deliberate process to stir up the competitive dynamic is thwarted by the combination of industrial predation (e.g. legacy systems and installed customer base) and incumbency power (market leadership, closeness to government, cross-subsidisation, information monopoly) favouring only modest and gradual change or by emergent and unexpected radical forces that have surprised both the omniscient market makers and those favouring the status quo. 

Introducing deregulation and liberalisation and engineering market dynamics in a utility world that is still characterised by partial competition and a persistent quasi-monopoly, is no easy matter. The process of de-monopolisation can be seen as the result of ongoing strategic and tactical interactions among incumbent operators and insurgent market players, tough bargaining between those firms and supervisory regulators, and difficult negotiations at the federal level of Washington and Brussels between the state administrations, their regulators and the transnational institutions. In order to create some form of dynamic rivalry in those "monopolistic" network-based industries, the emergence of new entry/exit and competition needs to be nourished and closely monitored and supervised: the emergence and persistence of competition needs to be engineered. The concept of engineering competition is somewhat ambiguous, since we should be both aware of the shortcomings of designing and managing markets and the limitations on and problems with self-organisation in regulation. Competition is a spontaneous process and is in the domain of human action, while "regulation" is a product of human design and contains instruments and toolboxes to intervene in a dynamic environment, and those two should not be mixed. Hence, despite the popularity of the term engineering competition, "engineering regulation", with a clear and intentional focus on devising an appropriate framework facilitating competition, is probably a better term.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Networks in Entrepreneurship (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/93/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-06-05T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The value of networks as integral part of the explanation of entrepreneurial success is widely acknowledged. However, the network perspective lacks specification of the various dimensions of a network and their impact on the early development of a venture. We make a distinction between a Schumpeterian start-up pursuing a radical innovation and a Kirznerian venture on basis of an incremental innovation. This distinction is introduced as a contingency in the way networks contribute to the ability of the entrepreneur to discover opportunities, to get resources, and to gain legitimacy. In this explorative study three cases on high technology firms in The Netherlands provide empirical material to develop a number of propositions on the network effect on the survival or performance of start-ups.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Do nations matter in a globalising industry? : the restructuring of telecommunications governance regimes in France, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom (1980-1994) (Doctoral Thesis)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/31647/</link>
      <pubDate>1996-12-06T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>