http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/42911/ List of Publications en http://repub.eur.nl/static-eur/img/logo.png http://repub.eur.nl http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/29082/ 2008-02-01T00:00:00Z Objective. Juvenile dermatomyositis (DM) is an autoimmune disease of unknown origin characterized by muscle weakness and skin manifestations. No definite autoantigen has yet been identified. Heat-shock proteins (HSPs) can be up-regulated at sites of inflammation, and immune reactivity to Hsp60 is suggested to play a regulatory role in various chronic inflammatory diseases. The purpose of this study was to determine whether Hsp60 could serve as an autoantigen in juvenile DM. Methods. Muscle tissue from 4 patients with juvenile DM and 1 healthy control subject without evidence of muscle disease was stained for Hsp60. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from 22 patients and 10 healthy control subjects were tested for T cell proliferation induced by human and microbial Hsp60. Cytokine production in response to Hsp60 was examined in 15 patients and 6 healthy controls. T cell reactivity to Hsp60 was determined in muscle biopsy samples from 2 patients. Results. We found significantly increased T cell proliferation to human Hsp60 in PBMCs from juvenile DM patients, which was higher during disease remission. Following in vitro activation with Hsp60, significant amounts of tumor necrosis factor α, interleukin-1β (IL-β), and IL-10 were produced. In contrast to muscle biopsy samples from healthy controls, samples from juvenile DM patients showed up-regulation of Hsp60, induction of T cell proliferation, and production of cytokines. Production of proinflammatory cytokines by muscle-derived cells in response to Hsp60 was associated with a poor clinical prognosis, whereas human Hsp60-specific induction of IL-10 was followed by clinical remission. Conclusion. These findings suggest that human (self) Hsp60 is a disease-relevant autoantigen in juvenile DM. The difference in T cell response with regard to disease activity indicates an immune regulatory effect of Hsp60-specific T cells, opening up perspectives for antigen-specific immunotherapy. http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/35135/ 2007-11-01T00:00:00Z Objectives: A previous 24-week randomised trial demonstrated that sulfasalazine (SSZ) treatment was superior to placebo (PLAC) in suppressing disease activity in patients with oligo- and polyarticular onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). The current study determines the long-term outcome of the trial participants and evaluates whether the benefits of SSZ allocation are sustained over time. Methods: Between 2001 and 2003, 32 SSZ and 29 PLAC patients (90% of all patients) were prospectively examined clinically and by chart review, median 9 years (range 7 to 10) after trial inclusion. In the follow-up assessment, variables of the American College of Rheumatology Pediatric 30 (ACR Pedi 30) criteria were collected. The assessor was blinded to trial treatment allocation. Results: After the trial, patients had been routinely followed in rheumatology referral centres, and treated at the discretion of the attending physician. Almost all patients continued or started disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (SSZ 91%, PLAC 93%; SSZ treatment in about 80%). DAAARD treatment appeared less intensive in the SSZ group as evidenced by a significantly shorter duration of SSZ use (median 2.5 vs 5.2 years; p = 0.02) and a trend towards less use of methotrexate and other DMARDs. More than one-third of the patients reported long periods of non-compliance with DMARD treatment in both groups. At follow-up, 74% of the patients had active joints, and 30% showed active polyarthritis. Almost all outcome scores were better for SSZ compared with PLAC patients. Differences (often exceeding 50%) were significant for the number of active joints, patients' overall well-being, number of patients with episodes of clinical remission off medication (CROM) and duration of these episodes, patients in CROM and ACR Pedi 30 response at follow-up. Additional exploratory analyses performed to detect potential confounders related to patient characteristics or follow-up treatment showed that DMARD treatment compliance was positively correlated with an ACR Pedi 30 response (odds ratio 3.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1 to 13.4; p = 0.03). Adjusted for compliance, an SSZ patient was 4.2 times as likely as a PLAC patient to be an ACR Pedi 30 responder at follow-up (95% CI 1.3 to 14.3; p = 0.02). Conclusions: This follow-up study shows that effective suppression of disease activity by SSZ treatment early in active disease in JIA patients has beneficial effects that persist for many years. Given these results, compliance with DMARD treatment deserves serious attention.