<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Westerterp, K.R.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/4415/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Is it possible to improve elderly male bladder function by having them drink more water? (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/14678/</link>
      <pubDate>2006-11-23T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>OBJECTIVES: Several animal studies have shown that bladder performance improves as a result of diuresis. Whether increased urine output also has beneficial effects on elderly male bladder function and lower urinary tract symptoms is unknown. METHODS: We performed a randomized placebo-controlled trial of 141 men, 55 to 75 years of age, with moderate lower urinary tract symptoms. The experimental group drank 1.5 L of extra water daily. The control group consumed one tablespoon of placebo syrup daily. After 6 months, we evaluated bladder contractility, voided volumes, and the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms. The actual increase in water consumption was measured using the deuterium urine dilution method. RESULTS: Water consumption in the intervention group increased by 359 mL (95% confidence interval [CI] 171 to 548) per 24 hours compared with the control group. At 6 months, no statistically significant effect was found in the maximal flow rate (0.9 mL/s, 95% CI -0.4 to 2.2) compared with placebo. A statistically significant effect was found for bladder pressure (20 cm H2O, 95% CI 6 to 34) and bladder wall stress (1.9 N/cm2, 95% CI 0.3 to 3.5). In addition, it showed that the experimental group had greater maximal (44 mL, 95% CI -1 to 90) and average (26 mL, 95% CI 1 to 51) voided volumes per urination. The subjective effect parameters improved in both groups, but no statistically significant differences were found between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: It seems possible to improve some aspects of male bladder function by drinking more water. However, the effects are too small to be clinically relevant</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Energy utilization and growth in breast-fed and formula-fed infants measured prospectively during the first year of life (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8819/</link>
      <pubDate>1998-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>This study is the first to report approximations of energy requirements
          for male and female breast-fed and formula-fed infants based on individual
          estimates of total daily energy expenditure (TDEE) and energy deposition
          derived from total body fat (TBF) and fat-free mass (FFM) gain as
          determined by total-body electrical conductivity. In 46 healthy, full-term
          infants the effect of &gt; or = 4 mo of exclusive breast-feeding compared
          with formula feeding on macronutrient and energy intake, TDEE, energy
          deposition, and growth were investigated prospectively. Metabolizable
          energy intake (MEI) was assessed from macronutrient intake by test
          weighing (MEI-TW) and from the sum of TDEE and energy deposition
          (MEI-Pred). At 1-2, 2-4, 4-8, and 8-12 mo of age MEI-Pred averaged 431 +/-
          38, 393 +/- 33, 372 +/- 33, and 355 +/- 21 kJ x kg(-1) x d(-1) for boys,
          and 401 +/- 59, 376 +/- 25, 334 +/- 33, and 326 +/- 17 kJ x kg(-1) x d(-1)
          for girls. No significant difference between breast-fed and formula-fed
          infants was found with respect to weight, length, head circumference, TBF,
          FFM, and TDEE at all ages, or for gain in length, weight, TBF, and FFM.
          MEI-TW was significantly different between feeding groups at 1-4 mo of age
          (formula-fed being greater than breast-fed, P &lt; 0.005). This feeding
          effect, however, was not significant for MEI-Pred (MJ/d). MEI-TW differed
          from MEI-Pred only in breast-fed infants at 1-4 mo (P &lt; 0.05 at 2-4 mo).
          The data from this study indicate that energy requirements in infants are
          lower than the recommendations in guidelines currently in use.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>