<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Briggs, R.O.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/4459/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Satisfaction Attainment Theory as a Model for Value Creation (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/1450/</link>
      <pubDate>2004-08-06T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Organizations exist to create value for their stakeholders that stakeholders cannot create through individual effort. Information systems exist to increase an organization’s ability to create value using intellectual capital. A theoretical explanation of value might therefore be useful to increase the likelihood that IS/IT professionals would design and deploy systems in ways that increase value for stakeholders.  This paper proposes Satisfaction Attainment Theory (SAT) as causal model of value creation.  An organizational stakeholder is a person whose wellbeing might be advanced by an organization.  Perceptions of value have reference to some object-of-value.  The term, object, in the context of this paper, means anything to which one could ascribe value –  e.g. goods, services, states, or outcomes.  SAT assumes that people hold multiple, conflicting goals, and so must sacrifice the yield of some goal to attain others.  It posits that an individual automatically and subconsciously sets an expectation for some level of utility from attaining a goal and assesses the likelihood that a goal will be attained.  It also posits that individuals automatically and subconsciously assess yield the yield of a Set of Salient Goals (SSG).  Any perceived Shift in the Yield Assessment (SYA) for the salient set of goals is automatically accompanied by an affective arousal proportional to and with a valence in the direction of the perceived SYA.  SAT proposes that the value of an object is a positive function of the SYA that occurs when an individual contemplates sacrificing the yield of other goals to obtain the yield that could be derived from the object.  Value is therefore created by making an individual aware of an opportunity to attain a positive SYA by sacrificing the yield of one set of goals to attain the yield of another set.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Harnessing Intellectual Resources in a Collaborative Context to Create Value (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/178/</link>
      <pubDate>2002-03-08T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The value of electronic collaboration has arisen as successful organisations recognize that they need to convert their intellectual resources into customized services. The shift from personal computing to interpersonal or collaborative computing has given rise to ways of working that may bring about better and more effective use of intellectual resources. Current efforts in managing knowledge have concentrated on producing; sharing and storing knowledge while business problems require the combined use of these intellectual resources to enable organisations to provide innovative and customized services. In this chapter the collaborative context is developed using a model for electronic collaboration through the use of which organisations may mobilse collaborative technologies and intellectual resources towards achieving joint effect.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>What Does It Mean for an Organisation to Be Intelligent? Measuring intellectual bandwidth for value creation (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/120/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-10-18T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The importance of electronic collaboration has risen as successful organisations recognize that they need to convert their intellectual resources into goods and services their customers will value. The shift from personal computing to interpersonal or collaborative computing has given rise to ways of working that may bring about better and more effective use of intellectual resources. Current efforts in managing knowledge have concentrated on producing, sharing and storing knowledge while business problems require the use of these intellectual resources to create value. This paper draws upon Nunamaker et. al.'s (2001) Intellectual Bandwidth Model to measure an organization's potential to create value. Following an analysis of initial data collected at the Netherlands branch of Cap-Gemini Ernst &amp; Young, conclusions are drawn with respect to what it means for an organisation to be intelligent and how such organisations can create value through the use of information and collaboration technologies to increase its intellectual bandwidth.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>