<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Smout, A.J.P.M.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/47154/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Myoelectric activity of the stomach : gastroelectromyography and electrogastrography (Doctoral Thesis)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/31494/</link>
      <pubDate>1980-06-04T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The musculature of the distal two-thirds of the stomach generates electrical
signals that are related, in a complex manner, to the (peristaltic)
contractions of these muscles. These electrical signals originate in ion
shifts from the intracellular to the extracellular space and vice-versa.
Apart from recording intracellular electrical activity with the aid of a
microelectrode inserted into the cell, gastric myoelectrical activity can
be recorded in two ways.
Firstly, gastric electrical activity can be recorded with electrodes located
in the immediate proximity of the muscle layers. This method is called
gastroelectromyography. lt provides information about the electrical activity
of larger groups of cells.
Secondly, gastric myoelectrical activity can be recorded with the aid of
electrodes at relatively large distances from the stomach (e.g. on the abdominal
skin). This method is called electrogastrography. It provides rather
global information about the electrical activity of the stomach.
Whereas the method of electrogastrography is still in a relatively early
experimental phase, the method of gastroelectromyography has frequently
been used in studies on gastric myoelectric activity, both in health and
disease. The published descriptions of the characteristics on normal gastroelectromyographic
signals are not in complete accordance, however. No agreement
exists about the existence and meaning of the so-called 1 Second potential
1 (Daniel, 1965, 1966) and about the relation between intracellular and
extracellular electrical activity.
Furthermore, gastroelectromyographic 1 iterature paid relatively 1 ittle attention
to the rhythm of the so-cal led 1 Electrical Control Activity 1 (Sarna.
1975</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>