<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Majumdar, M.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/48732/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>The Marks Race. India’s Dominant Education Regime and New Segmentation (In Book)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/34859/</link>
      <pubDate>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Introduction: “An [education] system that is lifeless, devoid of joy and freshness, not even offering an iota of space to move and grow, is doomed to dead, dry rigidity. Can such a system ever nurture the child’s mind, expand her horizons, and elevate her soul and character? Will this child, once she grows up, ever be able to figure anything
out on her own, overcome hurdles using her own resources, stand on her own two feet with head held high banking on her own natural fire? Will she not be given to mindless copying [from others], cramming [without comprehension] and slavish servitude?”
Quoted from: Shikshar Herpher (Manipulations and Distortions in Education, 1907, p.539), Rabindranath Tagore. (authors’ translation). 
The angst expressed in the above quote is shared by many contemporary scholars and
experts. Indeed, the Indian school education system seems to be under the grip of a `diploma
disease’ (Dore, 1976). More specifically, the sceptre of test scores seems to be haunting the
entire school system in contemporary India, deforming the educational values of teachers,
parents, education bureaucrats and above all hapless students. To put it differently, the
prevailing educational ethos is such that value addition through education is measured mostly
in economic terms of marks and test scores, rendering irrelevant other worthy goals of
learning such as cognitive development, creative thinking, and citizenship abilities.
Curiously, almost all schools – from elite to budget, from vernacular to English-medium,
from `communal’ to `secular’, from government to private – seem to be chasing the same
`dream’ of turning over more students securing more marks. Children are driven to savour
first the joy of earning marks and then of earning money, thereby numbing their urge to
explore the joy of learning.
</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Primary Education in India: Empowerment of the Marginalized or the Reproduction of Social Inequalities? (Research Report)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/32962/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-09-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Although major progress has been made with regard to school education in India in the
last two decades, access to quality education is still highly uneven. It can, hence, not be
assumed a priori that school education is capability enhancing. It certainly is for some
children, but for many others it remains a disempowering and dispiriting experience. Is
education in India, hence, mainly a system that reproduces already existing social
inequalities?
It is this question that has been at the centre of our work during the last few years. In two
Indian States, Andhra Pradesh in the south and West Bengal in east India, we have done
extensive fieldwork to find out how social inequalities are reproduced in Indian schools,
but also how that is contested in different ways. We explored this theme at various
levels, ranging from the educational system as a whole and the policy level, to the
classroom and the textbooks. This paper cannot do justice to all these processes,
mechanisms and counter currents that exist at various levels, but it will summarize some
of the arguments.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>