<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Aarst, M. van</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/4886/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Practical aspects of conducting a pragmatic randomised trial in primary care: patient recruitment and outcome assessment (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9422/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Conducting a pragmatic randomised trial in primary care is
          often accompanied by practical problems. Such problems are seldom reported
          and may constitute useful lessons for researchers planning future trials.
          AIM: To address the difficulties involved in patient recruitment and to
          present measures to minimise bias during outcome assessment. METHOD: A
          recently conducted trial comparing the effects of corticosteroid
          injections and physiotherapy for painful stiff shoulder was used to
          illustrate problems related to patient recruitment and outcome assessment.
          RESULTS: Recruitment of patients was not without difficulties despite
          careful preparation. Recruitment was discontinued after 20 months, when
          109 of the intended 120 patients had been admitted to the trial. The
          shoulder trial mainly included patient-oriented subjective outcome
          measures. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that patient preferences might
          have had some influence on outcome. CONCLUSIONS: General practitioners
          might be willing or unwilling to participate in research for many reasons.
          The researcher should take these motivations into account when inviting
          physicians to take part in research. Strategies to enhance enrolment
          should be prepared before the start of the trial. When blinding of
          patients is problematic, patient preferences should be assessed before
          randomisation and their influence on the outcome studied. Although
          involving a blinded independent observer enables a more objective
          assessment of outcome, the success of blinding should be clearly
          evaluated.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>