<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Brinkman, K.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/4962/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Costs of gastroenteritis in the Netherlands, with special attention for severe cases (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/33982/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>In 1999, the costs of gastroenteritis in the Netherlands were estimated using data on hospitalizations from national registries, together with data on etiology and self-reported data on health care resource use in a community-based study. Now, more information on hospitalizations is available and these data were used to update the total costs of gastroenteritis in the Netherlands. The costs of severe gastroenteritis in the Netherlands were estimated in more depth using a hospital-based study, with patient questionnaires including a follow-up period of 6 months. The overall costs of gastroenteritis were calculated taking direct medical costs, direct non-medical costs, and indirect non-medical costs into account. The costs for severe gastroenteritis in 2009 were estimated at €2,203 per hospitalized child and €6,834 per hospitalized adult. The overall costs of gastroenteritis in 2009 were estimated at €611-695 million, which is €133-151 per gastroenteritis case or €37-42 per inhabitant. The total health care costs for gastroenteritis were about 50% higher in 2009 compared to 1999, which is mostly due to the rise in health care costs. The costs per gastroenteritis episode in adults are higher compared to children, mainly due to differences in the reasons for hospitalization and course of disease, and productivity losses. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>A randomized controlled study of accelerated versus standard hepatitis B vaccination in HIV-positive patients (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/25497/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-04-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background. In human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients, the immunogenicity of hepatitis B vaccines is impaired. The primary and secondary aims of our study were to investigate the effectiveness and compliance of 2 different vaccination regimen in an HIV-infected population. Methods. A noninferiority trial with a 10% response margin was designed. Included were patients ≥18 years old, with negative HBsAg/anti-HBc serology, and not previously vaccinated against hepatitis B. Patients were stratified according to CD4+cell count: &lt;200, 200-500, &gt;500. Participants received 10 μg HBvaxPRO intramuscularly according to a 0-1-3 week schedule or the standard 0-4-24 week schedule. Anti-HBs levels were measured at week 28, considered protective ≥10 IU/L. Results. Modified intention to treat analysis in 761 patients was performed. Overall response difference was 50%(standard arm) versus 38.7% (accelerated arm) =11.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], [4.3, 18.3]), close to the 10% response margin. In CD4+cell count group 200-500 cells/mm3, the response difference was 20.8% (95% CI [10.9, 30.7]). However, the response difference in CD4+cell count group .500 cells/mm3 was -1.8% (95% CI [-13.4,19.7]). Compliance was significantly superior with the accelerated schedule, 91.8% versus 82.7% (P ≤ .001). Conclusion. In HIV-infected patients, compliance with an accelerated hepatitis B vaccination schedule is significantly better. The efficacy of an accelerated schedule proved to be non-inferior in CD4+cell count group &gt;500 cells/mm3. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Baseline lipid levels rather than the presence of reported body shape changes determine the degree of improvement in lipid levels after switching to atazanavir (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/32601/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: To study factors influencing lipid changes after switching to atazanavir (ATV) and the effectiveness of ATV in maintaining virus suppression. Methods: Retrospective cohort study in patients with viral suppression, comparing patients switching to ATV with those continuing combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). Outcome measures were 48-week total (TC), high-density (HDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and triglycerides (TG) changes, stratified for dyslipidemia and lipodystrophy and virological failure (time to first of two consecutive detectable HIV RNA). Results: 225 patients switched to ATV (193 [85.8%] RTV boosted), and 3120 continued cART. In patients with baseline TC &gt;6.2 mmol/L, those switching had greater mean (95% CI) TC decreases compared to those continuing cART (-1.26 [-1.63 to -0.89] and -0.54 [-0.64 to -0.44] mmol/L, p = .002). Likewise greater TG changes were observed in patients with high (&gt;2.3 mmol/L) baseline TG (-1.44 [-2.05 to -0.83] and -0.54 [-0.70 to -0.38] mmol/L, p = .002). Effects were seen irrespective of presence of lipodystrophy. Patients switching to ATV had virological failure more often (17/224 [7.8%]) than those continuing cART (73/3100 [2.4%], p &lt; .0001). Conclusions: Patients with virological suppression, including those with lipodystrophy, may benefit from switching to ATV with lipid profile improvement, especially if baseline lipid levels are high. This should be balanced against a possible higher virological failure risk. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Discontinuation of nevirapine because of hypersensitivity reactions in patients with prior treatment experience, compared with treatment-naive patients: The ATHENA cohort study (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/30116/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-03-15T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background. Recommendations that nevirapine (NVP) should be avoided in female individuals with CD4 cell counts &gt;250 cells/μL and in male individuals with CD4 cell counts &gt;400 cells/μL are based on findings in treatment-naive patients. It is unclear whether these guidelines also apply to treatment-experienced patients switching to NVP-based combination therapy. Methods. Patients in the ATHENA cohort study who had used NVP-based combination therapy were included. We identified patients who discontinued NVP-based combination therapy because of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs; rash and/or hepatotoxicity) within 18 weeks after starting such therapy. We grouped patients according to their CD4 cell count at the start of NVP-based combination therapy (current CD4 cell count) as having a high CD4 cell count (for female patients, &gt;250 cells/μL; for male patients, &gt;400 cells/μL) or a low CD4 cell count. Treatment-experienced patients were further subdivided according to the last available CD4 cell count before first receipt of antiretroviral therapy (ART; pre-ART CD4 cell count) using the same criteria. Risk factors for HSR were assessed using multivariate logistic regression. Results. Of 3752 patients receiving NVP-based combination therapy, 231 patients (6.2%) discontinued NVP therapy because of HSRs. Independent risk factors included female sex and Asian ethnicity. Having an undetectable viral load (VL) at the start of NVP therapy was associated with reduced risk of developing an HSR (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-0.71). Pretreated patients with low pre-ART and high current CD4 cell counts and a detectable VL when switching to NVP-based combination therapy had a significantly higher risk of developing an HSR, compared with treatment-naive patients who started NVP therapy with low CD4 cell counts (adjusted OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.11-3.12); pretreated patients with low pre-ART CD4 cell counts who switched to NVP therapy with a high current CD4 cell count and an undetectable VL did not have an increased risk of developing an HSR (adjusted OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.66-1.61). Conclusions. Treatment- experienced patients who start NVP-based combination therapy with low pre-ART and high current CD4 cell counts and an undetectable VL have a similar likelihood for discontinuing NVP therapy because of HSRs, compared with treatment-naive patients with low CD4 cell counts. This suggests that NVP-based combination therapy may be safely initiated in such patients. However, in similar patients with a detectable VL, it is prudent to continue to adhere to current CD4 cell count thresholds. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Effects of active treatment discontinuation in patients with a CD4+ T-cell nadir greater than 350 cells/mm3: 48-Week Treatment Interruption in Early Starters Netherlands study (TRIESTAN) (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/37031/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-04-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of discontinuing highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in HIV-1-positive patients who initiated HAART at a CD4 T-cell count &gt;350 cells/mm. METHODS: Eligible patients were identified from the Dutch AIDS Therapy Evaluation, The Netherlands (ATHENA) national observational cohort. Interruption or continuation of HAART was offered to all. RESULTS: Of 71 patients enrolled, 46 (64%) interrupted HAART (STOP group) and 25 (36%) continued HAART (control group). The median CD4 T-cell nadirs at the start of HAART were 469 (interquartile range [IQR]: 430-720) cells/mm and 510 (IQR: 440-637) cells/mm, respectively. At week 48, the median plasma HIV RNA level in the STOP group had stabilized at approximately pre-HAART values (4.55 log10, IQR: 4.2-4.9 copies/mL), but the CD4 T-cell count still exceeded the pre-HAART count (563 cells/mm, IQR: 450-710 cells/mm). Only 5 patients (11%) had reinitiated HAART after 48 weeks, all for personal reasons. No Centers for Disease Control and Prevention category events or death occurred after interruption. In 6 (13%) of 46 patients, mild symptoms of acute retroviral rebound syndrome (ARVS) were identified. No improvement was observed in mental or physical health scores. In 37% of patients, nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor drug concentrations were still detectable 1 week after stopping. CONCLUSIONS: Although HAART can safely be interrupted in patients with a high CD4 T-cell nadir, no improvement in quality of life was established. Patients can experience ARVS, the risk for development of resistance after treatment interruption is realistic, and there is a potential hazard of HIV transmission to sexual partners. We would not actively advise stopping treatment in patients who started treatment too early according to current guidelines. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Clinical, immunological and virological response to different antiretroviral regimens in a cohort of HIV-2-infected patients (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/3923/</link>
      <pubDate>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical, immunological and virological response and the emergence of resistance towards antiretroviral therapy (ART) in a cohort of HIV-2-infected patients.

DESIGN: Observational study.

PATIENTS: HIV-2-infected patients residing in the Netherlands.

RESULTS: From 1995 to 2001 seven patients failed various ART regimens. The resistance mutations were analysed retrospectively. Development of mutations proved to be similar to that observed in HIV-1-infected patients, with the exception of a higher occurrence of the Q151M mutation within the reverse transcriptase gene. In a prospective study, comprising 13 consecutive naive HIV-2-infected patients, all patients achieved plasma HIV-2-RNA suppression below the detection limit (500 copies/ml). The antiretroviral regimen consisted of two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and indinavir, with a boosting dose of ritonavir; the median follow-up was 91 weeks. Two patients experienced a temporary virological rebound, while at the same time therapeutic drug monitoring showed sub-therapeutic plasma levels of indinavir.

CONCLUSION: Sustained viral suppression in HIV-2-infected patients can be achieved using an antiretroviral regimen of two NRTIs and boosted indinavir or lopinavir.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>