<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Duffy, M.J.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/5084/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Methylated genes as new cancer biomarkers (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/24328/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-02-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Aberrant hypermethylation of promoter regions in specific genes is a key event in the formation and progression of cancer. In at least some situations, these aberrant alterations occur early in the formation of malignancy and appear to be tumour specific. Multiple reports have suggested that measurement of the methylation status of the promoter regions of specific genes can aid early detection of cancer, determine prognosis and predict therapy responses. Promising DNA methylation biomarkers include the use of methylated GSTP1 for aiding the early diagnosis of prostate cancer, methylated PITX2 for predicting outcome in lymph node-negative breast cancer patients and methylated MGMT in predicting benefit from alkylating agents in patients with glioblastomas. However, prior to clinical utilisation, these findings require validation in prospective clinical studies. Furthermore, assays for measuring gene methylation need to be standardised, simplified and evaluated in external quality assurance programmes. It is concluded that methylated genes have the potential to provide a new generation of cancer biomarkers. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines for use of tumor markers in testicular, prostate, colorectal, breast, and ovarian cancers (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/14371/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Updated National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry (NACB) Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines for the use of tumor markers in the clinic have been developed. METHODS: Published reports relevant to use of tumor markers for 5 cancer sites - testicular, prostate, colorectal, breast, and ovarian - were critically reviewed. RESULTS: For testicular cancer, α-fetoprotein, human chorionic gonadotropin, and lactate dehydrogenase are recommended for diagnosis/case finding, staging, prognosis determination, recurrence detection, and therapy monitoring. α-Fetoprotein is also recommended for differential diagnosis of nonseminomatous and seminomatous germ cell tumors. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is not recommended for prostate cancer screening, but may be used for detecting disease recurrence and monitoring therapy. Free PSA measurement data are useful for distinguishing malignant from benign prostatic disease when total PSA is &lt;10 μg/L. In colorectal cancer, carcinoembryonic antigen is recommended (with some caveats) for prognosis determination, postoperative surveillance, and therapy monitoring in advanced disease. Fecal occult blood testing may be used for screening asymptomatic adults 50 years or older. For breast cancer, estrogen and progesterone receptors are mandatory for predicting response to hormone therapy, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 measurement is mandatory for predicting response to trastuzumab, and urokinase plasminogen activator/plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 may be used for determining prognosis in lymph node-negative patients. CA15-3/BR27-29 or carcinoembryonic antigen may be used for therapy monitoring in advanced disease. CA125 is recommended (with transvaginal ultrasound) for early detection of ovarian cancer in women at high risk for this disease. CA125 is also recommended for differential diagnosis of suspicious pelvic masses in postmenopausal women, as well as for detection of recurrence, monitoring of therapy, and determination of prognosis in women with ovarian cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of these recommendations should encourage optimal use of tumor markers.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Protein kinase Cδ expression in breast cancer as measured by real-time PCR, western blotting and ELISA (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/29150/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-11-04T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The protein kinase C (PKC) family of genes encode serine/threonine kinases that regulate proliferation, apoptosis, cell survival and migration. Multiple isoforms of PKC have been described, one of which is PKCδ. Currently, it is unclear whether PKCδ is involved in promoting or inhibiting cancer formation/progression. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate the expression of PKCδ in human breast cancer and relate its levels to multiple parameters of tumour progression. Protein kinase Cδ expression at the mRNA level was measured using real-time PCR (n=208) and at protein level by both immunoblotting (n=94) and ELISA (n=98). Following immunoblotting, two proteins were identified, migrating with molecular masses of 78 and 160 kDa. The 78 kDa protein is likely to be the mature form of PKCδ but the identity of the 160 kDa form is unknown. Levels of both these proteins correlated weakly but significantly with PKCδ concentrations determined by ELISA (for the 78 kDa form, r=0.444, P&lt;0.005, n=91 and for the 160 kDa form, r=0.237, P=0.023, n=91) and with PKCδ mRNA levels (for the 78 kDa form, r=0.351, P=0.001, n=94 and for the 160 kDa form, r=0.216, P=0.037, n=94). Protein kinase Cδ mRNA expression was significantly higher in oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive compared with ER-negative tumours (P=0.007, Mann-Whitney U-test). Increasing concentrations of PKCδ mRNA were associated with reduced overall patient survival (P=0.004). Our results are consistent with a role for PKCδ in breast cancer progression. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Pooled analysis of prognostic impact of urokinase-type plasminogen activator and its inhibitor PAI-1 in 8377 breast cancer patients (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9823/</link>
      <pubDate>2002-01-16T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its inhibitor
      (PAI-1) play essential roles in tumor invasion and metastasis. High levels
      of both uPA and PAI-1 are associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer
      patients. To confirm the prognostic value of uPA and PAI-1 in primary
      breast cancer, we reanalyzed individual patient data provided by members
      of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Receptor
      and Biomarker Group (EORTC-RBG). METHODS: The study included 18 datasets
      involving 8377 breast cancer patients. During follow-up (median 79
      months), 35% of the patients relapsed and 27% died. Levels of uPA and
      PAI-1 in tumor tissue extracts were determined by different immunoassays;
      values were ranked within each dataset and divided by the number of
      patients in that dataset to produce fractional ranks that could be
      compared directly across datasets. Associations of ranks of uPA and PAI-1
      levels with relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were
      analyzed by Cox multivariable regression analysis stratified by dataset,
      including the following traditional prognostic variables: age, menopausal
      status, lymph node status, tumor size, histologic grade, and steroid
      hormone-receptor status. All P values were two-sided. RESULTS: Apart from
      lymph node status, high levels of uPA and PAI-1 were the strongest
      predictors of both poor RFS and poor OS in the analyses of all patients.
      Moreover, in both lymph node-positive and lymph node-negative patients,
      higher uPA and PAI-1 values were independently associated with poor RFS
      and poor OS. For (untreated) lymph node-negative patients in particular,
      uPA and PAI-1 included together showed strong prognostic ability (all
      P&lt;.001). CONCLUSIONS: This pooled analysis of the EORTC-RBG datasets
      confirmed the strong and independent prognostic value of uPA and PAI-1 in
      primary breast cancer. For patients with lymph node-negative breast
      cancer, uPA and PAI-1 measurements in primary tumors may be especially
      useful for designing individualized treatment strategies.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>