<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>El Hachioui, H.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/51479/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Aphasia after Stroke: the SPEAK Study  (Doctoral Thesis)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/38716/</link>
      <pubDate>2012-11-21T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Aphasia is a disorder of the production and comprehension of written and spoken
language as a result of acquired brain damage. This damage is located in the
dominant hemisphere, which is the left hemisphere for nearly all the right-handers
and for about 70% of the left-handers. The evolvement of aphasia is usually rapid
if caused by a head injury or stroke, but can also evolve slowly as a consequence of a
brain tumor, infection, or dementia. The most common cause of aphasia is a stroke.
The number of people living with aphasia in the Netherlands is approximately
30,000. Every year, about 9,600 new cases of aphasia after stroke occur. The first and
main question of patients and their family in the acute stage of stroke is whether the
symptoms will decrease, and the patient will ever be able to speak and comprehend
as before the stroke again.
The severity of aphasia after stroke ranges from having difficulties with infrequent
words, complex sentences and texts, to being completely unable to speak, comprehend,
read, or write. The impact on one’s ability to communicate is devastating, not only for
the patients with aphasia but also for their family and friends. Patients with aphasia
are no longer sufficiently capable of expressing and clarifying their thoughts, wishes,
and needs, which puts an aphasic patient at a higher risk for depression. Ninety
percent of persons with aphasia feel socially isolated. Stroke patients with aphasia
also have a higher mortality rate and a worse rehabilitation outcome than stroke
patients without aphasia.
In this thesis, I address the natural course and prognosis of aphasia after stroke in a
large Dutch multicenter prospective study, the Sequential Prognostic Evaluation of
Aphasia after stroKe study, known as the SPEAK study.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Phonology is the strongest language component in predicting aphasia outcome after stroke (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/34612/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-10-20T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>A 3-year evolution of linguistic disorders in aphasia after stroke (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/33833/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-09-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Aphasia recovery after stroke has been the subject of several studies, but in none the deficits on the various linguistic levels were examined, even though in the diagnosis and treatment of aphasia the emphasis lays more and more on these linguistic level disorders. In this observational prospective follow-up study, we explored whether it is meaningful to investigate the recovery of semantics, phonology, and syntax separately. Fifteen patients with aphasia poststroke were assessed at 3 and 10 days, 7 weeks, 4 and 7 months, and 3 years postonset with the ScreeLing, a linguistic level test, the Aphasia Severity Rating Scale (spontaneous speech) and the Token Test. Group results showed improvement for the overall ScreeLing (P&lt;0.01) and its subparts semantics (P&lt;0.01) and syntax (P&lt;0.01) up to 7 weeks, just as the Token Test (P&lt;0.01). Phonology improved up to 4 months (P&lt;0.05) and spontaneous speech up to 7 months (P&lt;0.05). The recovery pattern of the three linguistic levels did not follow a parallel course, with a great deal of variability in linguistic recovery curves between and within patients. These results suggest that it is meaningful to assess the recovery of the linguistic levels separately, starting from the acute stage poststroke. </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>