<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Deleersnyder, B.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/5185/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>The Role of National Culture in Advertising’s Sensitivity to Business Cycles: An Investigation Across All Continents (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/10890/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-12-19T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Cutting advertising budgets has traditionally been a popular reaction by companies around the globe when faced with a slacking economy. Still, anecdotal evidence suggests the presence of considerable cross-country variability in the cyclical sensitivity of advertising expenditures. We conduct a systematic investigation into the cyclical sensitivity of advertising expenditures in 37 countries across all continents, covering up to 25 years and four key media: magazines, newspapers, radio and television.
While our findings confirm that advertising moves in the same direction as the general economic activity, we also show that advertising is considerably more sensitive to business-cycle fluctuations than the economy as a whole, with an average co-movement elasticity of 1.4.  Interestingly, advertising’s cyclical dependence is systematically related to the cultural context in which companies operate. Advertising behaves less cyclically in countries high on long-term orientation and power distance, while advertising is more cyclical in countries high on uncertainty avoidance. Further, advertising is more sensitive to the business cycle in countries characterized by significant stock-market pressure and few foreign-owned multinationals. These results have important strategic implications for both global advertisers and their ad agencies.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The Impact of Business-Cycle Fluctuations on Private-Label Share (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/6997/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-10-18T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>This study investigates the cyclical dependence of private-label success in four countries. The results show that private-label share behaves countercyclically. Moreover, asymmetries are present in both the extent and speed of up- and down-ward movements in private-label share over the business cycle. Finally, part of private-labels’ share gain during contractions is found to be permanent.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Win-Win Strategies at Discount Stores (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/6924/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-09-14T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>An important development that contributes to store brands’ growing success in the grocery market is the increasing number of discount stores that sell predominantly own, private-label, brands. To fight private labels, manufacturers of national brands feel increasingly compelled to develop better trade relations with discounters. Some discounters, from their part, are looking for opportunities to differentiate themselves, and to move beyond a pure price-based competition, by extending their assortment with attractive national brands. In this study, we determine what factors drive national-brand success at discount stores, and lead to positive outcomes for both the manufacturer and the discounter.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Weathering Tight Economic Times: The Sales Evolution Of Consumer Durables Over The Business Cycle (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/428/</link>
      <pubDate>2003-06-06T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Despite its obvious importance, not much marketing research focuses on how business-cycle fluctuations affect individual companies and/or industries.  Often, one only has aggregate information on the state of the national economy, even though cyclical contractions and expansions need not have an equal impact on every industry, nor on all firms in that industry.  Using recent time-series developments, we introduce various measures to quantify the extent and nature of business-cycle fluctuations in sales.  Specifically, we discuss the notions of cyclical volatility and cyclical comovement, and consider two types of cyclical asymmetry related, respectively, to the relative size of the peaks and troughs and the rate of change in upward versus downward parts of the cycle.  In so doing, we examine how consumers adjust their purchasing behavior across different phases of the business cycle.  We apply these concepts to a broad set (24) of consumer durables, for which we analyze the cyclical sensitivity in their sales evolution.  In that way, we (i) derive a novel set of empirical generalizations, and (ii) test different marketing theory-based hypotheses on the underlying drivers of cyclical sensitivity.

Consumer durables are found to be more sensitive to business-cycle fluctuations than the general economic activity, as expressed in an average cyclical volatility of more than four times the one in GNP, and an average comovement elasticity in excess of 2.  This observation calls for an explicit consideration of cyclical variation in durable sales.  Moreover, even though no evidence is found for depth asymmetry, the combined evidence across all durables suggests that asymmetry is present in the speed of up- and downward movements, as durable sales fall much quicker during contractions than they recover during economic expansions.  Finally, key variables related to the industry's pricing activities, the nature of the durable (convenience vs. leisure), and the stage in a product's life cycle tend to moderate the extent of cyclical sensitivity in durable sales patterns.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>How Cannibalistic is the Internet Channel? (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/171/</link>
      <pubDate>2002-02-27T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>During the past decade, irrational exuberance has turned into a possibly equally irrational pessimism about what the Internet can accomplish. The fear of getting ruined through cannibalization losses has recently deterred many firms from deploying the Internet as a distribution channel. But do Internet channels really cannibalize firms' entrenched channels, or is this widely held assumption exaggerated? To answer this question, we apply recent structural-break time-series econometrics to quantify the impact of an Internet channel addition on the long-run performance evolution of a firm's established channels. Using a database of 85 Internet channel additions over the last ten years in the British and Dutch newspaper industries, we find that the often-cited cannibalization fears have been largely overstated. The Internet therefore need not be disruptive to established companies and channels. This does, however, not imply that firms enjoy free play in setting up Internet channels. In cases where the newly established Internet channel too closely mimics the entrenched channels, substantial cannibalization is more likely to take place.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>