http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/55486/ List of Publications en http://repub.eur.nl/static-eur/img/logo.png http://repub.eur.nl http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/35155/ 2007-10-01T00:00:00Z BACKGROUND: The American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery recommend an algorithm for a stepwise approach to preoperative cardiac assessment in vascular surgery patients. The authors' main objective was to determine adherence to the ACC/AHA guidelines on perioperative care in daily clinical practice. METHODS: Between May and December 2004, data on 711 consecutive peripheral vascular surgery patients were collected from 11 hospitals in The Netherlands. This survey was conducted within the infrastructure of the Euro Heart Survey Programme. The authors retrospectively applied the ACC/AHA guideline algorithm to each patient in their data set and subsequently compared observed clinical practice data with these recommendations. RESULTS: Although 185 of the total 711 patients (26%) fulfilled the ACC/AHA guideline criteria to recommend preoperative noninvasive cardiac testing, clinicians had performed testing in only 38 of those cases (21%). Conversely, of the 526 patients for whom noninvasive testing was not recommended, guidelines were followed in 467 patients (89%). Overall, patients who had not been tested, irrespective of guideline recommendation, received less cardioprotective medications, whereas patients who underwent noninvasive testing were significantly more often treated with cardiovascular drugs (β-blockers 43% vs. 77%, statins 52% vs. 83%, platelet inhibitors 80% vs. 85%, respectively; all P < 0.05). Moreover, the authors did not observe significant differences in cardiovascular medical therapy between patients with a normal test result and patients with an abnormal test result. CONCLUSION: This survey showed poor agreement between ACC/AHA guideline recommendations and daily clinical practice. Only one of each five patients underwent noninvasive testing when recommended. Furthermore, patients who had not undergone testing despite recommendations received as little cardiac management as the low-risk population. http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/36715/ 2007-01-01T00:00:00Z Objectives: To assess the relation between beta-blocker use, underlying cardiac risk, and 1-year outcome in vascular surgery patients, including the effect of beta-blocker withdrawal. Design: Prospective survey. Materials: 711 consecutive peripheral vascular surgery patients from 11 hospitals in the Netherlands between May and December 2004. Methods: Patients were evaluated for cardiac risk factors, beta-blocker use and 1-year mortality. Low and high risk was defined according to the Revised Cardiac Risk Index. Propensity scores for the likelihood of beta-blocker use were calculated and regression models were used to study the relation between beta-blocker use and mortality. Results: 285 patients (40%) received beta-blockers throughout the perioperative period (continuous users). Only 52% of the 281 high risk patients received continuous beta-blocker therapy. Beta-blocker therapy was started in 29 and stopped in 21 patients, respectively. One-year mortality was 11%. After adjustment for potential confounders and the propensity of its use, continuous beta-blocker use remained significantly associated with a lower 1-year mortality compared to non-users (HR = 0.4; 95%CI = 0.2-0.7). In contrast, beta-blocker withdrawal was associated with an increased risk of 1-year mortality compared to non-users (HR = 2.7; 95%CI = 1.2-5.9). Conclusions: We demonstrated an under-use of beta-blockers in vascular surgery patients, even in high-risk patients. Perioperative beta-blocker use was independently associated with a lower risk of 1-year mortality compared to non-use, while perioperative withdrawal of beta-blocker therapy was associated with a higher 1-year mortality.