<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Marquis, J.F.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/5799/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Angiographic predictors of recurrence of restenosis after Wiktor stent implantation in native coronary arteries (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4528/</link>
      <pubDate>1993-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Intracoronary stenting has been proposed as an adjunct to balloon angioplasty to improve the immediate and long-term results. However, late luminal narrowing has been reported following the implantation of a variety of stents. One of the studies conducted with the Wiktor stent is a prospective registry designed to evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of elective stent implantation in patients with documented restenosis of a native coronary artery. To identify angiographic variables predicting recurrence of restenosis, the angiograms of the first 91 patients with successful stent implantation and without clinical evidence of (sub)acute thrombotic stent occlusion were analyzed with the Computer Assisted Angiographic Analysis System using automated edge detection. The incidence of restenosis was 44% by patient and 45% by stent according to the 0.72 mm criterion, and 30% by patient and 29% by stent according to the 50% diameter stenosis criterion. The risk for restenosis for several angiographic variables was determined using an univariate analysis and is expressed as odds ratio with corresponding confidence interval. The only statistically significant predictor of restenosis was the relative gain when it exceeded 0.48 using the 0.72 mm criterion (odds ratio 2.7, 95% confidence interval 1.1-6.4). Furthermore, the relation between the relative gain (increase in minimal luminal diameter normalized to vessel size) as angiographic index of vessel wall injury and relative loss (decrease in minimal luminal diameter normalized to vessel size) as index of neointimal thickening was analyzed using a linear regression analysis. When using the categorical approach to address restenosis, there is an increased risk for recurrent restenosis when the relative gain exceeds 0.48. The continuous approach underscores this concept by indicating a weak but positive relation between the relative gain and relative loss.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Wiktor stent implantation in patients with restenosis following balloon angioplasty of a native coronary artery (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4451/</link>
      <pubDate>1992-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Intracoronary stenting has been introduced as an adjunct to balloon angioplasty aimed at overcoming its limitations, namely acute vessel closure and late restenosis. This study reports the first experience with the Wiktor stent implanted in the first 50 consecutive patients. All patients had restenosis of a native coronary artery lesion after prior balloon angioplasty. The target coronary artery was the left anterior descending artery in 26 patients, the circumflex artery in 7 patients and the right coronary artery in 17 patients. The implantation success rate was 98% (49 of 50 patients). There were no procedural deaths. Acute or subacute thrombotic stent occlusion occurred in 5 patients (10%). All 5 patients sustained a nonfatal acute myocardial infarction. Four of these patients underwent recanalization by means of balloon angioplasty; the remaining patient was referred for bypass surgery. A major bleeding complication occurred in 11 patients (22%): groin bleeding necessitating blood transfusion in 6, gastrointestinal bleeding in 3 and hematuria in 2. Repeat angiography was performed at a mean of 5.6 +/- 1.1 months in all but 1 patient undergoing implantation. Restenosis, defined by a reduction of greater than or equal to 0.72 mm in the minimal luminal diameter or a change in diameter stenosis from less than to greater than or equal to 50%, occurred in 20 (45%) and 13 (29%) patients, respectively. In this first experience, the easiness and high technical success rate of Wiktor stent implantation are overshadowed by a high incidence of subacute stent occlusion and bleeding complications.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Morphologic change in coronary artery stenosis with the Medtronic Wiktor Stent: initial results from the core laboratory for quantitative angiography (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4441/</link>
      <pubDate>1991-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The purpose of this study was to assess the early changes in stenosis geometry after implantation of the Medtronic Wiktor stent in human coronary arteries. Morphologic changes were evaluated by quantitative coronary angiography using automated edge detection. The hemodynamic significance of the morphologic changes were assessed by the calculation of the theoretical pressure drop across the dilated and stented stenosis derived from the Poiseuile and turbulent resistances assuming a coronary blood flow of either 0.5, 1, or 3 ml/sec. Fifty patients were studied before and immediately after stent implantation. The stented coronary artery was the left anterior descending artery in 26 patients, the circumflex artery in eight patients, and the right coronary artery in 16 patients. Stent implantation resulted in an additional increase in the minimal luminal cross-sectional area and minimal luminal diameter of the dilated vessel without changing the curvature of the stenosis. Furthermore, there was a significant reduction of the "plaque area." This was associated with a normalization of the calculated resistances to flow and pressure drop across the stenosis. To a minimal extent, recoil (0.1 +/- 0.36 mm) was observed after stent implantation.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>