<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Gonzalez Duarte, R.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/59785/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Access to tacit knowledge by executive retention in cross-border acquisitions (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/38795/</link>
      <pubDate>2012-07-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>For companies that are internationalizing through foreign acquisitions, a major consideration is likely to be access to the technical and social knowledge of the local environment that executives of the acquired companies possess. Despite the importance of this consideration, the literature has not sufficiently addressed the issues it raises. Investigations of the factors that affect the departure of executives of acquired companies have until recently tended to overlook the question of the knowledge that leaves with them. The present paper discusses executive retention in cross-border acquisitions from a knowledge-based perspective. It analyzes three cases of such acquisitions in Brazil. The results show how knowledge can play a critical role in the acquirer's decision to retain or release owners and/or executives after the acquisition. In addition to conventional variables, the characteristics of the knowledge of the acquired companies' owners and/or executives emerge as essential to explain their retention. This paper argues that evaluating the knowledge the acquired company's owners and/or executives possess, especially regarding its degree of tacitness, is one basis for decisions on their retention. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Indigenous or imported knowledge in Brazilian management studies: A quest for legitimacy? (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/37717/</link>
      <pubDate>2012-03-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>This article reflects upon the evolution of Brazilian management studies in light of the debate provoked by Management and Organization Review, 5(1), in a special edition on 'The Future of Chinese Management Research'. Despite an impressive growth in publications, Brazilian management and organization studies have had little conversation with mainstream international scholarship. The article offers some explanations as to why this might be so and suggests some alternatives for enhancing the international impact of Brazilian studies and advancing the country's reputation in the field. We suggest two routes through which Brazilian management studies could enhance international legitimacy: an outside-in approach, which draws upon established international contributions to theory to inform the investigation, but uses the Brazilian context to enlighten these same theories, and an inside-out approach that draws upon indigenous questions and research design to develop a theory relevant to the Brazilian context, which ultimately contributes to the enhancement of existing or to the creation of new theories. In addition, this article suggests that ambidextrous policies provide a better fit for research strategies intended to foster both approaches. </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>